online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Politics  > Surely she didn't      Mod Threads Home login  
Page 4 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 Author Thread: Surely she didn't
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 76
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 9:17:11 PM
Oh good lord. Let's not overdo, shall we?


Good edit...but I'm not going to come back and take the Lord's name in vain and say there is something inherently wrong with Hillary supporters. I'll just pray for her....that Bill remembers to give her her Estrogen.

lol Now come on.....THAT was a joke. I'm trying to lighten the mood a little once in a while on these threads....


 edisto

Joined: 5/14/2008
Msg: 77
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 9:23:42 PM
an entire forum trying to prove that Clinton had a "Freudian" slip of the tongue and is hoping that Obama is assassinated so she can have the nomination....
and I'm "overdoing it"....

below-(Merriam Webster) dictionary
forum-a medium (as a newspaper or online service) of open discussion or expression of ideas
 VioletSkye

Joined: 1/3/2006
Msg: 78
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 9:25:37 PM
an entire forum? where?
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 79
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 9:38:06 PM
Actually, edisto...if you will check out the link I provided on the other thread Why is Hillary Losing, you'd see why her crying sexism is so redundant. She's affiliated with a religious group that separates the boys from the girls, even to the point of making them wear skirts and heels and lipstick to serve the men breakfast. It's pretty nauseating.
 edisto

Joined: 5/14/2008
Msg: 80
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 9:39:09 PM

lol Now come on.....THAT was a joke. I'm trying to lighten the mood a little once in a while on these threads....

lightening the mood?
with a sexist type joke is no different than "lightening" it with a racial joke-

funny how the sexist "joking" is acceptable
but you would have been blasted for a racial one-
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 81
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 10:05:00 PM
Sigh....well, I don't think she's read it. I'm waiting and waiting for a response here...and it's not coming. I will start it's own 'forum', don't think I won't!


 edisto

Joined: 5/14/2008
Msg: 82
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 10:11:38 PM
^^^^^^
actually I looked for your post concerning Hillary "sexist" church in the "forum" but couldn't find it-
sounds like a definite must read
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 83
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 10:16:08 PM
Well I will happily provide it again.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080331/ehrenreich






Clinton fell in with The Family in 1993, when she joined a Bible study group composed of wives of conservative leaders like Jack Kemp and James Baker. When she ascended to the Senate, she was promoted to what Sharlet calls the Family's "most elite cell," the weekly Senate Prayer Breakfast, which included, until his downfall, Virginia's notoriously racist Senator George Allen. This has not been a casual connection for Clinton. She has written of Doug Coe, The Family's publicity-averse leader, that he is "a unique presence in Washington: a genuinely loving spiritual mentor and guide to anyone, regardless of party or faith, who wants to deepen his or her relationship with God."



And more on Doug Coe:
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101050207/photoessay/4.html


http://www.harpers.org/archive/2003/03/0079525?pg=1

The last one is the most informative.
 edisto

Joined: 5/14/2008
Msg: 84
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 10:45:09 PM
have you read any of the author's other works?
Barbara Ehrenreich hates Clinton...reading her for an unbiased reporting on Clinton would be like listening to Olbermann for facts on O'Reilly-

so Clinton "fell into" this church in 1993?
fell into?
what's that mean?
I belong to things, I don't fall into them-

pretty National Enquirer- type reporting

BTW, The Nation supports Obama so I'm not surprised they had this garbage too

right up there with believing Clinton spoke out loud that she's hoping for Obama's demise-
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 85
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/25/2008 10:53:59 PM
Oh I just knew that would get the brush off!

