|
|
|
|
|
| | Rick SantorumPage 5 of 7 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) | ^
On the Yahoo home page there was something about Sara Palin ready to "jump" into the race, if "pressed to do so"! I wonder what would be the pressing issue! | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/7/2012 9:23:49 AM | | ^^^^^ Great! We won't have to wait for the Republican Convention to see the bigger and better circus. We would get the greatest circus right now, and with a bigger buffoon. I wonder if she would be dragging the rest of her family into the rings. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/7/2012 5:27:07 PM | I'm on the fence on who is the bigger nut, Palin or Santorum.
I was just wondering if it was possible for the Republican Party to become any more of an embarrassment and then Sarah Palin says she might jump into the race and answers my question. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/10/2012 2:14:49 AM | Credit where credit is due. I enjoyed the video of this song by two Oklahoma sisters written in support of Ricky-boy.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/click/2012/03/song-about-rick-santorum-goes-viral-116979.html
Out with Obama Girl, in with the Santorum Girls?
A catchy song praising Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum sung by two young women from Oklahoma is making the rounds online. Sisters Haley and Camille Harris of the First Love Band are big fans of Santorum and wrote “Game On” after attending a rally for the candidate earlier this week.
A few of their lyrics:
Oh, there is Hope for our Nation again
Maybe the First time Since we Had Ronald Reagan
There will be Justice for the Unborn
Factories back on our Shores
Where the Constitution rules our land
Yes, I Believe... Rick Santorum is our Man!
The music video for “Game On” – which features the girls smiling, swaying and holding Santorum signs – was uploaded three days ago and has nearly 400,000 views on YouTube.
But not everyone on the Internet appreciates it: The song has racked up 9,848 "dislikes" from users and only 2,348 "likes."
Still, the girls have Santorum’s stamp of approval. “Wow!” the former senator tweeted. “I love this #GameOn song and video.”
I love the girls' harmony singing. If Santorum was smart he'd purchase the song and video for his campaign and broadcast it just as it is. It's a refreshing presentation that stands apart from all the negative superPAC garbage messages that we're all so sick of.
Too bad their candidate's such a medieval bonehead. If only Christian inspiration could continue producing great artistic talent and stop trying to run our secular government, eh?  | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/10/2012 6:53:51 AM |
A catchy song praising Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum sung by two young women from Oklahoma is making the rounds online. Sisters Haley and Camille Harris of the First Love Band are big fans of Santorum and wrote “Game On” after attending a rally for the candidate earlier this week
So lets see if this passes the mustard. (In Santormuns case I guess that would be brown frothy mustard)
Reagan-love - ✔
Bullshiat about domestic production - ✔
Pro-lifer crap - ✔
Lower taxes - ✔
I hereby certify this to be typical brainwashed Republican rhetoric. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/11/2012 3:07:35 AM | Oh, don't get me wrong - I agree with your analysis ^^^. It's the stuff that spews forth from an ideological medieval bonehead, as I said. But, as put by these singers, it has a beat and you can dance to it! 
If Ricky-boy was smart he'd harness that chit. Rick Perry or Herman Cain would jump right on that and pass the collection plate, too. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/11/2012 9:21:51 AM | ^^^ Looks liek the whole damn GOP is trying to drag us backwards.
To wit:
Mississippi Republicans Seek To Ban Liberal History In Social Studies Courses
Conservatives have made strong efforts in the past few years to rewrite textbooks and brainwash school kids with their own twisted version of history. Mississippi Republicans are the latest to attack education, and they plan to pass a bill in the legislature that would practically ban liberalism in class rooms and in textbooks.
According to the Mississippi Clarion Ledger,House Bill 1384 prohibits educators from teaching what Republicans call “any partisan agenda or philosophy,” but to hear some of them talk about the bill, what it really sounds like is that conservatives want to force instructors to teach history the way they see it.
House Education Committee Chairman John Moore (R) says Republicans are “trying to protect the history of our nation in its purest form,” which would normally sound like an innocent statement until you factor in that Republicans across the country have tried to rewrite textbooks to reflect their own unsupported claims about what the “purest form” of American history is.
