Free Dating Site    

I have a question why the hell do men think its attractive to talk about sex immediately ....Just cause I have a Vagina does not automatically make me a candidate for you sexual fantasy's.

Because.... we're guys?

>Ahem< Having a penis does not give you license to act like a pig. Only men with no class would speak to a lady this way. Next!!

There's a simple solution.

Don't date morons.

You're welcome.

Where I live, Quebec, it's simply another topic of discussion. By that I don't mean the type of conversations that are raunchy, but mean one can talk about sex as a subject far more easily than you can probably in Texas - without crossing any lines.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hypocrisy in this statement never ceases to amaze me as I hear this same garbage all the time.

You don't have one clue as to what you are talking about here. You're just making some blanket statement based on some stereotype, yet you probably think you are an open minded person.

Simply amazing.

Average age for first marriage:

The average age for first marriages is rising steadily for both brides and grooms. In 2000, first-time brides were 31.7 years old, while grooms proclaimed their first marriage vows at an average age of 34.3.

Only two decades earlier, women and men were 25.9 and 28.5 years old, respectively, when they got married. Statistics Canada attributes the change to greater economic opportunities for women and the growing popularity of common-law unions.

Common-law relationships:

The number of couples forgoing marriage has more than doubled since 1981, the first time the statistic was tallied. At the time, there were 357,000 common-law relationships – about six per cent of all couples. By the 2001 Census, roughly 14 per cent of all couples were common law. Common-law unions are most prevalent among young people and couples living in Quebec, where more than 30 per cent of all families are common law.

Common-law unions tend to be temporary and transitory, though they often transform into marriage. However, those marriages break up far more frequently than marriages not born out of common-law relationships.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/marriage/

Sexy 'swingers clubs' okay, Supreme Court rules

Updated Wed. Dec. 21 2005 11:32 PM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

Canada's top court says clubs that feature group sex and partner-swapping are perfectly legal.

In its 7-2 decision released Wednesday, the Supreme Court of Canada said, because consensual sexual activity in a private club poses no threat to society, it shouldn't be considered criminal.

The ruling sets a single standard, after lower courts went in opposite directions on two similar cases involving a pair of so-called 'swinger clubs' in Montreal.

In one case, the owner of a singles club was convicted on two counts of keeping a common bawdy house and fined a total of $7,500.

James Kouri's "Coeur a Corps" featured a dance floor around which a black curtain would swing every half hour. People hidden behind the drapery could then take part in or watch sex acts.

In the other case, Jean-Paul Labaye, the owner of the members-only "liberated couples" club L'Orage was also convicted of keeping a bawdy house and fined $2,500.

Members of Labaye's club could enter a locked room where they could participate in or watch any kind of sex act.

"It's a commercial establishment where people reconvene and practice swapping or swinging, even orgy gang-bangs," said Labaye's lawyer, Robert La Haye.

"It does not contaminate society. It does not hurt, it does not do any harm to society and to the public in general."

While Kouri's conviction was overturned by the Quebec court of appeal, Labaye's was upheld. Because a judge dissented in each of those decisions, they both wound up in front of the Supreme Court.

Under the Criminal Code, a "bawdy house" is defined as a place used or frequented for prostitution or "for the purpose of acts of indecency."

Because there was no money paid for the sex acts at the heart of the two cases, the prostitution issue was moot -- leaving the case to be decided in terms of indecency.

The definition of indecency is typically measured against what ordinary Canadians will tolerate.

But in their ruling Wednesday, the Supreme Court judges said the test for indecency should not simply be whether an activity violates a "social consensus" of community standards, but the actual harm it causes.

"Consensual conduct behind code-locked doors can hardly be supposed to jeopardize a society as vigorous and tolerant as Canadian society," Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the majority decision.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/
20051221/SCC_swingersruling_20051221/20051221/

Feeling lonely in the Lone Star State this Valentine's Day? You'll be glad to know that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has just overturned a statute outlawing sex toy sales in Texas.

According to a law on the books since the 1970s, the sale, promotion, donation or lending of "obscene devices" was punishable by up to two years in jail.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/offbeat/2008/02/
selling_sex_toys_now_legal_in.html

The hypocrisy in this statement....

Like I said, I'm not trying to be rude. I'm just pointing out the obvious, from one Texan to another. Try the profile review section for more help, if you're stuck.