|
|
|
|
|
w10938
| Joined: 2/24/2008 Msg: 1576 | |
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 12:24:00 PM | "Too many americans, think by owning a gun, you are safe."
Well you are. I think most of those people who were murdered by rapists might of had a chance if they had a hand gun.
Safety is mainly personal responsibility, that's why when the government moves away from the second amendment and unarms the people, they are vulnerable. You can't depend on the government for everything including being there 24/7 and the framers of the constitution understood that with the right to bear arms also helped stave off domestic tyranny from the government itself.
If a group of robbers breaks into your house, believe me, you'll want a gun then.
Criminals will always find ways to get guns, but if you can arm most law abiding citizens, then believe me, you'll have less crime.
Those people who shot up their schools would have much less chance at succeeding if they are staring back into a classroom full of guns aimed back at them. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 12:45:21 PM |
Well you are. I think most of those people who were murdered by rapists might of had a chance if they had a hand gun.
actually I think more would get shot with their own gun,...if they had them near them when attacked but what if your gun was safely locked away when attacked,...now how safe are you?
Safety is mainly personal responsibility, that's why when the government moves away from the second amendment and unarms the people, they are vulnerable. You can't depend on the government for everything including being there 24/7 and the framers of the constitution understood that with the right to bear arms also helped stave off domestic tyranny from the government itself.
the framer's never heard of automatic weapons either,...this is such a stupid argument the framers were living in a different world,...or to be fair give everybody a long gun you have to stuff with powder and a ball,...sheeesh!
If a group of robbers breaks into your house, believe me, you'll want a gun then.
actually groups of bank robbers rarely if ever break into houses,...and I have been broken into 3 times never needed more than a dog and good shoes,...to chaise them out,....having had the dogs didn't hurt though,.... but no one had a gun,...not them and not me,... (I was married to a doctor at the time and I think the kids thought that it meant we had all the good dope at home,...they only left with booze).
Criminals will always find ways to get guns, but if you can arm most law abiding citizens, then believe me, you'll have less crime.
absolutely,.. but there aren't nearly as many of them about as you might think,....many people live their entire lives and never ever encounter any,...and you don't kill someone for every crime do you? or do you think shoplifters deserve to die?
Those people who shot up their schools would have much less chance at succeeding if they are staring back into a classroom full of guns aimed back at them.
now you have gone off the deep end,....I would advocate closing all schools before arming all students,...there's a reason why children aren't supposed to play with guns,...
and teen ager's are still children,.... imagine betty blowing sally away for bullying her,..good grief what next?,...
people who have a gun handy don't have to develop better coping skills,....
The Usa already is number one in locking away it's citizens,....above china even now you want to fill more jails full of kids with poor coping skills too?
I find it sad that you a young, strapping fellow is so fearfull,....what a shame,...
I am female, 50 ish, with a physical debility and I have never been fearfull of walking alone at night in any city,....and have never been attacked yet either,....
fear is the big enemy,.....not the unknown boogey men with guns,.... | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 12:49:18 PM |
Criminals will always find ways to get guns, but if you can arm most law abiding citizens, then believe me, you'll have less crime. Well, that CERTAINLY explains why the US, with one of the highest rates of privately-owned firearms among western countries also has one of the highest rates of violent crimes among western countries too.
 | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 2:13:42 PM |
So, in this "gun control" country, in four weeks I have essentially the same thing as any American has - a lethal weapon. I'm expected to take courses to use it (not a bad idea there) , and to store and transport it properly .
This is something that I'm curious about, and have been. However, with the over simplification of explanation that I was given when I first posed the question, I decided not to waste any more time in pursuing the matter.
Given the quoted statement, I'll try this again.
What is the procedure for buying, if that is the proper term to use, a rifle, shotgun, and/or handgun, in Canada?
What is the process?
What paperwork is entatiled?
How long, in realistic, not altruistic, terms does this process take?
Where I presently live, I can go to Walmart and buy a rifle or shotgun tonight, and walk out of the store with it. I believe there's a three day waiting period for a handgun; I honestly don't know, as I haven't bought a handgun in many years. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 3:15:04 PM | I've heard many people say that if you make gun ownership illegal than criminals will still get access to guns. I'm not so sure that argument holds up all that well. If there isn't much of an inventory to steal from, how will criminals get them?
No criminal is going to go to the trouble of traveling a long distance just to get one, and few illegal dealers are going to risk transporting them unless they can get a lot of money for them. That means that illegally purchased guns will be _expensive._
Having a lot of guns lying around the neighborhood is the surest way to supply criminals with guns. If 1 house in 5 has one, and especially if someone is stupid enough to advertise the fact that she or he has one, it won't take long for a burglar to steal a gun, resell it, or use it her/himself in future crimes.
Also, the argument that you're safer with a gun than without one is also not necessarily true. Most shootings occur among family members or acquaintances. If you eliminate them by restricting access to guns, you eliminate a big proprotion of gun crimes right there. The odds are much higher that you'll get shot if you have a gun in your house than if you don't.
The only crime that widespread gun ownership prevents is burglaries when someone is at home, and dogs deter them just as well or better.
Guns for personal crime protection are two-edged swords.
