| |
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/4/2009 7:18:17 AM |
Why do you think it is called a "tramp stamp"
Sorry... despite all the denials.. generally, it is a true statement.
right u are
It's not a cause and effect thing nor would a woman become more sexually available for sake of having a tattoo. However, would a study find a correlation between a frivolous adornment and sexual availability?
right again, good job, guys. nice to see some honesty in an otherwise hopelessly
disingenuous bunch of dumb posts.
putting a permanent ink stain on her body says a lot more than she wants to admit. there's usually a statement beneath the statement when it comes to bodily adornment of this sort, and its the substatement that is the more interesting of the two. Its the substatement she seeks to deny. | |
|
| |
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/4/2009 12:16:23 PM | OP- Your friends may have a point. On the day I had my first tattoo approx 15 yrs ago, I had to sign a consent form, to A-say I was old enough to get the tattoo and B- to leave my morals and sense of decency in the tattoo parlour when I left...
My tattoo's represent nothing, other than the fact that I like the designs and I like the look of tattoo's. That said, non of my tattoo's could be seen by anyone say, in a club or bar...so no one would be able to make that assumption about me anyway.
Nowadays, tattoos can have a more sexual meaning, as in women have them to enhance or draw attention to their bodies etc. But that doesn't mean the woman is easy.
Your friend's observations, in my opinion are flawed, maybe its just a coincidence these easy women have tattoos? | |
|
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/4/2009 1:16:34 PM | I wonder if there has been any valid research on a topic like this:
If there is some sort of correlation between a lady's "tramp stamp" and her proclivity toward promiscuity.
If there is some sort of correlation for a lady with a "tramp stamp" regarding how others view her proclivity toward promiscuity. | |
|
| |
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/4/2009 5:25:10 PM | The only thing it proves is that these women with an armful of regrets are capable of making decisions that they would later regret....in which case, I'm in!!!!!!!! W00t!
In saying that, I've been with a woman who had a collection of stamps instead of tatts, and she sexed me out big time, like I thought it would never happen.... I have since asked every single woman I've met if they collect stamps or something. | |
|
| |
| |
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/4/2009 8:06:14 PM | I am almost 52 and got my first tat when I was 48.
I now have 4 tattoos (for those of you who've not been cursed with following my forums posts) and they are:
1. Pi
2. Binary Pi
3. Double Helix
4. Quadratic Formula.
It now makes complete sense about being a whore once I got my first tattoo.
It started the whole shoe whore journey of my life.
My name is ^^Batgirl^^ and I am a shoe whore.
^^BG^^ | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/15/2009 5:04:34 PM | | Brunoplis. I paid nothing. I never pay for sex. I have been paid for it, though. One grateful wench bought me a Bose stereo system. Two others gave me Rolexes (one President, and one Submariner). Yet another paid my airfare to Australia, and paid for my room, board, sightseeing, tourism, etc, for the three months that I was there. Others have paid for my visits to: Miami, LA, Butte, New Orleans, and Taipei...among other places. I never charge for sex, but I can't politely decline when women I am with wish to bestow gifts upon me. Study The Kama Sutra Of Vatsyayana, and The Ananga Ranga, as well as the works of: Byron, Shelley, Shakespeare, Brown, and Wordsworth, and you-too-can become a gigolo. Don't knock it until you've tried it. | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/17/2009 9:51:39 AM | Eh, once upon a time, mostly the only people who had tattoos were guys who had been in the service, or had done time in prison.
Some time about 35 years ago(if I remember correctly) they became popular among the more rebellious and "transgressive" hip, uptown youth, male and female. Punkers and such, maybe others.
Since women with tats at that time were considered "rebellious and transgressive", or anyway wanted people to think that they were, maybe they were, then, more rebellious and transgressive in their sexual behavior. Maybe.
Since tattoos have become more broadly fashionable, I don't think there's much connection to sexual behavior, if there ever was. | |
|
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/17/2009 11:54:52 AM | In my observation, it works one way but not the other.
That is, people (yep, guys too) who like to get around some sexually are more likely to have tattoos than those who are more choosy.
However, those who have tattoos are not necessarily more likely to want to get around sexually.
