alp65
| Joined: 8/6/2005 Msg: 76 | |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/8/2005 9:27:01 PM | | And Pedro: Your a 19 yr old kid. What did the army teach you?? DON'T THINK, DO!! I suggest you follow orders. My impression of you is basically a soldier that's got to protect my petroleum shares. I don't need you going off on your own ideas. If you get wounded protecting my assets - I DON'T CARE! Take your medals and we'll call it square. oooooo rahhhhh | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/8/2005 9:44:37 PM | alp; just who are you calling small town? ROFLMAO>.,.....you live in an area populated with 200,000 people...I come from a city of MILLIONS.
You know absolutely NOTHING about my life. How I retired, when I retired, or why, is none of your business. I don't recall bringing your personal details into any discussion. You don't agree with me fine, but if you wanna get personal....you can KISS MY ASS. Easy for you to come on here and slam other posters when you tell nothing about yourself in your profile, and hide behind a name with no picture.....and if Pedro was here, he'd probably kick your LOSER ass. | |
|
alp65
| Joined: 8/6/2005 Msg: 78 | |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/8/2005 10:00:13 PM | | I live in VANCOUVER....burnaby is a subburb...i look out my window and see my city. Pedro is not here because he's gone to protect my assets. I'm sorry, but I'm not too worried about you sending a 19 yr old child to protect you LOL! | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/8/2005 11:20:01 PM | Do you even know what you are talking about when you start flying these silly comments around? I didn't send anyone to protect anybody, your statement about Pedro does not even make any sense. There you go again, personally insinuating things against other posters. This is a discussion, it is not personal. I'm hardly in a position to send any military personelle anywhere.
You are coming in rather late arguing about my nuking & immigration post. I already discussed it in great detail and came to the conclusion that the best alternative was that mother nature will take her course. I guess you missed all that.
I do apologize for getting angry on here, but I did not slam anyone in the forum, as you frequently seem to do in every topic you participate on. Disagreeing is one thing, but bringing up details of someones profile in a discussion in a derogatory manner is really uncalled for. | |
|
alp65
| Joined: 8/6/2005 Msg: 80 | |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/8/2005 11:58:57 PM | | Nuking a SPECIFIC group of people is not a sensible and thoughtful action. It is veiled racism when you make those kinds of statements. You single out the 'flavour of the day' - our muslim friends as if that's going to engraciate yourself within, god knows what kind of people in this forum. Personally, I'll call anybody on it each and everytime. AND, you say it's a 'discussion' and not to be taken PERSONALLY? Sure, let's play it that way. I stand by what i said before, any person not contributing to their country and is a burden on resources during a time of over-poplulation should be culled and placed in say....Sasaktoon and process for orderly disposal...I like your idea, let's nuke em!!...forgot, you'd be in that group too. :( PS: don't take it personally, I'm just throw out some ideas! | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/9/2005 12:48:48 AM | | Koss, you do make some good points. I love the smell of napalm and gunsmoke in the morning! | |
|
| |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/9/2005 6:47:34 AM | | Want to REALLY affect the World population? Let's quit handing out money to the rest of the World. It's not like these S.O.B.'s like us anyway. And YES, shipping out all the foreign flotsam and jetsam will solve America's problem nicely, thank you. We don't have to kill them; when we're no longer on the menu, the bad guys will kill the REST of the World instead. | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/9/2005 9:46:39 AM | solution, get rid of the arabs, nuke them all cut off supplies to the poor countries and ppoor people and let nature take it course exterminate all prisoners, bann walmart and get rid of mcdonalds sterlize all people after first baby, and bann china from reproduction get rid of television and media and get rid of baseball then the world would be better place, | |
|
| |
alp65
| Joined: 8/6/2005 Msg: 86 | |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/9/2005 4:30:13 PM | | ....and Koss, do you think this attititude is why you haven't had a date in your life?? | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/9/2005 6:04:30 PM | | I'm tempted to say that deporting immigrants is the only way, but really there is enough land and food to feed the world’s population many times over. It is the cruel and greedy leaders of some countries that stand by and do little or nothing to support their own people that really get my back up. | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/9/2005 6:21:58 PM | I just have to say 4sexyfun..you scare me. Are you Michael Moores blow up doll?