Having said that, I still believe that the best form of gun control is universal training. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 3:21:02 PM |
What is the procedure for buying, if that is the proper term to use, a rifle, shotgun, and/or handgun, in Canada? Plus all the other questions that followed (because they are all tied in together)
First you apply for a Possession and Acquisition Licence. It is a fairly straight-forward form.
The application fee depends on the class of firearms ($60 - $80). Classes of firearms are Non-restricted, Restricted and Prohibited.
these are the definitions of the classes
Non-restricted firearms are ordinary rifles and shotguns, other than those referred to below.
Restricted firearms include:
* handguns that are not prohibited; * semi-automatic, centre-fire rifles and shotguns with a barrel shorter than 470 mm (about 18.5 inches); * rifles and shotguns that can be fired when their overall length has been reduced by folding, telescoping or other means to less than 660 mm (about 26 inches); and * firearms restricted by Criminal Code Regulations.
Prohibited firearms include:
* handguns with a barrel length of 105 mm (about 4.14 inches) or less and handguns that discharge .25 or .32 calibre ammunition, except for a few specific ones used in International Shooting Union competitions; * rifles and shotguns that have been altered by sawing or other means so that their barrel length is less than 457 mm (about 18 inches) or their overall length is less than 660 mm (about 26 inches); * full automatics; * converted automatics, namely full automatics that have been altered so that they fire only one projectile when the trigger is squeezed; and * firearms prohibited by Criminal Code Regulations. Prohibited firearms can only be owned but may not be sold or bought (in other words it had to be acquired before the law came into effect or inherited).
Take and pass the safety course appropriate to the class of firearm.
Once that is done you may purchase your firearm (Order it from a dealer or buy privately). Registration of the firearm is completed at the time of purchase/transfer and it can be completed on-line.
If your firearm is going to leave your home you need to fill out an Authorization to Transport (authorization is essentially automatic. I have never seen an ATT be denied). It simply demonstrates to police that you have the legal right to be carrying a firearm in public if they have any suspicions about you and your gun or someone reports you under the mistaken belief that you are a criminal out to do harm.
The paperwork is a couple of simple forms, a background check and you are "off to the races", so to speak.
Officially, the time for the licensing process is 30 days but realistically, during particularly busy times it can extend to 60 days.
The time frame for buying depends on whether it is an "in-stock"/private purchase or whether a dealer must order it from the manufacturer.
"in stock"/private purchases involve only as much time as it takes to complete the transaction and go on-line to transfer it to you (a handgun could be bought and taken home the same day as it will already be registered at the time the dealer/seller acquired it).
If it has to be ordered then it depends on how long it takes the manufacturer to deliver and whether or not it has to be imported from another country.
That is the process in a nutshell. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 3:28:08 PM | "Where I presently live, I can go to Walmart and buy a rifle or shotgun tonight, and walk out of the store with it. "
So, if I understand the above correctly, Even if I have criminal history for violent acts, I could just simply walk into any walmart and walk out with shotgun?
Are there states that require a criminal record check before owning a gun? | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 3:29:26 PM |
Well you are. I think most of those people who were murdered by rapists might of had a chance if they had a hand gun.
actually I think more would get shot with their own gun,...if they had them near them when attacked but what if your gun was safely locked away when attacked,...now how safe are you? At Luby's Cafeteria, in Killeen, Texas, where 23 people (I think) were killed. A lady that was there, had a gun, she had left in her car, in compliance with Texas law, at the time. Had she had her gun with her, she could have stopped the killing, during one of the five times the gunman was reloading, before he murdered her parents.
Safety is mainly personal responsibility, that's why when the government moves away from the second amendment and unarms the people, they are vulnerable. You can't depend on the government for everything including being there 24/7 and the framers of the constitution understood that with the right to bear arms also helped stave off domestic tyranny from the government itself.
the framer's never heard of automatic weapons either,...this is such a stupid argument the framers were living in a different world,...or to be fair give everybody a long gun you have to stuff with powder and a ball,...sheeesh! Please read previous posts in this thread, or United States v. Miller, 107 US 374. The US Supreme Court has interpreted the Second Amendment to the US Constitution to refer to common military equipment; which could reasonably be argued to include automatic weapons. In fact, many private citizens in the US keep automatic weapons as investments.
actually groups of bank robbers rarely if ever break into houses,...and I have been broken into 3 times never needed more than a dog and good shoes,...to chaise them out,....having had the dogs didn't hurt though,.... but no one had a gun,...not them and not me,... You were fortunate. About six years ago, a man tried to steal my car. I turned the dogs loose, and called the Sheriff's Office. When my dogs "treed" him, he began yelling that he had a gun, and that he was going to kill my dogs, then me. It seemed like it took forever for the Sheriff's Deputies, and what seemed like entire compliment of law enforcement in the County, to arrive. Though I only had a single barrel shotgun, I was glad to have it, both to defend myself, and to hold the criminal that tried to steal my car, and injured my dogs, till law enforcement personnel arrived.
The ensuing comedy after the Cavalry arrived is a story for another day.