According to conservative pseudo-historians, America was founded as a Christian state; slavery had nothing to do with the Civil War but was a good thing; the Civil Rights Movement was a communist movement; states have the right to secede; and the Founding Fathers were all Christians and conservatives. Oh, and they claim liberalism is inherently evil. I knew I missed one. So maybe this is still hard to believe. Well, another GOP lawmaker had this to say.
“Rep. Becky Currie, R-Brookhaven, a committee member, said she was aware of problems at her daughter’s school. Currie said a teacher took liberal viewpoints when discussing current events assignments, leading her to demand a conference with school authorities. “No matter which side of the coin you’re on, her teacher ended up going toward the liberal end,” Currie told the committee. “I was surprised she made it out of there, still believing the way she was taught at my house.”"
Translation: ‘The teacher didn’t teach the class the way I teach my kid.’ It sounds to me that what Republicans really have a problem with is that liberalism is touched upon at school at all. If the teacher had slanted towards a conservative agenda, we wouldn’t even be hearing about this bill. The problem is, this is the word of one parent who also happens to have a political bias. Who is to say that her daughter didn’t just report that her teacher was presenting the Civil Rights Movement or women’s rights or the New Deal, all of which are historical events steeped in the liberal movement of the early 20th Century. Maybe the teacher stated accurately that Franklin Roosevelt is one of America’s greatest Presidents. Who is to say the daughter isn’t just targeting her teacher in an attempt to get him fired? Perhaps Currie is just mad that the teacher didn’t present the events in a negative way like conservatives do.
While conservatives are throwing a hissy fit over the suspicious claims of one biased colleague, the Democrats have a different take on the bill. Democratic Rep. Rufus Straughter says he opposes the bill. “This is a bad bill. It’s unnecessary. Who determines what conservative is, what liberal is?” And Robert Townsend, deputy director of the American Historical Association, doubts the validity of the claims, saying that most history teachers have a hard enough time teaching the amount of material that the state curriculum requires without trying to find the time to inject personal views.
The fact is, this bill is about banning liberal history from being taught. If Republicans have their way, slavery, women’s rights, the Civil Rights Movement, the New Deal, and pretty much all of early 20th Century American history would be ignored or slanted to a conservative viewpoint. In other words, they will be presented in a hateful light. And here’s another point. Let’s say this bill is what the Republicans claim it is. How the hell does a history teacher address the conservative movement of the 1980′s in a non-partisan manner? I guarantee that if the teacher doesn’t glorify that decade, Currie will find out and then whine about it to her colleagues. Then what? Do we then get a law that says ‘teach in a non-partisan way unless you’re discussing Ronald Reagan and all the “good” things conservativism did?
This bill is just plain wrong. It handcuffs teachers and, quite frankly, will cause young people who want to teach the subject to change their mind about teaching. It’s hard enough to teach history as it is, but the way conservatives want to define ‘partisan agenda’ will make it much harder for teachers to do their job because the liberal movement is a part of history. It’s already slanted to the liberal philosophy. The way conservatives think today, even saying that JFK or FDR were two of our greatest leaders could be called partisan. Heck, just using any facts at all is considered partisan. How can history teachers do their jobs if they have to worry about every little thing they say about the subject? If the child of a mindless conservative complains because the teacher talked about Martin Luther King in a positive way, will that lead to the firing of the teacher? This just seems to be a Pandora’s box that Republicans want to open. What Republicans in Mississippi really want to do is water down American history so that what is left is their twisted version of it. It would be as if liberalism never existed.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/03/11/mississippi-republicans-seek-to-ban-liberal-history-in-social-studies-courses/ | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/11/2012 9:34:05 AM |
^
On the Yahoo home page there was something about Sara Palin ready to "jump" into the race, if "pressed to do so"! I wonder what would be the pressing issue!
Her either running out of money, or out of attention.
She's a joke. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/11/2012 9:36:27 AM |
Conservatives have made strong efforts in the past few years to rewrite textbooks
Nothing new there:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/17/AR2010031700560.html
Much of what the Republicans do seem to be right out of some twisted Orwellian guidebook.
Every time I watch Fox News or listen to one of Rich Santorum's speeches, I'm reminded of Orwell's Two Minutes Hate. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/18/2012 6:38:38 AM | Now Frothy wants to declare war on PORN?