i read..."As for 911, your information is flawed again ...911 was a crime perpetrated against America by its own government military complex ...to further the agenda of empire." copied from your post on a previous page of this thread and well..I hope someone lets the air out of you for that statement. wow...paranoia mixed with some very good drugs. | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/9/2005 7:52:47 PM | im going to clean up my act now, and stop doing bad posts have to look to the positives | |
|
| |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/10/2005 6:51:39 PM | yes I read it. just proves that which I have concluded. I do not base my faith in this country on propoganda that i cut and paste or from underground news that is everywhere if you WANT it. I have my own mind and a history to substantiate my faith in our flag and all she represents. | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/10/2005 7:56:39 PM | ....and Koss, do you think this attititude is why you haven't had a date in your life??
Alp; You really need to learn how to debate without getting personal.
That remark was REALLY LOW.
There you go again, looking up people's profiles and using what is in them against the individual on the forums.
What does his dating life have anything to do with his opinion on world population?
holy shit man, GROW UP!!!!!!! | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/10/2005 8:55:01 PM |
Alp; You really need to learn how to debate without getting personal.
Yes, let's murder or deport every single ethnic group I disprove of. So if you are a jew, or a muslim, or whatever, please don't take it personal. I don't give preference to either, I hate them all equally. It's their fault blah,,,,blah,,,,,blah,,,,,blah,,,,,blah,,,,,
p.s. The war on terror is total bullshit. duh. | |
|
| world population is too high Posted: 8/10/2005 9:10:26 PM | Speaking of overpopulation:
Can you guess which is the original piece?
{Translated from its original German}
WIE: Which brings us to another question I wanted to ask you. Dr. Joseph Goebbels, in his article "The Future—If There Is One—Is Pure" writes: "At least three further requirements supplement the strategies of environmentalists if we were to create and preserve a less violent world. 1) Every culture must begin to affirm the Aryan future. 2) Species responsibility must be returned to Ayran's in every culture. 3) The proportion of jews must be reduced to and maintained at approximately ten percent of the current population." What do you think about this statement?
MD: I think it’s not a bad idea at all. If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of jews. People are afraid to say that kind of stuff anymore.
Or:
WIE: Which brings us to another question I wanted to ask you. Sally Miller Gearhart, in her article "The Future—If There Is One—Is Female" writes: "At least three further requirements supplement the strategies of environmentalists if we were to create and preserve a less violent world. 1) Every culture must begin to affirm the female future. 2) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. 3) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately ten percent of the human race." What do you think about this statement?
MD: I think it’s not a bad idea at all. If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males. People are afraid to say that kind of stuff anymore.
Life is precious, consider this thread carefully. | |
|
| |
| |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/10/2005 10:52:00 PM | I think at some point everyone has thought a few or all of these things. Sorry, the world is over populated, we are running out of resources. If this were any other animal population, humans (OR NATURE) would be looking at thinning it out.
Enough said. | |
|
alp65
| Joined: 8/6/2005 Msg: 98 | |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/11/2005 12:41:31 AM | There's plenty of resources but we are currently a currency based society. If we get rid of money we can accomplish everything since money would be no object. Isn't Star-Trek set at a time when there's no money and you just spend the time improving yourself?....sorry, I trailed off there.  | |
|
alp65
| Joined: 8/6/2005 Msg: 99 | |
| |
| world population is too high Posted: 8/11/2005 1:52:46 AM | Well. I am sure that Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Jacques Costeau (yes, he did say that), Ralph Nader, Al Gore (so did he) and Pol Pot would agree with you. I concur that health care system is being destroyed but not by overpopulation, per se. It is being destroyed in the US by overpopulation by illegal aliens as is much of our nation's infrastructure and social system. Overpopulation isn't the problem. It is overpopulation in nations where the standard of living and education is so low that they are not self-sufficient and never will be. RE: "the (our) leaders" are not "leaders". They are a self-anointed elite who feel that they are above the rabble of the citizenry. A similar environment existed with pre-revolution France, a la Marie Antoinette and Louis the XVI, the French aristocracy and theocrats. When we tell our oligarchs "we have no jobs and no bread" Instead of "let them eat cake" we are told "we need a guest worker program" to remedy that problem. Viva La Revolucion! 80-90% of the True Americans disagree with you, el jefe' Jorge BOOSH. Tell your puppet master, Vinnie Focks, that the storm is coming..... | |
|