How many Beck lawyers attemped to shut down a web site they don't like?>>>>>>>>>>

glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com

Why doesn't Beck address the issue?

Although the vast majority of visitors get the joke, a small minority don't. I keep trying to make it clearer and clearer without ruining it for everybody else. Well, this section is now written for you.

First of all, we're not actually accusing anyone of rape and/or murder. We didn't chose the nature of this meme (see the "origin" links to see where it came from on Fark, and the origin of the 'rape and murder' idea from the Roast of Bob Saget, where Gilbert Gottfried performed).

Second of all, we're not trying in any way to spread any rumours that anyone might have raped or murdered. The entire point is that it's so over the top that it should be clear that anyone believing such a stupid rumour is a moron. And anyone thinking we're trying to sully Beck's name in that manner isn't understanding what we're here to do

News - Just the facts

Seems like Beck should address the issue.... Or ignore it....
Not send Lawyers to shut them down....
Free speech?
Shut down sites you don't like.... Bully them with lawyers....

Seems like Beck should address the issue.... Or ignore it....

Not send Lawyers to shut them down....

Free speech?

Shut down sites you don't like.... Bully them with lawyers....

Why doesn't Obama address his Birth Certificate Issue instead of Sending his lawyers out to fight it?

Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II ...

Interesting enough Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II, his WH administration and some of the elected democrats' enemies list seems to grow bigger as Obama's popularity wanes.

There is a difference between libel and free speech.

Primary reason for this is because they are bringing up issues Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II does not really want the American people to know about.

Why doesn't Obama address his Birth Certificate Issue instead of Sending his lawyers out to fight it?

Now back on topic. ---- Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II, his WH administration and some of the elected democrats have declared war on FOX.

Primary reason for this is because they are bringing up issues Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II does not really want the American people to know about. Plus Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II cannot seem tolerate anyone that does not go lockstep with him.

If people would notice FOX News Network is not the only one on the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II, his WH administration and some of the elected democrats' enemies list. As the Obama administration keeps pushing through agendas that people in America are not liking the list appears to be getting longer.

Interesting enough Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II, his WH administration and some of the elected democrats' enemies list seems to grow bigger as Obama's popularity wanes.

Its not really paying for Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Barack Hussein Obama II, his WH administration and some of the elected democrats to create a list like this and ostracize so many people and organizations.

Tony Blankley, who once served as press secretary to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, noted on CNN:
"Going after a news organization, in my experience, is always a loser. They have a big audience. And Fox has an audience of not just conservatives – they've got liberals and moderates who watch too. They've got Obama supporters who are watching. So it's a temptation for a politician, but it needs to be resisted."
Last week, Fox News was informed by the White House that Obama would grant no interviews to the channel until at least 2010. The edict was relayed to Fox News by a White House official after Dunn discussed the channel at a meeting with Gibbs and other Obama advisers.
Even that left-wing journal The Nation ridiculed the Obama press operation for turning Obama into "whiner in chief."http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=113424

...What all these critics fail to address is that the administration's argument is right on the merits. Fox's pretense of being an actual news network is hardly more convincing than, say, Milton Berle in a bra and garters posing as a woman. By refusing to acknowledge Fox's open and avowed partisanship, its MSM defenders are not only flacking for Ailes & Co.; they're diminishing the work of honest journalists who try to play fair. Ask yourself:

§ Would a genuine news network reproduce a Republican press release, replete with typos?

§ Would a genuine news network run, over a five-day period, twenty-two excerpts from healthcare forums in which every single speaker was opposed?

§ Would a genuine news network allow a producer to cheerlead, off camera, anti-Obama protesters?

§ Would a genuine news network take out full-page ads to complain of insufficient coverage of antigovernment protest marches it had promoted?

§ Would a genuine news network run the following headlines, trumpeting each story as a "Fox Nation Victory"?

Senate Removes 'End of Life' Provision

Congress Delays Health Care Rationing Bill

Anti-Tea Party Reporter Dumped by CNN

Obama's Drive for Climate Change Bill Delayed

Obama's 'Green Czar' Resigns

(Note: I have not had to quote the lunatic ravings of Messrs. Beck, Hannity or O'Reilly to make my case.)

