| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/30/2009 4:36:34 PM |
States will be able to Opt Out of the plan BUT they still have to pay the govt the SAME amount as if they were IN the plan. Sooo ... just more (cluster) Faux Noise ... it's not certain that is at all true ...
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_10/020666.php
Political Animal October 28, 2009
WHAT OPT-OUT STATES WOULD 'PAY FOR'.... Greta Van Susteren claimed last night that states that chose not to give their residents the choice of a public option would "still have to pay for it." She didn't specify what "it" referred to.
This seems to be catching on, though, as a key conservative talking point. Rich Lowry asked this week, "Does a state get to opt-out of the taxes too?" Karl Rove asked rhetorically, "What state is going to say -- what governor and legislature of Republican or Democrat majority is gonna say to its citizens of its state, 'You can pay for this sucker for decades and decades to come, but you're not gonna -- we made a decision -- we're not going to get any of our money back?'" Newt Gingrich added, "What if a big state like Texas opts out? Does that mean they don't have to pay taxes on it?"
Before this spreads too far, let's take a moment to note how little sense this makes.
[W]hile Reid has yet to release details of the compromise Senate legislation, every other proposed bill with a public option so far has required the costs of the public plan to be covered by the premiums of those who enroll in it, and the taxes proposed in each of the bills are used to cover the expansion of coverage through Medicaid and subsidies to help certain families purchase insurance, both of which are provided to residents of every state regardless of any public option.
Right. Financing for a public option would come from those paying the premiums -- those premiums would pay for benefits and administrative costs. That's how it's been structured in both chambers, by every public option supporter on the Hill. The idea is for it to be self-funding -- a not-for-profit insurance program financed by those it covers.
It's likely that this argument will continue to work its way through conservative circles, but that doesn't mean it makes sense.
| |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/30/2009 5:22:00 PM | It seems the States Opt Out is nothing more than a cop out.
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/10/26/state-opt-out-proposal-a-ruse-within-a-ruse/
States will have to pay their share of Fed Med even if they opt out. | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/30/2009 6:18:21 PM | .
State ‘Opt-Out’ Proposal: a Ruse within a Ruse ............
This is meaning less Fiction ...........ANOTHER ..........death panel...........
The Public Option is a start up set up with funds from Treasury.
It will be an independent Insurance "Company" stand alone offered on the exchange . There are no TAXES contributed by the state ........... If the state opts out the reserve money would revert to Treasury.... If the state stays in the Reserve is paid back to the Fed over 10 years.........
Opt out and the Low income Members with Gov. Supported premiums would go to a Private Company......
See page 116 of the posted bill.............
. | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 8:52:18 AM |
Sooo ... just more (cluster) Faux Noise ... it's not certain that is at all true ...
Attempt to obfuscate by impuning the source all you want, but the fact remains there is no provision to allow anyone to "opt out" of paying the taxes a 1.055T price tag will bring. | |
|
| |
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 10:01:54 AM | 'impuning'
Do you mean 'impugning'? To attack as false or misleading?
Golly, ClusterFox has never 'reported' anything false or misleading--why then, would one attempt to impugn ClusterFox as a 'news' source?
'Scuse me for a second...
'K, I'm back.
See page 116 of the posted bill... Wonder what that page says... | |
|
| |
| |
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 1:32:43 PM |
Why not do your own search? I did and came up empty. Seems the text is not available from the congressional web site. All I could find was articles guessing what is in the bill. Figured I would read it for myself. But, then may not be worth the effort since it won't have much impact on me one way or the other. | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 3:38:57 PM | The fact that no one can find the bill speaks of the lack of transparency in the entire process.
The pattern is clear, write a bill that is 2,000 pages long (does this remind anyone of the "stimulus bill"?) They rush it through so that Congressmen say they don't have time to read it. Then they vote on bill that hardly anyone has read all in the name of artificial expediency.
At least one of the bill versions is at http://breakitapart.ning.com
You can download it as a PDF file. | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 3:53:09 PM |
he fact that no one can find the bill speaks of the lack of transparency in the entire process. Well, that might not be exactly true.
Seems some of your buddies have not only found it but are reading it and complaining about understanding the "formal, legal language contained in the document."
No matter what a few of the posters in here may want ... it appears that support is strengthening and the mentality of those who don't want it is indeed a sad state. | |
|
| |
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 4:48:39 PM |
I did and came up empty.
GOOGLE house health care bill.............
second entry...........
[PDF] H. R. ll File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat A BILL. To provide affordable, quality health care for all Americans ... Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- ... docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf - Similar -
tuff stuff..............
If you down load it and re format get rid of that cazzzzy page lay out and change the font the Public Option will be around page 75................
 | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 4:56:09 PM | ^^ um... the link you provide is the old house bill that's been out for months. Refer to msg 25 for a link to the latest house bill released last week. The old bill is history.
Edit: My bad... the link in the link in msg 25 now points to the old house bill. Strange. When I made the post it pointed to the new bill pdf, which I downloaded. You'll know the new bill because it's 1990 pages, not 1018. | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 5:06:10 PM |
Seems some of your buddies have not only found it but are reading it and complaining about understanding the "formal, legal language contained in the document."
Yes we do have this annoying habit of actually reading the bills instead of taking politicians words for what it contains.
Did you read the bill?
cricks chirping | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 10/31/2009 5:43:19 PM | .
Yes we do have this annoying habit of actually reading the bills instead of taking politicians words for what it contains.
