|
|
|
|
|
| | Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?Page 32 of 53 (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53) |
I'm not saying matter is continuing to appear from nothing- I'm saying it happened once, and the result of which was a violent explosion the likes of which has not been seen since
But this violates the principal of cause and effect. If a violent explosion can happen without cause then books can fly off the shelf without cause. | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/26/2009 7:59:58 PM |
is not to say that our calculations, measurements, or expectations as to how things work currently are 'wrong', but just that we don't know that they have always existed in their current form.
I am not claiming the universe has always existed in its current form, in fact if there is one thing that appears evident is that there are no beginnings or ends, but constant change.
There are many possible explanations as to how the universe 'began', but some versions avoid a 'beginning' completely. One possibility (one version of the big bang) that has been suggested is that the universe has always been and that it simply expands until it reaches a limit, then contracts back to where it started, and begins its expansion again (similar to blowing up and deflating a baloon).
Exactly what I was saying, with my analogy of the ball rolling. Either it was rolling infinitely, like the universe expanding and contracting infinitely, or an event caused it to begin rolling, like an event causing the universe to begin. | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/26/2009 8:46:57 PM | Hmm? ~ 5 sounds better, ~ here on planet earth anyway, ~ we must attempt to qualify ~ a little bit.
14 billion is a possibility, but I think maybe ~~ not here
I flunked out of human anatomy and physiology ~ unable to stay focused on one chapter long enough to pass a test. ~ constantly getting ahead of the lesson plan and test, very exciting stuff, ~ plus it was "HARD" class, with a lab.
I dug some stuff up ~ that might amuse some, bore others. I try to keep it short ~ very hard to do, there being some much wonderful material. ~
Let me just say, " Life belongs to it's self" ~ and it is devine in nature. ~ regarding aliens and human creation, ~ it's seems a man is always the last one to know! and he refuses to believe his little darling been fooling around. ~ could someone sneaked in the back door? ~ what do you think? , in the 3 billion years, you can't say they didn't have the time.
~~~~~Man on Earth
Author: jmagee
Text: How long has man as a species existed on the planet?
Author: wizkid
Text: Human evolution is a matter of considerable debate. Since the
phrase in the question, "man as a species," is a bit vague, here is a brief
run-down of the fossil evidence for the evolution of hominids (animals able to
walk upright):
Australopithecus - the first hominid, appeared on the African savannas 2-3
million years ago. Brain size was 1/3 modern human's.
Homo habilis - the first hominid to make and use tools.
Homo erectus - a. k. a. Peking and Java man, evolved from Homo habilis about
1.5 million years ago, built fires, resided in huts, and had a brain capacity
of 1,000 ml (versus modern man's 1,375 ml).
Homo sapiens -
1. Neanderthals: 130,000 - 30,000 yrs ago,
2. Cro-Magnon Man: 90,000 yrs ago
The oldest fossils of Homo sapiens are those of the Neanderthals (130,000 -
30,000 yrs ago), found in the Neander Valley of Germany. Compared to modern
humans, they had heavier brow ridges, less pronounced chins, and slightly
larger brains. Plus, they were adept in making and using tools and even had
burial rituals. They eventually became extinct and probably did not
contribute to the modern human gene pool. The oldest fully modern fossils are
those of Cro-Magnon man, dating back 90,000 years. Interestingly, Cro-Magnon
and Neanderthal Men may have coexisted, but only Cro-Magnon Man contributed to
the modern gene pool.
~~~~~~~ What is heredity?
In: Cells and Genetics
Answer
Heredity are traits passed down from your parents to you that influence your DNA.
~~~~~Heredity is a process when person gets some of the physical and mental qualities of his or her parents.
The biological process whereby genetic factors are transmitted from one generation to the next
~~~~~~~ What are the three parts of the cell theory?
In: Cells and Genetics
The three parts of the cell theory are: 1. All living things are composed of one or more cells.
2. Cells are the basic units of structure and function in living things.
3. All cells are produced from preexisting cells.
~~~~~~ How big is the human genome?
