|
|
|
|
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/15/2009 11:18:38 PM |
You know which states are in trouble.... The ones that are extremely liberal... New York and California... And I'm not really saying politics. It's the social stances that are taken. We throw so much money at Illegal's and welfare... and over regulate and over tax businesses, to chase them out of the state.
I dunno. I'd rather be here than in, say, Detroit, or Pittsburgh, or Ohio. There are two ways to really screw up an economy. Overburden and over-regulate it, and give free reign to the big players even when it's obvious they're running it into the ground.
Why is the Conservative position that it has to be one over the other when both are ruinous? There has to be a balance for an economy to have staying power. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/15/2009 11:30:09 PM |
There has to be a balance for an economy to have staying power.
Your right Ace... I'm not totally jumping on one.... There does need to be some regulation... and those d1ck-weeds that are greedy need to be taken down... But there really isn't as many as the cost we are throwing away on our Illegal population...
And don't get me wrong, I have nothing against immigrants... and I know the plight of those in Mexico... But we should deal with the legality of it... not just turn our backs and let it bleed us dry. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 5:39:34 AM | Here's my concern. We talked a while back about the neighbors who moved into your 3rd bedroom without permission. And we also talked about how, as soon as you were able to get them out the people who paid them to move in just brought in another group.
I wonder sometimes how much of the talk about illegal immigrants is a divide-and-conquer ploy. Of course not all of it is, but who profits most from their presence here? | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 9:28:41 AM | | Thanks Jack and Ace. Maybe California's collapse won't affect the virtual world though.....we shall see! :) | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 9:40:49 AM | It's all kinds of reasons. Sure Companies large and small take advantage of the cheap labor.... Heck a guy renting a truck at a U-haul takes advantage of a couple of them on the corner looking for work, to help him move his stuff. But they come here for work, to flee poverty for drug trafficking... gangs... all sorts of reasons Illegally. What I was saying, we should work on protecting our borders and looking at how we can make the legal process work.
Instead we get illegal citizens, who end up with more rights and get more benefits than a lot of our legal citizens who are struggling. I saw some numbers, can't remember where, maybe even from a link someone put on this thread or another one here of how much California spends on Illegals.... cutting that out alone, would turn California's economy around. But what do we do? cut out spending on Education and the Fire Dept. and things we need, and raise more taxes to keep throwing money into an open bottomless pit.
I don't think it's a divide and conquer ploy... I don't think it's where my neighbor keeps bring more in, Yes... I believe since more and more come here, that my neighbor takes advantage of them,,, which isn't right either. But it's because we have a border with a lot of holes... and no law enforcement when they're here... only free stuff... a welcoming basket of goodies.
I believe they all have reasons to come here, and I don't blame them for wanting to for the most part, everyone should have the right to have the best life possible... but legally (which I know is harder) But we keep bleeding ourselves... and ruining our way of life. I'm not talking greed... I'm saying we have to take care of our own citizens first, and not throw our money out the back door to illegals while telling the legal citizens at the front door that they must go with out, that there is nothing left for them... and as a matter of fact... give us all your change. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 11:36:30 AM |
Instead we get illegal citizens, who end up with more rights and get more benefits than a lot of our legal citizens who are struggling.
I see this claim a lot, but I'd like to see it substantiated. Yes, we spend a lot on illegal immigrants, but they also pay witholding and sales tax. What is the net, and what services do they get that a destitute citizen wouldn't? | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 12:58:58 PM | This article is a little bias... but I have seen it argued in other articles, and it still tells the facts. Taking away the income tax of these people is a little over a billion... still leaving a little over 9 billion, and some things can't be calculated...
Dateline: December, 2004 In hosting America's largest population of illegal immigrants, California bears a huge cost to provide basic human services for this fast growing, low-income segment of its population. A new study from the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) examines the costs of education, health care and incarceration of illegal aliens, and concludes that the costs to Californians is $10.5 billion per year.
Among the key finding of the report are that the state's already struggling K-12 education system spends approximately $7.7 billion a year to school the children of illegal aliens who now constitute 15 percent of the student body. Another $1.4 billion of the taxpayers' money goes toward providing health care to illegal aliens and their families, the same amount that is spent incarcerating illegal aliens criminals.
"California's addiction to 'cheap' illegal alien labor is bankrupting the state and posing enormous burdens on the state's shrinking middle class tax base," stated Dan Stein, President of FAIR. "Most Californians, who have seen their taxes increase while public services deteriorate, already know the impact that mass illegal immigration is having on their communities, but even they may be shocked when they learn just how much of a drain illegal immigration has become."