Similarly, people who eat grapefruit on a regular basis are more likely than those who don't to have low cholesterol and healthy body weights.
However, those with low cholesterol and healthy body weights do not necessarily eat grapefruit or even like it. | |
|
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/17/2009 3:15:08 PM |
I got my tat (tramp stamp.. whatever creative name you want to call it) in front of my ex husband before my divorce to prove he didn't own or control me.
Yes, there is some truth to it. I have noticed a higher amount of women get their first tramp stamp soon after a breakup/divorce. Right after a breakup/divorce, many women are on the rebound and some go through a phase in life where they are rebellious and a little wilder than usual.
Since they are, by definition, available after a breakup, they are easier than a woman who is typically unavailable, one who has a boyfreind/husband.... at least for a time. This is just common sense.
Of course, this does not apply to all women, just a higher percentage. It's not a myth. | |
|
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/20/2009 10:40:55 PM | | I haven't taken any polls and I highly doubt anyone polled would be honest, but I do know this...EVERY and I do mean EVERY female "I know in person" that has a tattoo beyond the tiny hidden ONE could never in anyones stretch of the imagination be called anything less than easily laid. Just buy them a drink, look at them right, or give them a compliment and they will be dragging you down. That is why those women get tattoos, so someone will comment and they have what is in their minds a valid excuse to think you WANT them bad. When reality sets in that you just wanted to use them, then everything is YOUR fault and you are a worthless low life man who used them and lied to them. Same old desperate for attention, Jerry Springer craving, females who like to call themselves women. | |
|
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/21/2009 2:02:09 AM |
I haven't taken any polls and I highly doubt anyone polled would be honest, but I do know this...EVERY and I do mean EVERY female "I know in person" that has a tattoo beyond the tiny hidden ONE could never in anyones stretch of the imagination be called anything less than easily laid. Just buy them a drink, look at them right, or give them a compliment and they will be dragging you down. That is why those women get tattoos, so someone will comment and they have what is in their minds a valid excuse to think you WANT them bad. When reality sets in that you just wanted to use them, then everything is YOUR fault and you are a worthless low life man who used them and lied to them. Same old desperate for attention, Jerry Springer craving, females who like to call themselves women.
If I didn't think you were serious, I would  ; however, you truly are, which makes me want to .
Ah. SmilingSalmon, you have certainly cornered yourself with your observation.
^^BG^^ | |
|
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/22/2009 9:45:36 PM | Ok, hate me for this.
Yeah, I think that there might be something to it, because tats are a way of saying that you don't give a fu** what people think, so you're more rebellious and adventurous.
Also, easily led. I know that sounds like a paradox, but it isn't. People get tats to symbolize their non-conformity, but tats are so common that it backfires and shows conformity instead to a sort of hipster status.
I don't like tats and would never get one. And generally I find that I am not attracted to women who wear tats. To me it's a matter of self respect, or the lack of it. I'm not saying that I would never date a women who has tats, but it hasn't happened thus far.
I remember reading something recently about the boom in the tat removal business. I keep thinking that the fad will fade, but I thought the same thing about rap. | |
|
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/23/2009 2:23:10 PM |
I keep thinking that the fad will fade, but I thought the same thing about rap.
Ha! Well, don't feel bad. I initially thought "reality TV" would last maybe three years...
I'm kind of surprised at the continued tattoo (and piercing) boom, though. I mean, at this point, if you want to be different, the thing to do to yourself is nothing. So you'd think that would start coming back pretty soon, but all indications point to the upswing of body art continuing. | |
|
| Guys, Is It An Urban Myth Or Are Women With Tats Easier Than Women With None?
Posted: 11/23/2009 7:33:35 PM | Like who wants some nasty ho who has so little respect for her body that she mutilates herself with painful and potentially disease provoking tattoos? Seems most of the people in this site will just about sleep with anyone or anything. It would very easy to generalize that
most women with tattoos are underachievers and losers, but I won't go quite that far even though I haven't seen any tattooed cuties who are in a very high position socially speaking so maybe some generalizations do apply. We all have to have our standards, that being said standards of personal conduct are at a all time low! | |
|
Home
login 