Oh well, I tried to bring people up to speed on this. Why don't you find out where she really gets her spiritual advisement from then and refute those cites?
 uninterested

Joined: 4/26/2008
Msg: 86
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 6:49:21 AM

Barbara Ehrenreich hates Clinton

I doubt she hates Clinton. She probably just sees Clinton for who she really is and realizes what a disaster it would be if she became president, as do most Americans now. Doesn't mean she hates the woman. I'm sure you don't hate Obama, you just don't want hom to become president. (If you do "hate" him, then get your head checked - I know he's stomped all over many women's feminist aspirations - but that's no reason to hate him).

http://ehrenreich.blogs.com/barbaras_blog/2007/06/who_is_hillary_.html

Here's some reasons from her blog why she believes Clinton is not presidential material


Hillary Rodham Clinton was always a moderate, given to centrist, technocratic. In her lifetime, she has glided effortlessly from one side to another on key issues – the death penalty, for example, or entitlements for poor women and children – all the while maintaining the self-righteousness granted, supposedly, by her Methodist God.


But it was a relationship irreparably twisted by Bill’s compulsive priapism, which seems to have put the young Hillary into a permanent rage, but, perversely, also bound them ever more tightly together. In the unstable molecule we used to call “Billary,” he was the id and she was the super-ego, a role she clearly relished even as it poisoned her with resentment.


In Bernstein’s account, which strives nobly for fairness, Hillary’s early behavior as First Lady was stunningly arrogant. She disdained the press, alienated the White House staff, turned on her close friend Vince Foster (who responded by committing suicide) and appalled Al Gore by trying to claim the West Wing office suite traditionally reserved for the vice president. She demanded a cabinet position, and when that was over-ruled, insisted on leading Clinton’s efforts at health reform, despite the objections of Health and Human Services secretary Donna Shalala, who was no less a feminist than Hillary.

Haha, her delusions of grandeur were evident back then.

Hillary’s attempt to create a national health insurance system – which she will have to undertake a second time as a presidential candidate – was a disaster in every way. Procedurally, she screwed up by conducting the planning under conditions of extreme secrecy, not even bothering to reach out to potentially supportive members of Congress, never mind the usual populist trimming of few televised town meetings.


The real scandal is that she had worked for Rose at all, which represented the notorious anti-labor firms Tyson Poultry and Wal-Mart, but Bernstein makes nothing of that.


Having failed with her own hard-won health portfolio, and besieged now by the press for her sleazy deals in Arkansas, Hillary began to flail – reaching out for help from New Age healer Marianne Williamson.


It took Monica Lewinsky to restore Hillary’s upper hand within her marriage and, with it, her self-confidence. Apparently believing her husband’s protestations of innocence, she took over the management of his defense within the White House, and, disconcertingly, started exploring the possibility of running for the senate in New York State at the very same moment the already-elected senate was voting on Bill’s impeachment.


Worse, she has dodged the question of whether she ever actually read the full text of the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, which was offered as a causus belli despite its equivocations on the subject of Saddam Hussein’s purported WMD’s. “If she did not bother to read the complete intelligence reports,” Gerth and Van Natta observe, “then she did not do enough homework on the decision she has called the most important of her life. If she did read them, she chose to make statements to justify her vote for war that were not supported by the available intelligence.”


but what we are left with is a sleek, well-funded, power-seeking machine encased in a gleaming carapace of self-righteousness. She’s already enjoyed considerable power, both as a Senator and a “co-president,” and in the ways that counted, she blew it.


Very many compelling reasons why Hillary isn't presidential material. This was written in June 2007, long before Hillary started unravelling and revealling herself as a compulsive (liar) erm misspeaker and guttersnipe who is willing to stoop to any level to win.
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 87
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 7:10:29 AM
There is also this about Hillary's religious ties:

http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/03/857959.aspx




Besides the presidents and first ladies--Bill and Hillary Clinton attended in 1997--the one constant presence at the National Prayer Breakfast has been Douglas Coe. Although he’s not an ordained minister, the 79-year-old Coe is the most important religious leader you've never seen or heard.



Senator Clinton’s participation is surprising to observers who have investigated Coe’s group, called The Fellowship Foundation, which critics have described as a secretive organization populated mostly by conservative Republicans. “I think in part through her involvement with the Fellowship’s prayer group she was able to meet with some of these Republican senators and get to know them on a one-on-one basis,” said Joshua Green, a Senior Editor at The Atlantic magazine.


