|
|
|
|
|
| | Feminism Your ViewsPage 42 of 44 (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44) |
Well, if you're not seeing it then I guess it doesn't exist. The point is, it's about perspective, not just what you see with your eyes.
Example..a young parent swats a rowdy small child on the behind. One person sees child abuse that they believe exists behind every family door, another sees the firm discipline that they perceive as lacking in modern parenting.
No, in my personal little corner of the world, I DON'T see a 50% marriage failure rate, I don't see a large percentage of messed-up kids. I'm not so foolish or so sheltered as to try and claim that I don't know any divorced people, problematic kids or screwed-up families, of course I do. But I don't spend time combing media sources to come up with "evidence" "supporting" the downward slide of marriage and family, because I don't need to hunt for statistics as a means of self-comfort. In fact, I'm not so sure that "family" is in such a downward slide, I think it just has some different faces these days.
TBH, there was a time when I used all the bad news I read here and in other places to comfort myself for not having quickly secured another man that I truly wanted to be with,as spouse or long-term SO. Now that I've had more of a chance to experience being single(that means without a LONG-TERM partner, not that I never date or never have relationships) I realize that I don't need that self-comfort. It is what it is. And given the alarming stats I see regarding the failure rate of 2nd, 3rd, (and up) marriages, I wonder how many of those are failing BECAUSE people rushed into a new couplehood rather than really listening to their own hearts?
No, I have absolutely no doubt that for those who want to find "examples" and "proof" that something has screwed up traditional marriage and family roles, that there is "evidence" in plenty, and also lots of scapegoats.
Well if they find out the woman lied in those cases they need to at the very least do a full female circumcision on her. But women are more likely to get over loss of sexual desire so they need to do even more. lol
....started going downhill when women entered the worforce enmasse and hyphenating their last names after marriage Really? REALLY!? Wow-just-wow. This is, IMO, an example of why more choices for women can be a GOOD thing. Yes, I know the argument could be made that "feminism" is the CAUSE of these rather alarming opinions. But then we get into the whole chicken and egg debate...
The Dr. then explained to the audience that while boys needed there fathers more than girls did, having no father was preferrable and better to the well being of boys than having one around that was abusive.
That's an excellent point, but what do you wanna bet that someone will counter it with an opinion that feminism has made it necessary for fathers to be more harsh to their sons?
Regardless of your gender, as a parent, if you think that teaching your kids to be accross-the-board suspicious, distrustful and disrespectful of their opposite gender, is wisdom, then-IMO-THERE lies the root of the problem. Cindy O | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 12:59:48 PM | Good points Thinkinginca. The 50s and early 60s were a great time for men, not so much for women. Domestic abuse was considered more of a private matter. Divorces were frowned upon and there was a lot of pressure for women to remain with abusive or unhappy relationships. That "golden age of the family" was post WW II, when marriage rates were at an all time high, kids got married right out of high school, women were expected to be domestic servants, faced 3 decades of childbearing until menopause, had relatively little political power, nor resources to fall back on if they divorced, and drinking and pharmaceuticals were available to tolerate what life had given them. Thalidomide was one of the drugs of choice to handle the depression until the side effects proved so horrific.
After WW II, women who had experienced the joys of life and satisfying work outside the home were shoved back into domestication when the boys returned. The women had a taste of what could be and there was no turning back.
The advent of the Pill was one of the most liberating events in that era, allowing women to have control over their reproduction and more time and freedom to pursue other aspects of life other than being a breeding stock. Feminism was a result, a symptom, of the hidden unhappiness that pervaded the world of women then. June and Harriet did not represent all women. Having a known abuser in the house, opened up other kids to share their stories about their homelife and that of their moms. It was a lot more common than many still choose to believe.
Feminism is just another word for liberation and equality. Of course there were those who were a bit harsh but who could blame them after decades of being treated as second class citizens or worse. The children of those 50s housewives learned from their mistakes and embraced the new-found rights. The first time my sister's last ex grabbed one of her daughters and threw her across the room was the last time he set foot in that house. As you pointed out, people don't have to put up with that anymore and the divorce rates reflect that. When my mom finally found the love of her life, she refused to marry him citing, "I don't want to grant him a liscense to take me for granted". That the the last low-life tried to steal her house out from under her.
The guys here who look back in fondness to that mythical era seem not to have a clue or care what it really meant for women. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 2:02:06 PM |
The advent of the Pill was one of the most liberating events in that era, allowing women to have control over their reproduction and more time and freedom to pursue other aspects of life other than being a breeding stock.