Thats gonna lose him fans in the Bible belt.
Seriously, is there anything about this guy that ISN'T obsessed with sex? He's got some seriously deep seated homosexual repression issues. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/18/2012 1:08:33 PM | | If you lived in one state and voted in the primaries and moved to a diff state a couple months later that still hasn't voted in the primaries yet can you vote in that state as well or can you only vote one time per election cycle? | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/18/2012 3:33:05 PM |
If you lived in one state and voted in the primaries and moved to a diff state a couple months later that still hasn't voted in the primaries yet can you vote in that state as well or can you only vote one time per election cycle?
You know, I'd like to know about that as well.
In Florida we were voting so early that it's fully possible (I think) to move to another state that has not yet had it's primary. All that was necessary was that you were registered in the appropriate time frame for Ohio in order to vote.
Years ago, I thought I remembered that when I registered to vote, I had to declare my party. This time when I went in to vote the primary, I got to declare right there at the voting table what party I wanted to vote.
Of course, no matter what I'm registered as, I can still vote whatever I want in November, but here in Ohio, one is limited to either Democrat or Republican candidates. I have no idea if Independents are voting for presidential candidates or not ... maybe they have a chance to write someone in? | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/18/2012 4:03:14 PM | Each states' party makes the rules for their state, so you'd have to find out what the local GOP or Dems put into place. From what I've read, the national party can't directly control any of the state groups, they can only try to punish them after the fact.
I'm thinking there, of the fuss at the end of last year, as several states (including Florida, I think) wanted to move their own primaries up ahead of the rest of the states, so as to have more influence over who the final nominee would be. The national party couldn't stop any of them from doing so, they could only punish them (as they did) by restricting how many delegates they could send to the convention.
Since states don't share their voting records with each other, I would bet that one person could move state to state voting over and over, though I know that many states have residency rules such that they couldn't vote unless they signed up to do so a certain amount of time in advance.
So, all in all, I'd wager that though someone might be able to vote in perhaps as many as a half a dozen states during one primary, that it would be so expensive to move around like that and comply with each states requirements, that only very rich poop heads could pull it off. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/20/2012 12:06:14 PM | Just an interesting article I just read about the lack of catholic support for Santorum:
March 19, 2012
Many Kinds of Catholic
By FRANK BRUNI
If Catholicism is measured by obeisance to the pope, his cardinals and the letter of Vatican law, then Rick Santorum is the best Catholic to ever get this far in presidential politics.
He doesn’t just oppose abortion as a private matter of personal conscience. He has made that position a defining crusade.
He hasn’t just been fruitful and multiplied. He has promulgated the church’s formal prohibition against artificial birth control, yanking this issue, too, into the public square.
On homosexuality, premarital sex, pornography and more, he doesn’t just take his cues from church dictums. He trumpets that alignment as a testament to the steadfastness of his devotion, the integrity of his faith.
And for this he has been rewarded with a truly noteworthy level of Catholic support.
Noteworthy because it’s so underwhelming.
Exit polling suggests that he lost the Catholic vote to Mitt Romney, a Mormon, by 7 percentage points in Michigan and by 13 in Ohio. These weren’t isolated cases. In primary after primary, more Catholics have gravitated to Romney than to Santorum (or, for that matter, to Newt Gingrich, a Catholic-come-lately who collaborated with his third wife to make a worshipful documentary about Pope John Paul II).
This is a hurdle that Santorum must overcome to win the primary in Illinois, whose population is about 30 percent Catholic. And it’s yet more proof of most American Catholics’ estrangement from an out-of-touch, self-consumed church hierarchy and its musty orthodoxies.
For months now the adjective Catholic has been affixed to the country’s strange contraception debate, which began when many Catholic leaders took offense at a federal mandate that Catholic institutions provide insurance coverage for artificial birth control.
But most American Catholics don’t share their appointed leaders’ qualms with the pill, condoms and such. These leaders have found traction largely among people — Catholic and otherwise — concerned about government overreach. And the whole discussion has opened the door to plaints about morality from evangelicals, who warm to Santorum more than Catholics do.