In: Cells and Genetics
Answer
The human genome is made up of DNA, which has four different chemical building blocks. These are called bases and abbreviated A, T, C, and G. In the human genome, about 3 billion bases are arranged along the chromosomes in a particular order for each unique individual. To get an idea of the size of the human genome present in each of our cells, consider the following analogy: If the DNA sequence of the human genome were compiled in books, the equivalent of 200 volumes the size of a Manhattan telephone book (at 1000 pages each) would be needed to hold it all. ( I was told in class it was 37 feet long when unfolded)
It would take about 9.5 years to read out loud (without stopping) the 3 billion bases in a person's genome sequence. This is calculated on a reading rate of 10 bases per second, equaling 600 bases/minute, 36,000 bases/hour, 864,000 bases/day, 315,360,000 bases/year.
Storing all this information is a great challenge to computer experts known as bioinformatics specialists. One million bases (called a megabase and abbreviated Mb) of DNA sequence data is roughly equivalent to 1/4 megabyte of computer data storage space. Since the human genome is 3 billion base pairs long, 3/4 gigabytes of computer data storage space are needed to store the entire genome. This includes nucleotide sequence data only and does not include data annotations and other information that can be associated with sequence data.
As time goes on, more annotations will be entered as a result of laboratory findings, literature searches, data analyses, personal communications, automated data-analysis programs, and auto annotators. These annotations associated with the sequence data will likely dwarf the amount of storage space actually taken up by the initial 3 billion nucleotide sequence. Of course, that's not much of a surprise because the sequence is merely one starting point for much deeper biological understanding!
Remember that humans have a diploid genome thus our entire complement of DNA is composed of 6 billion bases; 3 billion from each parent.
~~~~~~Main articles: Prokaryotic DNA replication and Eukaryotic DNA replication
Origins of replication
For a cell to divide, it must first replicate its DNA.[7] This process is initiated at particular points within the DNA, known as "origins", which are targeted by proteins that separate the two strands and initiate DNA synthesis.[3] Origins contain DNA sequences recognized by replication initiator proteins (eg. dnaA in E coli' and the Origin Recognition Complex in yeast).[8] These initiator proteins recruit other proteins to separate the two strands and initiate replication forks.
Initiator proteins recruit other proteins to separate the DNA strands at the origin, forming a bubble. Origins tend to be "AT-rich" (rich in adenine and thymine bases) to assist this process because A-T base pairs have two hydrogen bonds (rather than the three formed in a C-G pair)—strands rich in these nucleotides are generally easier to separate.[9] Once strands are separated, RNA primers are created on the template strands and DNA polymerase extends these to create newly synthesized DNA.
As DNA synthesis continues, the original DNA strands continue to unwind on each side of the bubble, forming replication forks. In bacteria, which have a single origin of replication on their circular chromosome, this process eventually creates a "theta structure" (resembling the Greek letter theta: θ). In contrast, eukaryotes have longer linear chromosomes and initiate replication at multiple origins within these.
~~~~~~~~~~ The replication fork
Many enzymes are involved in the DNA replication fork.
The replication fork is a structure which forms when DNA is being replicated. It is created through the action of helicase, which breaks the hydrogen bonds holding the two DNA strands together. The resulting structure has two branching "prongs", each one made up of a single strand of DNA.
Leading strand synthesis
In DNA replication, the leading strand is defined as the new DNA strand at the replication fork that is synthesized in the 5'→3' direction in a continuous manner. When the enzyme topoisomerase unwinds DNA, two single stranded regions of DNA (the "replication fork") are formed by
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What is the function of mitochondria?
In: Biology, Cells and Genetics
Answer
Provide energy to cells
Also known as the powerhouse of the cell, the mitochondria provide the location for the production of ATP (adenosine tri-phosphate). ATP is produced by glycolosis, the Krebs cycle and electron transport. ATP in turn provides energy for the cell at the molecular level.
they break down food and release energy
~~~~~~~DNA replication takes place in areas where there's DNA.
