online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Science/philosophy  > Moon Landings - Question.      Mod Threads Home login  
Page 2 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4
 Author Thread: Moon Landings - Question.
 --Brightspark--

Joined: 6/17/2009
Msg: 26
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/26/2009 4:59:56 AM
To be out in the void, travelling, cramped, floating. To touch down on a different world and be the first of your kind to do so. The final tense minute before the journey home is attempted. So much could of gone wrong.... I can barely imagine the feelings and bravery of such pioneers.
It's a somber thought but does anybody know if the astronauts who visited the moon were issued 'some sort' of cyanide pill in case the mission failed?
 yna6

Joined: 1/21/2007
Msg: 27
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/26/2009 7:54:58 AM
Suicide pill? Jeeze...probably just easier to step out the airlock sans suit. Less mass to haul up there too! (ok...mass of one pill...or two or three...)
I took a look at Life magazine from July of 69. I explained to my kids that we did have a dream...and lost it due to foolish politicians and shortsighted people running a crappy gov't. But....we still had the dream...and it was up to them to make it a reality.
Perhaps Obama will have some idea that the space rpogram helps a lot of citizens. Not just jobs...but actual science breakthroughs that affect people in their everyday life. Like that computer you are sitting at.
Also...a lot of people say "It isn't worth the money...a waste! We have problems at home to care for!" Might I remaind these people that EVEY DOLLAR it cost for the Apollo missions STAYED on the planet? Nobody went to the moon and bought a burger! All those dollars fueled the economy...which is what is needed today! More jobs...more dreams....and a better economy. Not such a "waste" when looked at like that. Not to mention all the spin-off jobs and technology that can be applied to civilian use here...like microwave ovens!
 MaxxQ

Joined: 6/14/2008
Msg: 28
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/26/2009 9:20:02 AM
For those who want a laugh, check out this video of Buzz Aldrin responding to a guy who thinks the moon landing was a hoax:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo6aHSY8hU&feature=player_embedded
 MaxxQ

Joined: 6/14/2008
Msg: 29
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/26/2009 9:26:36 AM

This is pretty much exactly what I've been saying for a while now . What the f@ck happened to our society so that now it's so acceptable to be intellectually lazy ? Did our education system completely crap out in the last twenty or thirty years or what ? No wonder kids can't read or even add anything up anymore....they're told that they don't need to actually know anything. They just need to feel good about themselves. The dumbest idea ever conceived for the education system is the self-esteem movement and mark my words , that movement is the root of our current woes with academic standards and performance. Mostly it has eliminated the need to actually have kids learn about critical thinking. Critical thinking is just completely ignored now and even basic scientific tenets have been replaced with "Does it feel true to you ? That's all that really matters."

Sorry....had to rant. Anyway , yes , I agree with you Mad and the above is my theory of why. The inmates are running the asylum.


On a similar note, here's a couple of posts from another message board I frequent:

Poster #1

I find it ironic, however, that our technological advances since the 1960s go into things like Twitter, rather than, say, going to the Moon.


Poster #2 (in direct response to #1):

And our would be aerospace engineers of the future are too busy finding out what Miley Cyrus bought at the grocery store to study their calculus...


Sad, but true...
 Mister Logic

Joined: 3/5/2009
Msg: 30
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/26/2009 2:36:47 PM
The 4oth anniversary of the first landing is coming up in less than a month. (It's had to believe that 40 years have gone by. I remember the event so vividly.)
 FunkyMonkee

Joined: 4/7/2009
Msg: 31
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/26/2009 2:44:53 PM
Or indeed the Buzz interview with Ali G

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKedyQQkZQ


Mostly it has eliminated the need to actually have kids learn about critical thinking. Critical thinking is just completely ignored now and even basic scientific tenets have been replaced with "Does it feel true to you ? That's all that really matters."

Sorry....had to rant. Anyway , yes , I agree with you Mad and the above is my theory of why. The inmates are running the asylum.


I agree..

We need to rant.....

 normaldude

Joined: 3/8/2006
Msg: 32
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 8:50:47 AM
this is seen in a lot of "younger" folks now. They sit at a computer, click a mouse, google stuff and then actually believe all the crap that is on the net. Kids are full of bad info due to the net allowing a large voice to liars, deniers and snake oil salesmen,
We turn out lots of lawyers from colleges and less and less scientists and engineers.
They just cant believe that people of the 1960,s were that smart and innovative and brave enough to have done something that would be hard pressed to repeat today.
Also for the moon landing deniers didnt apollo leave mirrors on the surface of the moon for bouncing lazer beams off to measure distances?
 Mister Logic

Joined: 3/5/2009
Msg: 33
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 9:10:07 AM

Also for the moon landing deniers didnt apollo leave mirrors on the surface of the moon for bouncing lazer beams off to measure distances?

