online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Relationships  > Sex versus love      Mod Threads Home login  
Page 3 of 11 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
 Author Thread: Sex versus love
 ladyc4

Joined: 2/14/2006
Msg: 51
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:07:56 PM
IMO, it's perfectly possible to have sex for the sake of enjoyment- what it takes to enjoy it is different for each individual.

Yes this is absolutely correct. I'm not talking about having sport sex with complete strangers! But I think you can enjoy sex with someone without it having to be the big fairy tale or mushy mushy love.

Then when it turns out to be either a one night stand, or something other than a LTR they feel badly because of the story they built up in their heads about it.

Absofreakinlutely! I'm not a fan or promoter of NSA, but as this poster says, REFRAIN from building up that story in your head until you are sure he intends to be part of it, and I don't think you can KNOW that until you've had sex with him.

If men werent conditioned to label women who have sex because they enjoy it as sluts, both genders might get along a whole lot better.

precisely.
Cindy O
 HappyHeart777

Joined: 8/2/2009
Msg: 52
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:17:15 PM
Msg #7 had my thoughts exactly. A man can have a daughter whom he does not desire any harm to come to them physically or emotionaly but they can hurt woman emotionaly and physically all they want. What ever happened to fathers setting the example for their children. This is a lost art. So to all the premuscuise fathers - when your daughters grow up and get in abusive relationships or even used time and time again look in the mirror. Even if your child does not see it they will not know how to expect a man to treat them if it is not lived in front of them.
 OnlyThis

Joined: 3/31/2009
Msg: 53
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:23:24 PM

Simply not true? Again, your opinion, please present your evidence.

You're joking right buddy?

There is an entire frickn sex industry that caters to satisfying the sexual desires of men. It's no secret (outside these boards) that men want sex. What world are you guys living in?

It's no wonder some of you "guys" on these boards can't find someone... women tend to want to date actual men. I need a beer.
 CloudHidden

Joined: 9/28/2009
Msg: 54
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:27:36 PM
And there’s the evidence that angry Neanderthals with small penises still exist! Give the guy in the wife beater a beer please! Archie Bunker has found a friend!
 chameleonf

Joined: 12/22/2008
Msg: 55
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:36:07 PM

There is an entire frickn sex industry that caters to satisfying the sexual desires of men. It's no secret (outside these boards) that men want sex. What world are you guys living in?

The sex industry of prostitution caters to physical sexual gratification. If you can provide statistics that every man goes to a hooker for non-emotional based sex, you can make your point stick. Your theory of every man being capable of non-emotional sex isn't true - it's only true for some.

If you're referring to the sex industry of porn, that's not having sex with someone, unless, of course, you're referring to those who blow up their rubber dolly and get it on while they watch and call it being intimate with someone.
 packagedealx3

Joined: 2/4/2006
Msg: 56
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:40:44 PM

A man can have a daughter whom he does not desire any harm to come to them physically or emotionaly but they can hurt woman emotionaly and physically all they want. What ever happened to fathers setting the example for their children. This is a lost art. So to all the premuscuise fathers - when your daughters grow up and get in abusive relationships or even used time and time again look in the mirror. Even if your child does not see it they will not know how to expect a man to treat them if it is not lived in front of them.

This is an interesting point.


And there’s the evidence that angry Neanderthals with small penises still exist! Give the guy in the wife beater a beer please! Archie Bunker has found a friend!

I have missed most of this love fest and have no desire to go back and read it but can't we just recognize that just like there are many women who can and do enjoy sex without any extraordinary love-filled relationship, there are men who aren't particularly concerned about the emotional aspects of sex and men who prefer to make sex a part of a loving relationship, and many men have been both of these types of people at different times in their lives.

Just as there are many men who weren't opposed to taking a woman up on her offer while not ever entertaining anything more than a one-night stand because they too believe in the skank theory; if she did him the first time they met, how many others....Like they didn't have partners that were male at the time, of course not considered by the broad brush of society as man-whores for their behavior.

Like any of this is news to anyone?
 OnlyThis

Joined: 3/31/2009
Msg: 57
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:58:33 PM
there’s the evidence that angry Neanderthals with small penises still exist! Give the guy in the wife beater a beer please!

Can't imagine why guys like you are sleeping alone... just boggles the mind.


