| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 3/24/2009 11:28:57 PM | Energy is changed and dissipates over time. All matter is energy.
dissipates is another word of "transferred" ~
and that is what energy does, ~ move about, manifesting effect with it's presence.
heat moves to cold.
friction creates heat, heat creates oxidation, oxidation, creates a mess of matter, and the heat moves to cold. the cold warms and things grow, life move about and dies ,"oxidize" again, go back to dirt ~ just wait to be reborn with some more heat.
did I get that right? Transference
I'm not really sure if we create it or just transfer it. I'd guess we only transfer it. We borrow it!
Dance | |
|
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 3/25/2009 1:05:06 AM | I think when VVendy said dissipate, she meant to disperse and become less influential.
Because the tendency of it all is to wind down. Thank gawd we have that sun shelling out for all our fun, for a while longer yet. | |
|
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 3/25/2009 1:57:30 PM | If you've been keeping in touch with all the fingernails, intestinal cells and hairs you've shed over the years you have a pretty good basis for your thesis.
Otherwise, no. | |
|
| |
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 3/25/2009 6:38:54 PM | I was thinking of Hawking my favorite Englishman.
If the Universe is like a bubble it has to expand until all of the force that started the expansion dissipates or loses so much of it's intensity that it is hardly detectable. In my thinking matter is absorbed or solid energy and if energy is not changed to matter it will stop being a recognizable force. | |
|
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 3/29/2009 10:04:22 PM | | With the rise of quantum mechanics, a lot of the old sacred cows had to be discarded. "Strict" conservation of energy/momentum was one of them. It is now quite certain that energy is created and destroyed all the time, within the parameters allowed by a quantum probability wavefunction. In other words a particle is "allowed" to spontaneously exist or spontaneously disappear as "needed" in a given field. | |
|
| |
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 4/4/2009 11:15:59 AM |
I don't know but I sure know how to create it!
Don't worry, I'm "anti" just about everything, so I might as well include energy.
But hey...I'm just doin' my bit to keep the universe's energy books balanced. (between beers of course)  | |
|
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 4/4/2009 1:11:36 PM | Sometimes I feel like we are being squeezed, into squeezing the squeeze toy, that has been squeezing us. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9iw7r88F7w
Like an insane feedback loop.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFuPHxJY5XY
Its horrible! 
I feel a 'chunky salsa effect' coming on. lol | |
|
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 10/24/2009 1:25:00 PM | This is reffered to as Lavoisiers Law or The Law of Consrvation of Mass. It's true in Chemistry. At least in endothermic reactions. But,in exothermic reactions & nuclear bombs more energy/heat is released than is needed to initiate the reaction/explosion.
The concept is generally accepted as true. Energy can only be released or stored. | |
|
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 10/26/2009 7:20:45 AM | Someone mentioned Ghosts???
Ever noticed that sightings of ghosts tend to depict them as fully clothed ..... and in period dress as well ??
Does this mean that our wardrobe dies with us ..... could it be possible that nakedness is a ghostly sensitivity as well .... will there be ghost laundromats available for dirty laundry ..... ???
Or are Ghosts a big pile of sheet ......???? | |
|
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 10/30/2009 1:23:48 AM | That is the Ultimate Question! Better said as "Why is there something rather then nothing." This started out as a Philosophical Question and moved on to a Physicist Question since 95% of the world are hardcore Materialist. This is still being debated with no light at the end of the tunnel in sight and we may never know. But Hawking proposed with James Hartle, using the whole Universe as a Quantum Mechanical Wave Function.
Using Feynman's Path Integral approach to Quantum Mechanics he arrived at the conclusion of the universe being it's Sum Over Histories. So every possible universe that can exists, exists but eventually it all collapses and ends up summing over its histories and what do you know, our universe pops up.
This means one should not try to create the world from the beginning to the present but sum over all it's histories and we arrive where are current universe is now. Since we can't possibly do that it becomes a Unanswerable Question.
As to the question of where did the universe come from there are three good approaches which all have there good and bad points.
1. Our Universe is just one Universe floating in a sea of Multiverses. Everything sprang up from possible brane collisions or refer to 2 approach.
2.Our Universe Sprang up from a random Quantum Mechanical Fluctuation, Possibly caused from the Quantum Foam or the Zero-Point Energy Field.
3.GOD and the one I tend to favor since anyone of these can never be proven, and since they are all unprovable are all logically on the same plane... 
I hope this helps... | |
|
| Energy cant be created nor destroyed?
Posted: 10/30/2009 4:48:08 PM | Some speculate ghosts are energy imprints.
I'm curious, if hauntings were to be mapped out and applied to the mapped out Ley Lines, would there be any correlation? Hypothesis says yes, if ghosts are energy imprints.
Anyone do this yet? Nope. | |
|
Home
login 
