|
|
|
|
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/24/2008 7:40:22 PM | I cut my hand badly the other day on a can of potato sticks. Let's ban them | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/24/2008 8:32:24 PM | I've been on both side of this issue ~
I always felt safer having one handy ~
until ~ policeman got so quick to shoot someone just for having one in you hand.
until ~ some of my druggy friends , drops in to say hello
until ~ i accepted the reality that ~ if I got to go ~ I hope to go fighting.
until ~ i decided , if given 1 seconds ~ I'll take his gun and cram it up his ass.
so I practice some nine "take downs" that comes automatic ~ no thinking involved
If I approached some other way ~ I'm screwed and will have to figure it out ~ dar | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/24/2008 8:42:08 PM |
If I approached some other way ~ I'm screwed and will have to figure it out ~ dar
Hmm ~ Martial Arts?  | |
|
NERO1
| Joined: 3/8/2008 Msg: 1979 | |
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/24/2008 9:00:33 PM | QUOTE: I just wouldn't live there, and with the amount of crime that goes on I don't get why anybody who takes personal security seriously would.
^^^ No one that I know or actually now that I think of it no one that I have ever known well or even been acquainted with has ever reported an instance of having been seriously personally victimized in the city. Yes there are certain areas in general which people don't venture into particularly at night if they do not have to. It's like that in any big city. So either the general (non-victimized) population , of non-gun carriers (presumably) -- that is to say, basically law-abiding ppl who DON'T drive or walk around packing heat "just in case", are all very very lucky, or ..... perhaps these incidents are (relatively) rare enough to still be newsworthy (at least the big bad ones; I'm not talking about every random mugging or purse snatching -- but then if you'd drill some loser with your hand cannon for snatching your purse or taking a pick at your pocket....frankly I'd wonder about your ethics and values , and sanity, at least as much or more than the crook's). People do other things around here for basic outdoor security ; if they like to go for walks for instance they perhaps get a big dog, or they carry something that's (I believe) legal to carry here such as pepper spray. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/24/2008 9:34:46 PM | | whoa whoa, whoa, hold on there, ban guns?! are you on crack? do you know what that will do with the crime rate? when the UK and Austraila banned all guns, the crime rate went up 800%. and trust me i'm well aware of the gun problems in Toronto, i've spent lots of time in Toronto and Canada. its a lack of enforcement not the lack of laws, the spineless gutless politicians don't enforce the current gun laws. i love the fact we have the right to own as many firearms as I want. and yes gun registration is a waste of money, and it punishes the law abiding citizens, cause the criminals aren't gonna register their guns. so please don't even suggest banning firearms, i use mine in a safe and responseable manner, and if you ban them, people like me will suffer, while the criminals run amok. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/24/2008 10:37:57 PM | | Some of us harbor this crazy notion that criminals should be treated like criminals and aggressively punished for gun crimes. We also have this mildly insane idea that locking up guns somehow isn't going to stop criminals. Go figure. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 6:19:16 AM |
Posted: 4/24/2008 10  22 PM I cut my hand badly the other day on a can of potato sticks. Let's ban them This sort of idiocy is why Americans are unlikely to figure out safe and sane gun controls........ Since when does "control" equate to a "ban"? Ohhhh in the NRA pamphlet. Do you also believe the "facts" PETA presents without question? With a little digging posters would finally stop repeatting fake "facts" such as
whoa whoa, whoa, hold on there, ban guns?! are you on crack? do you know what that will do with the crime rate? when the UK and Austraila banned all guns, the crime rate went up 800%. and trust me i'm well aware of the gun problems in Toronto, i've spent lots of time in Toronto and Canada. its a lack of enforcement not the lack of laws, the spineless gutless politicians don't enforce the current gun laws. i love the fact we have the right to own as many firearms as I want. and yes gun registration is a waste of money, and it punishes the law abiding citizens, cause the criminals aren't gonna register their guns. so please don't even suggest banning firearms, i use mine in a safe and responseable manner, and if you ban them, people like me will suffer, while the criminals run amok. Australia's violent crime rate actually dropped by a statistically significant amount (check with the Australian governments own statistics as reported by actual Australians to actual Australian police)There goes that arguement, I don't recall researching fully the validity of the statement about the UK though I would be inclined to believe that one more based on the history of violence involving the IRA etc..... When you have violent opposition to government illegal arms being available more easily is a no-brainer. I do have to agree the gun resgistry here is a farce though. The fault lies in how it was implemented and it's lack of thought into how it could be used to do any good at all (perhaps test fires of all arms imported before sale logged and kept with the serial number in a central registry, not that it would do much good for shotguns). Wasted money that could have put a few more cops on the street in trouble spots like Toronto's ghettos. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 7:09:33 AM | Responding to Loonytunz:
"This sort of idiocy is why Americans are unlikely to figure out safe and sane gun controls........ Since when does "control" equate to a "ban"? Ohhhh in the NRA pamphlet....".