Fox is not a news organization; it is a propaganda outlet, and an extremist one at that. Is it any wonder that according to survey after survey, Fox News viewers are among the worst informed Americans when it comes to politics, despite their obsessive interest? A recent study by Democracy Corps finds that this audience believes "Obama is deliberately and ruthlessly advancing a 'secret agenda' to bankrupt our country and dramatically expand government control over all aspects of our daily lives," with the ultimate goal of "the destruction of the United States as it was conceived by our founders and developed over the past 200 years."

There is something to be said for collecting all the crazies in one place. As conservative pundit Reihan Salam argued on behalf of the nuttiness of Glenn Beck, his value lies in the fact that "he's a kind of national therapist for some of America's craziest people, few of whom are willing to go in for professional help." And so it's nice that ABC's John Stossel has migrated to his natural home at Fox and Lou Dobbs is said to be in talks to take his racist rants over there as well.

But the danger increases when the rest of the media allow this particularly swine-ish flu to infect their news operations, and this is the White House's legitimate concern. Why was George Stephanopoulos taking up valuable time in his interview with the President of the United States badgering him about ACORN? ("George, this is not the biggest issue facing the country. It's not something I'm paying a lot of attention to," was Obama's entirely appropriate response.) And why did Stephanopoulos persistently pester the president, in the same interview, about whether a transformational reform of our dysfunctional healthcare system--which is on its way to eating up 20 percent of the entire GDP--could be reduced to the Republican-friendly sound bite "a tax increase"? (Is it surprising that the interview made its way into an RNC attack ad the very next week?) Is the fear of Fox making its way through ABC's corporate bloodstream? Recently David Axelrod appeared on Stephanopoulos's program and schooled him on the stakes involved: "It's really not news--it's pushing a point of view. And...other news organizations like yours ought not to treat them that way."

I suppose we can be grateful that Obama has not been asked lately about his flag pin; but it's a sad day when our big media pooh-bahs need instruction on the values and responsibilities of their own profession by political operatives. No one's asking to censor Fox, but a little shame and scorn ought to go a long way. This, thankfully, is one of the concurrent crises facing the profession that journalists can fix all by themselves, and perhaps restore a bit of their self-respect in the process. http://www.thenation.com/doc/20091109/alterman

So, I agree with TheNation's assessment of ClusterFox--it's not a news source.
AND--Obama was right when he called them out.

"We paid $3 billion for these television stations. We will decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you it is."

Remarks of David Boylin, FOX network station manager, as contained in Akre's and Wilson's court filing

As far as First amendment infringement and censorship, just look at it like playing chess....have to move your pawns into position first.....

There is a great deal of intellectual dishonesty here. For example, Chris Matthews the Democrat version of Mr. Potato Head, worked for the Democrats for several years including a stint with the Democratic Majority Leader Tip O'Neill. He is biased to the far left.

He really is unbiased here!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no9fpKVXxCc&feature=related

He talks like he has a school girl crush on Obama and then says it's an objective assessment.

They can't dispute FOX's admitted claim to a "right to "make sh*t up" and pass it off as news"... They can't defend FOX's firing of personnel for refusing to "make sh*t up"...

FOX's admitted claim to a "right to "make sh*t up" and pass it off as news"...

Matthews and Olberfuhrer were taken off presidential election coverage because of their BLATANT LIBERAL BIAS. Explain that one.

{Raises his hand and waves it wildly}

Ooo! Ooo! Me! I can!

Because the MSNBC producers have integrity and Faux news doesn't.

The left is simply trying to discredit FOX because FOX has uncovered some things that have made the Obama administration look like the Far Left Radical group that it is, and they have been trying so hard to hide their true nature from main stream America...

That is your opinion. The point I am making is that Chris Matthews is ALSO biased. Keith Oberfuhrer is BIASED. I backed up this assertion of Matthews with a video clip.

Where is your source for that?

I can sense your frustration, but this isn't a classroom filled with empty headed, adoring students.

Talk about bias and being a bit weired out....Oh well maybe Chris has gotten a few winks or fanny slaps since then from Obama....

Matthews and Olberfuhrer were taken off presidential election coverage because of their BLATANT LIBERAL BIAS. Explain that one.

Actually until Obama won the primary most of the comentators seems pretty much divided between Hillary and McCain. So there was reporting from the left and right, with O'Reilly eventually giving Obama some kudos after his Obama interview.

Hmm I wonder if it was because Mathews was falling head overs heels in adoration of Obama.

Have to say at least FOX wasnot like that.....