Yeah, I did find that site. However, I cannot find anywhere on it where the people involved state they want to ban guns altogether. If you know of such a statement, please direct me to it.

Yeah, I did find that site. However, I cannot find anywhere on it where the people involved state they want to ban guns altogether. If you know of such a statement, please direct me to it.

I just answered your question for what was the site he was reffering to.

I support the 2nd Amendment a 100% and I want to see ALL FEDERAL gun laws dropped/earased/abolished (along with the ATF and some other Fed groups). Even with that, I still don't like, nor trust the NRA...they take your money and then compromise on your rights. Leave the gun control or lack there of to the States.

The Brady Law Today

From 1994 through 2008, 1.8 million attempted firearm purchases were blocked by the Brady background check system. For checks done by the FBI in 2008, felons accounted for 56 percent of denials and fugitives from justice accounted for 13 percent of denials[14]. In April 2009, the FBI announced it had completed its 100 millionth NICS approval since its inception 10 years before.

So, you're happy for the United States to be an armed camp. It doesn't matter who dies or how many, so long as you get to have a deadly weapon, no matter how dangerous, in your hands?

I'm assuming you are not from the U.S., for how you referance it and your name kinda says you may not be from the states.

Essentially, that means I'm not going to bother aurguing/debating gun laws and the culture and history of the US with you. Thanks for your concern, but no thanks at the same time.

YES

I won't waist my time trying to explain why as you either get it or you don't.

Is that the forum equivalent of 'taking your ball and going home'?

I just checked that site myself and they state theyare not a gun ban organization. They do however want to ban certain guns such as the uzi and ak47 for example. Now the question would be can they be trusted to stop there or are they going to call for further bans if these are successful? If successful they would have no reason to elicit funds from the public unless they do expand on the ban program. It does look like a well thought out corporation and although they are claiming charity status via an education exemption they are set up to do the background checks on potential gun owners. That in itself should bring in enough funds to keep the corporation alive without the charity status and donations from the public. This tells me that if they want to keep the big money flowing in then they need to work toward a total ban in steps. Maybe they are sincere but i doubt it, a liberal is a liberal and not to be trusted.

First its "assault rifles", then hand guns, then anything that holds more than a round or two, and finally an outright ban.

Really don't need to cite anything as it is a known that the Brady group and most of the anti gun people know they will never abolish the 2nd amendment. If you have looked into any of the anti gun plans or manifestos they want to regulate it out of existence through piece meal legislation, fees and taxes over time.

Cite?

No this is the equivalent of I don't care what you think about a country you don't live in.

The problem is, whilst you are waiting for the opportunity to defend yourselves as the government knocks your door down, people continue to die.

Anyway, as you gentlemen mentioned, I'm an outsider and can't possibly understand your love-affair with deadly weapons. I have no guns in my house and neither does anybody I know (with the exception of my two late uncles, who were both farmers).

and self-defense as well as the fact that when a populace is disarmed, the balance of government is shifted unacceptably. It becomes a government over the people instead of a people who have elected a government.

here you go msquared....this is "handgun inc's"agenda