Since then, I keep a pump shotgun handy, in the unlikely event that a criminal comes to visit in the future. Home invasion robbery has become stylish among criminals in the US of late; a crime that is about violence, lots and lots of violence. Being prepared does not equal being offensive; it just means being prepared.
Those people who shot up their schools would have much less chance at succeeding if they are staring back into a classroom full of guns aimed back at them.
now you have gone off the deep end,....I would advocate closing all schools before arming all students,...there's a reason why children aren't supposed to play with guns,...
I believe the gentleman was referring to the recent college shootings here in the US.
Besides, possession of firearms by persons under the age of 18 is a crime in the US. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 3:42:51 PM | Thank you for the explanation of how a gun is acquired in Canada. I tried researching Canada's gun laws, and it turned into an exercise in frustration. It seems that Canada still subscribes to a different form of codifying it's laws, than the US, and I'm not familiar with how the codes are divided.
As I understand it, no one who has been convicted of, or is presently charged with, a Felony, can legally buy a gun of any kind. I believe, although I am not sure, that anyone convicted of any crime of violence is prohibited from legally buying a gun.
All firearms purchases in the US require that the purchaser pass a background check, that is run at the transaction is about to be consummated. As I understand this procedure, you fill out, and sign, a form. The holder of the Federal Firearms License then calls in the purchaser's information, and has a background check run, to ensure the purchaser is eligible to buy a firearm.
I have been told, that since I am a former Police Officer, that I can purchase a handgun, and walk out with it. I don't know whether this is, in fact, the case, as I haven't purchased a gun, of any kind, in a long time. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 3:43:27 PM |
What is the procedure for buying, if that is the proper term to use, a rifle, shotgun, and/or handgun, in Canada?
What is the process?
What paperwork is entatiled?
How long, in realistic, not altruistic, terms does this process take?
Heres's what I've found :
Non-Restricted Long Guns: Possession & Acquisition
If you have no interest in restricted firearms (e.g. many handguns, some military looking semi-automatic rifles) but you still wish to be able to acquire typical sporting long guns, you will need this Possession & Acquisition Licence (PAL).
You will be required to pass the Canadian Firearms Safety Course exam. The fee is $60 for a 5 year licence. At present the processing time for this licence appears to be a couple of months.
Restricted Firearms: Possession & Acquisition
This licence will allow you to purchase non-restricted and restricted firearms, plus any classes of prohibited firearms that you are eligible to acquire.
You must pass both the Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Exam and the Canadian Firearms Safety Exam. If you completed the old Canadian Firearms Safety Exam (the full one which included long guns and handguns) between 1993-1999, you will not have to write the current exams. The fee for this licence is $80 for five years. These licences are available to Americans (or any foreigner) but they must meet the same conditions as Canadian citizens.
http://www.firearmstraining.ca/licences.htm
So, one or two courses, depending on what you want to buy.
Now you don't even NEED to take those course, and can challenge the exam. You can then take the exam, which is both written and practical. If you get more than 80 percent - you've passed it.
The only people that DO have to take it are :
It is only mandatory to take the Canadian Firearms Safety Course if you:
* You are a minor (under 18 and not a subsistence hunter) * You are coming off a legal prohibition order * You want to become a CFSC Instructor
Sounds pretty fair to me.
Both exams have a written, multiple choice test and a practical session in which you have to demonstrate safe handling of several firearms in different scenarios. There are 50 questions on the written portion: two thirds are true/false with the rest being multiple choice. You have to get 80% to pass.
In the practical part, you will be asked to handle three different A student demonstrates the standing position during a Canadian Firearms Safety Course practical test kinds of firearms, under different conditions. Every time you handle a firearm, you must perform ACTS & PROVE, with marks deducted for missing any of the necessary steps. You lose two points every time you point a gun outside of the designated safe direction, or put your finger unnecessarily inside the trigger, or attempt to load the wrong ammunition. You also need to get 80% on this portion to pass.
If you point a firearm at any person (including yourself), you fail the exam. The only exception to this rule is when doing a visual bore inspection on an open, safe firearm.
On the tests most people typically take about 20 minutes for each of the CFSC exam sections: there is no time limit so you can take as long as you like. You will need two pieces of identification, one of which must be a photo ID, in order to complete the required paperwork. The examiner will give you two copies of each of the CFSC report forms. Attach one copy to your Firearms Licence application form and keep the other for your records. Keep your copy in a safe place - forever!
If you take the course, your instructor is not permitted to administer your examinations.
http://www.firearmstraining.ca/exam.htm
Now, for an experienced firearms owner, that's forty minutes of testing per license. required.
The cost would be about 120 per course, or 200 if taken together in the same weekend.
Once the course is done, the tests are all sent to the Chief Firearms Officer in your province to certify, after which they will send you back a copy of the test results by mail. At that point, you would fill out the application for the P.A.L., get your spouse (if you have one) to sign, get two references to sign, include a copy of your test results, include a photo that is to the government's guidelines, have a photo guarantor sign to confirm that that's you, and include your fee ($60.00 for non-restricted, $80.00 for restricted) to pay for your licence (which is good for five years).