Hmmmm... too bad women didn't use this new found, liberating event, responsibly.... 'cause, there are one hell of a lot of women squirting out a hell of a lot of kids without really thinking about the responsibilities of their choices....
... seems they turned themselves into a new kind of "breeding stock" when they could have chose not to do so...
... or, maybe they just forgot to read the label on the dozen or so methods of BC that is available to them... 
The guys here who look back in fondness to that mythical era seem not to have a clue or care what it really meant for women.
Well, at least you agree that the era you yap about is mythical: ergo, the men "who look back in fondness" must also be mythical....
 | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 6:09:41 PM | I am a feminist, it says so on my profile. Unlike you, I don't need to abase myself and resort to name calling. So, who really sucks here? | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 7:05:45 PM | ""Feminists are noptorious (sic) for being the ones attacking others.""
I don't think so. I just think smart human beings are bang on in calling out an idiot for writing juvenile statements. Smart human beings also want fairness and equity for all genders. Just because you have testicles doesn't mean you get to make the rules. And the same goes for those with vaginas. Fair is fair and just is just.
There have been some very interesting and thoughtful statements made by both genders on this thread. | |
|
| |
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 7:37:46 PM | I don't want to interrupt this fine rant you guys got going.... just puzzled.
as it seems to me.... arguing about women... to abunch of other women.... probably isn't helpful in getting one.
But what do I know. carry on.
I'm sure you guys can tell women how to be women for another 40 pages and then some. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 7:51:56 PM | ^^^So are hapless chauvinistic men.
Feminists are not just out to stop chauvenists.
Can you guys please go look up the origin of the word "chauvinist", please? Sorry, but it's one of the terms that's thrown around without anyone even understanding what the fvck it means.
Both of you are chauvinists. There are female chauvinists and male chauvinists. There are female pigs and there are male pigs....
... and, speaking of pigs, in threads where men and women are pitted against each other as they are in this thread, I always think of George Orwell and his book Animal Farm: "ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS"...
... currently, I think women are more equal, at least by law in Canada where their superior equality is written into our Charter of Rights and Freedoms....
 | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 8:07:44 PM |
Hmmmm... too bad women didn't use this new found, liberating event, responsibly.... 'cause, there are one hell of a lot of women squirting out a hell of a lot of kids without really thinking about the responsibilities of their choices Hmmmmmmm too bad men didn't wear condoms to protect themselves against unwanted pregnancies, unless these were all emaculate conceptions, it takes two to make a baby and both are responsible not just the woman. Feminism is basically about women having equal rights in our society, thats it, bad things happen to good people all the time, it's not something you can control, blaming feminism for what happens in your life and the choices you make, shows a lack of personal responsiblity IMO.
Since most of my family members and friends have been married for 25-50+years, and all of these successful marriages involved a working male and working female, raising a family together I find it funny how people blame feminism for the breakup of the family unit. People tend to look back in time with rose coloured glasses on, thinking everything was fabulous, the reality is people got and stayed married because that is what you did in those times, you had very little choice for the man or the woman, I prefer to have a choice in my life not be dictated to by some outdated and distorted image of the good old days. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 8:10:30 PM |
But they about had a ehart attack when Limbaugh said WRODS (the truth) about a law student.
Everything Limbaugh said about Sandra Fluke was a lie. Absolutely everything. Also, his interest in who paid for her contraception is grade school, and saying she should post sex videos of herself so he could get off was revolting. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 8:20:17 PM |
Hmmmmmmm too bad men didn't wear condoms to protect themselves against unwanted pregnancies, unless these were all emaculate conceptions, it takes two to make a baby and both are responsible not just the woman
I agree. Any man who trusts what a woman says about her birth control is a fvcking idiot. Women have all of the control once they accept a guy's sperm. Men are stupid to trust that, absolutely.
Feminism is basically about women having equal rights in our society, thats it, bad things happen to good people all the time, it's not something you can control, blaming feminism for what happens in your life and the choices you make, shows a lack of personal responsiblity IMO.
Absolutely... just as women continuing to blame men for women's professed current oppression and disadvantage in 2012 shows a marked lack of personal responsibility.
 | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 8:30:04 PM |
Thus why they don't say a word about that whole Hustler issue where they portrayed a conservative woman in a sexual situation. Go to the Daily Beast site. Read what Gloria Steinem has to say about the issue. And the Women's Media Center. And even that law student who was slandered by Rush.
