Wow if you could just get 11 or 12 more people to take the poll then I too could put all my trust in that poll like you do.

Any intelligent person using sound reasoning would tell you that if a poll used 1% of the people and then tried to tell you the 1% is all they need to tell you how everyone is thinking,you'd say ,not so,thats impossible !

Well 1% would be a poll using 3,070,000 people.

All the polls out today use between 350 to 20,000 people,The average is under a 1000.

I don't know how all the presidents have been but most I can remember traveled great distance to support others in their party.Both sides do it,I never saw it as if some huge meaning was behind it,Just something a prez does it ,or something a senator or governor does for a mayor,its normal really .But coming from a person that lets us know when a poll has changed a tenth of one percent,I'm certain it tells you a lot.

As for referring to poll numbers in the beginning, his polls are the same as to the beginning when it was 50 to 56% at election final,now after the beginning in June,which is 6 months past the beginning, one poll hit 62%,thats one poll, and as all polls their spread can be 12%,or more or less !

that's why I don't like it when one gal combines all of them for an average,because if you take one scolding pot of water and mix one freezing pot of water and average them ,you get a warm, bath ready bucket.Its totally inaccurate.

Numbers are the same,as I pointed out using the 16 top polls at the time of election with a plus minus of 3%accuracy that was 50 to 56% meaning they were accurate if it was in reality 47% to 59%,that is a 12% spread,now one gal here likes to take a group of number and average it,so she would would say that figure is actually 53%,not 47 or 59,

Can't really get more inaccurate than that,because 47% means Obama is wavering a touch in popularity and at 59% shows he's obviously solidly doing well with a clear majority and at 53% he is just neutral.It does not take a rocket scientist to show those are 3 completely different conclusions off of one poll period,it really depended on whose poll you wanted to use to shout from you pulpit with,the one that averages all of them is also choosing her way to make her point seem better.That why she states averages,it fits her point better thats she trying to instill in us.

Since some of you guys thrive on inaccurate polls, Gallup states the highest approval rating for Obama was 63% and their all time highest disapproval poll of Obama is 39%.Point being of of these polls he never has had a significant disapproval number.

Try to remember when something is in approval at say 60% and then disapproval is at 30 % then undecided people might be 10%,so an optimist could say then that approval just might be at 70% using that undecided 10% in their favor and a pessimist just might argue that the dissapproval might then actually be at 20% using that 10% in their favor.

Its easy to make numbers look like how they want them to look.Like when Jeb Bush played with the voters numbers in Florida to give brother Bush the presidency,or rather steal the presidency.He made it look like childs play.