online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Off Topic  > Iranian Election Fallout      Mod Threads Home login  
Page 3 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 Author Thread: Iranian Election Fallout
 where4

Joined: 10/1/2008
Msg: 51
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 6/30/2009 6:39:16 PM
@ 53
The bloody videos please?

Far be it from me to pretend it's all perfect here. I b!tch all the time. In many cases I can appreciate why other countries are critical of U.S. foreign policy. The level of post-election duplicity and violence in Iran offends all reason. It's pathetic to see the clerics and President A. try to deflect blame for their 2009 political opposition toward the west.
 AdvanceMan

Joined: 2/17/2009
Msg: 52
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 6/30/2009 8:18:56 PM
I think the Iranian protesters are right to be angry with their government, especially after Khameini's response to them.
 annabelle1962

Joined: 6/5/2009
Msg: 53
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/1/2009 2:46:52 AM
Ezzee - in total agreement. Perhaps this new government in the US may actually lead in staying out of other countries' business and governing or lack of for that matter. Cheers
 annabelle1962

Joined: 6/5/2009
Msg: 54
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/1/2009 2:58:21 AM
xzanthius - History has a way of repeating itself and there is much that has tainted the reputation of CIA and US involvement in other country's conflict. Sept 11, 1973 coup in Chile was financed by the then US government and we know how tragic that was for so many of the Chilean citizens. I continue to remain hopeful that lessons are learnt however more recent involvements such as Afghanistan and Irak demonstrate that little has changed. Cheers
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 55
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/1/2009 9:43:17 AM
Foul play at the G8 conference in Montebello Canada
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourview/2007/08/police_admit_going_undercover.html

Politics haven't really changed.
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 56
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/1/2009 11:42:26 AM

xzanthius - History has a way of repeating itself and there is much that has tainted the reputation of CIA and US involvement in other country's conflict. Sept 11, 1973 coup in Chile was financed by the then US government and we know how tragic that was for so many of the Chilean citizens. I continue to remain hopeful that lessons are learnt however more recent involvements such as Afghanistan and Irak demonstrate that little has changed. Cheers


My first girlfriend's mother survived that coup... much of her family was imprisoned, tortured and/or killed.

Lessons are not learned because the people still believe that our governments are the 'good guys' and that the other guys are the 'bad guys'. The truth is that there are no good guys.
 NotGorshkovAgain

Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 57
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/1/2009 1:53:14 PM

The truth is that there are no good guys.

If you can't see any difference between Jesus Christ, Gandhi, Buddha, Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, then you've got some serious issues.
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 58
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/1/2009 5:50:04 PM

The truth is that there are no good guys.

If you can't see any difference between Jesus Christ, Gandhi, Buddha, Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, then you've got some serious issues.


You totally misquoted me. I was not talking about religious messiahs, I was talking about governments. Sure there are good people and sure sometime they get into government but the sad truth is that there are no 'good guys'.

Put another way, every country engages in the darkside of humanity. Some more than others, usually, if not always, the more powerful the country the more it is engaging in that behaviour.

How long did it take for Christians to begin burning people?
while Adolf Hilter created a symbol of evil that has in many ways prevented further genocides.

One could say that Jesus was responsible for as many deaths and Adolf Hitler while one was a paragon of goodness and the other a homocidal megalomaniac. The works of men... tainted with greed and ignorance.
 NotGorshkovAgain

Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 59
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/1/2009 9:46:18 PM

I can provide evidence that at the G8 summit here in Canada that some of the 'protesters' were paid members of the police.

Of course they were - they're called informants. And the police wouldn't have been doing their jobs if they did NOT have informants in some of the violent anarchist groups.

These very same people were the principle agitators attempting to sully the reputation of the whole movement.

oh, REALLY?
There were groups planning on disrupting the meetings months in advance, laying in supplies of gas masks etc specifically to cause trouble. Is that the police fault too?


The media is biased toward Iran, misquoting the president and now focusing so highly and so negatively on his government.

You have a wonderful set of one-way glasses there. First, at the G8 summit it was the government's fault that some "protesters" were paid members of the police ... but when the government of Iran shoots unarmed civilians protesting peacefully, it's because the media is biased towards Iran?

