Maybe you can show me a reason for flags to be at half mast on 9/12.

Shame that so many politicians keep turning a blind eye. I have a funny feeling that is why the approval ratings on Obama slid so much during the Summer, Obama hasn't been listening.

I'll just accuse the guy that put this clip together of falsifying a story line and mixing in the half mast with other sources to make it appear it was on 9/12. And I'll accuse anyone that tries to prove I'm wrong of getting sucked in by winger propaganda.

That is, unless you can come up with links to reputable news outlets that show flags on that building at half mast on 9/12.
Maybe you can show me a reason for flags to be at half mast on 9/12.

Well how about MCNBC? Would you consider those left wing sellouts to be "respectable?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/32813988#32813988

Oh and in case that link doesn't work right, here's where you can find it:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32811199

Notice the flag 50 seconds into the video... Half mast...

I think we can call this an attempt to discredit FAIL...

Obama and the Democrats took a "Stimulus" bill filled it with so much pork and Liberal programs that it did nothing to Stimulate the economy.

Does it really matter whether they believe it was one, a hundred, a thousand or ???.

I did find it interestting that whether the numbers turn out to be 1.2 million or 2 million or somewhere in between that many

What really matters is that people are angry enough to say we want our country's constitution back.

Notice the flag 50 seconds into the video... Half mast...

I think we can call this an attempt to discredit FAIL...

Funny how you discredit MSNBC while using their production to prove there were millions when there were only thousands.
Yes MSNBC may be guilty of using stock clips in their story but if you look at the video AND listen to the commentary when the half mast video shows they say "thousands of people" not millions of people.

As far as the stimulus plan not working, like you said they have to spend massive amounts of money to stimulate the economy, what have they spent so far? And its easy to make assertions about unemployment possibly having gone higher if they had done nothing since there is no way to prove that, just like when Obama edited his statements about job creation when selling the Stimulus plan, create or save 3-4 million jobs, how do you prove a save? and what happened to all of the jobs that were supposed to be created? Unemployment rate keeps rising..so much for your theory about the stimulus plan working...Our economy is resilient we probably would have recovered this little without the stimulus thanks to TARP.....

Monetarists, including Milton Friedman and current Federal Reserve System chairman Ben Bernanke, argue that the Great Depression was mainly caused by monetary contraction, the consequence of poor policymaking by the American Federal Reserve System and continued crisis in the banking system.[16][17] In this view, the Federal Reserve, by not acting, allowed the money supply as measured by the M2 to shrink by one-third from 1929 to 1933, thereby transforming a normal recession into the Great Depression. Friedman argued that the downward turn in the economy, starting with the stock market crash, would have been just another recession.[18] However, the Federal Reserve allowed some large public bank failures – particularly that of the New York Bank of the United States – which produced panic and widespread runs on local banks, and the Federal Reserve sat idly by while banks collapsed. He claimed that, if the Fed had provided emergency lending to these key banks, or simply bought government bonds on the open market to provide liquidity and increase the quantity of money after the key banks fell, all the rest of the banks would not have fallen after the large ones did, and the money supply would not have fallen as far and as fast as it did.[19] With significantly less money to go around, businessmen could not get new loans and could not even get their old loans renewed, forcing many to stop investing. This interpretation blames the Federal Reserve for inaction, especially the New York branch.[20]

British economist John Maynard Keynes argued in General Theory of Employment Interest and Money that lower aggregate expenditures in the economy contributed to a massive decline in income and to employment that was well below the average. In such a situation, the economy reached equilibrium at low levels of economic activity and high unemployment. Keynes basic idea was simple: to keep people fully employed, governments have to run deficits when the economy is slowing, as the private sector would not invest enough to keep production at the normal level and bring the economy out of recession. Keynesian economists called on governments during times of economic crisis to pick up the slack by increasing government spending and/or cutting taxes.

As the Depression wore on, Roosevelt tried public works, farm subsidies, and other devices to restart the economy, but never completely gave up trying to balance the budget. According to the Keynesians, this improved the economy, but Roosevelt never spent enough to bring the economy out of recession until the start of World War II.[28]

Good News is that he is not below 50% this week.

You are all keeping your eye on the wrong shell, the Pea is under the other one.....Health Care Reform will not provide any new jobs in the near future if at all -

Practically everything thing Obama has brought out so far has been a temporary bandage or something that will not even take effect for years from now. Most of his policies have not been doing anything lasting for our country's current economy now.

Unless you consider higher taxes a way of helping the unemployed, bankrupt companies and families lose of homes.

Unless you consider higher taxes a way of helping the unemployed, bankrupt companies and families lose of homes.

Obama focused on the $787 billion stimulus plan, an ambitious package of federal spending and tax cuts designed to revive the economy and save millions of jobs. Most wage-earners will soon see the first paycheck evidence of tax breaks that will total $400 for individuals and $800 for couples.