So who is Doug Coe? He shuns almost all interview requests, including ours. But in hours of audiotape and videotape recordings obtained exclusively by NBC News, he frequently preaches the gospel of Jesus to followers and supporters. In one videotaped sermon from 1989, Coe provides this account of the atrocities committed under Chairman Mao in Communist China: "I've seen pictures of the young men in the Red Guard…they would bring in this young man’s mother…he would take an axe and cut her head off. They have to put the purposes of the Red Guard ahead of father, mother, brother sister and their own life. That was a covenant, a pledge. That's what Jesus said."

In his preaching, Coe repeatedly urges a personal commitment to Jesus Christ. It’s a commitment Coe compares to the blind devotion that Adolph Hitler demanded from his followers -- a rhetorical technique that now is drawing sharp criticism.

"Hitler, Goebbels and Himmler were three men. Think of the immense power these three men had, these nobodies from nowhere,” Coe said.

Later in the sermon, Coe said: "Jesus said, ‘You have to put me before other people. And you have to put me before yourself.' Hitler, that was the demand to be in the Nazi party. You have to put the Nazi party and its objectives ahead of your own life and ahead of other people."

Coe also quoted Jesus and said: “One of the things [Jesus] said is 'If any man comes to me and does not hate his father, mother, brother, sister, his own life, he can't be a disciple.’ So I don't care what other qualifications you have, if you don't do that you can't be a disciple of Christ."

The sermons are little surprise to writer Jeff Sharlet. He lived among Coe's followers six years ago, and came out troubled by their secrecy and rhetoric.

“We were being taught the leadership lessons of Hitler, Lenin and Mao. And I would say, ‘Isn’t there a problem with that?’ And they seemed perplexed by the question. Hitler’s genocide wasn’t really an issue for them. It was the strength that he emulated,” said Sharlet, who is a Contributing Editor at Rolling Stone and is an Associate Research Scholar at the NYU Center for Religion and Media in New York.

Sharlet has now written about The Fellowship, also known to insiders as The Family, in a soon-to-be published book called “The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power.”

“They’re notoriously secretive,” Sharlet said. “In fact, they jokingly call themselves the Christian Mafia. Which becomes less of a joke when you realize that they really are dedicated to being what they call an invisible organization.”

Federal tax records for Coe's non-profit group shows it funds charitable programs around the world -- but that it is also a family business.

The 990 tax forms for 2005, the last tax year available, show that both of Coe’s sons were on the payroll, at $110,000 a year each. The organization also paid his wife, his daughter and his daughters-in-law.

So how do Coe's admirers explain his unusual sermons? David Kuo, a former Bush Administration aide and religious-outreach official at the White House, says The Fellowship is a peaceful, faith-based group that does good works internationally. Kuo says Doug Coe wasn’t lauding Hitler's actions.

“What Doug is saying, it’s a metaphor. He is using Hitler as a metaphor. Jesus used that,” Kuo said. A metaphor for what? “Commitment,” Kuo answered.

Asked about Coe’s influence on Hillary Clinton, people close to her told NBC News that she does not consider him one of her leading spiritual advisors. They added that Senator Clinton has never contributed to Coe’s group, is not a member of The Fellowship and has never heard the sermons obtained by NBC News. And, they said, Doug Coe is not Hillary Clinton’s minister.

Coe declined repeated requests for an interview. But a close friend told NBC News that Doug Coe invokes Hitler only to show the power of small groups -- for good and bad. And, the friend said, Coe spends “99 percent” of his time during the sermons talking about the leadership model set by Jesus Christ.

Supporters also point to Coe’s charitable works around the world. Still, critics question his influence -- and secrecy -- in a year when the candidates' religious beliefs are part of the political debate.