Did you read the bill?
cricks chirping
Yes.... Do you support the anti gouging section? Or THE DEATH PANEL....
I had accessed the Bill from Huffington.... Many here would never use that link...........
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/MoreInfo.asp?section=52 http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3962/text
The last link allows comment...........
.The name of the bill
"Affordable Health Care for America Act -- H.R. 3962 "
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv | |
|
| |
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 11/3/2009 2:26:46 PM | Is govt health care constitutional???
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=56491
Gibbs was asked by a reporter on Monday: “Have White House lawyers looked at this issue (govt health care constitutionality) ? Has this been examined in any way?” Gibbs responded: “Not that I know of. I don’t think it has gotten to the point where anybody questions the legitimacy of it.”
The reporter followed up: “Well, Orrin Hatch questions the legitimacy of it.” Gibbs quipped, “Well, you should ask him.” The reporter asked, “Do you not feel there is any concern at all about whether it is constitutional for Congress to impose a mandate?” “No,” Gibbs said. | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 11/3/2009 3:16:14 PM | The liberals here on POF are doing nothing but spewing warm and fuzzy liberal talking points. They will NOT read the bill or try to understand the taxes and the lack of care to be provided. They do not give a damn about seniors...hey lets cut $500 billion from their care, but hey, lets give them $250 bucks to help them out. I just heard on the news that the obama will not be getting this bill when he demanded...hhhmmm...another obama deadline come and gone ....no results as usual..but then again...they did have a Halloween party.
Hey..paying for this sham of a bill to help your warm and fuxxies? Simple...tax everything...raise taxes on everyone...have the fed print a few trillion more{ Like a few months ago} and watch our dollar drop like a rock...yea...liberal feel good destruction | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 11/3/2009 3:31:13 PM |
The liberals here on POF are doing nothing but spewing warm and fuzzy liberal talking points. They will NOT read the bill or try to understand the taxes and the lack of care to be provided. They do not give a damn about seniors...hey lets cut $500 billion from their care, but hey, lets give them $250 bucks to help them out. I just heard on the news that the obama will not be getting this bill when he demanded...hhhmmm...another obama deadline come and gone ....no results as usual..but then again...they did have a Halloween party.
The liberals here on POF are doing nothing but spewing warm and fuzzy liberal talking points.
Once again you are starting out with personal attacks on those who don't share your opinions, what do you hope to gain? Do you think those that you attack will suddenly change their minds because you demean them? Do you think it will make those who agree with you agree more?
They will NOT read the bill or try to understand the taxes and the lack of care to be provided. They do not give a damn about seniors...hey lets cut $500 billion from their care, but hey, lets give them $250 bucks to help them out.
I am a senior convince me that the bill will hurt health care, be specific because your generalizations will not convince me.
I just heard on the news that the obama will not be getting this bill when he demanded...hhhmmm...another obama deadline come and gone ....no results as usual...
We have waited for 40 years so another week or month is worth the wait.
but then again.
but then again? | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 11/3/2009 3:42:29 PM | http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=56491
White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs said today that he does not know if White House lawyers have reviewed whether it is constitutional for the federal government to order individuals to buy health insurance and said that the White House is not seriously considering the concerns of people such as Sen. Orrin Hatch (R.-Utah) who believe the mandate is not constitutionally justified.
There we go again. The issue of constitutionality should be considered BEFORE laws are to be voted on. | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 11/3/2009 4:31:31 PM |
White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs said today that he does not know if White House lawyers have reviewed whether it is constitutional for the federal government to order individuals to buy health insurance and said that the White House is not seriously considering the concerns of people such as Sen. Orrin Hatch (R.-Utah) who believe the mandate is not constitutionally justified.
There we go again. The issue of constitutionality should be considered BEFORE laws are to be voted on.
If any part of the health care bill was unconstitutional the republicans would be all over it, it's just another delay tactic. The people will eventually see exactly what the elected republican's represent, big $$$$$$$$$$$$$ | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 11/3/2009 4:58:34 PM | I am so looking forward to the people of Virginia, New Jersey and New York electing REPUBLICANS to run the states! Looks like a clear message is being sent to the obama...we were fooled once...but not again! Looks like the beginning of the end for the liberal control that is choking the nation! Republicans take every office in Virginia..Governor, Lt Governor, Atty Gen...SWEET!
A big message to the obammy and his liberal fools on the health care joke...no bill THIS YEAR...not any year! | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 11/3/2009 5:12:49 PM |
The issue of constitutionality should be considered BEFORE laws are to be voted on. I'm sure it is considered, just as I'm sure constitutionality is sometimes ignored when laws are passed. However, a challenge to the constitutionality of a law can't take place until that law exists.
If any part of the health care bill was unconstitutional the republicans would be all over it. Orrin Hatch is a Republican. | |
|
| Support broad in U.S. for public healthcare option Posted: 11/3/2009 5:31:54 PM |
I am so looking forward to the people of Virginia, New Jersey and New York electing REPUBLICANS to run the states! Looks like a clear message is being sent to the obama...we were fooled once...but not again! Looks like the beginning of the end for the liberal control that is choking the nation! Republicans take every office in Virginia..Governor, Lt Governor, Atty Gen...SWEET!
What republican party? They are booting out their own party members to pull in supposedly independants
A big message to the obammy and his liberal fools on the health care joke...no bill THIS YEAR...not any year!
There you go again attacking those who don't agree with your opinion, I think you will eventually get the message when the health care bill passes, if you have stock in health care it's probbaly a good time to look for another investment | |
|