American Catholics have been merrily ignoring the church’s official position on contraception for many years, often with the blessing of lower-level clerics. When my mother dutifully mentioned her I.U.D. during confession back in the 1970s, the parish priest told her that she really needn’t apologize or bring it up again. Which was a good thing, since she had no intention of doing away with it. Four kids were joy and aggravation enough.
Despite church condemnation of abortion and same-sex marriage, American Catholics’ views on both don’t diverge that much from those of Americans in general. These Catholics look to the church not for exacting rules, but for a locus for their spirituality, with rituals and an iconography that feel familiar and thus comfortable. In matters religious, as in “The Wizard of Oz,” there’s no place like home, and Catholicism is as much ethnicity as dogma: something in the blood, and something in the bones.
The Catholic hierarchy, meanwhile, keeps giving American Catholics fresh reasons for rebellion. As The Times’s Laurie Goodstein reported last week, lawyers for the church in Missouri have begun a campaign of intimidation against a support group for victims of sexually abusive priests: they’re trying to compel the group to release decades of internal documents.
This may be cunning legal strategy, but it’s lousy public relations and worse pastoral care. Which isn’t any surprise.
I’ve been monitoring and occasionally writing about the church’s child sex-abuse crisis since 1992, and most of church leaders’ apologies and instances of constructive outreach have come about reluctantly, belatedly or with a palpable sense from many bishops and cardinals that they were the aggrieved, victimized ones.
As they complained about excessive media attention, they frequently lost sight of its heinous root: a great many priests molested a great many children, who were especially vulnerable to them — and especially damaged by them — because they called themselves men of God. And for a great many years, church leaders actively concealed these crimes, which continued.
For the church ever to grouse that critics make too much of this, let alone to retaliate against victims and accusers, is galling. But it helps explain the breach between the hierarchy — invested in its own survival, resistant to serious discussions about the celibate culture’s role in child sexual abuse — and everyday Catholics. They’re left to wonder where they fit into their church and how it fits into the modern world.
They don’t really constitute a voting bloc, because their political allegiances reflect income and education as much as creed. That’s a big part of their resistance to Santorum.
But it’s also true that his particular Catholicism isn’t theirs. It’s the hierarchy’s. And his poor performance among Catholics should cause cardinals, bishops and the candidate himself to rethink the way they approach their religion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/20/opinion/bruni-many-kinds-of-catholic.html?_r=1&em=&exprod=myyahoo&pagewanted=print | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/20/2012 6:57:05 PM | Rachel Maddow had an interesting point this evening ...
Voters in Illinois do not simply pick who they want to nominate.
Instead, they directly elect delegates, and each primary ballot will contain a list ... and in at least 4 of 18 Illinois congressional districts, Santorum did not qualify. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/21/2012 1:44:53 AM | Santorum has no logical path to 1144. Even if Romney lost lets say California and NJ to Santorum which would be highly unlikely, Romney would still have 1160 delegets. So Romney doesn't even need California and NJ and he can still win the nomination. Santorum basicly has to win out now and that isn't going to happen. That means he would basicly have to win all the remainder states in the northeast, all the remainder states in the midwest and all the remainder states in the west to get to 1144. Basiclly he needs 3 Hail Mary's and two onside kicks because he is behind by 3 touchdowns with a minute left in the game and anyone that knows anything about football knows that's pretty much impossible to do with that amount of time left in the game. So his odds are greatly stacked against him to the point where they aren't even logical for him to win the amounted needed by state delegates anymore.
The only shot he has is to block Romney from getting 1144 so that it goes to the convention in Aug, but he needs to win New York, NJ, California, and at least 3/4 of the other states left which BTW heavily favors Romney and those states like Utah, Montana, Oregon, New Mexico, South Dakota. lol Good luck.
As for Newt he is just staying in for the same reasons Paul is and that's for PR purposes.
And i wish Newt and Santorum would stop complaining about Romney out spending them soo much. I mean seriously if they got the amount of money he did from super pacs and donations would they go.... no we don't want all of this money to help us win take it back.. LOL I mean give me a break if they had the amount of money and org Romney has they wouldn't be complaining one bit, instead they would embrace it. They are just jealous that's what it boils down to.