Any time you subsequently buy a firearm (whether it be a gunpowder based firearm or a high power air rifle), you will need to show your P.A.L. They will then ring up the sale and if it is a good store, they will actually register the firearm with the federal government's gun registry for you while you wait (yeah, the gun registry sucks, but that's another discuss for another time). The gun registry is used by police, amongst other things, to alert them to a potential household that may have firearms if they are responding to a call (ie. domestic abuse, etc.). Of course, from what I understand, there have been search and seizure of homes that house firearms without notice (though those who fear this happening to them have not really read the cases where this has happened - the cops always have reasonable cause to ring your doorbell and ask to look at your firearms - they don't just do this out of the blue).
http://proudlyconservative.blogspot.com/2008/02/ getting-firearms-licence-pal-in-canada.html
Now , your PAL will take the following steps, and take one (maximum two) months to get in your hands. It will cost you 60 dollars every five years.
Think of it as a passport to hold a weapon, if you wish.
Let's look at the restricted weapons holder, as he/she has the most regulations to follow. After one has one's first handgun, other handguns can be bought within 24-48 hours.
PROCESS FOR OBTAINING A LEGAL HANDGUN FOR TARGET SHOOTING
Following is a brief description of the steps involved.
* Obtain an application form for a 'Possession/Acquisition License' - available at the post office. * Successfully complete the Canadian Firearms Safety Course and the Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course (or challenge the exams). See www.FirearmsTraining.ca for an explanation. * Forward the License application with proof of Safety Course completion, photo and appropriate fees to the Canadian Firearms Centre in Miramichi, New Brunswick. * Police background checks will be completed as well as reference and spousal checks (the authorities seem to have given up on reference checks as they are too time-consuming {and probably the most valuable part of the screening process!!}). If anything shows up on these checks, even if you were a victim of a criminal act (theft, assault, etc.), the application will be forwarded to the Chief Firearms Office (CFO) of your province for further investigation.
* If approved, a firearms license will be produced and mailed to the applicant (currently 1 to 2 months) * Join an approved handgun club, such as the Eastern Ontario Handgun Club. * Complete a mandatory Club level handgun safety course and serve a probation period. * Fill out an application for an 'Authorization to Transport (ATT)* - club executive will forward to the CFO along with their recommendation for processing. * Further police checks may be done along with a second computer record check. * If approved, an ATT will be mailed to the applicant, or in Ontario, to the club. * At this point, you may purchase a handgun from a gun shop or an individual. The registration must be called in to Miramichi (1-800-731-4000) for approval. * The information is forwarded to the CFO for final approval and issuance of an ATT (short term) for transport from the vendor to the purchaser's home. * Handguns cannot be moved from the dwelling until an ATT is received allowing for the transport to an approved firing range (in Ontario this ATT usually covers all approved ranges in the province). * The permit is valid for one to three years and must be renewed at the recommendation of the Club executive. * To transport the firearm to any location other than an approved range i.e. gunsmith, border point for competition in the US, etc., requires the owner to obtain another ATT from the Chief Firearms Office.
* A few words on the infamous ATT here: There are two basic 'types' of ATT: Short term and long term. Short term ATTs are issued by the CFO when (generally, there can be exceptions) a requirement exists to move a restricted firearm from one place to another on a temporary basis (like taking it to the gunsmith or bringing it home after purchasing it.) Long term ATTs are required to move restricted firearms to and from approved shooting ranges. While it is not strictly necessary to have a valid long term ATT to own restricted firearms, it is required if you wish to bring them to the range. A person wishing to apply for a long term ATT must belong to a registered club and the club must endorse that person's application. EOHC generally has new members complete an ATT application as a part of the new members safety course, whether or not they currently own restricted firearms. The exception to this, naturally, is if the prospective member does not carry the 'restricted firearms' endoresment on their PAL.
http://www.eohc.ca/legal_handgun.asp
So the only documents you need are your license, approved, and then an "Authorization To Transit" which allows you to bring it home from the shop. If you want to go to a gun range, you get another one to cover that long term.
That will specify the details of where you are going. If stopped by a peace officer outside of the area it applies to - you are in trouble.
We have something like one million hand guns in this country, legally.
Now, transporting a non-restricted weapon is a lot easier. Let's say you and your friends want to go hunting tomorrow, in Canada, as Canadian PAL holders.
1) The firearm must be unloaded. 2) If the car is left with no one in it, then the weapon must be loaded into a locked location out of sight , like the trunk area. 3) If the car is left with anyone in it, and without the weapons being stored securely, then at least one person in the car must hold a valid PAL.
Storing them at home ?
Storing Firearms in Canada
Storing Unloaded Firearms
To safely store an unloaded firearm, the firearm must be rendered inoperable by means of a secure locking device (such as a Trigger Lock or a Locked cable through the action), or rendered inoperable by removing the bolt or bolt carrier. Unloaded firearms must be stored away and out of easy access to its ammunition. Unloaded firearms do not need to be stored in a locked container or recepticle, vault or safe. Unloaded firearms do not need to be locked in a room.