In eukaryotic cells the DNA can be found in the nucleus mainly. So DNA replication takes place in the nucleus during the S phase of the cell cycle.
Also in eukaryotic cells there are mitochondria and chloroplasts (plants) and these have circular DNA and they also get replicated (according to their own mechanism).
Prokaryotic cells do not contain a nucleus. They do contain DNA in the cytoplasm and thus the DNA replication will take place here.
Source(s):
PhD candidate in stem cells and Immunology
Dance | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/26/2009 8:49:58 PM | oh no you can deffentily say white people were at one time aliens, if you look around white people dont look like anything on this planet, black and shit look like monkeys and ape like creatures, but whites were brought to this planet at a latter time, but also yeah all humans could have been created by aliens to and were just ants in an ant farm...  | |
|
Thorb
| | Joined: 7/15/2005
Msg: 780 | |
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/26/2009 10:11:22 PM | ^^^ damn ... that is a scary post if it isn't some kind of joke ... and even then ^^^
I wonder if he is a follower of Ernst Zundel? 
[just a note ... to means traveling towards. too means also ... two is a number.] | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/27/2009 2:03:27 AM |
But this violates the principal of cause and effect. If a violent explosion can happen without cause then books can fly off the shelf without cause.
Well, causality as we understand it on the macro level has been called into serious question at the sub-atomic level...Newton works well enough as we walk around the world we can see feel and manipulate, but things began to get messy once we probed further...the principle of cause and effect as we understand it has been seriously challenged a long long time ago... | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/27/2009 6:16:35 AM | I apologize if I repeat anything already visited on this blog, but I wanted to add my 2 cents without reading all 32 pages first!
Go to http://www.lloydpye.com/ and click on Intervention Theory.
There is an overview there of the process by which is one of the thousands of examples of evidence that I find compelling in this story. He basically breaks down how there is a process for splicing genes chemically which we have not known about for very long, but now science has a firm grasp on. This method of gene splicing was found evident in the human genome. Evidently there are over 4000 so called "Defects" in the human genome. One of these defects is an Enlarged Cerebral Cortex (About 4 times that of a Chimp). Though most of the genetic coding of a human compared to chimps/gorillas/orangutans is practically an exact match, there is a sudden shift/drop off of chromosomes. All of these animals have 48 chromosomes and we have 46. Where did the other 2 go? Well, we didn't lose them! They were in fact fused together. The DNA has been strung together for the 2nd and 3rd Chromosome. This particular type of fusion can only take place in a lab. There also emerged in the late eighties Mitochondrial DNA Evidence of the fact that Homo Sapiens have only been evident for the past 200,000 years, and all linking back to the same genetic lines. It wouldn't surprise me if those so called Gods that came to earth to mate with the women had 46 chromosomes and would need humans to have the same in order to mate with them.
Now as a Religious Studies major and someone that has researched ancient history for much of my life, I have found that we would be fools to not recognize that we are the product of some other worldly influence just according to our own sacred texts passed down over the millenia. Take the Norse Eddas, The Hindu Vedas which are some of the oldest documents in the world greatly pre-dating the bible, or just go straight to the bible!
There is reference of beings coming down to mate with the daughters of men, as well as countless references to beings/angels who have powers and come from the sky in chariots of fire, riding on clouds, etc...
This would explain the sudden emergence of an intelligence that did not exist prior to their arrival. We leaped forward in evolution, and there really is no other logical explanation. The fact that all of these ancient texts tell their own versions of the same story is very compelling to me. These stories are not just specific to their cultures, but sound remarkably like the exact same stories told from several different perspectives depending on the peoples which maintained it.
These references are all over the bible, but compared to the Sumerian Texts, the Vedas, The Book of Dzyan, there is very little information that is not veiled in some King James authorized, church sanitized version.
Most of us know that the bible has only been around for about 500 years, and that many books of that collection of works were not allowed into the bible. Can you imagine the change in the human perspective if we all knew what our true birthright was, and that it is possible to travel vast distances through space? My studies on emerging physics and technology being developed on this new model of physics shows extremely promising possibilities in the field of space travel, anti-gravity, and understanding of the space/time continuum. The door is only now beginning to open.