Newt needs to get over this deep dislike over Romney because of Iowa. It's called politics. so quit whinning, because Romney hammered you on negative attack ads and you didn't have the money or the org to fire back. Like the old saying goes "If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen."
It's time for those 3 to step down and do the respectful and noble thing and give Romney the nomination now, but they won't, because one thinks he can still win it in which he logically can't now and the other two are enjoying the PR too much to get out of it. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/21/2012 4:06:26 AM |
Basiclly he needs 3 Hail Mary's and two onside kicks because he is behind by 3 touchdowns with a minute left in the game and anyone that knows anything about football knows that's pretty much impossible to do with that amount of time left in the game.
Well, now that Denver is cutting Tebow loose, maybe Santorum could give it a try enlisting Tebow. That guy not only can score in a hurry, but he also prays at the drop of a hat. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/21/2012 2:27:07 PM | I'm surprised Santorum hasn't enlisted this spooky priest to make appearances with him, or hasn't at least made some comments to back up his case. (If you only use the link to see the article's creepy-looking photo of this priest it will be worth it. Yikes! Spanish Inquisition ghost incarnate!)
Denying Communion: A priest and a lesbian set off a Catholic culture clash
By Michael S. Rosenwald and Michelle Boorstein, Published: March 17
The moment was fleeting.
Barbara Johnson reached out to receive Holy Communion at her mother’s funeral Mass last month at St. John Neumann Catholic Church in Gaithersburg. The Rev. Marcel Guarnizo, standing before her, placed his hand over the offering bowl, denying her the sacrament.
Those mere seconds between Johnson, no ordinary Catholic, and Guarnizo, no ordinary priest, have touched off a heated controversy among Catholics across the country — another battle in the seemingly endless cultural wars that have invadednearly every corner of daily life, even funerals.
Conservatives have accused Johnson, an openly gay woman, of promoting a liberal political agenda at her mother’s funeral, of all places. The Archdiocese of Washington has accused Guarnizo, a Russian-ordained traditionalist with powerful friends, of intimidating parish staff after the incident and suspended him from his priestly duties. He, in turn, has essentially accused church officials of lying.
[...]
If Father Spooky doesn't resolve his issues with the Washington Archdiocese maybe he'll defrock and join Santorum's campaign. He'd fit right in.   | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/22/2012 7:57:22 PM | Oops - forgot to post the link ^^^^^ for anybody who's interested:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/denying-communion-a-priest-and-a-lesbian-set-off-a-catholic-culture-clash/2012/03/15/gIQA9roNJS_story.html | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/23/2012 2:30:46 PM | In the footage, filmed at the Greenwell Springs Baptist Church in Louisiana yesterday, Pastor Dennis Terry told a crowd that anyone who doesn’t worship God should leave the country, before calling on people to "stand up" against" gay people, liberals and women who have abortions.
“Listen to me. If you don’t love America, and you don’t like the way we do things, I’ve got one thing to say, get out!,” he said. “We don’t worship Buddha, we don’t worship Mohammed, we don’t worship Allah. We worship God. We worship God’s son Jesus Christ.”
To a rapturous applause, Pastor Terry continued: “As long as they continue to kill little babies in our mother’s womb, somebody’s got to take a stand and say it’s not right. God be merciful to us as a nation. As long as sexual perversion is becoming normalised, somebody needs to stand up and say God forgive us, God have mercy upon us.”
Republican contender Mr Santorum was shown clapping approvingly in the background as the rightwing pastor delivered the ranting fire and brimstone address. He later received a personal blessing from the preacher who called on God's will to be done in the upcoming election
And this one of the people the GOP has a one of it's front-runners? Horrible! | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/23/2012 6:19:08 PM |
And this one of the people the GOP has a one of it's front-runners? Horrible!
If the information contained in your post in true...it IS absolutely horrible!
And scary... | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/23/2012 8:15:40 PM |
If the information contained in your post in true...it IS absolutely horrible!