This dude's basic misunderstanding is that he assumes controls are a Good Thing. Left hanging is the question - Who does the controlling?
Ah, glad you asked. He is from Oz, a country where people are conditioned to trust their government. They have never shed blood to throw off their government.
Vestiges of medieval despotism still affect their lives. They are "subjects;" Americans like the French are CITIZENS, not subjects. The "governor general" appointed by the Queen of England was able to dismiss a lawfully elected Australian government quite recently.
Funny thing about that foreign queen, too. They grovel to Her Majesty as if she is THEIR monarch - so how many months of each year does she live on THEIR soil? Oh.
When Australians have real control of THEIR country, then I will listen to them when they preach at us. At present I prefer to be proudly a citizen, by choice, of a nation which had the cojones to say a loud and clear NO to the monarchy in 1776 and make it stick even at great cost.
And freedom of the common people - not just the government and its cops - to possess arms has ALWAYS been the hallmark of a free society throughout history. Australians get all preachy because they have never yet had to fight for their freedom; their independence was handed to them on a platter. They have no idea why it is good for the common people to be armed. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 9:22:13 AM | Its clear you are as uninformed as the rest of your liberal ilk. Check the statistics where there is gun control crime goes thru the roof -- ask Australia the last major nation that banned them. Ask canadians same thing there. Your example actually showed the need for the people to have guns, not the opposite. Guns are not the problem, people are. more peiople are killed by cars than guns so lets ban cars -- where there are no guns only the criminals and the authorities have them as law abiding citizens dont shop the black market for them. Then comes dictatorship and mass killings of those who oppose them. The USA was founded so we could be FREE and have the right to our own lives including the right to own whatever means necessary to protect ourselves esp guns. If you dont like it then go to England or Canada, or Australia or any of the countries that meet your ideal of a gun free society and see how well you do there. | |
|
Win70
| Joined: 2/23/2008 Msg: 1985 | |
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 9:40:01 AM | | I agree with you like the saying goes when guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns. so many out there are to blind to see or to stupid I haven't figured that one out and probably never will. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 10:48:40 AM | Mr. Catchinnj you made a comment in your message that tells me that you don`t own a gun or know very much about what they are used for. Your comment about Firearms are made for one purpose is to take a life an way out of line an before making a comment like that you should check out what all guns are used for. My guns are used for putting food on the table(thats taking a life, but the life of a person)an with people hunting in this country an others, the wildlife would all catch something an die an kill off all the wildlife. So they are used for the good of control of wildlife. I use mine to go to a safe place an target shoot with my friends for fun an to relax. I have one that was made in 1901 that is never shot, it is only shown to my friends an was my first gun I owned an will be handed down to my son an so on.(An you people want to take things like this away???) Guns are also used in competions such as the World Shooting Complex in the state of Illinois. People from all over the US comes to compete to see you is the best at shooting clays. If you want to stop people getting killed by guns?? Take them away from the crooks. I feel that they should bring hanging back. An if you kill someone hang the sucker an after a few is cought an they figure out what will happen to them, you`ll see the killings stop or at lest drop way down an you won`t be slapping them on the hand an then feeding them an giving them more rights in prison then the abiding person has for the rest of there lives. If someone uses a gun to kill what do they care about law they know if cought they will be taken very good care of in prison by me an all of you for the rest of there lives. An if you think by taking away guns from people that does go by the law is going to stop killings your mighty wrong. If someone wants to kill there going to kill an taking my guns(which will never happen)will not stop them, neither will all the laws in the world. So guns don`t kill people,people kills people | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 11:04:34 AM | | The fact is that cigarettes kill many times more people than guns do. If saving lives is the point then deal with the cigarette addiction, gun possession can wait even if it is a problem at all. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 2:08:32 PM | Check the statistics where there is gun control crime goes thru the roof -- ask Australia the last major nation that banned them. Ask canadians same thing there.