Then go back to the kiddie table. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 8:59:32 PM | So why can't we leave that pendulum thing they keep talking about in the middle and hug and part ways? I can't be responsible for what other men do. I can't be responsible for what other men say. Some of these men are on this thread are sad.
I was answering someone who was making nasty comments about feminist, but I see he deleted his post. I wasn't talking about any other man....just him.
**See post 1083 for the comment he deleted.
Chauvinist - Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one's own gender, group, or kind
Any man who trusts what a woman says about her birth control is a fvcking idiot.
So I guess that means there are just as many men that are fvcking idiots as there are stupid women. I guess we can't claim there isn't equality. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 9:54:06 PM | Women are women and men are men. Together we comprise the human race.
Not sure how we came to be. God, a big bang , evolved from some primordial slime to become the advanced creatures we are?? Darned if I know.
But, whatever universal knowledge designed men and women sure knew what they were doing. I mean, look at our reproductive parts in respect to gender. Made to fit together and when they do, and egg meets sperm voila! Life continues.
So, I'd have to say I am a feminist in the sense women are over half of the population. Women, for the most part are the nurturing half of humanity that is the first human we all have contact with. Why would you not respect women?
Or men, for that matter? We're equal, and infintitely different. Women can do things I could'nt and vice versa. I respect women for who they are and realize they are, and will be better at some things than I am. Equal treatment in all aspects of life should be a given, to me anyways.After all, if you diss the women you're dissing half of humanity. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/25/2012 11:31:27 PM |
Actually this is very true to me. I'd like to add as a consideration that maybe women were never really powerless. Kind of depends on your view of power. I think of it like a scale and to me it's always been as balanced as it can get for the times. Mothers almost always get the choice to be stay at home moms and dads don't so often. How is that not also oppression?
You're 37. You didn't even live through those times barely. I'm 49 and even in my time, it was much better than a decade earlier. How could you possibly know to judge even the things that EP's mom had to relay of her experience? You should have asked that 90 year old woman you helped what she felt about her "equal freedom" back in her day.
Not an ounce of encouragement? You weren't encuoraged by the people that gave you kudos for being an obviously caring dad? What else did you expect? And what positive thing have you said about women so far?
Really, we're all strangers with our own prejudices, hoping to come to some common ground...and that's probably about all you have the right to expect...anything else is icing on the cake....and will come only if you're equally thoughtful and complimentary in your views. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 2:42:30 AM | Most women can't compete physically with men. I'm no shrinking flower, but I can't. For those women blessed with that kind of strength, u go girl! Wow. You seriously believe it is an advantage for a woman to be strong physically?
I don't get competitive mindset. I like dolphins, I believe they are very wonderful creatures but I'm not gonna try to out-swim one. I would not be impressed if there are a human that can and I doubt a dolphin would care. Competition is archaic for us. Humans have no real need for it. It's a primal urge and I do understand a need to give in to primal urges ones in a while but competition between genders is simply ridicules. I believe it is a huge sign of insecurity when there are gender competition. Why not just embrace and admire the differences?
Feminism is basically about women having equal rights in our society, thats it Initially it may have been but the ideology it self is damaging to society in various ways. Just like 99% movement there are backlash against feminism because people are starting to realize what has been done to this society. If your knowledge of history, anthropology and behaviorism extends beyond "news-makers", "renowned psychiatrists" like Pill and Hollywood you will see the connection between the two. Broader cultural perspective wouldn't hurt either. It all starts with basic questions. Why did feminism happened in the last century and not before? How does a traditional, circumcised, Muslim woman view western society? Why can't a traditional middle class man support his wife and children today? | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 4:49:10 AM | Zen,
""I don't get competitive mindset. I like dolphins, I believe they are very wonderful creatures but I'm not gonna try to out-swim one. I would not be impressed if there are a human that can and I doubt a dolphin would care. Competition is archaic for us.""
Good point, "equal" isn't the same as. The original feminists were selling the idea equality meant the same as and the idea of equal civil rights never really got to be clear. There were some exceptions, of course ... that only another woman could relate to a woman in a GYN exam or deliver a baby, so throw out all those male doctors and claim that medical field for women ... and, of course, only another woman knows what a woman wants in bed, so try on gay for a while.
Another thing they really didn't form a good idea on was what "independence" meant. When you think of a woman that is "independent", what do you think of? Do you think of someone married with a husband and children? Nope. Do you think of someone single by choice, divorced or in the process of divorcing? Yep.