Your theory of every man being capable of non-emotional sex isn't true

It's your fantasy.. make it whatever you like.
 handsoflove

Joined: 10/26/2009
Msg: 58
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:58:58 PM
If there was a battle between sex and love I think sex would win because sex has an arsenal of wicked weapons like floggers and nipple clamps, whereas love is basically goodness without malice and could only turn the other cheek, which would get spanked. You could try to even the odds, handicap sex by tying one of its hands behind its back, and arming love with something, anything, like an empty champagne bottle or a bunch of roses with thorns. It would probably be over if five minutes. Love would lay there vanquished, while sex victoriously smoked a cigarette.
 Mme. Chaucer

Joined: 9/21/2009
Msg: 59
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:59:37 PM
OnlyThis:


In typical fashion of many pof women, you are making judgments about someone you do not know


You are making a judgment about someone you do not know when you accuse one man of being dishonest when he says he needs "love" to have sex. I bet that guy can speak for himself better than you can speak for him.

Note that I am refraining from bundling you in with all your brethren with "in typical male fashion," or any such generalization.

I am sure that the entire range of people who engage in sex for recreation through those who need absolute commitment and lurrrve contains folks of both genders.

Mme. C.
 Belle Lass

Joined: 8/27/2009
Msg: 60
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:02:36 PM

But I think you can train yourself to be more prepared for the instances of bad sex partners( whatever that means to each individual person),therefore sustaining LESS pain,harm, disappointment, whatever.

A sad way to be. To turn yourself into a frozen "I don't care" type of person who is detached from her own emotions just to survive a sexual encounter.
Think about those prisoner of war people who have distanced themselves from their core so that they can withstand the pain.....and survive.
Is this how women have to look at sex now? Something is very wrong with our mentality if the sexual revolution has brought women to this.


It's fascinating to see how many people keep repeating the same old stuff..."I can't have sex unless I'm in love" ...fine, some people do prefer a connection of some kind....but how can you possibly fall in love with someone WITHOUT the sex?

I cannot have sex with a man unless he and I agree on this point: "that this is a person who I CAN love....that I do have strong feelings for." His sentiments about me, too.
Only by his actions and his being patient and thoughtful can I tell whether he's in for the long run or not. How can you KNOW someone within 3 dates?
That love is something that gradually happens through experiencing each other.
Making love/sex is the expression of those feelings, the caring and sharing.
That is why the term was coined many years ago.
AA....women don't view sex as bad. We love it. On our terms.
Too much of this musical beds, promiscuity, ONS, and FBs have left women feeling like they have to gear up and lock down their emotions and hearts to play the man's game. As per my opening comment on Cindy O's.
 venndiagram

Joined: 10/29/2009
Msg: 61
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:05:50 PM
Just as there are many men who weren't opposed to taking a woman up on her offer while not ever entertaining anything more than a one-night stand because they too believe in the skank theory; if she did him the first time they met, how many others....Like they didn't have partners that were male at the time, of course not considered by the broad brush of society as man-whores for their behavior.

Like any of this is news to anyone?


There's something to be said for having sex on the first date, if the chemistry is there... it certainly eliminates those men whose attitudes I don't want any part of! If he's not interested because I "put out" he certainly isnt someone I would want to spend any time with!
LOL I am not saying I'll have sex with you on the first date!
But if I feel like it I will, and how you react will certainly tell me a lot about you!
 OnlyThis

Joined: 3/31/2009
Msg: 62
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:11:13 PM

you accuse one man of being dishonest when he says he needs "love" to have sex.

Yes I did... I don't buy it. Of course, he isn't selling that crap to me is he?


I bet that guy can speak for himself better than you can speak for him.

Granted.. however, the only place you are ever going to encounter bs statements like that is on a dating website where desperate men are trying to impress women who (by some of the statements given here) will buy into almost anything because that is what you want to believe.
 chameleonf

Joined: 12/22/2008
Msg: 63
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:14:51 PM

Your theory of every man being capable of non-emotional sex isn't true



It's your fantasy.. make it whatever you like.


The fact there is just one man who has responded here that he does not have emotionless sex makes you the one who is fantasizing that every man will have emotionless based sex. If you're one who likes to generalize hugely based on your own lifestyle, there's nothing I can do to dissuade you. I'm just saying your statistics are skewed.