Storing Loaded Firearms
In my opinion, the only safe way to store a firearm is to remove all ammuniton, disable the action with a lock or cable, and store the ammunition out of easy access to the firearm. There are situations, however, that warrant the storage of loaded firearms. You may only store a loaded firearm if it is stored in a securely locked recepticle, container, or room that can not be easily broken open or into. If it is stored in a location that is previously described, it can be stored with the ammunition loaded in the firearm, or with the firearm. If it is stored as previously mentioned, the firearm does not need to be rendered inoperable. Storing Firearms and Ammunition Together
A firearm can be stored with its ammunition provided that they are locked inside a locked recepticle, a locked container, or a locked room that has been modified for the use of firearm storage. The location in which the firearm and ammunition is stored must not be easily broken open or into. Loaded or unloaded firearms may be stored together with their ammunition, provided that the previous criteria are met. It is not recommended to store firearms with their ammunition, whether the firearm loaded or unloaded.
http://www.firearmscanada.ca/firearm-information/storing-firearms.php
If you want to buy ammunition for your weapon, then you better have your PAL with you and be over eighteen.
All these things strike me as a pretty reasonable set of regulations, for something as powerful as a gun. None of them impede the right of the gun owner to have his weapon, and none of them are that time consuming, especially after the first time once applied and been accepted.
Many of them, including the way of transporting weapons and storing them, are probably done by many American gun owners without even thinking about it.
From an American perspective, it may seem like a lot. That's again due to the different cultures we have. At the end of the day, I could (with some patience) be sitting here with a Glock pistol , locked and loaded - the same way you could.
I could take that weapon to a gun range, without any problem, with a long term ATT.
The only thing different between us is that an attempt has been made to look at who I am, and I've been trained (or have proven an ability to) use it properly and legally.
Not really much different from what a good gun owner there would do, honestly. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 3:51:50 PM |
At Luby's Cafeteria, in Killeen, Texas, where 23 people (I think) were killed. A lady that was there, had a gun, she had left in her car, in compliance with Texas law, at the time. Had she had her gun with her, she could have stopped the killing, during one of the five times the gunman was reloading, before he murdered her parents. Or she could have been drunk, taken offense over something and shot one or more people. Having grown up in the southern US I can't even begin to count the number of times people were shot in barroom disputes as a result of offended drunks. I do, however, clearly recall a neighbbour whose cousin shot another cousin in a drunken barroom dispute because he thought the other cousin was looking at his wife too amorously.
Besides, possession of firearms by persons under the age of 18 is a crime in the US. Under Canadian gun control laws a minor with a Minor's License (which requires the same safety course as adults take) may legally have a firearm (rifle/shotgun only) in their possession but they can't be the registered owner. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 4:21:56 PM |
As I understand it, no one who has been convicted of, or is presently charged with, a Felony, can legally buy a gun of any kind. I believe, although I am not sure, that anyone convicted of any crime of violence is prohibited from legally buying a gun. These are the actual criminal history questions asked on the application:
16. a) During the past five (5) years, have you been charged, convicted or granted a discharge for an offence: (i) under the Criminal Code or the Youth Criminal Justice Act where violence was used, threatened or attempted; (ii) involving the misuse, possession or storage of a firearm; or (iii) involving trafficking or importing drugs or controlled substances? This is the one that will likely guarantee denial
And this one MAY get you denied, depending on circumstances
b) During the past five (5) years, have you been subject to a peace bond, protection order or an order under section 810 of the Criminal Code? You might be denied if you are currently under trial or serving a current sentence for a felony but a past conviction for a felony which does not meet the standards in the questions above isn't likely to be considered (unless there is a pattern of multiple convictions of increasingly serious natures) | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 5:14:21 PM | So, in the end, Canadians DO have a de facto right to own arms - with some obligations.
Anyone that meets those obligations , and passes the test, gets a firearm - if they want one, even including a handgun.
Anyone challenging that "right" , including a peace officer, can be taken to court to prove it. Unless is based on some VERY good reasons, the court will uphold the right of the gun owner.
Do Canadians have the right to firearms ownership? The English Bill of Rights provided the right to English citizens. The preamble to the British North America Act extended that right to Canadians. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guaranteed the continuation of these rights.
http://www.brucemontague.ca/html/0007.html
Canada has long had stricter gun control laws than the United States.
In 1892, the first permit system for small arms was introduced in Canada.
In 1913, the sale of handguns was restricted to permit holders.
In 1968, certain classes of automatic weapons were prohibited. In 1976, a bill was passed requiring that every person in possession of any firearm or ammunition obtain a license, valid for 5 years, to be issued only if the licensing officer is "satisfied that the applicant has nothing in his or her background that would render him unfit to possess a firearms' license." The applicant was also required to provide "the statements of two guarantors, from a selected list, who have known him or her for more than two years, to the effect that they too know of nothing that would render him or her unfit to possess a firearms' license."
The tragic mass murder of 14 young women at Montreal's L'Ecole Polytechnique in 1989 by a deranged gunman galvanized the Canadian public to call for even more stringent firearm restrictions, including tighter restrictions on handgun ownership and the sale of ammunition, a ban on semi-automatic assault weapons and short-barrelled handguns, and mandatory registration of all firearms.