The Costs of Illegal Immigration to Californians focuses on three specific program areas because those were the costs examined by researchers from the Urban Institute in 1994. Looking at the costs of education, health care and incarceration for illegal aliens in 1994, the Urban Institute estimated that California was subsidizing illegal immigrants to the tune of about $1.1 billion. The enormous rise in the costs of illegal immigrants over the intervening ten years is due to the rapid growth in illegal residents. It is reasonable to expect those costs to continue to soar if action is not taken to turn the tide.
"Nineteen ninety-four was the same year that California voters rebelled and overwhelmingly passed Proposition 187, which sought to limit liability for mass illegal immigration. Since then, state and local governments have blatantly ignored the wishes of the voters and continued to shell out publicly financed benefits on illegal aliens," said Stein. "Predictably, the costs of illegal immigration have grown geometrically, while the state has spiraled into a fiscal crisis that has brought it near bankruptcy.
"Nothing could more starkly illustrate the very high costs of ‘cheap labor' than California's current situation," continued Stein. "A small number of powerful interests in the state reap the benefits, while the average native-born family in California gets handed a nearly $1,200 a year bill."
From the LA Times... making the argument that it wouldn't solve our economic problem... but that it is indeed a problem, and the fact once again... politicians went against the will of the people. Read the story here: http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/02/local/me-cap2
And Ace.... I'm not trying to slam illegals or immigrants... just how stupid some of our politicians are. And a mess this creates. PLUS... "Illegal"! doesn't that mean anything? | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 1:24:35 PM |
And Ace.... I'm not trying to slam illegals or immigrants... just how stupid some of our politicians are. And a mess this creates. PLUS... "Illegal"! doesn't that mean anything?
Fair enough. As far as "illegal" goes, I believe that necessity is a common law defense. If someone's family really would starve if he couldn't come here, what would we have him do? | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 1:59:49 PM | Ace, I have a cousin that is married to a guy from Central America... who hitch- hiked through Mexico to come here illegally. Heck they got beat up in Mexico... coming here. He has since become legal... and he is now helping others become legal. The guy has a fascinating story.... and is writing a book about it.
I know there are a lot of heart aches.. and starving people south of our border. A lot of people waiting legally to join family members here... but part of the delay for them is that we have this illegal problem. I look at it as people cutting line. It isn't fair for those who obey the laws and try and come here legally, and it isn't fair for those who have to fight for an education, or a job or medical attention with someone here illegally.
Look, I know things aren't going to change... I just hope they don't keep getting worse.
And J in SD..... thank God Idaho has that Pan handle... but I feel you... there is nothing like Cali.... | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 2:56:23 PM | So Congress is spending billions of our tax dollars to subsidize the very people it enacted laws to keep out of this country? That makes no sense at all.
California's only spending that huge sum to educate the children of illegal aliens because the Supreme Court's interpreted the 14th Amendment to make them U.S. citizens. Plyler v. Doe is the decision on point. It's from 1982, and the vote was 5-4.
This passage is from Chief Justice Burger's dissenting opinion:
“The Court makes no attempt to disguise that it is acting to make up for Congress’ lack of ‘effective leadership’ in dealing with the serious national problems caused by the influx of uncountable millions of illegal aliens across our borders. The failure of enforcement of the immigration laws over more than a decade [as of 1982] and the inherent difficulty and expense of sealing our vast borders have combined to create a grave socioeconomic dilemma. It is a dilemma that has not yet even been fully assessed, let alone addressed. However, it is not the function of the Judiciary to provide ‘effective leadership’ simply because the political branches of government fail to do so.”
The decision's a perfect example of unprincipled judging by the majority, cooking the law to make things come out the way they wanted. You'd think the Court would have overruled the sorry thing in the 27 years since--but no. And we may very well be stuck with it for 27 more. If Ms. Sotomayor gets on the Court as the fifth vote, it doesn't take much thinking to figure out which way her empathy would point on this issue.
But, what the heck. Doesn't it sort of warm your hearts to know that each of us, as a Californian, gets to pay $1,200 every year to educate these poor children? Shouldn't we spare their parents that duty, poor as they are? Yes, I know they knowingly broke federal laws by coming here--but is that really such a big deal? And why should any of us have that money, anyway, just to spend on food, housing, clothes, gas, and stuff like that? Let's follow what Our Dear Leader does--I mean, says--and not be selfish! | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 3:31:06 PM |
Why is the Conservative position that it has to be one over the other when both are ruinous?
Yes--sad, but true. Just look at what that ruinous free market capitalism did to this country, by allowing it to become the richest and most powerful the world has ever seen, in not much more than 150 years. Now, Mozambique, Turkmenistan, Albania, Cuba, North Korea, on the other hand--THAT's what a country ought to be!