You have a very distorted view of reality. Even the police went to great lengths to make it very clear that the overwhelming majority of protesters were peaceful, and that there was only a very small minority that was causing trouble.
 annabelle1962

Joined: 6/5/2009
Msg: 60
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/1/2009 10:20:47 PM
notgorshkovagain - Wether one sees the differences or not is irrelevant when the underlying issues relate to power in my view. This element and quality of any powerful figure sometimes is highly volatile and pervasive. Power corrupts, power can be useful and/or destructive, power is seductive and power is compromising.

In my view we all have power although many do not recognise it or understand how it is actually used and its influence. Leaders anywhere hold incredible power for the betterment of society however; history shows where it [power] has been used well or not. You have also touched on spirituality and religious beliefs ... now that's a separate conversation to which I would continue to argue that holds incredible power, influence and control.

All interesting topics. Cheers. A.
 NotGorshkovAgain

Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 61
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 1:36:53 AM

You totally misquoted me. I was not talking about religious messiahs, I was talking about governments.

The quote was accurate - you said guys, not governments. I gave the "good guy" examples I did simply for name recognition - same as with the bad guys. Religion was not the point.


Put another way, every country engages in the darkside of humanity. Some more than others, usually, if not always, the more powerful the country the more it is engaging in that behaviour.

It would be more accurate to say that it was more likely to be noticed.


How long did it take for Christians to begin burning people?

And when was the last time you beat your wife?
Non-Christians were burning people centuries before Christ was even thought of.


while Adolf Hilter created a symbol of evil that has in many ways prevented further genocides.

I would soooooooo love to see any evidence of that. And be careful before you try - you're talking to a historian here. I can very easily make the case that there have been more genocides in the 60 years since Hitler than there was in all of history before that.

Go find yourself a sword or a club, and then get yourself a nice, 10 lb pork roast. Try to "kill" it. And try "killing" it for 10 or 12 hours straight. It's a lot of HARD WORK killing a bunch of people when you have to do it by hand. Gas, machine guns, and really big bombs make the whole process *much* more efficient.

One could say that Jesus was responsible for as many deaths and Adolf Hitler while one was a paragon of goodness and the other a homocidal megalomaniac

I'm sorry, but that's specious beyond belief. To take what idiots & wingnuts have done over the years using Christ as a justification for their own insanity, and trying to equate that to what Adolph Hitler did by direct order is both silly and disingenuous.

The works of men... tainted with greed and ignorance.

Fortunately, the latter can be treated with a bit of knowledge. It would be nice of some people tried it a bit more often.

@annabelle

You have also touched on spirituality and religious beliefs

I gave examples that most people would agree are good men. For my point, their religious or philosophical beliefs are immaterial.
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 62
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 5:16:51 AM

The quote was accurate - you said guys, not governments. I gave the "good guy" examples I did simply for name recognition - same as with the bad guys. Religion was not the point.


Wether I said guys or governments, governments were implied. Most would understand that. So, you misunderstood me.


It would be more accurate to say that it was more likely to be noticed.


It would be more accurate to say that there is a lot more to be noticed.


And when was the last time you beat your wife?
Non-Christians were burning people centuries before Christ was even thought of.


I don't have a wife and have never hit someone out of anger in my life. You? Non-christians were burning people sure... but christians (I use the term loosely they hardly were practicing christ's love) elevated it to a high art form.


while Adolf Hilter created a symbol of evil that has in many ways prevented further genocides.


I realize that I was going out on a long, speculative limb with that statement, but I believe that sometimes good things come out of bad situations. Certainly WWII did a lot to put the word genocide in people's vocabulary.


One could say that Jesus was responsible for as many deaths and Adolf Hitler while one was a paragon of goodness and the other a homocidal megalomaniac

I'm sorry, but that's specious beyond belief. To take what idiots & wingnuts have done over the years using Christ as a justification for their own insanity, and trying to equate that to what Adolph Hitler did by direct order is both silly and disingenuous.


I was attempting to point out that the imperfection of humanity would often take the words and deeds of good men and twist them to evil use, likewise the reverse... hence supporting my original idea that there are no good governments. Saviors, good men, etc... die, and their works are then open to perversion.