This new legislation, passed in 1995 in large part due to the efforts of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, gave Canada among the strictest gun control regulations in the western world, while still allowing hunters and target shooters to practice their sports. Since enactment of the new regulations, gun ownership in Canada has fallen 17%, firearm-related homicides have dropped to their lowest level since 1966, and overall crime has declined by about 20%.
http://www.calacep.org/issues/pp_firearms%20background.html
Now those figures, based on Canadian statistics, show that there is (at least here, and somewhat logically) a cause and effect relationship between making sure gun owners are good citizens, trained and licensed - and public safety.
In fact, some areas of the USA have more restrictions on gun ownership than Canada does, quite ironically.
Conversely, the Canadian police will issue Weapon Certificates, even for restricted firearms, to people whose last felony was more than ten years ago.
A person may appeal the police refusal of a restricted weapons certificate to a provincial court judge. Unlike with the Firearms Acquisition Certificate for ordinary long guns, such applicants bear the burden of proving that the police erred in rejecting their application.
The Canadian laws for handguns and most long guns are more moderate than in some United States jurisdictions. Following an example first set in the Chicago suburb of Morton Grove, several other Chicago suburbs, Chicago itself, and Washington, D.C. totally bar handgun purchases. New York City (police for several years simply refused to issue handgun applications, until ordered three times to do so by the state courts.New Jersey allows handgun purchases, but (despite a requirement for 30-day application processing) the police often take half a year or more to issue a license.
In some Canadian jurisdictions the police run a background check and authorize a handgun purchase in an afternoon, whereas states such as California require fifteen-day waiting periods for every single handgun, rifle, or shotgun purchase.
http://www.davekopel.com/2a/LawRev/Canadian_Gun_Control.htm
So, again ironically, we see that all Canadians have rights that some Americans don't.
We also have a professionally trained group of citizens who have proven they can handle a weapon responsibly, and know the laws.
Just as one example, on a personal level, I learned to handle an air rifle from a very good friend, and great teacher. He taught me two basic things, before he even allowed me to take that rather powerless weapon in my hands.
1) Never point it at any one, and presume it's always loaded. 2) Keep your finger off the trigger, until you are ready to shoot.
That lesson stayed with me. A friend of mine recently was proudly showing off his Airsoft pistol ( a legal one here) , and we did some "target shooting". I did exactly the same things I had done with that air rifle, automatically, even though there was little danger to both of us.
He later wound up shooting himself in the head, by accident. ( Don't worry, he wasn't really hurt, but had one heck of a painful welt for a while.
Now the idea of anyone walking into a store and imply getting a weapon handed to them is troubling to me. They may be suicidal, or be angry at someone. Those aren't good things to be feeling, when you can get a firearm handed to you almost instantly.
You don't really even need the money, if your intent is illegal use against yourself or others, simply charge it. If you are dead, or in police custody, paying that credit card bill is the least of your worries now, isn't it ?
This easy access also means that you may have zero training, or have learned from Uncle Bob over a few beers back at his house. There's no way of having even the minimal assurance that you know how to use it - or what the legal ownership of such a weapon implies.
Now you may have that "right" ( as in fact I have too legally) , but you have essentially zero responsibility in your ownership. You walk out of that store, and you could be someone that's never had one second of gun training.
I don't see that as a good thing, for you....or for society. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 5:27:08 PM | Most shootings occur among family members or acquaintances.
now that, is ridiculous on it's face. sixty percent of all shootings in the u.s. are gang and drug related. another twenty five percent are during robberies not involving drugs and gangs. about three percent are police shootings. about ten percent are suicides. how do you get something as stupid as most shootings having any relation to family members? the number of family shootings is miniscule. that is just plain reality | |
|
| gun control in the usa-WRONG! Posted: 3/1/2008 5:57:03 PM | Sir, our country was created with the birth of our civil rights and the Constitution of the United States. Freedom of speech, the right to bear arms and many other rights are just an example of the many great aspects of a country based on freedom. NO ONE should tell us how many, or which guns we should own. If guns were made illegal, who would be the only people carrying? CRIMINALS! Currently we have the right to bear arms, and protect our homes and families. Unfortunately, the only stories you hear on the news are ones of innocent people being shot during crimes and about gang members killing one another or others. Let them shoot each other and weed out some of the worthless people in our society. Look back into history....when prohibition was incorporated, NASCAR began in the back woods of the south to transport alcohol/moonshine. You cant stop people who who are determined. We should not agree to surpress peoples rights just because there are bad people in this world. If you want to help the situation, ban the damned video games that allow children to shoot people without consequence. These games feed violent nature and glorify shooting, killing, hookers and more. Children need to be parented and brought up to be civil. There is a major problem with the young adults, the majority of them have a lack of work ethic, have little morals and lack ambition, dignity and respect for others. Guns dont kill people, people kill people. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 5:58:13 PM |
how do you get something as stupid as most shootings having any relation to family members?
