|
|
|
|
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/29/2008 10:46:51 PM | cncgandolf
Ah, shucks. Iraq was not an economically frail government. Their threat wasn't the non-existent weapons of mass destruction.
I said;
McCain has shown his cards in confronting this threat by voting to invade Iraq to pressure Saudi Arabia to confront their Qutbist infestation.
Not that Iraq had a Qutbist problem.
cncgandolf
btw "quitbist" refers to sects of the Muslim religion).
Yes indeed. The sect that Osama Bin laden follows.
Qutbism has gained notoriety from its massive influence on jihadi extremists like Osama bin Laden. According to observers, jihadi extremists “cite Sayyid Qutb repeatedly and consider themselves his intellectual descendants.” Here is one of their beliefs;
Qutbism postulates that sharia-based society will have an almost supernatural perfection, providing justice, prosperity, peace and harmony both individually and societally. Its wonders are such that the use of offensive jihad to spread of sharia-Islam throughout the non-Muslim world will not be aggression but "a movement ... to introduce true freedom to mankind." It frees humanity from servitude to man because its divine nature requires no human authorities to judge or enforce its law.
cncgandolf
The threat of Iraq was that the week we attacked them they were planning on changing their currency base from the dollar to the Euro.
Yes that would be a very good reason if people bought oil using huge suitcases of money in the form of dollar bills rather than instant currency transfers in whatever denomination they desired at the going exchange rate.
cncgandolf
And, as ever, Iraq not only had no part in 9/11, they were good at keeping Al Qaeda out of their country until we destroyed their anti-Al Qaeda government and we opened Iraq to Al Qaeda.
Yes, he only allowed some of them to pass through his country when they needed a safe haven for medical or administrative reasons unlike every other nation on earth. Clearly putting saddam in the 'with the terrorists' side of the 'either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists' equation.
cncgandolf
Meanwhile, McSame can't even go to the Cave Bin Laden is in much less the gates of hell.
Yes of course. I will post again the reason why this is one stupid idea and, why Obama was not thinking very well at one time;
Obama considered Iraq to be simply a Neo Con expansion. Now he wishes to invade Pakistan which would quite possibly result in the overthrow of democracy there and result in the empowering of a Qutbist takeover of a country with a fifth of a billion people with nuclear weapons who are aimed at a country with a billion people with nuclear weapons themselves and attacked weekly by those Qutbist backed terrorists.
So, other than the fact that McCain has not been in any position to send troops or not send troops to invade an ally and whip up the almost fifty percent of the population who are sympathetic to the Qutbist movement into overthrowing the democratic government there, it would be one silly idea that may result in a nuclear war with India and Pakistan. | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/29/2008 10:46:55 PM | how can Obama truly claim to be Christian, but yet not do all in his power (ie: even if it's just only voting on a couple of bills) to stop murder going on?
A number of faiths, many of them Christian, do not consider abortion murder. Here's one list:
Pro-choice groups: In general, these either promote a woman's right to choose an abortion, or are relatively silent on the matter. A number of liberal and mainline Christian and Jewish faith groups and organizations have publicly stated that abortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should remain legal. According to lists prepared by The Secular Web and the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, they include, in alphabetic order: 1 bullet American Baptist Churches-USA (see below), bullet American Ethical Union, bullet American Friends (Quaker) Service Committee, bullet American Jewish Committee, bullet American Jewish Congress, bullet Central Conference of American Rabbis, bullet Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), bullet Council of Jewish Federations, bullet Episcopal Church (USA), bullet Federation of Reconstructionist Congregations and Havurot, bullet Moravian Church in America-Northern Province, bullet Na'Amat USA, bullet National Council of Jewish Women, bullet Presbyterian Church (USA), bullet Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, bullet Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, bullet Union of American Hebrew Congregations, bullet Unitarian Universalist Association, bullet United Church of Christ, bullet United Methodist Church, bullet United Synagogue for Conservative Judaism. bullet Religious groups other than denominations: bullet Catholics for Free Choice, bullet Episcopal Women's Caucus, bullet Evangelicals for Choice, bullet Jewish Women International, bullet Lutheran Women's Caucus, bullet North American Federation of Temple Youth, bullet Unitarian Universalist Women's Federation, bullet Women of Reform Judaism, bullet Women's American ORT, bullet Women's Caucus Church of the Brethren, bullet Women's League for Conservative Judaism.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/abo_hist1.htm
You'll note that the United Church of Christ, which Obama attends, is included on that list.
Of course there are plenty of Christians convinced that their particular flavor of Christianity is the One And Only Way, but based on my understanding of Christ's teachings from my youth I think it's hard to say how he might feel about abortion, but far easier to assume that he would never support pre-emptive or perhaps any sort of war, nor the death penalty.