--With editorial help from EJ Johnson, John Holland, Michelle Perry, Luke Mayo and Linda Fecteau


That's not the entire article....but I think it leads to enough questioning.

It's from NBC news, so some here will say "they are anti-Hillary...I'm not buying it". But trust me, I have looked and I cannot find anywhere else a "non-biased" source will print this. Hillary's website sure doesn't address it, but they do provide her "official headshot", so I guess it's a give and take.

So now here's new news you've not yet heard about your Joan of Arc, and then the old news provided in the post above me...I'm not sure how people can still think she's fit to be the next President of the United States....or are our standards just that low after what we've just been through?
 edisto

Joined: 5/14/2008
Msg: 88
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 7:26:23 AM
LOL…
Obama supporters always slinging the mud-
yet they hold Obama to be this wonderful change, above the mud slinging
“isn't it ironic“....
Alanis Morrissette was right on-

so cutting and pasting supports your arguments-

I'm impressed

wait, NO, not really

any argument one has, you can cut and paste a link to someone who has your argument-
so what does that prove?
that you're not alone in your OPINIONS...

and about Clinton's religious ties-
when Christianity is based on pearly gates and rewards of eternity IF you believe one way and not the other-
just to say she's Christian at all is a negative to me, so if it's some even weirder type of Christianity, I’m not impressed either….

unless they are spewing off that one race brought the other race AIDS for the purpose of genocide, then I'm alarmed!


I'm not sure how people can still think she's fit to be the next President of the United States

funny, because…
I'm not sure how people can still think he’s fit to be the next President of the United States-
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 89
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 7:40:12 AM
You know what is utter hypocrisy? The fact that you come on here and laugh at every thing someone posts as an attempt at making you see the truth, and then call them mudslinging liars, which in fact, is slinging mud yourself and so are some of the things you post about the candidates you don't favor. You get mad when you feel Hillary's delicate sensibilites have been offended and go along on the sexist bandwagon, and then call other people Obama worshipers. You keep bringing up Obama's religion and then when Hillary's is called into question you say it doesn't really matter. You laugh, because you have no argument and if you didn't laugh, you'd have to address the matters in discussion.

Obama has been called on the carpet because of his religious affiliations, so has McCain. Obama has been called 'whiny' because some of his campaign staff choose to say that some things are racial statements. McCain has been called whiny because some of his campaign staff choose to say that some things are "age-ist". Yet Hillary can cry sexist when things aren't going her way and we can all sit here and not expect to see it validated?

These things are all pretty inconsequential in the grand scheme of what we're talking about here. Unfortunately, that's what the general populace loves to run with. These non important things are running away with the campaign for our next President. And if the wrong person wins because they were able to sling the most mud, that is a huge disservice to the entire country.
 Barbe1963

Joined: 9/30/2007
Msg: 90
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 7:50:48 AM

These things are all pretty inconsequential in the grand scheme of what we're talking about here. Unfortunately, that's what the general populace loves to run with. These non important things are running away with the campaign for our next President. And if the wrong person wins because they were able to sling the most mud, that is a huge disservice to the entire country.


I think we should take this one step further Simmah. If a person wins because they were able to sling the most mud, then that is indeed a huge disservice to the entire country.
 uninterested

Joined: 4/26/2008
Msg: 91
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 8:58:49 AM

so cutting and pasting supports your arguments-


It truly must be dark days in Hillaryville when her supporters can't actually respond to the content of an argument made against her but must resort to attacking the method in which it was presented. It's becoming funnier by the day. I wonder how many more superdelegates will announce their support for Obama today?

I agree with what Barbara Ehrenreich wrote in her article and have made many of the same arguments myself. I just thought that it would have a more pleasing quality to your eyes if it came directly from the desk of one of America's most noted feminists.
 edisto

Joined: 5/14/2008
Msg: 92
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 10:05:59 AM

You laugh, because you have no argument and if you didn't laugh, you'd have to address the matters in discussion.

