|
|
|
|
|
| | Feminism Your ViewsPage 38 of 44 (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44) | ^^^very gracious of you - no snark intended:)
I worked my way through school bartending. Few people realize how closely bartenders listen to conversations, or how foul they become when inebriated. I heard hate speech like this between men more than once or twice. It wasn't directed toward me, but I felt sorry for the wives.
Yes, my former spouse was abusive. I admitted it in a previous post. Of course I got help - which is why I don't hate men as a species. He wasn't abusive because he had a penis, he was abusive because he himself was a pitiful, frightened man.
I do not get to blame all men for him.:) | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 12:26:14 PM | however, like socialism it is unsustainable
That's communism; socialism is very sustainable if you have the population control and society for it:
-Sweden -Norway -Denmark - A number of smaller Carribean islands
To name a few
You will be surprised how many men raised by raised by strong, good women have relationships problems and end up whining the 'nice guy' crap. Seeking female validation and crying for no apparent reason. Males who are essentially women in male bodies.
I saw my ex try to raise her son to love all things woman; so she would have a friend to talk to about said things. I didnt believe "her" ex, initially, until I saw it with my own eyes.
The reason I say this and as you see it your sister was screwed over. As I see it my brother was just as screwed over. He was ordered to pay $1600 a month. His ex wife has a job and moved another guy in making just as much with in a couple of months. How is what he is paying going to the child? How can that child cost any where near $1600 a month?An example is let's say their house is $900. With 3 people that's $300 to the child. Lets say electric is $300. That's another $100 cost of the child. Let's say that final figure is a thousand dollars a month. Ok? So $500 of it is hers and $500 of it is his. That isn't fair? Why should one human being be made to support another just because they use to be married to them or they have a kid with them?
See; it's "that" phenomenon that blows the equality perception or claim all to he*l. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 12:39:50 PM | ^^^ Okay, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say you're 27 and you don't know jack shit about real feminism
Make sure you tie off to the heavy branch above; because I have read a ton of buddys' posts, and he speaks from a position of non-ignorance, research and non bias.
He seems to know an awful lot; WITH sources provided.
You've provided none, and rely on calling him names and giving personal examples that are, very much, not referenceable
we all grow up and gain knowledge.
Or forget the most important rules we ever learned in school; like the golden rule.
I guess what Im saying is that "not all you learn is actually to the end of an overall betterment". | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 12:50:32 PM |
Some things we can excuse to drunken stupidity. Some things we can't.
Very true! People blow off steam under Bacchus' amused influence. They say things they don't really mean. BUT. Sonetines ethanol just let's loose that which simmers beneath. There was a very different tenor to some of these men. They were not exasperated or frustrated with women - they loathed them and feared them. Again. This is not the norm, and their pathology can't be blamed on being male alone.
As for all the fussing about unfair financial arrangements in divorce - I've skipped much of this discussion because I got virtually zero support. Not completely fair, but better than making lawyers rich. Some men do get raped financially, but this is often due to the fact that the calculators are based on the woman's income.
If it werent for old-time feminists, they wouldn't stand a chance of earning enough to support their kids on their own, and every guy would either be forced to pay a king's ransom in support, or be forced to stay with the wife. So see? Feminists aren't all bad;) | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 4:07:21 PM |
The whiny males to whom I was referring by and large consider themselves to be the only "real men.". They just blame their misfortunes and failures on women, certain that, if we could just return to the fifties - or better yet, adopt sharia law - they would suddenly have bevies of adoring women doing their bidding, the perfect job, and untold wealth. Happily for women and society as a whole, these males are a shrinking (if vocal) minority. You are talking about traditional men. They are not a shrinking minority. Fact is majority of the world prefer traditional family. There are very few ITT who express traditional views and desire for nuclear family. Majority of men understand impact of feminism on society. Traditionals are not upset that women have same rights. They want a happy woman. What they are upset about that in current society even it they find a perfect wife and a mother they cannot support a family they way they could in the 50s. Single middle class income is simply not enough. It seems you have experience with selfish men and they have no agenda besides serving their own needs. Men who speak out against feminism want a better society, a benefit for all.
There's nothing wrong with a male who prefers an exaggeratedly feminine female's company. Different strokes for different folks. But in my experience, it has generally been the stronger, more confident men who enjoy, even seek out, the company of wonen who challenge and question - women who are capable and strong. Women are innately capable and strong. Please do not assume that traditional or feminine women are somehow inferior to modern. Very few women realize their own strength or power over men. Majority seem to compete on a masculine level. They believe that their looks or body is enough to attract a man and get upset when a man only wants what they offer.
