For example, a bird is an animal, same like a dog and a cat, yet is not a mammal

There is no CONSTITUTIONAL protection from discrimination in employment based on sex.

Then there is the overwhelming majority type 3 women. These women force men to help them with what they aren't physically able to do and then offer no help in return.

men don't help them it can even cost a man his job. This has happened to me.

Well you ladies have brought up that we haven't had a draft in a very long time. Well our volunteer military is an extreme majority men. Why aren't the women volunteering?

In other words, the typical white woman has no voice until she becomes a "feminist," at which point she becomes the enemy of the dominant white male population.

So I went back to ask for help. Attorney general laughed in my face and told me I was a man.

We can never be equals until we treat EVERYONE equally.

I got them to get my modified orders. They said great you can show these to the judge when we let you see him. My mom came thank god. I saw the judge two days latter. I was released and the reason given for the whole ordeal was the attorney general is 9 months backlogged.

I'm going to mention an issue related to this topic directly. Feminism itself is a movement that is part of the atomization
(balkanization) of the population, to break down the dominant culture itself.
PC, or cultural marxism works to dismantle the dominant culture via splintering.
In other words, the typical white woman has no voice until she becomes a "feminist," at which point she becomes the enemy of the dominant white male population. Every group has done this with the blessing of the elites who are doing the social engineering. Blacks, browns, homosexuals, feminists, etc., are all permitted and encouraged to join forces against the dominant culture. Most women have no idea that as "feminists" they are being used by the elites who are using a divide and conquer strategy to gain and keep control.
Anybody can reference what I'm saying here. These are the same techniques that the Bolsheviks used to gain control of Russia. These techniques have been time tested and are extremely effective.
The Frankfurt School promoted these top down ideologies as a means to deconstruct entire cultures.

I am eternally grateful for the abolitionist movement. Slavery in the US has been abolished for quite some time now and I am happy about that..Therefore, I am not an aboltionist. Will there ever be a time when prejudice and unfairness are eliminated? I very much doubt it.=Nevertheless I soldier on, trying to do the best I can for me and mine-

This is why feminism is a mental illness for a heterosexual woman. It's self-destructive. You espouse it, hold it close to your breast and it will be the only thing you are left with. No husband, no kids, no grandkids, no family life, no part of the circle of life, just your illustrious or otherwise career which will end, some "great friends", your glass(es) of wine, your computer, a few cats and the awful dawning realisation that it was all a ruse to get your tax dollars as a wage slave.

Such stories are not unusual, and are a direct result of "womens' rights."

the mothers decided the children were better off with me. So I went back to ask for help. Attorney general laughed in my face and told me I was a man.

Feminism is anti-men, anti-women, anti-family and anti-life. Just sayin'...

A time-limit imposed by Congress for ratifying the amendment has since expired. But Sen. Patsy Ticer (D-Alexandria), the bill's sponsor, explained to colleagues that an attorney general's ruling in the 1990s indicated that the amendment can still be ratified by states because such a clause can be disregarded by Congress if it was not a part of the original proposed constitutional amendment.

The proposed Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution finally passed the House of Representatives and Senate in the early 1970s, five decades after it was first proposed by Alice Paul. In March 1972, Congress sent the ERA to the states for ratification, with a March 1979 deadline. Eventually, the ERA deadline of seven years was extended, but the ERA still fell three states short of ratification … The fight for ratification by the new 1982 deadline continued. However, no more states ratified. On June 30, 1982, the total remained at 35. In October 1982, the Supreme Court ruled that the Idaho v. Freeman case was moot because the required total of 38 states had not been met, with or without the rescissions and deadline extension.

Sec. 3a. EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW. Equality under the law shall not be denied or abridged because of sex, race, color, creed, or national origin. This amendment is self-operative. (Added Nov. 7, 1972.)

The ERA was passed out of Congress in 1972 and has been ratified by 35 of the necessary 38 states. When three more states vote yes, it is possible that the ERA could become the 28th Amendment. The ERA could also be ratified by restarting the traditional process of passage by a two-thirds majority in the Senate and the House of Representatives, followed by ratification by legislatures in three-quarters (38) of the 50 states.

True anti-feminist and proud of it... misogyny is hatred of women, denouncing other women for doing things women have always done is typical feminist behaviour. they are, in actual fact, the true misogynists...
I love women (not sexually) an woman hood and therefore have never made the mistake of trying to compete as, or be a man. A woman trying to be just the same as a man will always lose something... Her very self...
But carry on, I know you will...

True anti-feminist and proud of it... misogyny is hatred of women, denouncing other women for doing things women have always done is typical feminist behaviour. they are, in actual fact, the true misogynists...

A woman trying to be just the same as a man will always lose something... Her very self...

So.. 28 pages and yet still NO CLUE what feminism is. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad.

And you're not denouncing other women..? Ok then.

I am fine with competing with them, but I don't want to BE them.

True anti-feminist and proud of it... misogyny is hatred of women, denouncing other women for doing things women have always done is typical feminist behaviour. they are, in actual fact, the true misogynists...

