| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/7/2009 1:08:54 AM |
This week's "manufactured outrage" is supposed to be at Glenn Beck...
OMG that dude's a freaking lunatic and needs to be hospitalized....but I thought we had known that for a while.
Hmmmm.....musing...... I wonder if the rise in the prison population has anything to do with the privatization of the prison system....SHOCK.
And....how many prisons does Haliburton run? | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/7/2009 5:41:37 AM | So this 150% is just a bunch of BS. THOUSANDS of injured children is B.S.?
I guess they should banned Sports in PE. That where the majority of the injuries come from.
So trying to blame Bush for this. This and...
...the poor innocent lives lost to GWB's play structures of death. | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/7/2009 11:40:33 AM | "GWB's play structures of death"!
Let me guess - Haliburton has gone into the swingset business and GW required all playgrounds to switch to their swingsets during his administration?
Yep! CLEARLY all GW's fault! Just like everything else that has gone wrong with the world!  | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/7/2009 12:48:27 PM |
Let me guess - Haliburton has gone into the swingset business and GW required all playgrounds to switch to their swingsets during his administration?
Yep! CLEARLY all GW's fault! Just like everything else that has gone wrong with the world!
He he he you realllllly don't get the joke. | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/7/2009 4:59:20 PM | "GWB's play structures of death"! That's right...
As a child, the playgrounds of parks and school used to be our Elysian fields, but now, owing to the Republican Bush admin's regulatory orgy of destruction they have become no more than a tomb of the mutilated | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/7/2009 11:24:41 PM |
As a child, the playgrounds of parks and school used to be our Elysian fields, but now, owing to the Republican Bush admin's regulatory orgy of destruction they have become no more than a tomb of the mutilated
You know, when you first started this thread, I laughed. I honestly thought it was a joke. Seriously. I thought you were being completely fascetious and tongue in cheek...
Then, you kept on, and I thought I was giving you too much credit, and began to see this as ridiculous partisan hyperbole, far beneath a person of your intelligence...
The more you rant about it though, and the more you amp up the rhetoric, the more I'm starting to think you actually DO believe this crap!  | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 5:21:11 AM |
The more you rant about it though, and the more you amp up the rhetoric, the more I'm starting to think you actually DO believe this crap
There is more validy to the quote below
As a child, the playgrounds of parks and school used to be our Elysian fields, but now, owing to the Republican Bush admin's regulatory orgy of destruction they have become no more than a tomb of the mutilated
Then the quote below
"Such a system is downright evil," Palin wrote on her page, which has nearly 700,000 supporters. She encouraged her supporters to be engaged in the debate.
The claim that the Democratic health care bills would encourage euthanasia has been circulating on the Internet for weeks and has been echoed by some Republican leaders. Democrats from Obama on down have dismissed it as a distortion. The nonpartisan group FactCheck.org, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania says the claim is false.
Argueing the facts is no longer the in thing, | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 7:45:22 AM | LOL - well if "factcheck.org" says it - then it MUST be true! LOL! Just like their "facts" about the NRA, Obama, gun control, Obamacare, etc, etc, etc... They're just a liberal construct used as a mouth piece to try to give credibilty to the wacky left... Well, they have no credibility with me... WHO is fact checking fact check anyway?  | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 7:53:49 AM |
hey're just a liberal construct used as a mouth piece to try to give credibilty to the wacky left... Well, they have no credibility with me... WHO is fact checking fact check anyway?
Obviously you haven't seen the fact check site or you would be using them to declare Obama Doesn't get all the facts correct. You are just a conservative construct that doesn't like having your 'facts' refuted. | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 7:58:07 AM |
LOL - well if "factcheck.org" says it - then it MUST be true! LOL! Just like their "facts" about the NRA, Obama, gun control, Obamacare, etc, etc, etc... They're just a liberal construct used as a mouth piece to try to give credibilty to the wacky left... Well, they have no credibility with me... WHO is fact checking fact check anyway?
Me, I think the problem with the "wacky left" as you so eloquently describe any one who disagrees with you is that they are just too kind, distortion? No just out right lies meant to stir up their base which they think lack the intelligence to know the difference | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 8:28:33 AM | Well, a lot of the liberal base certainly isn't the sharpest tools in the shed...
I saw a video the other day of a woman collecting signatures to ban dihydrogen monoxide. She claimed it is linked to thousands of deaths every year, contributes to soil erosion when sprayed on crops, is commonly found in cancerous tumors, has also been found in baby food, can cause severe burns in it's gaseous form, and is also used in animal research facilities during testing. In fact, if accidently inhaled in sufficient quantities it can cause almost immediate death....