There are many women who get along just fine without the company of a male, but this doesn't mean the woman dislikes males at all. There are many men who are pretty much content without a female companion - they can make food and do laundry all by their ownselves - but what is nice about being in the company of these independent folk is the knowledge that you must be pretty special if he or she wants to spend time with you just for you. Not because you are needed to wield a hammer or balance a checkbook... Why would you wear high hills or makeup? What is the point to wear expensive, matching underwear from VS? Why go through trouble and expenses of maintaining long hair? Why men open doors, pay for dinners and hummer nails into walls? What do women like about men besides external characteristics? Why most women find intelligent and confident men attractive? Need for human companionship is very natural but no one seem to ask questions about attraction. No matter how independent you are you are still depended on society and like it or not you must acknowledge social construct. What is the difference between 'want' and 'need' in gender relations and social context? | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 5:08:50 PM | Your question re: want and need is compelling. I suspect that failure to define one's own view of these concepts leads to much unnecessary disagreement, both in forums and elsewhere, so I'll start:
For me, "need" implies that the person cannot function without the other. You read about women who have been married for decades finding themselves single, and utterly incapable of changing a tire, managing finances, etc. she may have no education or job skills. This woman "needs" a man. Or some other caregiver. Personally, I've not met a woman this helpless, but they might exist. In a practical sense, of course it's nice to tackle life's challenges as a team. Just because I can change my own oil does not mean I'd object if someoYne else wanted to do it for me. I know men who enjoy cooking and are quite good at it, but they certainly aren't upset when I cook for them. Having a partner is a good thing for both sexes, but for me, when someone says they "need" one, it means that they just need anyone, and that they will grab the first warm and willing body that happens by.
I never made any claim that exaggeratedly feminine women were inferior to women who wear jeans. I'm sure there are many bright, strong women who enjoy dressing up, perhaps even surgically altering themselves to fit an ideal. I wouldn't know.
But you should understand that the "modern" woman may enjoy dressing up occasionally, because she likes feeling attractive. She may cook dinner for her husband every night without fail. Not because he is the man and she must, but because she loves him and enjoys being able to help him relax. The man who cooks for his wife is not emasculated. Hes confident enough in his own masculinity to do something kind for the person he loves.
Btw - my hair is quite long, but this is only because long hair is much less trouble than a coif that requires a bunch of product and salon trips to keep tidy. Long hair is low maintenance. And I like to wear heels sometimes because I'm six feet tall in my spikes, and it's interesting to view the world from that lofty height from time to time. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 5:53:06 PM |
For me, "need" implies that the person cannot function without the other. You read about women who have been married for decades finding themselves single, and utterly incapable of changing a tire, managing finances, etc. she may have no education or job skills. This woman "needs" a man. Or some other caregiver. Personally, I've not met a woman this helpless, but they might exist.
Indeed, this is what I think of too, when I think of traditional women, and obivously this will be a preferrable characteristic to many men. Unfortunately, just like needing two incomes these days to keep a household going, women like this are a thing of the past...especially if you take into account how easily divorces can be obtained today, a woman would be an aboslute fool not to go out in the world to compete along with the men in the workplace..but that comes with the mores we find today....women who financially and emotionally don't "need" men.
So maybe some men are asking for the impossible...one that acts the traditional role, but still goes out to help earn a living income. I do know some older women that were left in a pretty bad position when their husbands decided to move onto younger wive. Left without a way to earn a living themselves, they find the courts are becoming more hostile towards them needing alimony to live....and if it wasn't for child support, they would have been left out in the cold.
The court system works the way it does because it too is trying to move forward from the days when women didn't work. It's not the feminist's fault that men find they have to pay more than they should in support of their ex-spouses. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 5:54:21 PM | BUT. Sonetines ethanol just let's loose that which simmers beneath. There was a very different tenor to some of these men. They were not exasperated or frustrated with women - they loathed them and feared them. Again. This is not the norm, and their pathology can't be blamed on being male alone. So based on overhearing a random [drunken] conversation that was -maybe- 30 minutes long before someone changed the subject, you feel you have enough data to try to psychoanalyze these men? Where did you get your degree from? Just sayin...