I don't think people will ever agree exactly when the union of a sperm and an egg has developed to the point of having the same or greater rights than the woman who provided that egg.
I will say that if you're going to adopt a hard line, moment of conception, pro-life stance, than it's hypocritical to not condemn equally at the very least civilian casualties of military acts, and it's pretty easy to make the case that the same condemnation should extend to all acts of war and the death penalty. Otherwise you're making a choice about which life is worth protecting at all costs and which one isn't. And once we start making choices or granting others the right to make life and death choices, absolutist positions become pretty hard to defend.
But that's just my take.
My basic point is that there are plenty of Christians who are pro-choice.
Dave | |
|
| |
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/30/2008 12:21:50 PM | Reading through pages and pages of folks bitterly and hatefully slamming folks in Washington is..well, sad and discouraging, really. Gives me the whole "Pharisees's arguing over who is more righteous" feeling. And that is a feeling I do not enjoy... Apart from getting dirty and stinky from slinging mud all over theses forums, what do we gain, really? Even if we spend our efforts cleaning mud, slung at our candidate, are we any less filthy? Rarely ever do members of the opposite party ever really listen to what the other has to say..we just dance around, desperately looking for a chance to point out fallacy or error without paying the slightest bit of attention to the rest of the post..We all are so terrified to ever admit that we were wrong, even to ourselves, that we remain stubborn even on trivial crap..Yet we hang in the there, sometimes simply to support our hommies, the ones we think "need" us to keep them from being eaten alive by the other side. Or maybe we cling to hope that we will persuade one who is on the fence. But do we? Would you listen to a bunch of bickering a$$es, like us, if you were searching for answers? I think not. I believe that I will retire for now to perhaps another neighborhood in these forums, one less likely to conform me into something that I do not wish to become..Peace-out~Apologist | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/30/2008 1:20:39 PM | Apologist and O4
Both of you show a LOT of integrity, humility, and character in these Forums. Part of the PURPOSE of these forums is to voice one's opinions and to hear the views of others (it seems most people focus on the first and forget the latter). We are here for a DISCUSSION to learn from each other. Stay OPTOMISTIC in the face of cynicism. Hope that you stick around because you need to be a VOICE to the voiceless. | |
|
| |
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/30/2008 6:05:21 PM | Lean works.......when you know the Devil is so against so many womens rights/issues and you know Obama is not.....how can you say better the devil you know....
So what if he's good at giving speeches....are you not listening to what he is saying? Can you say you are against what he stands for...
your remarks puts me in the same foul mood as 25% of Hillary supporters are going to vote for a man so totally against everything Hillary stands for and Obama stands for because the Press treated her badly? Or they didn't count votes (knowing full well Hillary voted not to count the votes) it makes me ill knowing people have such screwed up logic... | |
|
| |
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/30/2008 9:33:39 PM | Get this..... My daughter said she heard "O" make a speech on which he has been to 57 states not including Alaska and Hawaii and he has one left. Guess the Teleprompter or who is writing his speeches should know how many states are in the good ol USA
Hear it yourself!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrsBKGpwi58 | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/30/2008 9:34:35 PM | Obama writes out his speech long hand says it into a text to type recorder then polishes it with staff reading it again into the text to type for the final. He speaks slowly and clearly so that any one who needs an interperter can understand him. He is good at making speeches. He worked hard in public service and served in state and national gov'. If you do not know him you can look him up he is real. You can read his books to understand his heart you can read the bookFaith of Obama writen by the same man who wrote the Faith of Bush. Read about him. Fox news tried there best and couldn't get anything on him. He will have a great cabinet.
Obama 08
can not wait to see the Rice vs Clinton fight for the white house in 2016. | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/31/2008 1:23:23 PM | Exodusi1..........that's what the Right is all about....Lies and BS and Oil and right wing evangilistic nutballs....I of course watch Campbell Brown , Larry King and Anderson Cooper but for months before everyone of the US Presidential race's I tune in to the Right....Bill O'reilly Hannity and Chris Wallace.... I don't know how these right wing pundits keep a straight face as they blast the McCain talking points over and over and over...I swear Hannity makes me taste a hot dog I ate 30 years ago...I don't know why any democrat would go on these shows when all they get is called names, interupted, treated rudely....and Hannity and O'reilly cry and wonder why Obama won't come on there attack shows...
But this year is going to be so much more satisfying when I tune into these Fox kooks from Nov. 4-6....so satisfying to see these fanatics coming up with all the reasons Obama won and how 'something' was so unfair to their party....God I can't wait to see these people figuartivley drop dead with the news of President Obama's win..