It's easy to find the film footage online. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/23/2012 9:04:26 PM | Msg. #125 : "This is clearly nothing more than a staged event, common nowadays, ones in which actors play certain parts in a scene, a scene that is orchestrated to achieve the social engineering desired by the elite. "
Why would you state that these people are "actors"? Here is some of the family background, as quoted in your own post:
The seeds of the collision date back to 2007, when Johnson’s parents joined St. John Neumann because it was near their new home in upper Montgomery County. Though the family showed up at Sunday Mass sparingly — mostly because of the parents’ advancing ages — they were devout Catholics, with priests visiting their homes and counted among their closest friends. When Barbara Johnson’s father, Theodore “Dick” Johnson, died in 2008, the funeral was held at St. John Neumann. She and her longtime partner attended together, and Johnson took Communion without incident.
The family clearly loves their Catholic faith. The article is four pages, more than what was posted in msg. #125. There is much more background on the priest's political activism and global connections as well as on Ms. Johnson's family and background. Here are a few more tidbits:
[...]
Finding a fit at church
While Guarnizo was hopscotching around Europe, giving speeches, Johnson was back home in Washington, wrestling with her own Catholicism, which had waxed and waned through her life as she confronted truths about her own sexuality. In the past decade, Johnson had returned to her alma mater, Elizabeth Seton High School in Bladensburg, to teach art, a move she said was part of a process of coming back to Catholicism on her own terms.
But it was also an unsettling time. Her parents were aging and were connected to an unfamiliar church, one they were too infirm to even visit. Johnson and her three siblings, spread around the region, didn’t know the parish, its culture or its members. Nor did they know its pastor, the Rev. Thomas LaHood, who last month compared gay marriage to slavery in a church bulletin.
LaHood has declined to answer questions about St. John Neumann or about Guarnizo’s work there. Archdiocese officials also have refused to explain how a priest so in demand on the world stage wound up in Gaithersburg.
[...]
In speeches to dozens of protesters, the priest [Guarnizo] has referred to LeRoy Carhart, a physician, as “the butcher of Germantown,” equating abortion with the actions of Nazi war criminals. Carhart, in an interview, said he and his staff were afraid of Guarnizo.
“He is the most likely person to push the boundaries in terms of trespassing and harassing women,” Carhart said. “If there is personal space between you and him, he’s invading it. It gives you an intimidating feeling.”
[...]
The vitriol the incident has unleashed online has unnerved Johnson and her family.
She has found some comfort at the grave site of her parents. She has visited them three times in recent weeks. She brings her father a carton of his favorite chocolate milk. She brings her mother yellow flowers, a gift her husband sometimes surprised her with when they were alive.
They are buried side by side in a Montgomery County Catholic cemetery, where they share a single marker that features a rosary at its center. Beside Loetta R. Johnson’s name is a bas-relief figure of the Virgin Mary. Beside Theodore E. Johnson’s name is a bas-relief figure of Jude the Apostle, the patron saint of impossible causes.
Hardly is this a "staged" incident.  Just an example of how real people lives are screwed up by sanctimonious religious zealots.
----------------------
A couple days ago I saw the above-mentioned article/video of Pastor Dennis Terry introducing Santorum, too (msg. 126). Creeeeeeepy fire-and-brimstone indeed! And today/Friday, of course, I saw/heard the video of the Louisiana woman at the gun firing range suggesting that Santorum should "pretend it's Obama" that he was shooting at. No, not "elites" I guess, those who back Santorum and buy his narrow religious garbage; just nasty ignorant racist people, intolerant types and such. The woman's remark is all the more appalling in light of the Trayvon Martin shooting incident all over the news of late. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/24/2012 9:39:14 AM | | Oh it be true. Watch the video. | |
|
| Rick Santorum
Posted: 3/25/2012 6:17:16 PM |
I might add) that in order to be "progressive" one must both hold vague and changing religions, and gay lifestyles. Either wise, were both part of this evil Christianity, and non-progressive.
[/quote}
OMG...what will I do...I'm both Catholic and progressive....yet, I often think my God is acceptive and forgiving of all God's creatures...not just the one's "some" think should be loved, accepted, or forgiven.
Anyway, Santorum is an evangelical bigot...and not to bright either. | |
|
|
|
|
Page
5
of
7 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
|
|
Home
login 