Personally, I can have sex without having to love someone, but just because I can, I also have a broad enough mind to acknowledge there are those who can't.
 kpooks

Joined: 12/23/2008
Msg: 64
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:17:44 PM
Sex is the fizz, love the warm, tender core. I think you need both to have something that lasts.
 Monongahela Sal

Joined: 10/29/2009
Msg: 65
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:31:45 PM
I'm in agreement with your post OP but a few things still puzzle me about this puzzle, one is how to reconcile it that

1) there's only one of the genders notorious for faking love to get sex
and
2) they wouldn't keep doing it, if they didn't find it works
so
3) how is that they simultaneously
a) still can't figure out the other gender is love-based,
yet
b) feel entitled to keep claiming theirs is the superior logic?
 NuDig

Joined: 6/10/2009
Msg: 66
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:32:19 PM
Falling in love and being in a committed relationship is great. It is what we are all after. To suggest that sex is only enjoyable under such circumstances is beyond ludicrous.


If you'd bothered to read my initial response to the OPs topic I'd stated that I hadn't had sex with someone I'm not in-love with. I never said a man can't have sex without love.

There's an almighty chip on your shoulder, ever wondered why you're single?


You are making a judgment about someone you do not know when you accuse one man of being dishonest when he says he needs "love" to have sex. I bet that guy can speak for himself better than you can speak for him.


Sadly the internet is full of bitter arseholes, and he's simply another clown to be avoided. I haven't been dishonest with my comments - I have never had sex with a woman whom I haven't been in-love with. Why would I lie? I have nothing to gain from lying on an internet forum full of strangers/weirdos.
 wanderingsoul1011

Joined: 10/30/2009
Msg: 67
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:36:24 PM
Some people do have sex to express they feelings of love and others have sex to seek sexual relief. But there's a grey area between black and white in sex like almost everything else in life. In my opinion, many people choose to have sex with a stranger without love because of loneliness. Even people seemingly emotionally unable to love someone can still wanna feel connected and loved by others and sex can be the closest thing in which they could feel what they wanna feel. In that sense, even some casual sex can't be called emotionless sex.
 OnlyThis

Joined: 3/31/2009
Msg: 68
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 3:45:49 PM
ever wondered why you're single?

Not really, I am in a relationship with a beautiful woman (yes, we met via pof) and I'm hoping that this might be "the one".

You won't find any threads with me complaining about women not responding to e-mail and not being able to get dates and other such nonsense.... it simply hasn't been a problem for me...


the internet is full of bitter arseholes

and apparently sexless men...
 Splendere

Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 69
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 5:45:14 PM

the day when some guy is banging your daughter for recreational sex.


It may come at the same time she enjoys recreational sex; it happens, not just today, it has always been like this. Not all person’s need to “Be in love” to enjoy sex.

IMO, it is a never married 30s man who presents a dilemma for women as he proclaims love for all who are with him in this manner.

Then again, I too am in love with all whom I make love with……..at that moment. I’ve been known to make such proclamations, “I love…..how you feel------”.

I can do just fine with lust; in fact I fall in lust before I fall in love. So I’m with OnlyThis.

Funny that the most vitriol comes mainly from two whom never felt enough “love” either for or from to form a lasting relationship with a SO yet, have only had sex with love. What is wrong with this picture?


I need a beer.
Have two! Cheers!!
 forumsrfun

Joined: 10/23/2009
Msg: 70
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 5:57:55 PM

I can't have sex with someone I don't love.


NuDig,
Not everyone man is like you....thus the world's oldest profession lives on.
 Goodewitch

Joined: 10/28/2009
Msg: 71
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 6:05:43 PM
To Splendere,
You took my words and quoted them out of context. i asked Only this how HE would feel about this happening to his daughter, which only he can answer, if he chose to, and he chose not to, which is telling.
You are speculating on what his daughter may feel,... no one can know that, therefore your misquote of my words, and your subsequent speculation, are irrelevant.
I have no problems with anyone having sex for whatever reason they wish to. My problem with Only This, was his insistence upon calling two other men on this thread liars, because they didnt agree with his stance on this subject.
I think anyone should be able to have sex with anyone they like, even if they lust after slightly effeminate looking tennis coaches, who seem to need to prove their manliness to make up for their rather feminine facial features, and a proffession which screams ' Lothario of a proffessional kind'
Ahem... yes, it takes allsorts, Im sure you'll agree Splendere..
G.
 Splendere

Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 72
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 7:16:08 PM

your subsequent speculation, are irrelevant.


You’re funny, really you are. Are you so sure of your opinions as to think they are more relevant than mine or others? I think not; especially since yours are so vitriolic. Rather makes what you say insignificant.

For instance, you say:

slightly effeminate looking tennis coaches, who seem to need to prove their manliness to make up for their rather feminine facial features, and a proffession which screams ' Lothario of a proffessional kind'

I’m not sure who you are referring to but if it is “OnlyThis”, I do not think his facial features effeminate. Anyway who are you to judge his looks? I’m certain you would not want your looks scrutinized as there is nothing that attractive about your facial features either. But, now that you’ve opened up this subject - way dated hair, roots aglow - believe me, you don’t want to go there.