Victim Offender Relationship by Victim Gender, 1976-2005
Percent of homicide victims by gender
Victim/Offender relationship Male Female Total 100.0 % 100.0 % Intimate 5.0 30.0 Spouse 3.0 18.3 Ex-spouse 0.2 1.4 Boyfriend/Girlfriend 1.8 10.4 Other family 6.8 % 11.8 % Parent 1.3 2.8 Child 2.1 5.4 Sibling 1.2 0.9 Other family 2.2 2.8 Acquaintance/Known 35.3 % 21.8 % Neighbor 1.1 1.3 Employee/er 0.1 0.1 Friend/Acquaintance 29.4 17.0 Other Known 4.6 3.4 Stranger 15.5 % 8.7 %
Source : US Department of Justice. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/gender.htm
The potential of an stranger killing you is far less likely than someone you know killing you.
In Canada, such killings by strangers are even rarer.
By far the most common crime committed with a gun in Toronto is robbery. In 1992, there were 1,111 robberies involving firearms. In 2004, the latest year for which Statistics Canada has data, there were 625. That's a 44-per-cent drop. (Note that the Statistics Canada data err on the side of inclusion: Any incident in which a firearm was present is recorded, even if the firearm wasn't used in the crime.)
The next most common gun crime is "assault with weapon." In 1992, there were 185 such incidents in Toronto. In 2004, there were 77. That's a 59-per-cent decline. In 1992, there were 44 kidnappings involving a firearm. In 2004, there were 21. That's a 53-per-cent decline. In 1992, there were 31 aggravated assaults with a firearm. In 2004, there were 26.
In 1992, 46 common assaults occurred in which a firearm was present. In 2004, there were 32.
It's also out of line with a decline in gun crime that has been going on fairly steadily for decades. In 1977, 39 per cent of all robberies involved a firearm; in 2004, just 14 per cent of robbers carried a gun.
Gun murders dropped even more dramatically: In 1974, the rate of such killings was a little more than 1.2 per 100,000 people; in 2004, it was less than 0.6.
http://www.dangardner.ca/Coljan406.html
That's in the largest city in Canada, with about 2.48 million people living in the greater Toronto area.
Six hundred and twenty five armed robberies, including those times it wasn't actually used during the commission of the robbery.
Seventy seven assaults with a weapon.
Twenty six aggravated assaults, where a weapon was present. Thirty two common assaults.
Twenty one kidnappings , involving a weapon.
Fourteen percent of robberies committed with firearms.
All of these things happening in a place where almost three million people live, in high population density, with poverty, and with a very multi-ethnic population.
Two hundred miles from Detroit, and yet a world away in it's reality. A short boat ride from Buffalo, NY.
The NRA would have you believe that Toronto's situation is impossible. That close to the border, no large numbers of weapons, the chance for armed criminals to prey on an unarmed population at will, a large city open for easy pickings for anyone with a gun.
We prove them wrong each and every day, with crime stats lower than many American cities have. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 6:07:58 PM | I have mixed feelings about gun control. I wish nobody had them or could get them. But the reality is that criminals, and young teen ones at that, have easy access to guns and use them in crime. When I see the cops giving up their guns, I'll give up mine. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 6:08:18 PM | Well...that's Canada...they've been used to strict gun control and other control measures, having been long-term citizens under the British Commonwealth and their rules.
Oh, btw...how many of those weapons used in Toronto 2004 were actually REGISTERED??? How many were used by the owners?? how many were stolen/unregistered??
As americans we've had quite a different society...in some ways better, in some ways worse...we had to fight for our independance as we were too impatient to wait the 200 years that Canada did to receive theirs from Britain...although we honestly believe that Canada BORED the Brits into releasing them...
In the US until the mid 1970's we pretty much had ZERO gun control...guns were sold in hardware stores. You could buy anything short of an full auto machine gun...they stopped selling those in hardware stores in the late 1930's. I bought an .177 bb pistol at age 12 from a hardware store, the only check was that the clerk called my mother and asked if it was OK...so we've had a pretty free run for nearly our entire existance...now everyone and their brother wants to put restrictions on Lawful Owners...I say all those who want restrictions against Lawful Individuals are screwed in the head...
Now Florida has gotten the right idea about Gun Control...10-20-LIFE. If you carry a gun and don't fire it during the commision a crime, you get an automatic 10 years. If you fire the gun during the commission of a crime, even if you don't hit/hurt anyone, you get 20 years...if you injure or kill anyone with a gun during the commission of a crime, you get LIFE. Oddly enough, Florida's crime stats are starting to show a serious drop in gun crimes due to the people that are committing crimes are GOING AWAY for a long time...kinda solves the problem, eh? Why penalize Legitimate Gun Owners when you can just penalize the crooks???
If every state had Florida's 10-20-LIFE law...there would be less gun crime due to less crooks being around... | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 10:38:23 PM |
If every state had Florida's 10-20-LIFE law...there would be less gun crime due to less crooks being around... Criminals having a firearm in their possession during a crime recieve, on average, twice the sentence compared to the same crime with no firearm around these parts.
Oh, btw...how many of those weapons used in Toronto 2004 were actually REGISTERED??? How many were used by the owners?? how many were stolen/unregistered?? Don't have the numbers for Toronto itself but, on a nation-wide basis, 83% of firearms used in homicides over the last 10 years are unregistered.
Declining rates of firearm usage in crimes leads to a reasonable inference that there are fewer firearms available for use in crimes.