Fortunately, the latter can be treated with a bit of knowledge. It would be nice of some people tried it a bit more often.


If that was an ad hominem directed at me I would caution you to pull the log out of your eye before you address the splinter in mine.

If you consciousnly go out looking for disaccord you will find it.
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 63
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 5:31:37 AM

Of course they were - they're called informants. And the police wouldn't have been doing their jobs if they did NOT have informants in some of the violent anarchist groups.


Read the article, this was all over the newspapers here, informants do not carry big rocks.

Why don't you read about the history of the CIA. You will recognize their tactics. I am not wearing one-way glasses, I hardly would wan to be an Iranian but... just read about the CIA.
 wudger

Joined: 12/20/2007
Msg: 64
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 5:56:51 AM
when the Freedom of Information Act came along, it turned out that the majority of the Black Panthers and many other activist groups were FBI agents.


we have only ourselves to blame for Iran. if we hadn't been so eager to prop up the brutal regime of the Shah in the 50s 60s and 70s, we wouldn't be toe to toe with Iran now.

what goes round comes round.
 Boortz

Joined: 2/6/2009
Msg: 65
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 7:37:05 AM
Obama is behaving as the political radical at his core is. I found his selective outrage i.e. the situation in Honduras where a Chavez ally who wanted to circumvent his countries constitution being ousted, (peacefully and legally), versus the brutal repression in Iran where he was basically silent, very revealing.... Obama is a Jimmy Carter clone, only worse it seems when it comes to being cozy with dictators, he doesn't want to offend them and cause him problems where he would actually have to lead and confront them. He has too much on his domestic and social agenda to accomplish to be distracted by matters elsewhere. His weakness on foreign policy matters is glaring. Too bad Kim Jung Ill won't cooperate and play nice isn't it?
 wudger

Joined: 12/20/2007
Msg: 66
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 9:11:48 AM



want to run that "legally" by us one more time? the army removing a president from power isn't even on the edge of legally.

with almost no exceptions every other nation in the world has demanded Zelaya's return to power, not to mention the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, the OAS, etc etc.

odd that they are all jimmy carter clones.

we have plenty of problems without the destabilization of central america.


far as I'm concerned obama did what he should have done in Iran. thank god we are done with cheney sailing the fleet into their waters. what we don't need is a third front in our misguided international military adventures, given how the other two are going.
 caliprince74

Joined: 10/9/2007
Msg: 67
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 11:21:15 AM
Think about this!

Any country that has no compunction about murdering it's own citizens for peacefully protesting in the streets will have no qualms about murdering it's enemies abroad.

Keep this in mind as Ahmedinejad continues to spin his way towards a nuclear weapon.
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 68
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 11:35:56 AM
The list of countries guilty of murdering their own citizens for peacefully protesting in the streets is quite long.

'4 dead in Ohio'

How many people have Iranian soldiers murdered? (hundreds of thousands)
How many people have American soldiers murdered? (millions)
compare if you dare.
 caliprince74

Joined: 10/9/2007
Msg: 69
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 11:45:23 AM
With all due respect, that is the stupidest analogy ever.
Please name for me one instance where American Soldiers have openly murdered unarmed citizens peacefully protesting in the streets!

To even begin to compare this to US soldiers fighting armed terrorists in other countries only shows your ignorance of the situation going on in Iran.
 Ezzee

Joined: 7/26/2004
Msg: 70
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 11:49:42 AM

With all due respect, that is the stupidest analogy ever.
Please name for me one instance where American Soldiers have openly murdered unarmed citizens peacefully protesting in the streets!

To even begin to compare this to US soldiers fighting armed terrorists in other countries only shows your ignorance of the situation going on in Iran.


While debatable in some of the facts, I would argue Kent State University would be a prime example.
 caliprince74

Joined: 10/9/2007
Msg: 71
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 12:01:40 PM
4 people were killed in the Kent State Univesity issue. Which is debatable because they had basically destroyed the city prior to the arrival of the National Guard and were combative even after being ordered to leave the area.

But let's just say for the moment that this was Govt Sanctioned killing order by Nixon himself for personal Sh*t and giggles.

