saxon king, I think it's all of you oral-sex-obsessed people who need help, not me.

NinkiNo need to justify. But...It just does not belong in the mouth in the first place! No matter what the porn industry tells you. It only belongs in the vagina.

Just because I do....doesn't mean you have to.....OR.....that I'm wrong for doing it.

That's very easy to say from a female perspective. But let's turn the tables and envision women being commonly denied something sexually that turned them on.

I would venture to say they would be widely perceived as victims who are being deprived, and simply need a "real man" who's willing to step up to the plate for them. (trust me, you'll see this point proven in these very forums)

For every woman who has a man who won't do a specific sexual act for her, there's hundreds of men with a super hero complex more than willing to do it.

And believe me, she will have it much sooner and easier than the man looking for a woman to perform taboo acts for him.

She can call her Superman and have his caped ass flying through her window before she even hangs up the phone.

Maybe the best way for you to understand is for you to experience it. The next time your girlfriend grants oral sex have her feed some of it back to you... then you'll know why!

Common sensically, women would not be able to "fake" orgasms if there was a significant amount of fluid expelled upon orgasm. For the most part, a man cannot fake an orgasm.

There's also the fact that HIV is more readily transmitted in heterosexual cases from male-to-female rather than female-to-male. This is has to do with amount of bodily fluids exchanged. More semen is produced than vaginal fluids (again, squirters set aside).

Considering the amount of fluid that accompanies peforming oral sex on a woman whether she has an orgasm or not, what's the difference? I'm sure I swallow a lot more than the amount of ejaculate from a male.

In addition, a woman can always take the fluid in the back of her throat and never have to taste it.

That argument regarding HIV is a non-starter for oral sex. A study done by the USCF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies places the risk of contracting HIV from an infected male partner, for the recipient of oral sex at approximately zero.

Unless you can distinguish how much of that fluid is your own saliva and how much is vaginal fluid, I really don't think you have much of an argument.

Even if you are swallowing more, you aren't swallowing it all at one time, now are you?

The argument had nothing to do with oral sex itself so I really don't know what the point of your link was. It was a point simply made that shows that the amount of bodily fluids produced my men is more than that produced by women. If they were the same, HIV transmission between the two wouldn't be so disparate.

There's also the fact that HIV is more readily transmitted in heterosexual cases from male-to-female rather than female-to-male. This is has to do with amount of bodily fluids exchanged. More semen is produced than vaginal fluids (again, squirters set aside)

Even if you are swallowing more, you aren't swallowing it all at one time, now are you?


Why is that better? Basically, you are expecting people to beieve that it's worse simply because you don't want to do it and you don't want to say you just dislike it without injecting some unarguable objective reason for it.

The argument had nothing to do with oral sex itself so I really don't know what the point of your link was. It was a point simply made that shows that the amount of bodily fluids produced by men is more than that produced by women. If they were the same, HIV transmission between the two wouldn't be so disparate.

Since you wrote:


There's also the fact that HIV is more readily transmitted in heterosexual cases from male-to-female rather than female-to-male. This is has to do with amount of bodily fluids exchanged. More semen is produced than vaginal fluids (again, squirters set aside)
.
Exactly what was your point then? This thread is about oral sex.

If fluid volume was the overriding factor, the chances of being infected by a needle puncture would be small, since the volume of fluid exchanged is very tiny compared with the fluids with which one is in contact during sex.

Stop trying to rationalize your dislike for swallowing with pseudo scientific arguments. The fact is you dislike it and for some reason, you are bothered by those who do like it or those who might expect reciprocity. If you don't like it, fine. Don't do it. Just stop trying to convince others that you have some moral high ground with respect to guys who want their partners to swallow and who do not want to date women who do not. You have no more justification for not wanting to swallow than I have for not wanting to date women who don't swallow. I quit buying into the idea that guys ought to be grateful for what women decide to throw at them a long time ago. I don't have to settle for less than I expect, so I'm not going to settle for less.

I'd rather deal with a woman that doesn't swallow then all of these long azz drawn out medical post! When will some people realize that sometimes the less said the better?

Not saying it's better, just tired of seeing the two compared when they're vastly different in my opinion. I find the whole "well we swallow when we go down on women so they should swallow too" argument completely weak.

Someone specifically asked about differences in quantity about male and female cum. That was my reply that the quantities are different and that males produce more.

The chance of getting HIV from a simple needle puncture IS small. There were less than 60 documented cases of this happening over a 20 year period. If you're talking IV drug users... well, you said it yourself, the virus has to reach the bloodstream. IV drug users using contaminated needles are injecting the virus DIRECTLY into their bloodstream, so what do you think is gonna happen?

Lol, I don't have to rationalize anything and there's nowhere on this thread where I have done such a thing.