If you dont like it then go to England or Canada, or Australia or any of the countries that meet your ideal of a gun free society and see how well you do there.
Guns are not banned in Canada, they are controlled.
Even I could apply for a permit for a rifle, shotgun, or pistol and get one - if I wanted one. I'd have a weapon that would be as lethal as an Americas one, but I would also have responsibilities attached to it's ownership.
If refused a permit, I could legally challenge the reasons why.
The things expected of me , as a gun owner here, would be the same things expected from any good gun owner anywhere.
i'm well aware of the gun problems in Toronto
Really ?
http://www.toronto.ca/quality_of_life/safety.htm
Compared to most American cities, even ones with similar populations, Toronto is far safer.
| |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 4:35:13 PM |
The fact is that cigarettes kill many times more people than guns do. If saving lives is the point then deal with the cigarette addiction
And what about alcohol addiction/abuse? Kill someone faster with that than with a carton of cigarettes. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 5:06:17 PM |
The fact is that cigarettes kill many times more people than guns do. If saving lives is the point then deal with the cigarette addiction
And what about alcohol addiction/abuse? Kill someone faster with that than with a carton of cigarettes.
If dealers sold only to responsible owners and people committing suicide this would hardly be an issue. One persons rights end where they begin to infringe upon anothers rights. Your rights are no less valid than mine, but I insist on the right to personal safety. That can include making it more difficult for unstable people to obtain weapons. Or testing drivers for that matter.
The beef is not with legitimate and responsible gun owners but with irresponsible ones and a question as to why you have so many illist firearms readily available to any loogan that wants one. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 5:21:15 PM | So, let's ask a question nobody seems to have addressed yet, in all these pages. It's close to the topic at hand, in fact it's the basis for it.
Where do criminals get their guns ?
Steal them ? Only about ten to fifteen percent of the time. Hmmmm.....
ATF agent Jay Wachtel says that most guns used in crimes are not stolen out of private gun owners' homes and cars. "Stolen guns account for only about 10% to 15% of guns used in crimes," Wachtel said. Because when they want guns they want them immediately the wait is usually too long for a weapon to be stolen and find its way to a criminal.
In fact, there are a number of sources that allow guns to fall into the wrong hands, with gun thefts at the bottom of the list. Wachtel says one of the most common ways criminals get guns is through straw purchase sales. A straw purchase occurs when someone who may not legally acquire a firearm, or who wants to do so anonymously, has a companion buy it on their behalf. According to a 1994 ATF study on "Sources of Crime Guns in Southern California," many straw purchases are conducted in an openly "suggestive" manner where two people walk into a gun store, one selects a firearm, and then the other uses identification for the purchase and pays for the gun. Or, several underage people walk into a store and an adult with them makes the purchases. Both of these are illegal activities.
The next biggest source of illegal gun transactions where criminals get guns are sales made by legally licensed but corrupt at-home and commercial gun dealers. Several recent reports back up Wachtel's own studies about this, and make the case that illegal activity by those licensed to sell guns, known as Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs), is a huge source of crime guns and greatly surpasses the sale of guns stolen from John Q. Citizen. Like bank robbers, who are interested in banks, gun traffickers are interested in FFLs because that's where the guns are. This is why FFLs are a large source of illegal guns for traffickers, who ultimately wind up selling the guns on the street.