Grapevine YOU know exactly what you're talking about...Obama is not only going to be a noticeable fabulous improvement over the last 8 years in your country but I really feel there's going to be a trinkle down effect on the whole world...I believe he will mend fence's between yours and other countries making the whole world a safer, better place to live in... | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/31/2008 1:39:09 PM | Apologist and O4 Both of you show a LOT of integrity, humility, and character in these Forums. Part of the PURPOSE of these forums is to voice one's opinions and to hear the views of others (it seems most people focus on the first and forget the latter). We are here for a DISCUSSION to learn from each other. Stay OPTOMISTIC in the face of cynicism. Hope that you stick around because you need to be a VOICE to the voiceless.
I agree !
If we concentrated on who the candidates are and stick to their strengths I bet we could get along better. And.. If we could stop getting side tracked with silly insults to someone else beliefs, and be a little more respectful of one another, we could make an intelligent and informed decision.
| |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/31/2008 3:20:52 PM | Grapevine;
Don't worry, I didn't get any farther than you did. . . We are so blessed to have such an icredible leader. . . I know what it must have felt like for those who followed JFK. . .
MLK would be so proud, that our dreams have been restored. . . I feel sorry for those on the right, they have no idea how powerful hope and dreams can be, what it is like to be moved to tears by hearing 84,000 of your fellow Americans cheering so much, that he couldn't even start his speech, having a tear roll down your cheeck, when he accepts, with humilty, our nomination for President. . .
Make no mistake, the next four years are going to be difficult as we begin cleaning up the mess that Dubya and reagan have tried to leave our children! 10,000,000,000 isn't going to be erased overnight and it is going to limit our ability to turn things around quickly. . . Our goal for the first 4 years is simply to get out of Iraq, eliminating that black hole, focus on Afgahnistan trying to ACTUALLY catch bin Laden and creating a better environment for business. We have to increase the earnings of those on the bottom, it is the only way to stabilize the economy again.
My picks would be; Bill Richarson Sec of State Wes Clarke Sec of Defense John Edwards AG (I Know) Potential SCOTUS Colin Powell Dept of Homeland security (real effort for a change!) Bill Bradley (Sec of Treasury) Al Gore (Sec of Interior) 41 & 42 continue working towards world peace and to rebuild our international alliances. Hillary Senate Majority leader . . . Potential SCOTUS. Sam Reed and Caroline Kennedy co-chairs to make sure that election fraud is reduced and that election become more fair and consistant. (Sam Reed is a Republican, Sec of St for the State of Washington, he is as honest as they come, Caroline Kennedy has proven herself as well)
Hey, a guy can dream right? | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/31/2008 9:02:59 PM | Supreme Court justices are picked from sitting Federal Court judges, not the US Senate. All the current justics served in the US Court of Appeals.
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/biographiescurrent.pdf
Neither Edwards nor Clinton would get a good ABA rating for the high court. | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 8/31/2008 9:31:53 PM |
Supreme Court justices are picked from sitting Federal Court judges, not the US Senate. All the current justics served in the US Court of Appeals.
I don't usually agree with you on things, but yah, you don't pick your judges for being good politicians. | |
|
| |
| |
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 9/1/2008 6:07:03 PM | Yes I have. Taft was the only President ever to be nominated as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (an office he held until he died). Taft was named Chief Justice before the ABA rating system, and he was a former President.
Neither Edwards nor Clinton is a former President, and neither has ever sat as a judge, even on the trial court level, much less the court of appeals.
Neither could be vetted as qualified, much less "very qualified".
| |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 9/1/2008 6:35:48 PM |
I feel sorry for those on the right, they have no idea how powerful hope and dreams can be, what it is like to be moved to tears by hearing 84,000 of your fellow Americans cheering so much, that he couldn't even start his speech, having a tear roll down your cheeck, when he accepts, with humilty, our nomination for President. . .
I don't even get a vote yet, but as a non-partial observer (newly transplanted Canadian)....I just don't believe this. I do think McCain is going to cream their asses in November, especially with his new running mate. (Just observing, nothing else....I don't get a vote yet either way..I just think that was pretty brilliant strategy/marketing). What boggles me thus far though is, if folks are so pyssed off with GW's presidency to date, then shouldn't the Dems be more than a shoo-in at this point? And, if that's the case then, isn't it surprising that this horse race is so evenly tied right now?
I still do have to say though...it's been more than two years, and I'm still waiting for Obama to actually say something of substance, besides just being out there touting the word "CHANGE" everywhere, though. | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 9/1/2008 7:44:25 PM | I still do have to say though...it's been more than two years, and I'm still waiting for Obama to actually say something of substance, besides just being out there touting the word "CHANGE" everywhere, though.