Just because some women take their exhusbands to the cleaners after divorce does not mean that all do, or even that most get enough help to care for their kids. Makes me wonder why they aren't getting enough to help care for their kids, why are the kids even in their [primary] custody? If mom can't afford your children, then perhaps the "best interest of the child" would have been to place them with dad.
woman may enjoy dressing up occasionally, because she likes feeling attractive. This reminds me of something I was reading just the other day about cultural influence, and how women are always pressured to look attractive. Just pick up any magazine with a woman on the cover, and 9 times out of 10, she's going to be wearing something and/or posing in a way that just screams sex appeal. I've noticed that most of your big executives love to hire attractive female secretaries, and it makes me wonder if she is really all that qualified or is she just cute, especially compared to all of the unattractive women and/or the men that applied for that job. This is one thing that I often think about when I see attractive women in high-paying positions.
Women, by and large, are judged by their beauty (which is something that I do not agree with). That alone is something that a lot of women (even the "so-called" feminists) will often use to their advantage. It's a paradigm that won't shift any time soon, and many men (like Tom Leykis and his followers or basically any unmarried rich older guy) have embraced it. And it's not hard to find a "strong" woman that is just looking for a guy to basically replace their father so that they don't have to fully grow up. Just look through some of these POF profiles and find the women that are looking for a "provider." Heaven forbid that THEY try to step up and be the provider. And speaking of which, statistically, when looking at the best interest of the child, the most successful scenario is where mom is off at work and dad is the one that stays at home. Not single mom, not single dad, not both parents working all the time, not stay at home mom.
We live in a society where an the average unmarried male with no kids only makes 85% of the money that the average unmarried female with no kids would make. So women HAVE the power and the ability to be -very- successful. But it seems to be that many (if not most) would rather piggyback off of their spouses success. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 5:59:29 PM |
All I've heard from women nearly my entire life is how they don't need a man. As a man how do you think this can affect someone?
Why would this bother you?
mean as a man to run around to strangers and shout I don't need a woman to everyone who will listen how stupid would that make me look?
Then don't do it. I mean, why would a man even have that conversation with strangers?
I don't get the reasoning behind the perceived need to say this? It doesn't even make sense if you think about it. Does it? A saying like sh*t happens at least makes sense.
It's all in the context. Maybe there are situations where it makes total sense to say this. It only makes no sense if one saids this without reason or provocation, which would just be nonsensical. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 6:05:14 PM |
If mom can't afford your children, then perhaps the "best interest of the child" would have been to place them with dad.
You just gave the best reason for why women should be feminist. In your world, love and marriage will be compeition in which a couple will battle to be the more deserving spouse...and it's all about money.
I've noticed that most of your big executives love to hire attractive female secretaries, and it makes me wonder if she is really all that qualified or is she just cute, especially compared to all of the unattractive women and/or the men that applied for that job. This is one thing that I often think about when I see attractive women in high-paying positions.
I believe people who automatically believe this way are called "misogynists". | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 6:43:57 PM |
You just gave the best reason for why women should be feminist I can think of significantly better reasons, but whatever you say.
In your world, love and marriage will be compeition in which a couple will battle to be the more deserving spouse...and it's all about money. Hold on there...lets look a bit further into this whole "all about money" thing.
How many, women are willing to marry broke and/or unsuccessful men? Or at least men that at least as successful as they are? How many women balk at the idea of signing a prenup?
Moreover, it's certainly all about money when you're talking about -divorce- and separation of assets. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 6:48:43 PM | The "old-time" feminists were mainly lesbians who remained childless, they had no concept of being in a marriage or raising a family. They were, by and large, well-educated, Jewish, and upper middle class. I am sure you can find an exception but they're mostly cut from the same cloth.
For them, man bad, woman good..........always. They didn't want a balance in families, they wanted NO families or at least have the men cut out of families entirely, have the women raise the children on her own with financial support from men. Hobble a man financially with child support, etc. and he's just not able to marry again, but she can, get inseminated again, dump the man and have him pay and life is good.......day care, plenty of cash, time off with "visitation", etc.
Divorce displaces the man as the head of the household and supplants that role with the woman, which is just how feminists wanted it. Women as head of households..........not a balance.........no men, just "visitation".
If you think otherwise, you surely jest. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 6:55:10 PM |
So based on overhearing a random [drunken] conversation that was -maybe- 30 minutes long before someone changed the subject, you feel you have enough data to try to psychoanalyze these men? Where did you get your degree from? Just sayin...