In fact, if you dig hard enough, history unravels into a seemingly large cover up of ancient technologies and understandings that we are only today beginning to understand. Though the human understanding of these technologies and ideas was very pre-mature at our exposure to them back then, nevertheless there is much evidence of a higher science existing as part of our past which has long been buried and lost so as to preserve power structures that replaced those imposed by the controllers and genetic engineers which visited this planet long ago.
Since then, we have been throwing virgins into volcanoes awaiting their return, and superstitiously blaming all that goes wrong or right on those elusive so called "Gods". lol
Kinda puts a new spin on the tower of babel eh! | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/27/2009 7:20:05 AM |
the principle of cause and effect as we understand it has been seriously challenged a long long time ago...
Just because the Heisenberg uncertainty principal has put into question the behavior of particles on the subatomic level, is no reason to discard the principal of cause and effect. The explanation of this behavior has not yet been determined, however to discard cause and effect, puts into doubt all science, all reason, all logic. A universe without cause and effect is only possible if it were entirely controlled by God. | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/27/2009 7:48:49 AM | I could accept that ~ if we dehumanize God, ~
which I have done ~ sometimes back. Things seem to fall into place much better with that approach to this whole quandary.
I know it doesn't meet the approval of many of faith ~ but ~~ oh well ~ sorry.
I could expand , but I'd rather for you too.
Truthseeker, you observation of biblical text, is correct ofcoarse. It was very well edited with many authors, offered many views of the same events often times. Often the meaning obscured with language translations. All and all a fine piece of work requiring a reader to dig deep, searching for interpretation . ~ The earlier books, fable in nature and told around tribal camp fires, offered at a level that all peoples of the day might understand in an attempt to explain the nature and connection of both God and man. Instilling comfort and offering leadership to a simple people that knew little about DNA or the mechanics of how the nature world worked.
Dance | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/27/2009 7:57:02 AM | | Causality or the lack of it does not support any version of a proof for God's existence, either as the prima causa or uncasued cause, in which case the causality question simply becomes deferred and more complicated (i.e. what caused the first cause) or in the case where there is simply a gap in our understanding of how the universe might have begun, in which case he still fills no explanatory gap, and besides, the universe doesn't entierly make sense on Newtonian principles alone, so we know that we have had to revisit the traditional understanding of causality...if there were sound explanatory principles or evidence supporting the rational belief in a being with logically necessary upper limits, there would be no reason for faith. Our lack of ultimate understanding concerning the universe is no argument for an even more fantasic notion like a supreme being at all, it is ONLY a statement concerning the shortcomings of our understanding! | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/27/2009 11:27:49 AM |
Now as a Religious Studies major and someone that has researched ancient history for much of my life, I have found that we would be fools to not recognize that we are the product of some other worldly influence just according to our own sacred texts passed down over the millenia. Take the Norse Eddas, The Hindu Vedas which are some of the oldest documents in the world greatly pre-dating the bible, or just go straight to the bible!
There is reference of beings coming down to mate with the daughters of men, as well as countless references to beings/angels who have powers and come from the sky in chariots of fire, riding on clouds, etc...
And we suddenly have to jump to the conclusion that these were aliens? Where's the beef? Can the text not just be talking about spirit beings? Are these people so unsophisticated as to not know the difference between flesh and blood things and physical beings? What is metaphor and what is real to them? You don't seriously believe those stories are literal narrative considering that literal narrative as a type of writing style had not been invented at that point in history...as a religious studies major, I would assume one would be aware of that? | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/27/2009 4:37:33 PM | | TruthSeeker333 these are excellent points and well taken. I think that, if it walks and talks like a duck, then it's most likely a duck or, as Jung pointed out "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar". I think the ancients described things in their day the best they could given what they knew at the time from their frame of reference. | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/27/2009 10:51:55 PM |
Mad ya never got back to me...