I did argue your points-
1. Barbara Ehrenreich's piece is opinion, opinion does not have to be refuted because it's just that, opinion...

2. Christianity is of little importance to me when selecting a candidate, I am in favor of our secular government so why should I care what religion she is, or he is...

3. however, to attend a church for 20 years that is linked with Louis Farrakhan and has children in the church, telling them that whites brought AIDS to their community to kill them, does bother me, if I had heard that said with my children sitting next to me, I would have left, right then, right there, these are words that I would have told my children are evil words meant only to divide this nation, coming from a man of "God", they are beyond evil...

as I said in an earlier post, Wright did his "over the top" tirade in front of the media so that Obama could gracefully cut the umbilical cord, a perfect political move on his handler’s part, he is not the refreshing and new politician he is portrayed to be, he is manipulating and has the advantage of race, whereas Clinton can be called any sexist thing (as your posts have demonstrated) with no backlash, every thing that will be and has been directed at Obama will be looked at and scrutinized to see if it is racist or perhaps could we twist the words around to make it appear- racist...

that has proved to be and will continue to be one big advantage-
(in answer to why is Hillary losing)

BTW, no one has won the nomination yet- Clinton may yet win the popular vote- if you read many of these posts you'd get the idea that she is light years behind Obama, not so-
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 93
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 10:32:06 AM
Obviously you are going to fight for your side of the argument as hard as I'm going to fight for my side. I still think you do not see the hypocrisy of your own words. But I hope you are thinking about your other options, because June 3 is coming fast and you'll have to say goodbye to Hillary.
 edisto

Joined: 5/14/2008
Msg: 94
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 10:39:53 AM

But I hope you are thinking about your other options, because June 3 is coming fast and you'll have to say goodbye to Hillary.

au contraire~

I believe that Clinton will walk in the foot steps of Ted Kennedy, he too, lost his race for the presidency, but became a fvcking awesome senator, who influenced this nation perhaps more as a senator than he could have as a president.........

as far as who to vote for in November, as I posted before, I am having a difficult time, choosing the lesser of the two evils-
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 95
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 10:42:10 AM
Well I hope that happens. I do feel she's effective at a lower level of government like Senator or even Governor...but I just don't think she's right for the highest seat.
 Steven02151

Joined: 2/17/2008
Msg: 96
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 10:49:48 AM
I have to say I've read both of Barbara Ehrenreich's books and respect her judgment.

At any rate, Obama and Clinton's positions are far closer to eachother than they are to a man like JOhn McCain. For a disappointed Clinton fan not to give his or her vote to Obama truly approaches "cult-ism" to me.
 designingwoman

Joined: 9/4/2005
Msg: 97
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 5:25:37 PM
John McCain isn't fit to be president. I would love to see Bill Weld run against Shrillary and get her out of politics altogether. Bill Weld is of the old school, like Eisenhower. When he was governor of Mass., I liked his socially liberal, fiscally conservative (his fiscal conservatism was aimed at Joe Average rather than the rich--he cut tolls on the Turnpike, for example rather than giving the rich any kind of "special break".) Weld is now a lawyer based in NY. He considered running for governor at one time. The Republicans would be smart to put him up against Shrillary--he has cross party appeal. Unfortunately the right-wing dingbats won't let a good guy like him run. So NY probably will be stuck with Shrillary for a long time. My friends in NY feel that she has done little for the people there. I have friends from west to east, and none are impressed with her.

With her latest foray into assassinationspeak, I'd say it's GAME OVER. She should give it up!
 Kaos86

Joined: 3/7/2007
Msg: 98
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 5:37:48 PM
If John McCain ;

U.S. Senator John McCain has a long career of public service.
He is currently the Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Armed Services. He also serves on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, and the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs.