The varying degrees to which this is due to the police removing unregistered firearms from the streets faster than new ones are available (mostly smuggled, obviously) and those who have them being less willing to use them to commit a crime is rather a moot point, the rates have been in long term decline regardless due to a comprehensive gun control policy. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/1/2008 11:04:20 PM |
Most shootings occur among family members or acquaintances.
now that, is ridiculous on it's face. sixty percent of all shootings in the u.s. are gang and drug related. another twenty five percent are during robberies not involving drugs and gangs. about three percent are police shootings. about ten percent are suicides. how do you get something as stupid as most shootings having any relation to family members? the number of family shootings is miniscule. that is just plain reality
Not sure where you are getting your "facts" from ,sports fan but stranger shootings represent one of the least numbers of shooting incidents annual. If you are killed...w/ or w/o gun it's almost certainly going to be by a family member,friend or acquaintance.
And that suicide number is not only ridiculously low (http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/dvp/suicide/SuicideDataSheet.pdf) it's adding something to the discussion that's irrelevant.
Bottom Line...the majority of the time if you are killed by a firearm whether accidentally or a homicide...you know the shooter. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/2/2008 12:29:17 AM | Unfortunately, alcohol seems to be a huge contributing factor in a many cases where someone is hurt, or killed. Sometimes, it's done with a knife, broken bottle, impact weapons of many kinds, and rather rarely, comparatively speaking, with a firearm. I responded to a number of calls, either as assigned, or as assisting, of assaults, and brawls, at various drinking places, and homes where alcohol was involved.
Funny thing about the overwhelming majority of those calls; they involved the same people, over and over again.
I don't honestly know what the law is for a minor to possess a firearm here in the US. My daughters have both fired handguns, shotguns, and rifles, from young ages; all under my very close supervision, of course. My concern in getting both girls acquainted with guns very young, was to take the mystery out of them. They are fascinating machines. As we have all agreed here, they can also cause serious harm if not handled properly.
In doing some research last night, I found a case from the Fifth Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Emerson, 2002. I don't know if a Writ of Certriorari has been issued for this case by the US Supreme Court. However, if the US Supreme Court takes this case, in the research I found, it was said to be the first "true second amendment case" in US history for the high court to hear. The case can by searching Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in your search engine.
I didn't get to read the whole Court decision. However, in the part I did get to read, the Judge writing the opinion, went back through the history of the US Constitution, into English Common Law, upon which US, and I presume Canadian, law both have their roots, to determine the basis upon which the US Constitution, in particular the second amendment was drafted. The summary of the Court's decision states that the Second Amendment provides for an individual right, and not a collective State's right, in the form of a Militia.
When I get a chance, likely this afternoon, to finish reading the Court's decision in Emerson, I'll post more on it.
The Canadian gun laws do sound reasonable in theory. However, I must say that a drop of 17% in private gun ownership, at least, suggests that these laws have, in practice, had a chilling effect on private gun ownership in Canada.
Given that the history of the US is steeped in private gun ownership, I sincerely doubt that such laws would be received in the US without some extremely serious opposition. There are far too many Americans, including myself, that rather like being able to target shoot, and hunt, in our own back yards. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/2/2008 7:02:23 AM | I'm not sure if someone already quoted the great philosopher: Larry The Cableguy.
"If you can blame guns for killing people, then I can blame pencils for misspelled words" | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 3/2/2008 7:52:34 AM | I own a pistol which unfortunately is the wepon most people think of when banning guns. During a tough time in my life it kept squirrel, rabbit, and other meat on my table. I was on the pistol team in our guard unit and am nearly a world class shot. I know where my bullets will end up and don't take a shot if I'm unsure. Having said that I feel ALL firearms should be tested for ballistics (this ID's the bullet from the weapon), numbered, and registered for law enforcement purposes. As for making them illegal to own SO IS POT!!! How long has that been around. Hell a judge near where I live got busted for cocain and is still a judge. Making things illegal does NOT stop them. The county in which I live is a wealthy wood manufacturing center. The $ for this capital came from prohibition. We're german and can make any drink you can imagine. These $ funded the capital to start these factories. The key is safety. My weapon is stored LOCKED my ammo is separately LOCKED and the firing pin is separately LOCKED. No child will ever get and use my weapon. Guns are simply tools that must be carefully and intelligentlly handled. Evil people will always find a way to be evil just look at the leadership of America and see! | |
|
| gun control in the USA Posted: 3/2/2008 10:15:05 AM | | never heard of anyone shot by a burglar? must not be a football fan. Sean Taylor of the washington Redskins was shot in his home by one of three armed buglars, he died as a result. this just happened last season. all it takes is reading the newspapers of any large city | |
|
| gun control in the USA Posted: 3/2/2008 11:01:48 AM | | Just reading through the posts on the process for obtaining a gun in the US, couldn't one say that the US or most individual states already have form of gun. The reason I say this is that above a poster said that at the time of purchase there is a criminal record check done. If this comes back that the person has a criminal past then they would be denied the purchase of the gun. Is this not a form of gun control by denying that person the purchase of the gun? How does this not breach that person's second amendment rights and how does the store do criminal record checks on the spot? Is there a central database that they look up? just curious | |
|
|
| Page 64 of 93
|
53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93 |
|