(was in reference to this...)
No, what I would like to know is this, what is your opinion of things that have crash landed, people have known that these things have crash landed. YET the government goes in does a really thorough clean up job, and flashes a pin saying it was swamp gas, or a weather balloon???
I have heard of many old reports of sightings, that had blurry pics, and then they either were just glossed over and as typical human forgotten or a major headline stating that the event didn't happen...
There are several incidents that seem to be very compelling in the annals of UFO lore. Roswell is one of the most due to the sheer number of eyewitnesses to things that don't add up.
I'll say this much. IF there were such an incident it is entirely plausible to assume the government would immediately cover it up and produce as much disinformation as possible surrounding it as it appears was done in Roswell to disguise what may or may not have occurred. Was it indeed an ET vehicle or was it some technology of our own gone astray? The other sightings may well fall into the same category. Either way it is hard to say what is actually being seen because we know all too well how easy it is for the human sensory apparatus to be misled. That's why I cannot leap from one conclusion to the next because it simply does not follow. Is the question in the OP plausible. Not to my mind. But possible? Yes.
Now as to the whole issue of do governments worldwide know of intelligent ET's visiting the earth and are they covering it up...I would refer to some of the erudite science that has been presented in this thread for reasons against that. If such beings occur, it would seem to me that they have command over a level of physics that renders them "extra-dimensional" for want of a better word, and we are little more than gnats to them...the very concept of human alien conspiracies, or conflicts becomes a quaint conceit but very fictional...even were they material space travelers the very technology that would allow them to come here would preclude them from crashing, or us being of anything more than an annoyance or amusement. | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 12:40:30 AM | | I was labouring under the misapprehension that the 'cigar' quip was a response by Freud himself following a lecture at Clark university...I certainly never knew that it was in fact attributed to Jung...who knew???!!! | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 1:01:33 AM | >>>FAIL!
>>>Did....did they respond to a 5 month old response?
>>> This thread is has become beyond silly
>>>As in a dog spinning chasing it's own tail.....silly
>>> I think it is very silly not to keep an open mind .
>>> As madfiddler pointed out no one person on this thread can actually prove
if it's plausible or not.
>>> nor can it be dismissed or refuted completely
>>>..... >> I'm gonna carry on keeping an open mind , I'm not gonna go through life having people drive my nose in to a pile of chit just to prove me wrong, and then get up and still say I'm right.
>>> do we really know if it is possible or not?..... so called scientist will continue to wonder I'm sure.
>>> who was that guy that said "Imagination is more important than knowledge"
>>> He had long fuzzy hair and a moustache.
>>>.......<--------- is this annoying or is it just me???? | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 1:33:25 AM | >>> I think it's just you.
"actually prove" ? ~ your annoyed that no one come forth with the holy grail ?
darn the luck!
I waited for 40 years for someone to tell me the secrets of the universe. ~ No luck to date!
I've found the truth is not available for the mear asking.
I don't even know how many times my last wife cheated on me!
Dance | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 5:13:42 AM |
If such beings occur, it would seem to me that they have command over a level of physics that renders them "extra-dimensional" for want of a better word, and we are little more than gnats to them...
Bingo! Fiddler gets to the crux of it...if aliens can transit great distances, etc, then what would they really need from a bunch of slightly-smarter-than-the-rest apes like us? Kinda silly, if you think about it in those terms, eh? | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 5:30:51 AM | Regarding cause and effect in the universe: I think I might point out at this point that some might argue the rule of "cause and effect" is one of those things that is true in the universe, like the mass of particles, or the speed of light. However, that might not necessarily be true of the universe itself. Don't forget, there was a period of rapid inflation at the earliest moments of the Big Bang. As a result, the universe as a whole may have expanded faster than the speed of light.
That said, the idea of "what banged" is something being examined closely. On the Perimeter Institute website, there is a discussion by Neil Turok on that very question. Check it out. | |
|
Thorb
| | Joined: 7/15/2005
Msg: 794 | |
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 8:13:05 AM | Love it ... The Vedas describe what could only be equated to a nuclear war ... and the Biblical destruction of Sodom was also very nuclear in description. The radioactivity would be detectible ...we haven't found it. Makes me think these are just man using his amazing imagination to tell moralistic stories to the generally uneducated public of the day.