McCain graduated from the United States Naval Academy in 1958 and became a naval aviator, flying attack aircraft from carriers. During the Vietnam War, he nearly lost his life in the 1967 USS Forrestal fire. Later that year while on a bombing mission over North Vietnam, he was shot down, badly injured, and captured as a prisoner of war by the North Vietnamese. He spent five and a half years as a prisoner of war, experiencing episodes of torture.
McCain retired from the Navy in 1981 and was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives from Arizona in 1982. After serving two terms, he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1986, winning reelection in 1992, 1998, and 2004.

Senator McCain has seven children and four grandchildren. He and his wife, Cindy, reside in Phoenix.

If this man isn't fit to be President then who is?
 Kiss_My_Karma~

Joined: 7/4/2005
Msg: 99
view profile
History
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 5:44:56 PM

If this man isn't fit to be President then who is?


This guy:

Barack Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4th, 1961. His father, Barack Obama Sr., was born and raised in a small village in Kenya, where he grew up herding goats with his own father, who was a domestic servant to the British.

Barack's mother, Ann Dunham, grew up in small-town Kansas. Her father worked on oil rigs during the Depression, and then signed up for World War II after Pearl Harbor, where he marched across Europe in Patton's army. Her mother went to work on a bomber assembly line, and after the war, they studied on the G.I. Bill, bought a house through the Federal Housing Program, and moved west to Hawaii.
Remembering the values of empathy and service that his mother taught him, Barack put law school and corporate life on hold after college and moved to Chicago in 1985, where he became a community organizer with a church-based group seeking to improve living conditions in poor neighborhoods plagued with crime and high unemployment.

The group had some success, but Barack had come to realize that in order to truly improve the lives of people in that community and other communities, it would take not just a change at the local level, but a change in our laws and in our politics.

He went on to earn his law degree from Harvard in 1991, where he became the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review. Soon after, he returned to Chicago to practice as a civil rights lawyer and teach constitutional law. Finally, his advocacy work led him to run for the Illinois State Senate, where he served for eight years. In 2004, he became the third African American since Reconstruction to be elected to the U.S. Senate.

It has been the rich and varied experiences of Barack Obama's life - growing up in different places with people who had differing ideas - that have animated his political journey. Amid the partisanship and bickering of today's public debate, he still believes in the ability to unite people around a politics of purpose - a politics that puts solving the challenges of everyday Americans ahead of partisan calculation and political gain.

In the Illinois State Senate, this meant working with both Democrats and Republicans to help working families get ahead by creating programs like the state Earned Income Tax Credit, which in three years provided over $100 million in tax cuts to families across the state. He also pushed through an expansion of early childhood education, and after a number of inmates on death row were found innocent, Senator Obama worked with law enforcement officials to require the videotaping of interrogations and confessions in all capital cases.

In the U.S. Senate, he has focused on tackling the challenges of a globalized, 21st century world with fresh thinking and a politics that no longer settles for the lowest common denominator. His first law was passed with Republican Tom Coburn, a measure to rebuild trust in government by allowing every American to go online and see how and where every dime of their tax dollars is spent. He has also been the lead voice in championing ethics reform that would root out Jack Abramoff-style corruption in Congress.

As a member of the Veterans' Affairs Committee, Senator Obama has fought to help Illinois veterans get the disability pay they were promised, while working to prepare the VA for the return of the thousands of veterans who will need care after Iraq and Afghanistan. Recognizing the terrorist threat posed by weapons of mass destruction, he traveled to Russia with Republican****Lugar to begin a new generation of non-proliferation efforts designed to find and secure deadly weapons around the world. And knowing the threat we face to our economy and our security from America's addiction to oil, he's working to bring auto companies, unions, farmers, businesses and politicians of both parties together to promote the greater use of alternative fuels and higher fuel standards in our cars.


Obama 08!!
 Kaos86

Joined: 3/7/2007
Msg: 100
Surely she didn't
Posted: 5/26/2008 6:06:44 PM
Not quite up to McCain's resume but all politics aside ... they are both fit to be President.
Page 4 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
Show ALL Forums  > Politics  > Surely she didn't