Seriously? A degree is needed to interpret body language, tone, phrasing, intent? Most people who really listen to others, especially those who've spent decades dealing with people on a one-to-one level, are able to distinguish between a drunk blowing off steam, hate speech, and an immature young person who is very good at Googling, but is not interested in learning about human nature, or how different people view the world.
Just sayin' :) | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 6:55:26 PM |
How many, women are willing to marry broke and/or unsuccessful men?
Considering how many couples fall in poverty and low income category, I'd say a lot. People often marry within their socio-economic group so 'broke or unsuccessful" is subjective. And I know women who marry guys that make less than they do....I imagine there are even some that will have difficulty finding a guy who are more successful than they in the circle of people they know.
How many women balk at the idea of signing a prenup?
Don't know....I've never been asked to sign one. In fact, I actually don't know many women who have been asked to sign one...sound like something you heard somewhere and believe its common....but I doubt it is. The percentage of men that need to shelter their wealth are pretty small in relation to the population.
Moreover, it's certainly all about money when you're talking about -divorce- and separation of assets.
Maybe it is to some, I don't know. Having been divorced more than once, it's never been my main focus....nor anyone I know. Most are just glad to get out of an unhappy situation. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 8:24:26 PM | Seriously? A degree is needed to interpret body language, tone, phrasing, intent? Most people who really listen to others, especially those who've spent decades dealing with people on a one-to-one level, You can make inferences about it, but coming to such absolutist conclusions is pretty outrageous, especially considering that you probably have very minimal information gathered about the person. But as the saying goes, "everybody's an expert." Lolz
an immature young person who is very good at Googling, I love you too, buddy! *high five*
Considering how many couples fall in poverty and low income category, I'd say a lot. Well the national average for families under the poverty level is at about 11%. If you actually give a number value to that, it would be considered "a lot," but it's largely the minority. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0709.pdf
The percentage of men that need to shelter their wealth are pretty small in relation to the population. Indeed. Only 3% for that matter (I wonder how many of the remaining 97 actually talked about it in some fashion). I think that the idea of not protecting your assets is pretty dumb. But some people like to live in their own fairy tales. You don't buy a brand new car without insurance, but whatever.
Maybe it is to some, I don't know. Having been divorced more than once, it's never been my main focus....nor anyone I know. Most are just glad to get out of an unhappy situation. Most are also very happy to get a "severance package" to for "past services," male or female. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 10:07:53 PM |
Well the national average for families under the poverty level is at about 11%. If you actually give a number value to that, it would be considered "a lot," but it's largely the minority.
Sure, that's 11% in poverty, which is defined as making $11,000 for a single. Making over that to the median income is not much more than that, and I did include low-income. Personally, I think even a single person making triple that ($33K) is still practically living in poverty in most places.
I think that the idea of not protecting your assets is pretty dumb. But some people like to live in their own fairy tales. You don't buy a brand new car without insurance, but whatever.
Worrying about protecting my assets is probably the last thing I'd worry about, but then again, money is not that important to some people, me included. But I don't know why that would be gender specific...women have to protect their assets as much as men these days.
Most are also very happy to get a "severance package" to for "past services," male or female.
You lost me. Divorce is a financial burden all around. Actually, according to the stats, a man that gets divorced ends up better off financially than when he was married. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/21/2012 10:17:39 PM |
But I don't know why that would be gender specific...women have to protect their assets as much as men these days. It wouldn't be gender specific. However, it seems to be that women are more anti-prenup than men are. Regardless, that is why I kept the comment that you quoted gender neutral.
Actually, according to the stats, a man that gets divorced ends up better off financially than when he was married. In the long run, at least. He still takes quite the hit early on. It's most likely to do more upward mobility at work because now the only person he needs to look out for is himself. He can downsize his living space if need be, travel more if the job requires it, has more reign of the financing of his money, among several other factors. It only makes sense if you ask me. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/22/2012 12:31:37 AM |
It wouldn't be gender specific. However, it seems to be that women are more anti-prenup than men are. Regardless, that is why I kept the comment that you quoted gender neutral.
Really? Or maybe the just don't expect a contract for failure like men do? How could we know?
He still takes quite the hit early on. It's most likely to do more upward mobility at work because now the only person he needs to look out for is himself. He can downsize his living space if need be, travel more if the job requires it, has more reign of the financing of his money, among several other factors. It only makes sense if you ask me.