While all that may be absolutely true... What she just does NOT understand is that it is also something commonly used each and every day all over the world. In fact, factories and manufacturing facilities around the world would have to SHUT DOWN if they stopped using it, or be forced to spend more money to find an alternative solvent. We simple cannot afford that in this economy... Also just the fact that is often found in baby food, that does not necessarily mean it is dangerous, if it were, I'm sure the FDA would have banned it by now...
Yet still - the left continues to put out propaganda like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MawlljmaS1w | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 8:34:54 AM | I'm not really sure what the point is of the above post. Apparently he saw a youtube video of a woman concerned about a carcinigen.
And the absolute HORROR of it, is that factories would have to use a different solvent if her concerns become widely shared.
Somehow, I kind of think industry and capitalism would survive. | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 8:44:34 AM | Somehow, I kind of think industry and capitalism would survive.
Well isn't THAT the liberal mindset? Impose WHATEVER regulations on private industry you want... The "rich" can always just be made to suck it up and deal with it, right? Dihydrogen Monoxide has been used safely for years - but now we should ban it just because some lefty found it in baby food? | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 8:48:37 AM | Yup, pretty much.
If what industry is doing is killing people, then they have to stop doing that. It's the liberal mindset that lead to child labour laws, workplace safety regulations, things like forcing the rich to stop chaining and locking the exit doors of factories. That was after the Triangle fire.
Yeah, liberals put human life over profit. You got me. | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 9:02:26 AM | So Dihydrogen Monoxide kills people every year... It's been that way as long as I can remember... Same in our GRANDPARENTS day... That just isn't something that can be avoided. If people would just learn how to be around it responsibly, and have the proper amount of respect for it, almost NONE of those deaths would EVER occur...
Switching to a different solvent would only introduce some other solvent into the environment while adding MANY times to the cost for production... Yes, in many instances, alchohol, hydrogen peroxide, or some other solvent COULD be substituted, but those have their own issues and many times the cost of Dihydrogen Monoxide...
Yea, sometimes profits really ARE more important than pure propaganda - which is all this is... Oh, and although George Bush has been accused of easing federal regulations with regard to it, in fact he is publicly on record favoring federal regulations to keep it's use safe... | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 9:45:03 AM |
While all that may be absolutely true... What she just does NOT understand is that it is also something commonly used each and every day all over the world. In fact, factories and manufacturing facilities around the world would have to SHUT DOWN if they stopped using it, or be forced to spend more money to find an alternative solvent. We simple cannot afford that in this economy... Also just the fact that is often found in baby food, that does not necessarily mean it is dangerous, if it were, I'm sure the FDA would have banned it by now...
You are sure right? I wonder since the FDA is largely funded by who?
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2006/06/21/fda-seeking-more-money-from-drug-industry.aspx
FDA Seeking MORE Money From Drug Industry
The FDA is negotiating with the drug industry over a possible user fee increase which, if it goes through, would give the industry even more in setting the goals and priorities of its supposed regulator.
Industry user fees were first introduced in the early 1990s in an effort to help speed up the FDA's approval process; prior to that, the FDA had been funded entirely by Congress.
But steadily rising payments have led to drug makers funding more than half of the FDA's drug review process, giving them immense clout in determining how the agency is run.
Drug makes renegotiate the fees with the FDA every five years, meaning they can have a great deal of input regarding which programs will receive funding. Regulatory agencies do not normally need to negotiate their budget with the industries they oversee.
The fact is we have to remove the influence that special interests have over our government
Let talk about the original FDA approval of aspartamine was provided by Ronald Regan for his buddy Donald Rumsfeld's company G.D.Searle without any independent studies on safety.
It looks like money can buy ?even the great Ronald Reagan? | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 9:55:55 AM | I knew the minute I used "dihydrogen monoxide" and "George Bush" in the same post, people would immediately seize on it and scream bloody murder...
He has absolutely NOTHING to do with the accidental deaths caused by it every year... It's not his fault if people don't choose use COMMON SENSE when around it, or when handling it... Requiring manufacturing, food production, and other plants to change solvents would be COMPLETLY cost prohibitive, and totally unneccesary...
The added cost would dry up profits for shareholders, in an already HORRIBLE economy, and could even cause many of these plants to go under. Some literally would be unable to FUNCTION without it's use, at least cost effectively anyway... But it's just like a liberal go go off on "the evil rich" without all the facts... Yes, I do believe if the FDA thought the levels of it found in baby food was harmful, they would ban it... And just because it is found in tumors does NOT mean it CAUSED the cancer to begin with... | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 10:05:21 AM | I saw a video the other day of a woman collecting signatures to ban dihydrogen monoxide. She claimed it is linked to thousands of deaths every year, contributes to soil erosion when sprayed on crops, is commonly found in cancerous tumors, has also been found in baby food, can cause severe burns in it's gaseous form, and is also used in animal research facilities during testing. In fact, if accidently inhaled in sufficient quantities it can cause almost immediate death....