This is still far less than the million the previous poster claims the US has murdered and just shows that he is trying to strawman his way from the real issue here.
 NotGorshkovAgain

Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 72
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 12:42:03 PM

While debatable in some of the facts, I would argue Kent State University would be a prime example.

Sorry, you loose.

The incident at Kent State started, and went out of control, because a young, inexperienced trooper panicked when confronted by a large, hostile, pushing crowd. He fired - everybody else heard the shot, thought they were being fired upon - and joined in. It was a clusterfrak of major proportions.

Big, BIG difference between that and a government intentionally ordering troops into the streets and giving direct orders to fire into the crowd.
 Ezzee

Joined: 7/26/2004
Msg: 73
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 1:01:50 PM

Sorry, you loose.

The incident at Kent State started, and went out of control, because a young, inexperienced trooper panicked when confronted by a large, hostile, pushing crowd. He fired - everybody else heard the shot, thought they were being fired upon - and joined in. It was a clusterfrak of major proportions.

Big, BIG difference between that and a government intentionally ordering troops into the streets and giving direct orders to fire into the crowd.


Actually, my understanding it was a National Guard group who did the shooting, unless there were two different shootings at Kent State.


On Monday, May 4, a protest was scheduled to be held at noon, as had been planned three days earlier. University officials attempted to ban the gathering, handing out 12,000 leaflets stating that the event was canceled. Despite this, an estimated 2,000 people gathered[16] on the university's Commons, near Taylor Hall. The protest began with the ringing of the campus's iron Victory Bell (which had historically been used to signal victories in football games) to mark the beginning of the rally, and the first protester began to speak.

Fearing that the situation might escalate into another violent protest, Companies A and C, 1/145th Infantry and Troop G of the 2/107th Armored Cavalry, Ohio ARNG, the units on the campus grounds, attempted to disperse the students. The legality of the dispersal was later debated at a subsequent wrongful death and injury trial. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that authorities did indeed have the right to disperse the crowd.

The dispersal process began late in the morning with campus patrolman Harold Rice,[17] riding in a Guard Jeep, approaching the students to read them an order to disperse or face arrest. The protesters responded by throwing rocks, forcing the Jeep to retreat.[18]

Just before noon, the Guard returned and again ordered the crowd to disperse. When most of the crowd refused, the Guard used tear gas. Because of wind, the tear gas had little effect in dispersing the crowd, and some began a second rock attack with chants of "Pigs off campus!" The students lobbed the tear gas canisters back at the National Guardsmen; however, they had put on gas masks upon first throwing tear gas at the students.

When it was obvious the crowd was not going to disperse, a group of 77 National Guard troops from A Company and Troop G, with bayonets fixed on their weapons, began to advance upon the hundreds of protesters. As the guardsmen advanced, the protesters retreated up and over Blanket Hill, heading out of The Commons area. Once over the hill, the students, in a loose group, moved northeast along the front of Taylor Hall, with some continuing toward a parking lot in front of Prentice Hall (slightly northeast of and perpendicular to Taylor Hall). The guardsmen pursued the protesters over the hill, but rather than veering left as the protesters had, they continued straight, heading down toward an athletic practice field enclosed by a chain link fence. Here they remained for about ten minutes, unsure of how to get out of the area short of retracing their entrance path (an action some guardsmen considered might be viewed as a retreat). During this time, the bulk of the students congregated off to the left and front of the guardsmen, approximately 150ft,(50m) to 225ft,(75m) away, on the veranda of Taylor Hall. Others were scattered between Taylor Hall and the Prentice Hall parking lot, while still others, perhaps 35 or 40, were standing in the parking lot, or dispersing through the lot as they had been previously ordered.

While on the practice field, the guardsmen generally faced the parking lot which was about 100 yards away. At one point, some of the guardsmen knelt and aimed their weapons toward the parking lot, then stood up again. For a few moments, several guardsmen formed a loose huddle and appeared to be talking to one another. The guardsmen appeared to be unclear as to what to do next. They had cleared the protesters from the Commons area, and many students had left, but many stayed and were still angrily confronting the soldiers, some throwing rocks and tear gas canisters. At the end of about ten minutes, the guardsmen began to retrace their steps back up the hill toward the Commons area. Some of the students on the Taylor Hall veranda began to move slowly toward the soldiers as the latter passed over the top of the hill and headed back down into the Commons.