That assertion is getting more and more lame as time goes by. Listen to McCain and Obama's speeches. Who goes into detail and who relies on one liners? If you think the answer is McCain you aren't paying very close attention.
Better yet, go to each of their websites. Obama addresses almost twice as many issues with twice as much detail as McCain does.
Now if you want to disagree with Obama's substance, with his values, with his decision making process, that's legitimate. In that case we can agree to disagree.
But the 'no substance' charges are just as groundless as the 'flip flopping' charges were against Kerry. They're oft repeated so too often believed, but honestly, there's no substance behind the 'no substance' claims.
I do think McCain is a decent man and I sorely wish he had beaten Bush eight years ago, but I think his time has passed, and that his VP selection process may well be an indicator that in other important decisions he may also not execute due diligence before shooting from the hip.
And as for your prediction, you do realize that Obama has never surrendered his electoral college lead in the state by state polls since he defeated Clinton? That doesn't mean he'll win, but McCain has a much bigger hill to climb than Obama does at this point.
Dave | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 9/1/2008 9:15:36 PM |
That assertion is getting more and more lame as time goes by. Listen to McCain and Obama's speeches. Who goes into detail and who relies on one liners? If you think the answer is McCain you aren't paying very close attention.
Lol, that's cute. You read my post, right? lol I don't get a vote... I was only commenting on what I've seen....I can guess how you're voting though, based on how you replied.
I didn't comment on McCain's speeches, btw. I didn't even comment on Obamas. I commented on Obamas LACK of saying ANYTHING, lol.
And remember, I'm ....well I won't say non-partial. But I don't get a vote yet...so I'm just yapping.  | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 9/1/2008 10:07:30 PM | Lol, that's cute. You read my post, right? lol I don't get a vote..
I saw that the first time. Actually I saw it when you said something similar on another thread. But you're weighing in on a political discussion, which means others who do vote read what you write, and when you post baseless conclusions I'll reserve the right to challenge yours the same as I might anyone else's.
So despite volumes of detailed policy text in his website, hours of the same in his speeches, interviews, and press conferences, you haven't heard Obama say anything.
What, exactly, would constitute saying something?
What I hear is the kind of substance we've been sorely lacking the past eight years. I'm interested in what might impress you.
Dave | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 9/1/2008 11:17:20 PM | John McCain's number 1 criticism of Barack Obama has been his lack of political experience to be President/Commander in Chief. This inexperience has been the source of constant debate in the media, over the internet, and on these forums. Part of McCain's criticism is valid/justified. It would be good to get some different perspectives on this issue.
Is Obama ready to LEAD the country? | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 9/1/2008 11:44:29 PM |
Is Obama ready to LEAD the country?
Ultimately, of course, we won't know until and unless he gets the chance. And even then we'll disagree on the quality of his leadership. Heck, there's still a fairly vocal minority who thinks Bush has shown good leadership skills the past eight years, and those in that minority are unlikely to approve of anything Obama does.
I say he is, based on my personal perception of his intelligence, values, and thought process. He's a smart guy firmly committed to core values but flexible in how best to apply those values to specific issues. He seems to be a good listener not afraid to evaluate the logic of any argument even if it's coming from another party.
And I honestly think Obama is more likely to start our deeply divided country on the path to greater unity. Certainly we'll always have radical extremists on both sides. But Bush has effectively forced many in the middle to pick on extreme side or the other, for him or against him. I think Obama is the best choice to push the extremists back to the fringe and do the most good for the greater number of us.
One could make the case that he has yet to serve in an executive position. Neither has McCain. Ironically, of the four, only Palin has. But I don't think we can dismiss how effectively he has led his campaign effort, making it possible for him to rise so far so fast while avoiding many of the pitfalls Gore and Kerry fell victim to.
So considering all of the above, I'm more comfortable with Obama's leadership potential than I am of McCain's, but in the next four years we're only going to get to find out whether one of them can truly lead.
Dave | |
|
| The Obama Administration... Posted: 9/2/2008 12:19:12 AM | Say huh?? I said:
I still do have to say though...it's been more than two years, and I'm still waiting for Obama to actually say something of substance , besides just being out there touting the word "CHANGE" everywhere, though.
Then you said:
Now if you want to disagree with Obama's substance, with his values, with his decision making process, that's legitimate. In that case we can agree to disagree.
But didn't we just somewhere in the middle of that, as you just said, agree to disagree that the man wasn't really saying anything of substance? lol | |
|
|
| Page 4 of 5
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
|