Dependent is synonymous with being a child or a ward or crippled or somehow not quite grown up and as capable and competent as an "independent" person... now what adult would want to be stuck with that label? Basically, it was dump the husband, grab the kids and be "independent"..........shorthand for not having a man in your life who is important to either you or your children ... lesbianism.
They also perpetrated the idea that traditional marriage and division of labor as a system for maintaining a family and home for children was inherently abusive, unhealthy for women, etc. across the board. My parents and grandparents and aunts seemed to have no problem with it, weren't abused, seemed pretty happy, no inclination to put on pants and go out into the working world, etc., being divorced was a sign of shame, not a badge of honor, being single meant you were either sick or a little wierd because marriage was the norm for healthy people .............all that changed just in one generation, turned upside down. And Madison Avenue loved it!!! | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 5:11:23 AM | The hyphenated names thing always made me chuckle.
So, a Smith marries a Jones and their boy is a Smith-Jones.
Down the street, a Carter and Boyd marry and have a child.
The children grow up, meet, marry and their children are Smith-Jones-Carter-Boyds? Ummm...no.
Somehow, someone has to lose some of those hyphenated names but.......hmmm... which ones? Which are expendable?
If a child is named for their father, that name isn't expendable .... but if Mary Smith divorces John Jones and obtains custody of their child (which, of course, is presumed because only a mother knows how to parent), maybe after a little while she ever so gently cuts that hypenation and loses the Jones so their last names match? So, the daughter of Mary Smith is now little Betty Smith?
And the father's name, the paternal lines and lineage, paternalism.........go bye-bye
Such an obvious ploy for matriarchy...............but of course matriarchy is equality, after all, patriarchy has had its run, right? Equal time! Hmmm.... just what to do with men in this new matriarchical society........oh, yeah, breed with them, make divorce easy and unilateral, play the abuse card, and get child support later.....see, fish CAN use bicycles! :-) | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 5:21:30 AM |
Or men, for that matter? We're equal, and infintitely different. Women can do things I could'nt and vice versa. I respect women for who they are and realize they are, and will be better at some things than I am. Equal treatment in all aspects of life should be a given, to me anyways.After all, if you diss the women you're dissing half of humanity.
What he said!!!!! Beautifully stated. One lady made the point that the concern should be human heights - humanism, not just feminism. I found that to be very wise.
Of course, feminism means something a little different to every feminist, just as few people would describe "love" in exactly the same terms. Equal rights, and protection from abusers is part of it. Another part is celebrating the differences, what makes us "special."
Some folks seem to think that there is no longer a need for "feminism.". That women have equal rights already, and it's true that we've come a long way.
I dunno. I hear a lot of ranting about how unions are horrible and corrupt, and are ruining our country. Some say they should be disbanded. If they were, I think it would be only a short time before Upton Sinclair's "jungle" resurfaced. Like workers, women are still relatively vulnerable. Usually physically weaker, and we have this tendency to grow humans inside us.
There are many good men out there, but without feminist activists, I worry that the protections that are in place now will vanish. That it won't just be bloated loudmouth gasbags like Limbaugh calling women who use birth control "sluts.".
There was a bill in Ohio about a year ago that sought to outlaw most kinds of birth control. The Pill, IUD, etc. the excuse was that this is abortion because the egg could be fertilized, and those methods prevent implantation. Didn't pass, thank God, but we do still need those activists.
Sure would be nice if we could work together for human rights without sinking to the level of misandry and misogyny. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 7:24:58 AM |
The original feminists were selling the idea equality meant the same as and the idea of equal civil rights never really got to be clear. There were some exceptions, of course ... that only another woman could relate to a woman in a GYN exam or deliver a baby, so throw out all those male doctors and claim that medical field for women ... and, of course, only another woman knows what a woman wants in bed, so try on gay for a while.
It occur to me that you're just taking everything to the extreme to prove some point, but it's difficult for most women to relate because your comments don't resemble reality we live. It doesn't matter what the activist groups sell, they have an agenda, which much like your comments here, is to sell their point. The exaggeration is necessary to get their points across, much like how the NRA, or unions, or any other groups operate, but most people don't have the luxury to live their ideals. I never heard a woman complaining about the sex of their OB/GYNs...but if you yourself have, you must know some misquided people. All "equality" mean to me in this context is that a women were given access to attend a school to become an OB/GYN.