At this point, at 12:22 PM,[1] a number of guardsmen at the top of the hill abruptly turned and fired their M1 Garand rifles at the students. The guardsmen directed their fire not at the closest students, who were on the Taylor Hall veranda, but at those on the grass area and concrete walkway below the veranda, at those on the service road between the veranda and the parking lot, and at those in the parking lot. Bullets were not sprayed in all directions; instead, they were confined to a fairly limited line of fire leading from the top of the hill to the parking lot. Not all the soldiers who fired their weapons directed their fire into the students. Some soldiers fired into the ground, while a few fired into the air. In all, 29 of the 77 guardsmen claimed to have fired their weapons, using a final total of 67 bullets. The shooting was determined to have lasted only 13 seconds, although a New York Times reporter stated that "it appeared to go on, as a solid volley, for perhaps a full minute or a little longer." The question of why the shots were fired remains widely debated.
Photo taken from the perspective of where the Ohio National Guard soldiers stood when they opened fire on the students.
Bullet hole in a sculpture by Don Drumm caused by a .30 caliber round fired by the Ohio National Guard at Kent State on May 4, 1970.

The Adjutant General of the Ohio National Guard told reporters that a sniper had fired on the guardsmen, which itself remains a debated allegation. Many guardsmen later testified that they were in fear for their lives, which was questioned partly because of the distance of the wounded students. Time magazine later concluded that "triggers were not pulled accidentally at Kent State". The President's Commission on Campus Unrest avoided probing the question regarding why the shootings happened. Instead, it harshly criticized both the protesters and the Guardsmen, but it concluded that "the indiscriminate firing of rifles into a crowd of students and the deaths that followed were unnecessary, unwarranted, and inexcusable."

The shootings killed four students and wounded nine. Two of the four students killed, Allison Krause and Jeffrey Miller, had participated in the protest, and the other two, Sandra Scheuer and William Knox Schroeder, had been walking from one class to the next at the time of their deaths. Schroeder was also a member of the campus ROTC chapter. Of those wounded, none was closer than 71 feet to the guardsmen. Of those killed, the nearest (Miller) was 265 feet away, and their average distance from the guardsmen was 345 feet.


Also, I'm pretty sure I'm not loose. Granted, I've had many sexual partners, but far fewer than what I would consider loose. Plus, loose is generally a term used for females, not males.
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 74
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 1:27:11 PM
If the states was having to deal with countries fermenting coups within it borders it would be in a position to have to shoot protesters to preserve stability.

The million that the u.s. has murdered were not their own citizens it was the citizens of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afphanistan, most central american countries, the philipines, much of south america... and on and on.

Iran, well, they were at war with Iraq for a while, that's where I got the hundred thousand figure.

The real issue? The real issue is that the president of Iran won the elections fair and square but because The States doesn't like that (well certain parts of its government) there is all kinds of behind the scenes agitatating going on.

Why don't we read "The presedent re-elected but insurgents are rebelling"... you see in Iraq they are insurgents, terrorists and criminals, but in Iran, because the States likes them, they are activists.

The media is biased. I am only pointing that out. Trust me, I like living in Canada, I wouldn't want to living in the middle east.
 NotGorshkovAgain

Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 75
view profile
History
Iranian Election Fallout
Posted: 7/2/2009 1:52:42 PM

Actually, my understanding it was a National Guard group who did the shooting, unless there were two different shootings at Kent State.

Differences in word usage. I'm assuming that you are referring to my use of the word trooper?

I'd forgotten till I read your comment and was wondering wtf you meant by it, that in the US state police are usually called troopers. I was using trooper to mean a non-commissioned soldier, which is how it's used north of the border.

As far as your degree of moral decay is concerned - sometimes, even a spell checker doesn't help :-)

The version you have posted there is different from what I remember, although they are broadly in agreement. Either way, I think it's still safe to say that that it still qualifies as a clusterfrak, as opposed to an intentional plan directed from on high.
Page 3 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
Show ALL Forums  > Off Topic  > Iranian Election Fallout