We do have amazing imaginations still and our brains can show us anything in a way that is reality to us at the time. We also micro sleep and hence micro dream especially if we are in a state of sleep deprivation [which seems to be the normal state for most of our western society].
Thanks ... stargazer ... I've bookmarked that site to go over it ... it looks very interesting. | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 9:24:38 AM |
what would they really need from a bunch of slightly-smarter-than-the-rest apes like us?
This is no different than us watching National Geographic on the tele. Why would we be interested in watching a bunch of apes on a far corner of the world.
If advanced aliens are in fact watching, they are probably sitting on a beach somewhere on their home planet, and when they want to check us out they put on their virtual reality helmets, and are plugged in to the robotic androids that are present on the earth, but cloaked.
I found an interview with a Russian Major General, where he claimed that during the cold war they could not only predict UFO sightings, but actually provoke them, even initiating a rudimentary contact.
Here is part of the conversation:
MAJOR GENERAL VASILY ALEXEYEV
Russian Air Force Space Communications Center Moscow
there were eye-witnesses to phenomena and that was reflected in specific documents and the reports of officials. At times this information was of such a fascinating nature that it was impossible not to believe it. Later the question no longer seemed so fantastic and began to be examined at the level not only of the Defense Ministry, but of other government departments as well. This interest specifically expressed itself in certain experts being sent to investigate, especially to those places where UFOs, let's call them that, appeared quite frequently. I know a whole number of military bases in that category. As a rule they are objects of strategic significance, rocket complexes, scientific test establishments, in other words the places where there is a high concentration of advanced science and, to some degree, danger. Because every nuclear rocket, every new Air force installation represents a breakthrough both in science and in military terms; it is first and foremost a peak, the summit of human achievement. And that is where UFOs appeared fairly often. Moreover, individual officers and commanders on the spot who knew about the phenomenon and had no official instructions on the matter, acted on their own initiative to investigate UFOs, recording data, and so on. I know that in some places they even learned to create a situation which would deliberately provoke the appearance of a UFO. A UFO would appear where there was increased military activity connected, say, with the transportation of "special" loads. It was enough artificially stimulate or schedule such a move for a UFO to appear. In other words, some kind of conditional relationship emerged. And they detected it. We're an intelligent nation, nothing escapes us. I know that at certain testing ranges - I won't name them, although it's no longer a secret - they even learnt to make contact of a kind. What did that consists of? First the UFO appeared; in most instances it was a sphere, but there were other kinds. Contact was achieved with the help of physical indications of behavior - pointing your arms in various directions, say, and the sphere became flattened in the same direction. If you raised your arms three times, the UFO flattened out in a vertical direction three times as well. In the early 1980s, on the instructions of the then Soviet leadership, experiments using technical devices (theodolites, radar stations, and others) were carried out as a result of which the unidentified objects were firmly recorded as instrumental data.
http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc437.htm | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 9:51:23 AM | like I said , from the offset, ~ they must have a working knowledge of gravity and time.
it's funny how some words stick out and mean something to someone, and other words simple passed over.
Both gravity and time are simple words and most all of us think we understand them and what they mean and how they work. However to suggest there is other parallel dimensions ready throws a wrench in our simple concepts of space and time.
the answers we seek lies in understanding space and time better then we do today. For once we do, we will be free to move about. Today we see them as barriers. Tomorrow we'll see them as the power of our engines and our world will become much, much larger.
Dance | |
|
Thorb
| | Joined: 7/15/2005
Msg: 797 | |
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 11:47:21 AM | Willow ... most of this direction of discussion has been covered already.
The UFO's do tend to look more interdimensional than exraterrestial just by the recorded appearance, disappearances, angles and speed of movement and shape changing. [I've actually seen at least one]
There also seems to be many time/space distortions to go along with their appearances.
all this is fine and dandy but really doesn't prove a seeding.
