Blogs are not major news sources.

Jarrett is a Senior Advisor and Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs for the Obama administration. Prior to that she served as a co-chairperson of the Obama-Biden Transition Project.http://www.squidoo.com/valeriejarrett

I guess now we are now calling CNN not a legitimate news source, especially when they interview the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate's Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett on FOX news. (http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/zontv/2009/10/cnn_campbell_brown_valerie_jar.html )

I guess now we are now calling CNN not a legitimate news source...

Given how Fox destroys MSNBC in the ratings, it appears the people have already made that decision.
More importantly, the most poignant aspect of this segment was once again the look on Brown's face, for it's become clear in the past week or so that most of the mainstream media are realizing just how off-base the Adminstration is with this attack on Fox, and they're all beginning to have a problem hiding their embarrassment.
With each passing day, it's becoming more and more apparent just how hapless this White House is, and the folks in the media who aided and abetted Obama's presidential campaign clearly are getting sickened by the trainwreck that's happening before their very eyes.
If only they would have asked him some tough questions last year rather than being dazzled by his charm and overcome with a desire to help elect our nation's first black president maybe they wouldn't be acting so surprised by the lack of adequate attire adorning this exceedingly less than qualified emperor. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/10/27/obama-adviser-tells-cnn-fox-biased-wont-comment-msnbc

And if the White House wants to leap into this debate, as they have, and talk about bias in the media, then great. But White House officials should elevate the conversation, and talk about bias on the right and on the left. Because when you just target one side, you reveal your own bias. That you are only critical of those who are critical of you.http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/10/fox-news-msnbc-cnn-campbell-brown.html

I am saying that some of his comments were valid as to the interview that CNN anchor person Campbell was doing of Jarrett. I could have just left them out or not.
The main reason for including the site was for the video of the interview.

Seems that more and more the mainstream media is realizing just how stupid the WH's war on FOX is.

Some in the mainstream media feel that this is show just how bias the Obama administration has become.

Seems that since Obama and his WH clowns started the Battle FOX ratings have increased over 13%

The primary point is FOX's efforts to pass off obvious lies and distortion as "news"... passing off non-existent "issues" as actual news... like "death panels", an "issue" which never actually existed as there never were "death panels" under consideration, just FOX's attempt to make it appear as if there were... or the "Obama's birth certificate", another invented "issue" that never really existed, as Obama would have HAD to meet ALL the legal requirements for candidacy just to get his name on the ballot, meaning that he met the LEGAL requirement for proof of eligibility, just another piece of made up "news" that FOX treated as a real news story...

Now... if you want to argue equal bias... perhaps you can show us where the "non-FOX" networks have run around inventing "news" about issues that never really existed outside the world of make believe...

Obama’s war on ‘Fox lies’ may backfire WASHINGTON, Oct 29 — Wild conspiracy theories about the overthrow of the American way of life by the Europeanised liberal left are the staple of conservative talk shows. The Obama administration’s panicky response — a ‘blackout’ of Fox News — is a huge miscalculation, however.
Analysts say it will only give more legitimacy to the talk show ranters and raise awkward questions about the White House’s news management skills and President Barack Obama’s leadership style.
Fox News is the home of Obama critics Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and others.
The White House has watched with rising alarm the increasing shrillness of their commentary, especially since Fox News gets a larger prime time audience than CNN and MSNBC combined.
The White House media managers seemed to have thought a pre-emptive strike was a good idea, especially given Obama’s wilting job approval ratings.
Key Bills need to be pushed through a sharply split Congress; Obama’s party is weakly positioned for the Congressional elections next year; and the Obama White House fears the conservatives might whip up further rounds of frenzy, as they did three months ago over Obama’s health-care reforms.
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/world/41704-obamas-war-on-fox-lies-may-backfire

The coverage of the Rush Limbaughs bid for the St. Louis Rams is a good example of liberal bias.

Seems like the longer Barack Hussein Obama and his WH administration rage their war on FOX news the more the WH seems to be getting more and more criticism.
Every day some other media picks up on this issue and sees how it is negatively affecting how people are viewing Obama's role as president.

How about citing all of these references? Prove that he said them. That's what good journalists are supposed to do.

"When contacted by the Post-Dispatch, Huberman said that he had a source for the quote but declined to reveal it on advice of counsel. The book's publisher, Nation Books, did not return calls to the Post-Dispatch.

the original attributor claims a source...