I'll trust our planners, any day, to do studies and decide what our economy needs, rather than let some "unseen hand" determine everything. I mean, letting supply and demand set prices for goods and services--what a STUPID idea! Adam Cartwright, or Smith, or whatever his name was--he should have studied more before pretending to know about the "wealth of nations." Only too bad our Founding Fathers were dumb enough to buy his hype.
Just think what America might have become, if we'd had really smart people like President Obama and Nancy Pelosi and Hilary Clinton and Joe Biden back then! But instead, we got a bunch of dopes with powdered wigs and snuff boxes. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 4:02:03 PM |
As far as "illegal" goes, I believe that necessity is a common law defense.
Right church, wrong pew. Private necessity's a defense to a tort, not a crime. And you have to pay the owner of the property you trespassed on for any damages you cause.
Example: Krusty's sailing his yacht in Glen Cove when a huge storm breaks. Desperate to save his life, he heads for Smithers' private boat dock. As he approaches the pier, a wave heaves the large yacht against it, badly damaging both. Still, Krusty is able to tie up. The next morning, Smithers inspects his ruined pier. He then sues Krusty for the damages--and he collects.
What would I have the starving of the world do? Not have more children than they can support, for a start. But I sure don't feel any obligation to invite them all to come here and ruin our country. | |
|
| |
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 5:52:55 PM | Two recent article that I saw on Calif that really made me gasp.... Calif's adult illiteracy rate is between 20-25%(srry can find that article again). Of the 13 worst cities for unemployment 9 are in Calif., most seemed to be in the area from Stockton to Visalia.(this was a yahoo news article, can't find it again).
Dont get me wrong I was born in and spent most of my life in Calif, and all my children still live there. Not too long ago I thought of moving back, especially when I found out I could buy a place almost identical to the place I sold in 2005 for less than 25% of what I sold it for.
To me it is sad to hear these things about Calif. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/16/2009 11:44:35 PM |
I love the Simpsons analogy
JD--Glad you liked it. Flanders has just weighed in on the evils of tobacco. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 12:49:07 AM |
Yes--sad, but true. Just look at what that ruinous free market capitalism did to this country, by allowing it to become the richest and most powerful the world has ever seen, in not much more than 150 years. Now, Mozambique, Turkmenistan, Albania, Cuba, North Korea, on the other hand--THAT's what a country ought to be!
I'll trust our planners, any day, to do studies and decide what our economy needs, rather than let some "unseen hand" determine everything. I mean, letting supply and demand set prices for goods and services--what a STUPID idea! Adam Cartwright, or Smith, or whatever his name was--he should have studied more before pretending to know about the "wealth of nations." Only too bad our Founding Fathers were dumb enough to buy his hype.
Yep. So let's just get rid of all financial regulation, all accountability for the wealthy. After all, they earned every penny through the sweat of their own labor.
I said, "balance," Match, not Bolshevism. And we had just as many illegals when Cali was so rich that people were willing to pay millions of dollars for shacks here. The illegal problem is a problem for sure, but it is certainly not the cause of the collapse.
What is? Speculation, over-leveraging, fudging the qualifications, and the vast sense of entitlement among Americans who think that honest work is beneath their dignity. I'd rather pay illegals with a work ethic than some of these citizens who believe it is their God-given right to wasted as much fuel as possible for as long as they can.
Wouldn't you? | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 1:01:16 AM | Right church, wrong pew. Private necessity's a defense to a tort, not a crime.
Thank you for the clarification! I like the Krusty analogy too.
As far as the starving world goes, we play a part in the ruin of their countries. We eat mainly beef, which takes 9 lbs of edible grain and over 1,000 gallons of water to produce per pound. We also use far more than an equal share of the world's oil. We also export "green revolution" seed, which supplants the subsistence farms that used to feed all those kids. Instead of growing diverse crops for their own consumption and selling the excess, they fall for the sales pitch to make more money, deplete their soils, lose their traditional practices, and fall into despair and debt as they need increasingly more fertilizer to reap enough yield to ... subsist on. Their store of nutrients in the soil just got shipped off to feed our cattle in the form of Roundup Ready corn.
Perhaps we can solve both problems. If I were to promise to find and report an illegal alien for every steak you gave up, would you go for it? | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 1:17:16 AM | The thing is though?
What exactly could Smithers collect from Krusty?
Krusty Burgers? | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 9:24:08 AM |
and the vast sense of entitlement among Americans who think that honest work is beneath their dignity. I'd rather pay illegals with a work ethic than some of these citizens who believe it is their God-given right to wasted as much fuel as possible for as long as they can. Wouldn't you?
No. I want U.S. immigrations laws to be enforced, not repealed. To the extent Americans consider themselves entitled to various things, that's what 75 years of the welfare state--Social Security, Medicare, AFDC, housing grants, federally subsidized schools, etc. ad infinitum--have bought us. And the pattern has repeated itself in states like this one.