I'm going to mention an issue related to this topic directly. Feminism itself is a movement that is part of the atomization
(balkanization) of the population, to break down the dominant culture itself.
PC, or cultural marxism works to dismantle the dominant culture via splintering.
In other words, the typical white woman has no voice until she becomes a "feminist," at which point she becomes the enemy of the dominant white male population. Every group has done this with the blessing of the elites who are doing the social engineering. Blacks, browns, homosexuals, feminists, etc., are all permitted and encouraged to join forces against the dominant culture. Most women have no idea that as "feminists" they are being used by the elites who are using a divide and conquer strategy to gain and keep control.
Anybody can reference what I'm saying here. These are the same techniques that the Bolsheviks used to gain control of Russia. These techniques have been time tested and are extremely effective.
The Frankfurt School promoted these top down ideologies as a means to deconstruct entire cultures.

Meaning no disrespect, but I spent many years working in manufacturing and assembly environments and I did NOT see any "majority" of women forcing men to help them without reciprocating.

Ahhh-that explains a lot! Not meaning for one minute to discount your experience!-but I can recall a situation where my mother, my aunt and other female union members had to involve the union in protecting them(women employees) from being held to a HIGHER standard than men employees. And this was back in the 1960s.

According to some of the information and links that have been posted in this topic, it would seem that women CAN be put into harms way but there is a technicality that can prevent them from receiving the pay,recognition and promotion opportunities that go with being placed in harms' way.
One of the reasons men used to use, to keep women in 2nd-class citizen status was the argument that women were less intelligent. Isn't it DELICIOUSLY ironic that now some men are complaining, because women's supposedly lss agile intellect is keeping her from rushing to sign up for a deal where she will take the same risks for less pay, recognition and advancement opportunities?

why didn't you contact the ACLU and do something about this??

Good gawd amighty,man! Why did you not contact a fathers' rights organization/attorney group and SUE THEIR SORRY ASSES for false arrest and imprisonment???

Women in the western world are no longer enslaved in the manner in which they were, just as blacks are no longer enslaved in the manner in which they were (and no I'm not saying the two were the same form of "enslavement"), however, because matters have become "better", is that reason to become apathetic and be satisfied with the status quo just because it is better but still not equal in the true sense of the word?

Did you ever stop to think that if and when women wind up with equal pay for equal jobs and if their partnerships go south, the men who are being burdened with exorbitant child support wouldn't have to pick up the slack for the amount that the mother can't afford to contribute? - more equality in pay - more equality in contribution to the raising of children.

I'm sorry, but those stories are a direct result of idiotic laws, not feminism.

Am I understanding this right? You have custody of the kids, but are still paying child support?

If I am reading your post correctly.. my god idiotic laws for sure.

Women in the western world are no longer enslaved in the manner in which they were, just as blacks are no longer enslaved in the manner in which they were (and no I'm not saying the two were the same form of "enslavement"), however, because matters have become "better", is that reason to become apathetic and be satisfied with the status quo just because it is better but still not equal in the true sense of the word?

Holly sh*t! Are you guys serious? We've gone from oppressed to 2nd class citizens to slaves now? Wow! you ladies are high. Even if that's true this is 2012 and really has nothing to do with the state of today.

I talked about this tendency of feminists to overly personalize posts as though everything was directed straight at them

of course we don't... we need you to educate us... hilarious, indeed...

and no response on how feminist stance affects their personal lives, relationships with men...

Umm...she's denouncing a subsection of women. Not women as a whole.

FixedVariable, don't waste your time. Nobody understands half of what she posts most of the time. And what she does post make no sense.

But then you're clear and articulate and bright.

Ok here is how it works. A woman basically decides that the father should be custodial parent. So he gets physical possesion of the child/ren. Right? Now it's his sole responsibility to modify the orders. This can take a year or even two years. Meanwhile you are still responsible for paying child support.

True but at the same time there are no women movements that are interested in the responsibilities that should come along with their equal rights.

With men they enforce hardcore. So even if you change and or convince your employer to stop sending payments they will come and get you.

some of your feminist sisters feel that "women's work" needs to be paid just as much as "men's work."

do feminists want equal pay for DIFFERENT work and want to make the work "comparable" instead of simply doing the same work?

Because we are more concerned about being PC than getting the job done. Just look at the histories of the protective jobs such as firefighting, police, and military

why would women want the opportunity to get drafted?

some self titled feminists don't want equal rights, they want every privilege they can get, with none of the responsibility

Are we to conclude then that it is your opinion that 'women's work' is indeed less valuable than 'men's work'?

Is this a sincere question? the why don't women just do 'men's work'? because you seem to have answered it yourself

i.e., you don't think they are able (unless we really dumb it down for them).

How convenient of you to yet again take something out of context which is responding to a specific statement made by someone else and twist it to sound like it's stating something other than what it was responding to. Try to stick with the programme instead of continuing to convolute things to support your largely unsupportable position.