Another thing they really didn't form a good idea on was what "independence" meant. When you think of a woman that is "independent", what do you think of? Do you think of someone married with a husband and children? Nope. Do you think of someone single by choice, divorced or in the process of divorcing? Yep.
Why yes. I was married and considered myself independent. I'm no longer and don't believe I am more independent than I was married, other than that I now have more free time.
Dependent is synonymous with being a child or a ward or crippled or somehow not quite grown up and as capable and competent as an "independent" person... now what adult would want to be stuck with that label? Basically, it was dump the husband, grab the kids and be "independent"..........shorthand for not having a man in your life who is important to either you or your children ... lesbianism.
Ridiculous. I don't know what lesbianism has to do with being able to make a choice about your destiny. All it means is that if the husband dropped dead tomorrow of a heart attack, I could take care of myself financially without having to be a ward of the state.
They also perpetrated the idea that traditional marriage and division of labor as a system for maintaining a family and home for children was inherently abusive, unhealthy for women, etc. across the board.
Again, poppycock.
My parents and grandparents and aunts seemed to have no problem with it, weren't abused, seemed pretty happy, no inclination to put on pants and go out into the working world, etc., being divorced was a sign of shame, not a badge of honor, being single meant you were either sick or a little wierd because marriage was the norm for healthy people .............all that changed just in one generation, turned upside down. And Madison Avenue loved it!!!
You fall into the same category of so many people that want to see everything as black and white. Just because your parents and grandparents were happy with a traditional family model doesn't mean that a modern family can't be and vice versa....it's all about environment and people around you. I don't know any one that thinks divorce is a badge of honor, but I know most people that initiate divorces are grateful that they had the option no matter how difficult the process. Since you're divorced, I take it that you didn't want to be? Not that I'm trying to get personal here, but it seems you're just colored by your negative experience, but blaming Madison Avenue or feminists is probably unproductive.
So, a Smith marries a Jones and their boy is a Smith-Jones.
Down the street, a Carter and Boyd marry and have a child.
The children grow up, meet, marry and their children are Smith-Jones-Carter-Boyds? Ummm...no.
Somehow, someone has to lose some of those hyphenated names but.......hmmm... which ones? Which are expendable?
If a child is named for their father, that name isn't expendable .... but if Mary Smith divorces John Jones and obtains custody of their child (which, of course, is presumed because only a mother knows how to parent), maybe after a little while she ever so gently cuts that hypenation and loses the Jones so their last names match? So, the daughter of Mary Smith is now little Betty Smith?
Agian, this seem like another overreach. I've never heard of a child using a hyphenated name. It may happen, but I've always found this was used by women to maintain continunity in their career or identity. When I divorced 30 years ago, my ex-husband drew up my divorce decree and changing my name back to my maiden name was not specified. When I remarried, I didn't change my name because the amount of paperwork as well as changing my business identity, so I retained the other married name for that purpose. Recently, in the process of getting my passport to match my other documentation, I tried to go back to my maiden name and found it was impossible unless I wanted to pay $500 to have my name changed legally in the courts. Such is the hassels women have to go through with name changes....so for myself, I think the whole idea is a relic of the past. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 8:41:11 AM |
Ridiculous. I don't know what lesbianism has to do with being able to make a choice about your destiny. Well it is rather curious that a very significant chunk of self-proclaimed feminists are [man-hating] lesbians. All the while, you don't see any gay MRAs as figure heads for their cause.
They also perpetrated the idea that traditional marriage and division of labor as a system for maintaining a family and home for children was inherently abusive, unhealthy for women, etc. across the board. Again, poppycock. Do you actually -read- feminist doctrine?
Betty Friedan referred to family life as a "comfortable concentration camp" Sheila Cronan stated, "Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking marriage."
pretty much this entire article: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family/#1.3
here's a snippet
Feminist economists and sociologists have also shown how women's role in parenting constrains their ability to pursue careers and compete for demanding jobs (Bergmann 1986, Folbre 1994). Many women therefore remain economically dependent on their male partners, and vulnerable to poverty in the event of divorce. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 9:10:09 AM | ""All "equality" mean to me in this context is that a women were given access to attend a school to become an OB/GYN.""
Ya, right. Therapists were also being called "the-rapists". Basically, any professional category that catered to women was being sold as women's rightful domain because "only another woman knows how a woman feels". It wasn't "equality", it was an attempt to TAKE OVER AND OWN whole fields of medical and social work and DISCREDIT MEN. Equality? Bullshit.