Yes. But those in denial of the missions (I'm NOT one of them) might claim that those mirrors could have been sent by just an ordinary rocket.
 The Bassist

Joined: 7/10/2008
Msg: 34
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 10:23:32 AM
As someone born nearly 20 years after the landings, if it weren't for the Apollo missions I never would have developed a healthy interest in physics!
 RocketMan_Len

Joined: 7/5/2006
Msg: 35
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 3:46:42 PM
@ Mister Logic...


Yes. But those in denial of the missions (I'm NOT one of them) might claim that those mirrors could have been sent by just an ordinary rocket.


I've posted this on other threads - the retroreflector argument *is* rather weak, because the Russians landed one as well. (Lunokhod 2, IIRC...)

If you want to talk about artifacts that *required* a human presence, there's the lunar seismic package, the solar wind monitor, etc.

I prefer to mention what was *returned* from the Moon, to refute the deniers... close to a half-ton of rock and regolith samples, and the camera from the Surveyor probe that Conrad and Bean retrieved on Apollo 12.
 FunkyMonkee

Joined: 4/7/2009
Msg: 36
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 6:56:07 PM
his is seen in a lot of "younger" folks now. They sit at a computer, click a mouse, google stuff and then actually believe all the crap that is on the net. Kids are full of bad info due to the net allowing a large voice to liars, deniers and snake oil salesmen,
We turn out lots of lawyers from colleges and less and less scientists and engineers.
They just cant believe that people of the 1960,s were that smart and innovative and brave enough to have done something that would be hard pressed to repeat today.
Also for the moon landing deniers didnt apollo leave mirrors on the surface of the moon for bouncing lazer beams off to measure distances?



Yes that is right.

We used to be allowed to tell people they were stupid/ignorant now we apparently have to tell them they are all clever.

They believe it really is that simple to go on the net and read something thus become an authority on it, and debate on an equal footing with the real experts. Maybe because that is what they did to get their qualifications because of the focus on coursework and dropping standards.
 membrane

Joined: 8/12/2008
Msg: 37
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 7:50:08 PM
we landed on the moon once... the video footage was damaged... the first time was top searet, there was a lander but no buggy, and they couldent stay long on the surface cause of radiation... the got baldy burned, but the apolo mission was a fraud... , and of cource there are minaras on the moon, both the earth and monn, and surounding planets are made of the same minarals, exsept jupider, but... the all contain rock, wich is where minarals are exstracted
 desertrhino

Joined: 11/30/2007
Msg: 38
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 7:59:52 PM

we landed on the moon once... the video footage was damaged... the first time was top searet, there was a lander but no buggy, and they couldent stay long on the surface cause of radiation... the got baldy burned, but the apolo mission was a fraud... , and of cource there are minaras on the moon, both the earth and monn, and surounding planets are made of the same minarals, exsept jupider, but... the all contain rock, wich is where minarals are exstracted


Please, stop before you hurt yourself.
 stargazer1000

Joined: 1/16/2008
Msg: 39
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 8:13:24 PM


we landed on the moon once... the video footage was damaged... the first time was top searet, there was a lander but no buggy, and they couldent stay long on the surface cause of radiation... the got baldy burned, but the apolo mission was a fraud... , and of cource there are minaras on the moon, both the earth and monn, and surounding planets are made of the same minarals, exsept jupider, but... the all contain rock, wich is where minarals are exstracted



Please, stop before you hurt yourself.


Yeah, I know what you mean...Wow! What possible response can you give to this?
 Funcuz

Joined: 1/16/2009
Msg: 40
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/27/2009 9:03:59 PM
^Well , whatever you do ,no sudden movements.
Oh sure , you're thinking "This is the internet...he can't even see me anyway." Au contraire my friend ! These tend to be the same people that believe dinosaurs wore shoes and Sylvia Brown is underappreciated.
Have an open mind ! That way you can become paranoid and live in fear too.
 LeCutter

Joined: 2/25/2009
Msg: 41
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/28/2009 12:14:48 AM
Of course the moon landings were fake! So was the entire space race. The USA and the Russians were in cahoots. They spent billions on a fake space race to bilk the taxpayers out of that money for wild orgies in Switzerland! Yuri Gagarin, Alan Shepphard, et al. all actors. In fact Chuck Yeager never broke the sound barrier. Oh sure, they "claim" jets can fly faster than sound, but...have you ever been in one? I'm told China exists too, but I've never seen it.
 RocketMan_Len

Joined: 7/5/2006
Msg: 42
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/28/2009 5:31:11 AM
@ Stargazer1000...


Yeah, I know what you mean...Wow! What possible response can you give to this?


Ever watch NCIS...? I think a whack to the back of the head is appropriate.
 yna6

Joined: 1/21/2007
Msg: 43
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/28/2009 11:23:33 AM
^^^ I'm thinking "With a 2x4"...but, hey...that's just me....
 normaldude

Joined: 3/8/2006
Msg: 44
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/28/2009 11:32:17 AM
this should stoke the conspiracy fires ........ lost tapes found!!!! Or... did they just take a long time in production over at disney?