And I'm sure there would be plenty of Americans to fill the jobs illegal aliens are now doing, if they weren't here. The oversupply of labor, not surprisingly, reduces the price of it. If only Americans were available, there's some price at which they would sell their labor for any given job. Or, if the price of labor rose far enough, new machines would be developed to do certain jobs--creating jobs to make the machines. And it would almost certainly be far cheaper, overall, for California to have no illegal aliens living here. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 10:02:12 AM | Besides... If our border was more secure... The gun and drug trafficking would take a hit... and maybe help Mexico with their violence problem... and give their people a better life their.
If America stopped buying the drugs from them... they would go out of business and it wouldn't be necessary for their strong presence at our border.
Pipe dream I'm sure... but reality
I know it's a hard thing to put a big fence up to keep the border secure. But if we offer gift baskets to them if they can get into our country... Guess we really don't send a message that it's illegal to sneak over here. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 11:26:51 AM |
I know it's a hard thing to put a big fence up to keep the border secure.
Hard, yes. But far from impossible, if the will were there. The Romans built Hadrian's Wall in Britain about 2,000 years ago. And before that, the Chinese had built the Great Wall, which I think is longer than the U.S. border with Mexico. Both of them were very effective. At the very least, a wall or fence lets you concentrate guards where the lay of the land makes it impractical to build anything.
I think the main problem is that this country has gotten so demoralized it barely has the will to defend itself. And fittingly, it elected a President who's lukewarm, at best, about defending it. That's why Mr. Obama's planning to extend Miranda rights to every battlefield in the world, to protect the jihadists who want to butcher us all.
If we someday catch a group of Islamic Nazis that has a nuclear bomb and plans to use it on one of our cities, apparently we'll have to read them their rights and get them lawyers. On our dime, of course. And they'll be free to sit there in silence, smirking and giving everyone the bird.
But, I guess, a country that's as wicked and guilty as we've taught two generations this one is doesn't deserve any better. Time to hang our heads, and take our medicine. As we all know, Reverend Wright--that Don King of the clergy--is such a moral authority that the President himself saw fit to take in his wisdom for twenty years. And as that sage preacher has warned, America can't escape retribution--our "chickens are coming home to roost." | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 12:19:19 PM | Yep... our society has been on this gradual slide..... Our morals and character corroding along the way. People just can't seem to remember anything past yesterday... unless it is drilled into their heads.
This is why the NAACP keeps reminding us of slavery. We are way past it... in reality... but not in memory.
If people knew what they know now.... back during the debates of last year... Would they want of known more about Obama and his true intentions... A year from now we will slide even farther... and what makes us mad now, won't even be a memory... and we will even be worse off... only remembering what they want us to remember.
People running around praising Obama as the second coming have their eyes closed and are in their own little fairy-tale.
Does this mean I hate our President? NO... I don't think he is an evil man... I only don't believe he is a saint and does no wrong... Actually he has made a lot of mistakes... but because he is seen as this deliverer.... he isn't accountable for his actions. This has even been true with Pelosi and others.... Why is Dodd and Frank still in office? Their actions with Fannie and Freddy and our bail out and other problems would have anyone fired in business.
anyway... don't mean to sound negative... Just can't understand why people can't see the writing on the wall... Obama is like taking a rookie who has great expectations.... putting him in the game.... having him mess up big time.... but instead of pulling him from the game.... you all want to give him the MVP and stick him in the Hall of Fame. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 12:53:48 PM | Looking back at several pages, it seems everyone is in agreement that CA is in a world of hurt for lots of reasons. Some of us are more in the direct line of fire than others, but everyone is feeling it in one way or another. This group is a really bright group here. Seriously, is there an opportunity to find/take/lead actions for positive rather than giving others the reigns seemingly just leading to never ending negative directions? Narrow a focus and organize around an agreed goal? Is there a POF CALIFORUM PAC hiding in here somewhere? | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 1:49:13 PM |
Obama is like taking a rookie who has great expectations.... putting him in the game.... having him mess up big time.... but instead of pulling him from the game.... you all want to give him the MVP and stick him in the Hall of Fame. I couldnt agree more and it looks like many people who voted for Obama are no having or beginning to havesimilar thoughts.... Wouldnt it had been nice if more had looked at experience as a factor last year.
Is there a POF CALIFORUM PAC hiding in here somewhere? Probably not in the Peloski Bay area, but you might look at some of the Calif Tea Party People. | |
|
| The California Collapse Posted: 6/17/2009 3:59:02 PM | | A good start to solving the problem would be to enact ZERO BASED BUDGETING | |
|
|
|