Tennis screams Lothario? Good God, you are full of prejudices and gross misconceptions. I recently attended a charity event for which the draw was tennis matches. We had some tennis players and coaches whom have been on the most prestigious tennis circuits that exist. No Lotharios were present; but a lot of generous men happy to donate their time and money to a worthy charity.

I can not help but wonder how you came to the “Lothario” conclusion? Are you a tennis player groupie? I know they exist, I’ve seen them; but for the most part most of the tennis guys are taken and the single ones aren’t trolling for babes at these events.

And not for one second do I believe that you have only had sex with love; noo way.
You would not be this bitter if that were true.

I'm sure you'll agree, gw
 verityone

Joined: 10/23/2008
Msg: 73
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 7:27:30 PM
but for me to totally let go and immerse myself in sex, I have to have feelings for him and he has to have feelings for me.

That's simply because you've had sex and love inextricably linked in your mind, and done so in a premeditated fashion, without even realizing it.
All arousal is processed in the brain.
It's often the same reason so many women have difficulty experiencing orgasm till much later in life, when they begin to deprogram and become more in tune, and less inhibited about their libido, and arousal.

Sex can generate a whole world of emotions in women...especially the bonding type.

And plenty of actions by women seem to indicate cautionary measures surrounding their "emotions". Which is merely suppression and denial, to the extent that they'll run away from the "hurt", when there only existed the potential of "hurt".

The confusion seems to stem from not realizing that it's not so much the "sex" part that is releasing the "emotions", but the feelings of trust, openness, vulnerability that naturally must be present in order to have "sex".
It's a fallacy to conclude that the only way these can be present, is within the confines of a committed relationship. That dovetails into those with fears of abandonment.

My mother or any other influential woman did not counsel me to be this way (social conditioning) as I am of the generation where our mothers didn't talk about sex. It was a subject that was not to be discussed other than "don't get pregnant...and good girls are not promiscuous." Most of us women discovered our sexuality on our own. Just like most men did. Instinctual.
There wasn't the heavy advertising of sex, nor were there anything blatantly sexual in the media except Marilyn Monroe.
One of the most blatant sex manipulation"cards" used on here is the fact "that we women are conditioned from our mothers to be like the way were are sexually and that we were taught to think sex is a tool.." Nope...nope...nope. Hands up, any woman from my generation that had a mother sit down and be very frank about sex. If there was, it is a rarity. Most of the time subject was evaded.

You contradict yourself, and your rationalizations, and the logic does not follow the premise you set forth. Those are the earmarks of a "manipulation".

Your example doesn't disprove that there was lack of exposure, or there wasn't the existence of social conditioning in regards to sexuality, in your youth.

Sex is like drinking beer--its an activity that creates a buzz. You can do it alone, with friends, or with strangers. If you see it as only pleasure, then you never feel like you "gave it up too soon". You get what you expect, right away.


lol...I am glad that you said it. I, as a woman, know that alot of men do feel this way about sex and that is exactly the reason why I don't enter into casual sex/flings.

Because they can take pleasure in something you can't. Therefore you fear it.

Sex is (arguably) one of the most stimulating and pleasurable experience or activity one can have. But fear can totally overwhelm one, and prevent any pleasure being able to be derived from it, and one can actually pathologically create an adverse physiological response in aversion to it.

Two people can get equal, and immense pleasure from swimming. However one of them cannot, and will not get in to the water without first knowing, and being assured of the depth of the water. If the water is known to be beyond a certain depth, the fear of the depth is such that not only is the swimmer incapable of deriving pleasure from "swimming", but can actually go into panic at the mere thought of immersing themselves in the water.
An analogy to the adverse physiological response to sex would be how a vegan (even a former carnivore) could actually go into convulsions and throw up at the mere thought of meat because of the associations made up in their minds.

And I think it's pretty lame that sex is considered a functional/mechanical act, unless there is love. I don't think I believe that for one minute? Maybe it is the person you choose to have sex with, and the chemistry between the two of you...because without love, there still can be passion.

Bingo.

I've heard many men from this forum use that phrase, that they think we are trading sex for a relationship.... They just don't get it that most of us are not trading at all, we are just waiting until we decide if we like them enough to have sex with them, and that usually takes more than a couple of hours of their company..