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/110442/WORLD-EXCLUSIVE-NASA-finds-missing-moon-landing-tapes
 Mikezt

Joined: 7/6/2008
Msg: 45
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/28/2009 10:15:18 PM

Oh and to clear up a misconception, the moon doesnt rotate, there is no day and night, just a light side and a dark side. They couldnt of landed at "dawn" the best they could do is land on the edge of light and dark, in which case the shadows they cast would be super elongated. Which they didnt, the shadows cast would indecate they landed on the day side. I wonder what their boots were made of that didnt melt?

Also about the rover....why the hell would you bring it where would you go with it? They had to micromanage the amount of weight they could bring so why would you bring a golf cart??

And finally....the lander. The feet of the thing look like twigs. how do you go from 1000's of miles per hour to a soft landing straight down? There is no atmosphere to slow you down. No way in hell they had any kind of rockets to slow them down enough. At best they could go into a decaying orbit to burn off extra velocity which would make them land sideways at about 1000mph, discentegrating the lander.

Look at the mars rover missions. They landed the rovers by deploying parachutes in the atmosphere to slow them down, then released them in an inflatable balloon like cocoon that hit the surface and bounced back up many times before settling on the surface. The kinds of G's the rovers went through to land would of killed a human 10 times over. Thats the only way they could do it so how the hell did they land on the moon?


From www.nasa.jpl.gov:

1) The moon rotates, it is gravitationally locked with the earth so the rotation rate is such that it keeps the same face toward the earth.

2) Max temp about 123 deg c, min about -233

3) The landers used rockets to slow their decent
 Kaos86

Joined: 3/7/2007
Msg: 46
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/29/2009 10:07:21 AM
I love this thread... very funny.
I wonder also if the OP believes OJ was framed.
Sort of like Capricorn 2 (OJ Framed)

You all realize that NASA next plans to go back to the moon.
So all of this debate can begin fresh again in a couple of years.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31532912/ns/technology_and_science-space/
 stargazer1000

Joined: 1/16/2008
Msg: 47
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/29/2009 12:12:07 PM
You all realize that NASA next plans to go back to the moon.
So all of this debate can begin fresh again in a couple of years.


Yup, all those "live" pictures will actually be coming from sound stage at Area 51. I'm assuming the technical crew will be made up by aliens from Zeta Reticuli. We all know what an eye they have for cinematography.

[edit] Assuming those are "eyes" in the conventional sense.
 stargazer1000

Joined: 1/16/2008
Msg: 48
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 6/30/2009 1:53:51 PM

Apparently, there's a bit of a gray area.


Actually, not really. The moon does rotate. It does so at the same rate it revolves around Earth, keeping one face more or less (libration notwithstanding) directed at Earth all the time.
 stargazer1000

Joined: 1/16/2008
Msg: 49
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 7/1/2009 7:34:27 AM

Joke. Pun. Bon mot. Play on words. Forget it.


Ah, oui! Mon erreur.
 KinkyBastard

Joined: 1/3/2008
Msg: 50
view profile
History
Moon Landings - Question.
Posted: 7/1/2009 5:28:56 PM


It. is. f**king. dismal. to see the kind of ignorance about science and spaceflight that gets talked about sometimes in these forums by supposedly people who have passed through the public education system and moreover have working televisions and likely the capacity to get library cards...

I have to ask...what the hell happened to the eduction system and the shortened attention span? Is this startling evidence that people ARE getting stupider? Who are these "moon landing hoax" jackasses?


As a Maths and Physics teacher, I see this educational decline and rise of ignorance on a daily basis. So much so that after 14 LONG years I want to pack it all in and do something FAR more useful with my Life.

We are heading into some pretty crazy times.

I remember when I watched a program based on the Apollo Moon landings. A British presenter on a BBC2 program called "Top Gear", was given the opportunity of a lifetime to fly up in a U-2 spy-plane.

At 70,000 ft the presenter took awe-inspiring footage of the "edge-of-space" above but, despite all of this, AND footage of him talking to several Apollo astronauts AND footage after footage of their actual missions, my brother (bless him) comes in and tells me its all a hoax and he doesn't believe it. Not one bit.

On a certain level, this I can understand. My brother dropped out of school with zero qualifications and he hardly reads.

Nonetheless it's kinda sad to live in a world where a lot of people don't seem to believe anything anymore... Except money, religion, sport and sex... (Oh did I miss celebrities?)

Anyway asides that (and perhaps slightly off topic), what REALLY scares me is an obvious lack of History. A lack of Science (and Reason) is bad enough, but combine that with a lack of History... And you got a problem... A serious one.
Page 2 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4
 
Show ALL Forums  > Science/philosophy  > Moon Landings - Question.