""Why yes. I was married and considered myself independent. I'm no longer and don't believe I am more independent than I was married, other than that I now have more free time."
Most of the time a married woman isn't considered "independent", whether she works or not. She is considered "dependent" at the level of a retardate or child. Independence for women in the popular mind means single, divorced or on the way to being divorced .... and you know it.
""Again, poppycock.""
see another post which addresses this. Feminists had NO USE at all for marriage. One of them even considered each and every act of sexual penetration by a man to be an act of RAPE.
""You fall into the same category of so many people that want to see everything as black and white""
Did you bite your tongue when you wrote that? You categorize me and then criticize people who want to see everything as black and white?
"". Just because your parents and grandparents were happy with a traditional family model doesn't mean that a modern family can't be and vice versa.."
And by "modern", of course, you mean a single mother head of household?
""I've never heard of a child using a hyphenated name""
It was being sold for a while, my ex-wife and I argued about it around the birth of our daughter. It was also the fashion to retain the maiden name on general principle. The whole idea was to break patrilineage to establish a matriarchal lines. Ever notice how ancestral lineage goes along paternal lines, not maternal ones? Unfair! Unequal!
I'm not trying to put anyone down, just calling bullshit when I see it. Oh, and personally, I am very happily divorced.:-) | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 9:13:14 AM | .
I never heard a woman complaining about the sex of their OB/GYNs...but if you yourself have, you must know some misquided people. All "equality" mean to me in this context is that a women were given access to attend a school to become an OB/GYN.
Excellent point. However, there are women who refuse to go to a male OB/GYN. I am one of them. Matter of fact, I would prefer not to go to a woman who hasn't given birth. It's just personal preference. I want someone there who knows what it feels like. This does NOT mean male docs are less competent, or that the women who prefer them are wrong.
It's nice to have a choice:) | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 9:14:47 AM |
There was a bill in Ohio about a year ago that sought to outlaw most kinds of birth control. The Pill, IUD, etc. the excuse was that this is abortion because the egg could be fertilized, and those methods prevent implantation. Didn't pass, thank God, but we do still need those activists.
No bill like you describe would have been constitutional, so it's hard to see why anyone would have wasted any time writing it. The Supreme Court held 46 years ago that contraception is a constitutionally protected right. And it's even harder to see why any state legislator would justify a bill like that as a way to infringe abortion, which has been a constitutionally protected right for almost as long.
Using someone's dubious claim that a bill would have done what you describe as a reason feminists have to stay on the qui vive is jumping at shadows.
That it won't just be bloated loudmouth gasbags like Limbaugh calling women who use birth control "sluts."
I don't think he called women who use birth control sluts. He was denouncing Fluke for demanding that other people should pay for her contraceptives. Whatever medical uses they may have, one obvious use was to relieve her of much of the worry about getting pregnant from recreational sex. | |
|
| Feminism Your Views Posted: 5/26/2012 9:37:51 AM | I don't want to interrupt this fine rant you guys got going.... just puzzled.
as it seems to me.... arguing about women... to abunch of other women.... probably isn't helpful in getting one.
But what do I know. carry on.
I'm sure you guys can tell women how to be women for another 40 pages and then some. Couldn't agree more. Funny thing about trying to tell anyone "how/who" to be? It's NOT logical. I makes no, zilch, zero, nada (as in NONE) sense.
as it seems to me.... arguing about women... to abunch of other women.... probably isn't helpful in getting one. Nah they are trying to teach us how to be men. So according to them my proper response to this even though I still don't understand it and in proper female logic it means something different to everyone when you try and figure out what it means is "I don't need a woman". And see? Now you find yourself in agreement with all those ladies you're trying to make a point to. They claim they don't need a man, you claim you don't need a woman. Seems to me like ya' all have just figured out the finale to this thread. None of you need one another, so? Everyone can now move along to a thread in which they state they "want" a man or woman but certainly don't need one and this can then turn into a debate about symantecs. And that makes about as much sense are trying to tell someone else "how/who" to be. And let's face one itsy little fact here ~ women don't need to be taught how to be women and men certainly don't need to be taught how to be men. What type of man or woman one wishes to be is the real question and if a woman chooses to be a libber? So be it. They can stay away from the alpha/manly men and leave those types for those like me and I'll leave the men alone who perceive it's possible to achieve some 50/50 arrangement. We all win in the end. Did I just solved world peace????? JMO  | |
|
|
|
|
Page
42
of
44 (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44)
|
|