Bvllshit.
That's why the "coffee date" exists.
You've already learned enough to know whether the person is someone you find appealing enough to have sex with, otherwise, you'd go not further into wanting to investigate or develop a "sexual relationship" with them.

and sex is infinitly better when in love!!!

I doubt anyone on either side of the fence would debate that...

In my experience, some of the absolute best, mind-blowing sex I've ever had was with someone I barely knew, and some of the worst and least satisfying was with someone I loved greatly and was within a long term relationship.

Love is not necessary for great sex - at least for me.

+1

IMO, it's perfectly possible to have sex for the sake of enjoyment- what it takes to enjoy it is different for each individual. I do think that many women are conditioned- by society, not their mothers- that if they have sex without love that makes them some kind of slut. Therefor they cannot allow themselves to just have sex with someone they are attracted to, without attaching some parameters of love around it. Then when it turns out to be either a one night stand, or something other than a LTR they feel badly because of the story they built up in their heads about it. The disconnect between their false expectations and reality causes that feeling of being used. If we can allow ourselves to just acknowledge our sexuality without expecting love, we wouldn't feel badly in those situations, but would rather just enjoy the moment.

Great post.

women don't view sex as bad. We love it. On our terms.

Premeditation and control. That's a serious problem.

Too much of this musical beds, promiscuity, ONS, and FBs have left women feeling like they have to gear up and lock down their emotions and hearts to play the man's game.

That's a sexist remark towards males.
You're projecting your fears.
In everyone of your scenarios, the woman was consenting, and an equal participant.
Not a victim.

To Splendere,
You took my words and quoted them out of context. i asked Only this how HE would feel about this happening to his daughter, which only he can answer, if he chose to, and he chose not to, which is telling.
You are speculating on what his daughter may feel,... no one can know that, therefore your misquote of my words, and your subsequent speculation, are irrelevant.

There are every bit as relevant as if HE responded with her words.
Your claim that she misquoted you, or should not respond because it's not her own daughter, is silly.
Her response was on point, and in her uniquely brilliant style.

Then again, I too am in love with all whom I make love with……..at that moment. I’ve been known to make such proclamations, “I love…..how you feel------”.

I can do just fine with lust; in fact I fall in lust before I fall in love.

It's no wonder why I think you're brilliant....

I can't have sex with someone I don't love.

You simply haven't met the right woman yet, grasshopper.....
 ohwhynot46

Joined: 6/28/2009
Msg: 74
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 7:31:25 PM
[The difference between love and sex? Love is what happens outside the sex. Sex is a medium thru which one shares life with another. Are there other mediums a person uses to share their life with you? Do they take you to events they enjoy, to hang out with families and friends, et cetera? Then they appreciates your company. Do they help you when you need help, just b/c they hates seeing you hurt? Then they could be in love]

I don't completely disagree, at all, as a matter of fact, I like your comparison. To take it a bit further, love doesn't only happen outside of the sex. Sex is an expression of love. It is a medium through which one shares love, and a part of the self which is special. You can certainly do the things you mention, out of love for someone, without having sex.

Sex is important and wonderful but for some people it is not essential, and not part of a relationship which doesn't encompass romantic love. The sex vs. love issue is different for the individual, and so long as you are comfortable with your definition, and upfront about your motivation, should not be subject to criticism. It is deceit that becomes the issue. And that is subjective.
 Goodewitch

Joined: 10/28/2009
Msg: 75
view profile
History
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 7:34:43 PM
Splendere.
Yourself and Only This seem to share the same unfortunate habit of disbelieving anyone who doesnt fit into your personal ways.
My posts are consistant. Nowhere in any of my posts have I judged anyone for whatever type of sexual activity they wish to indulge in.
Only This came into this thread and called 1 man specifically a liar, then implied that all men who said they didnt want sex without love were liars too.
Now, who's being judgemental, dismissive and vitriolic?
I shall ignore your attempt at a rally,, my tennis allusion seemed to hit the mark. Job done.
And again, there you go with unfounded speculation posing as righteous intuition again.
You say you dont belieive I never had sex without love?
If I told you I had 1 LTR of 3 years duration, and yes, it was love, he'd asked me to marry him in the future, I had agreed, and it only ended with his premature death at 38.
One more man since then, I loved him, unfortunately he decided he didnt feel the same way.
Not bad going for a woman of 40. 1 true love, and one that got away.
I have nothing to be bitter about, however, ust because you or Only this cant imagine people like me exist, theres no need to imply that I or any other poster on here is lying about their preferences.
G. x
Page 3 of 11 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
 
Show ALL Forums  > Relationships  > Sex versus love