Evolutionists think their oppinions are better than other people's

Thus one can get an apparently spatially infinite universe, from the no boundary proposal. The reason is that one is using as a time coordinate, the hyperboloids of constant distance, inside the light cone of a point in de Sitter space. The point itself, and its light cone, are the big bang of the Friedmann model, where the scale factor goes to zero. But they are not singular. Instead, the spacetime continues through the light cone to a region beyond. It is this region that deserves the name, the pre big bang scenario, rather than the misguided model that commonly bears that title.

Evolution, Evolution. There is a very good scientist M. Behe. He does not believe in God. He wrote a book called "Darwin's black box" (biochemical challenge to Evolution) not long ago. He is a biologist I think. I got this book from Salvation Army church (some guy gave it to me). I highly recommend this book. I heard many people talk about this book. Darwin in his book "Descent of man" uses phrase "we may suppose(this and that happened)" eight hundred times in 2 volumes. "Let us suppose" and "We may suppose" sound very scientific, doesn't it?

It takes ALOT more faith to believe in evolution then to believe in the fact that there was a Creator behind all this, one person said.

www.answersingenesis.org

No there is nothing wrong with figuring out how God does His miracles (we cannot fugure out everything though ) . Actually in the Bible in the book of Isaiah it is mentioned that the Earth is the sphere:"God is above the sphere of the Earth". The theory of Evolution requires long ages of struggle and violent death. Why would loving God allow this? God does not need Evolution. He is powerfull enough and smart enough to make everything right from the very first time.

22. It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:

For a while yes. But plants die and so does everyone else. They do not reverse entropy. Plants were designed this way. besides, usefull energy will decrease and "heat death" will happen sooner or later.

Darwin himself wrote in his book "The origin of species by means of natural selection" on page 85 : "Suppose an eye with all its complexity blah blah... could have been made by the means of natural selection seems to me an absurd in the highest degree possible" (well I put it in my words with the exception of the word "absurd", it is in the original).

To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree. When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science. Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself originated; but I may remark that, as some of the lowest organisms, in which nerves cannot be detected, are capable of perceiving light, it does not seem impossible that certain sensitive elements in their sarcode should become aggregated and developed into nerves, endowed with this special sensibility.

Skypoetone, this is just your personal oppinion, nothing else . Jews, Muslims and christians confirm Genesis account (one way or another). Unless you think you know more than those people

Evolutionists think their oppinions are better than other people's

Evolutionists think their oppinions are better than other people's

Evolutionists think their oppinions are better than other people's

please read all my posts. they show biochemical challenge to Evolution. Forget the Big Bang and try to explain the formation of a cell

Whats all this crud about science having no clue to as how evolution started? Its fairly simple actualy.

Firstly you nead a planet, one thats not too hot and not too cold, has a medium size so that grazity is within a tolerale range, and an atmosphere... think that sounds unliklely? Well we have already found several that are of similar size and distance from thier respective sun as we are and those are just on our nearest neighbours.

Next you nead some simple sugar complexes. These are easily created as carbon will tend towards creating long chain hydrocarbons under most circumstances, even in space we find sugars floating around frealy.

After sugars we require the four bases TAGC. Again these are found comonly throught the universe as they are created through the interaction of sugars and acids. We also nead long chain protiens, now these are not so easy to come by, they require a liquid medium to develop in. Howeve space be so vast as it is, this still means that even the long chain protiens join up in the inky vastness of space.

Now we have the building blocks of life, we can create a simple strand of RNA. This again, is know to hapen in the big black beyond. Now, RNA creation is one of those lovely special chemical reactions that we like to call. A SPR or Self Perpetuating Reaction. What this means is that a small section of RNA acts as a catalyst providing the ideal conditions for more RNA. as long as there is suficent fuel to do so.

This however is not yet life, although capable of reproducing itself. it is only a chemical reaction at this stage, no more sentient than the nclear fusion that is self perpetuationg at the heart of the sun right now. However it will soon become we call life, when two sections of RNA come together along the TAGC bases and creat a strand of DNA. So far this has not been observed as a cosmic event, but there is no reason that it canot happen, we just haven't seen it happen.

So now we have DNA from a start of simple chemical reactions. But we still don't have life. This is where its starts to get a little bit complex. Firstly the DNA, under presure and heat, starts to unravel into RNA, as it dose so it grabs free bases from the surounding soup of chimcals to creat a section of mRNA identical to one half of the DNA.

After this the DNA sheds the mRNA it has just created and "rezips". This step provides a twined copy of mRNA that codes for the creation of other simpler chemicals and as such provides the DNA with a surounding of simple sugars, bases and protiens. These protiens and sugars are free to interact as they will and eventualy form Lipids. Lipids are VERY important as they are a ball and chain shapped protien that has a ball that is atracted to water and a chain that is repeled from water. When you put several of these lipds together, they form tiny beads as they stic to each other and to a small droplet of water.

If the DNA strand, and its mRNA copies are on the inside of this ball of lipids. You get a stable chemical enviroment, where a strand of DNA is able to control its enviroment by altering the levels of chemical protiens, acids and fats (all made from simple sugars) it creates. It dose not change its enviroment diliberately, but dose so by a siple process of Homeostasis. when there is two much of one chemical, no more of it can be produced because it just cant interact with its DNA or mRNA hosts.

This is the basic cell. The building block of all life. To develop to this stage has not required direct intervention but a simple proces of random chemical reactions.

If you have any questions about this please don't hesitate to ask. I will endevour to answer all valid questions to the best of my ability.

Then maybe you can explain to me the problem of chirality and why proteins cannot form by themselves

No, Lizards know best - they've been around for so long ;)