Exactly...see, we do agree on something. So I don't understand why they complain. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/22/2012 2:41:40 AM | "Most are also very happy to get a "severance package" to for "past services," male or female." Really? What percentage is "most?". Do you have a source stating that divorced folk claim happiness with a "severance package?"
I'm certain that you are far more familiar with the emotions experienced by both men and women in divorce than, say, women and men who have actually lived through it, so we await your elucidation of our reactions with breathless anticipation! | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/22/2012 3:50:38 AM |
Really? What percentage is "most?". Do you have a source stating that divorced folk claim happiness with a "severance package?" I don't have a source, but I can't think of many reasons why people would -not- like to get thousands of dollars that they probably don't deserve.
Speaking of sources, when was the last time you provided a source for ANY of your obtuse analyses other than pure anecdote?
I'm certain that you are far more familiar with the emotions experienced by both men and women in divorce than, say, women and men who have actually lived through it, so we await your elucidation of our reactions with breathless anticipation! *Snore*
Really? Or maybe the just don't expect a contract for failure like men do? How could we know? Maybe they are "absolutely certain" that they will be different than all of the other millions of failed marriages. I'm sure they are just as hopeful as all those ex-wives and ex-husbands that said "i do" when they heard "til death do you part." The reasoning behind why is rather moot, but the fact of the matter is that women are still less adamant about the whole prenuptial thing than men are.
So I don't understand why they complain. *Facepalm* | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/22/2012 6:40:42 AM | ^^^lol! I bow to your vast wisdom, accumulated through your life experience and, I am certain, rigorous formalized education. You are absolutely correct! All women are gold diggers, flashing cleavage to get ahead, expecting special treatment. And anyone who accepts the label of feminist is definitely a baby-killing lesbian! With hairy armpits.
If you read the op, you will see that he asked what feminism means to us personally. I googled my views on the subject, but came up empty. Mea culpa, buddy! I will make certain I am able to cite sources for all of my personal views and experiences in the future!
And...jumping into a thread, pulling a quote out of context, harping on something completely off topic and snarking at strangers...boy. That was a TERRIBLE thing for me to do! I am sore ashamed...
Please accept my most heartfelt apologies, and my apologies for all the other ball busting diesel dykes out there! | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/22/2012 6:53:40 AM |
^^^lol! I bow to your vast wisdom, accumulated through your life experience and, I am certain, rigorous formalized education. You are absolutely correct! All women are gold diggers, flashing cleavage to get ahead, expecting special treatment. And anyone who accepts the label of feminist is definitely a baby-killing lesbian! With hairy armpits.
If you read the op, you will see that he asked what feminism means to us personally. I googled my views on the subject, but came up empty. Mea culpa, buddy! I will make certain I am able to cite sources for all of my personal views and experiences in the future!
And...jumping into a thread, pulling a quote out of context, harping on something completely off topic and snarking at strangers...boy. That was a TERRIBLE thing for me to do! I am sore ashamed...
Please accept my most heartfelt apologies, and my apologies for all the other ball busting diesel dykes out there!
Hey look, I'm post number 1000. Hooyah!!
Now back to your regularly scheduled programming. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/22/2012 7:08:27 AM | | You cant blame people for not cojuring up your image of Feminism..unfortunately Miltant Feminist whined the loudest so they got the most attention ..the hairy underarm lesbian man hating ball busting radicals destroyed your messaging... | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/22/2012 7:50:38 AM | Gertrude and Thinkin...I appreciate your efforts at restraint when discussing the issue with misogynists, but remember, it's a lot like wrestling with pigs...The pig likes it and you both end up dirty.
Once you realize where the misogyny comes from, you might be gentler and humor the poor, poor, rejected damaged goods who take it out on feminism and women in general. This is a good piece, written by a man, on the origins of male misogyny and the problem of the self-perpetuating negative feedback loop that it become. http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/malefeminism/The-Origins-Causes-of-Misogyny.html | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/22/2012 8:36:22 AM | Thanks, earthpuppy!
Some men have been hurt by women. It's natural to assign the characteristics of the ones who damaged you to an entire population - to blame a movement for the actions of an individual. If we try to state our case, it might not be heard, but sometimes you gotta tilt at them windmills...and it IS wrong for any human, male or female, to mete out the treatment some women have. Failing to acknowledge than just isn't right...
Of course, some are just trolls, and no one takes them seriously, anyway.=D | |
|
|
|
|
Page
38
of
44 (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44)
|
|