While all that may be absolutely true... What she just does NOT understand is that it is also something commonly used each and every day all over the world. In fact, factories and manufacturing facilities around the world would have to SHUT DOWN if they stopped using it, or be forced to spend more money to find an alternative solvent. We simple cannot afford that in this economy... Also just the fact that is often found in baby food, that does not necessarily mean it is dangerous, if it were, I'm sure the FDA would have banned it by now... Yeah, whatever... don't be trying to suck the thread off topic...
back to the topic... the death machine that was the Republican Bush admin.
Between the gardens that bathe in blood that our parks and playgrounds have become due to Bush's death metal and the death and disfigurement of our teens from STD's we also have a steady increase in child abuse during the Bush years.
All of this coming from Bush's following the chanting of the priests of money and religion as he sought his one thousand days in Sodom.
Each one an act of the unspeakable from this scavenger of human sorrow.
For the Republican Bush admin and its supporters, clearly evil has no boundaries. | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 10:10:16 AM | Okay, first off, I'd never heard of this till you brought it up. So I have no opinion one way or the other on the actual chemical.
But holy cow, I'm absolutely certain that nothing said by those seeking it's elimination can possibly match the rhetoric you're using:
Requiring manufacturing, food production, and other plants to change solvents would be COMPLETLY cost prohibitive, and totally unneccesary...
The added cost would dry up profits for shareholders, in an already HORRIBLE economy, and could even cause many of these plants to go under. Some literally would be unable to FUNCTION without it's use, at least cost effectively anyway...
It's a SOLVENT. I'm not a chemical engineer, but I've been in business long enough to know that there are without question already other solvents out there. The "prohibitive costs" you're so worried about would mean generating an whole new P.O. number. Here in Canada, we don't have to sacrifice a virgin to do that. We just enter the new vendor information into the system, hit enter, and "Voila." A P.O. number is magically created. | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 10:15:37 AM |
Yeah, whatever... back to the topic... the death machine that was the Republican Bush admin.
Well deaths caused by dihydrogen monoxide FAR outnumber these playground deaths... and I suppose THAT is George Bush's fault too - right?
While it may be true that dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, tasteless, has no smell, and can be inhaled without you even being aware of it, and it IS true that sufficient quantities of it CAN and WILL kill you - that has NOTHING to do with George Bush - any more than these playground deaths do...
Still - that didn't stop HUNDREDS of idiot liberals at a Worldfest rally from signing a petition to ban it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi3erdgVVTw | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 10:19:08 AM |
The added cost would dry up profits for shareholders, in an already HORRIBLE economy, and could even cause many of these plants to go under. Some literally would be unable to FUNCTION without it's use, at least cost effectively anyway.
Well, STUPID shareholders would not be able to figure out how to invest in an alternative that doesn't kill people. Smart investors would put their money into plants that replaced those that insist on using a product that kills people.
Evil investors don't care about people losing their lives as long as there are profits. | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 10:23:05 AM | Well deaths caused by dihydrogen monoxide FAR outnumber these playground deaths... and I suppose THAT is George Bush's fault too - right?
While it may be true that dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, tasteless, has no smell, and can be inhaled without you even being aware of it, and it IS true that sufficient quantities of it CAN and WILL kill you - that has NOTHING to do with George Bush Like I said... yeah, whatever...
The topic is NOT water... it's GWB and death metal... don't make me report you... | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 10:24:30 AM |
Well, STUPID shareholders would not be able to figure out how to invest in an alternative that doesn't kill people.
Smart investors would put their money into plants that replaced those that insist on using a product that kills people.
Evil investors don't care about people losing their lives as long as there are profits.
But you just don't get it... It really IS safe and effective to use as a solvent if you handle it properly, and do not inhale too much of it at one time. When it is heated, all you have to do to avoid burns is to avoid allowing it to contact your skin...
Now is THAT unreasonable? Why should the shareholders get screwed? Most of the dihydrogen monoxide deaths don't even occur in factories! Furthermore - no one has ever even proved it harms babies in any way even if it IS found in baby food! | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 10:26:22 AM | Yea - dihydrogen monoxide IS water...
My point here is that people signing a petition to ban WATER is about as ridiculous as blaming George Bush for playground deaths... All just a bunch of rhetoric and hyperbole... Which is all this topic is :) | |
|
| Did their evil know no bounds? Posted: 8/8/2009 10:41:30 AM | Congratulations. By making stuff up and posting extremely vituperative comments you managed to take a thread off topic.
Not quite sure why you bothered. But you succeeded. | |
|