Why would we not be able to just evolve ... since they must have.
They just as likely are drawn to potential disturbances in their dimension and dimensional travel that nuclear testing may have caused. They also just like us may have a curious nature and like to observe... in fact that is very likely and as in our learned methods we now know that very little disturbance of what we are observing is allows for more valid results especially in the case of wild life ....
don't feed the bears or monkey.
Now that other post by truthseaker about the genetic anomoly ... if it was from a better source I would give it more credit . If its true ther should be many many papers on it and I'm still googling to find them.
some of us possibly could be geneticly altered [given a propensity to bi polar problems which may let these interdimensional beings jump into our dimension ... hence the kidnappings and experiments to tweek the process and possibly implant amplifiers and transmitter/receivers ... but so far it looks more like just for observational purpose. No invasion pending.
[great sci-fi material] | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/28/2009 12:43:26 PM | Pseudo-science at its finest OR something worth thinking about...
(http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&q=negative+blood+rh+factor&btnG=Google+Search)
I have written about the neg RH factor in humans before.... In all the world there is only 15%, this is not about the typing, like A, B, O, AB, but rather if the there is a negative or positive RH factor...
All creatures have a positive RH factor, except for 15% of the human population, this the question where did that neg RH factor come from, and why is it that a mother with a neg RH factor can carry one fetus with a positive RH factor, but until a couple of decades ago would generally abort a pos RH factor fetus.
This + Rh factor is common with the Rhesus monkey, and would make sense as to it being the same for man kind having that commonality. However the - RH factor is an anomaly and completely uncommon for these.
The Problem comes along when a fetus has a + RH factor in a mother with - RH factor, after a first pregnancy with a +RH factor fetus, any + RH factored fetus USUALLY will develop haemolytic disease, thus causing the fetus to abort. This does not happen with Rh- fetuses.
People have brought up the bible, and in the bible blood is one of the terms brought up very often. Does this mean there is blood with a Neg RH factor from another source? Before the hemoglobulan treatments a could decades ago, those women with this - rh factor were having miscarriages, and there was no understood reason why.
Thorb brought up Bi polar disorder, something that is also known to happen along side extremely intellectual beings..
The Bi polar issue is something man kind would like to locate the gene, and remove it. However those with the disorder, despite the radical mood swings, in an intellectual person, having that part of them dulled down through drugs, makes them feel lifeless, and flat.
These anomalies are known, and as of yet only dealt with, however they are NOT understood, nor do they have a known cause to them.
Time was brought up by Dance, when traveling beyond the sped of light, or even up to it, time goes backwards... Thus if a person has left this planet 20 yrs ago, that person will be 20 yrs younger at the point that they are at, then the people left on earth.
If a person arrives at some other planet, going back could mean that planet will no longer exist, and those who had been monitoring them would be older, if not dead...
Thus time is altered in a way, not time itself, but with other factors, it no longer holds the same rules as sitting on our planet in a everyday run of the rat race fashion...
What my ramble proves is that these things have something to say, directions to point us in different directions... The where, meh I have no answer to that, however I do want to know the WHY....
Those on the what is possible in this scheme of life still see questions boldly being asked where no man has gone before...
 | |
|
| Humans created by Aliens: Plausible theory?
Posted: 3/29/2009 6:52:52 AM |
Thus time is altered in a way, not time itself, but with other factors, it no longer holds the same rules as sitting on our planet in a everyday run of the rat race fashion...
What my ramble proves is that these things have something to say, directions to point us in different directions... The where, meh I have no answer to that, however I do want to know the WHY.... [/quote
You not rambling nexthyme, you are narrowing your search.
It funny how , the same thing can be said six different ways ~ and only one of them will strike a nerve ~ and trigger a whole chain of thoughts.
dance | |
|
Thorb
| | Joined: 7/15/2005
Msg: 800 | |
| |
|
|
|
Page
32
of
53 (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53)
|
|
Home
login 