According to a recent ATF report, there is a significant diversion to the illegal gun market from FFLs. The report states that "of the 120,370 crime guns that were traced to purchases from the FFLs then in business, 27.7 % of these firearms were seized by law enforcement in connection with a crime within two years of the original sale. This rapid `time to crime' of a gun purchased from an FFL is a strong indicator that the initial seller or purchaser may have been engaged in unlawful activity."
The report goes on to state that "over-the-counter purchases are not the only means by which guns reach the illegal market from FFLs" and reveals that 23,775 guns have been reported lost, missing or stolen from FFLs since September 13, 1994, when a new law took effect requiring dealers to report gun thefts within 48 hours. This makes the theft of 6,000 guns reported in the CIR/Frontline show "Hot Guns" only 25% of all cases reported to ATF in the past two and one-half years.
Another large source of guns used in crimes are unlicensed street dealers who either get their guns through illegal transactions with licensed dealers, straw purchases, or from gun thefts. These illegal dealers turn around and sell these illegally on the street. An additional way criminals gain access to guns is family and friends, either through sales, theft or as gifts.
ATF officials say that only about 8% of the nation's 124,000 retail gun dealers sell the majority of handguns that are used in crimes. They conclude that these licensed retailers are part of a block of rogue entrepreneurs tempted by the big profits of gun trafficking. Cracking down on these dealers continues to be a priority for the ATF. What's needed, according to Wachtel, is better monitoring of the activities of legally licensed gun dealers. This means examining FFL paperwork to see where their guns are coming from, and making sure that those guns are being sold legally. But he says, "Let's be honest. If someone wants a gun, it's obvious the person will not have difficulty buying a gun, either legally or through the extensive United States black market."
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/guns/procon/guns.html
The answer ? From a market that's not controlled properly,
Eight percent of retail gun dealers sell the majority of the guns that criminals gain access to.
The Journal of the American Medical Association study questioning the effectiveness of the Brady law in reducing homicide rates begins with a flawed premise: that criminals get guns from their own states (news article, Aug. 2). The study compared the 32 states that installed the Brady law in 1994 with the 18 states that already required buyer background checks and concluded that the law had limited effect.
But gun-trace data show that a handful of states with weak gun laws are the source of most of the country's out-of-state crime guns. They also show that in states with tough gun laws, like New York and New Jersey, nearly three-fourths of all crime guns were bought in another state and trafficked over state lines illegally.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0 DEEDE153CF934A3575BC0A9669C8B63
Thanks to opponents of gun control, there is a failure to mandate a national gun control policy that is effective.
That means that a criminal, or his supplier, simply has to go to the nearest state that offers the best chance to get access to legal weapons that can then be sold illegally to criminals. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/25/2008 7:16:11 PM | In fact, there are a number of sources that allow guns to fall into the wrong hands, with gun thefts at the bottom of the list. Wachtel says one of the most common ways criminals get guns is through straw purchase sales. A straw purchase occurs when someone who may not legally acquire a firearm, or who wants to do so anonymously, has a companion buy it on their behalf. According to a 1994 ATF study on "Sources of Crime Guns in Southern California," many straw purchases are conducted in an openly "suggestive" manner where two people walk into a gun store, one selects a firearm, and then the other uses identification for the purchase and pays for the gun. Or, several underage people walk into a store and an adult with them makes the purchases. Both of these are illegal activities.
Well, if this is true then we could all use a little help from the NRA in lobbying for strict enforcement of laws against straw sales. I'd like to see a lot more focus on sting operations and the revocation of licenses for dealers who go along with this.
Plus, the idea that a person can be held liable for damages to victims made with guns that they purchase starts to look like a much more effective deterrent than I'd thought. Buy a gun for your buddy, and you assume liability for whatever nonsense your buddy gets up to with it.
Well friends? What do you say? Do you agree with me that this is an existing gun law that should be much better enforced?
Also, if you're a licensed FFL dealer of a gun that is used in crime, perhaps you should be charged as an accomplice in that crime.
Anyone have a problem with that? Why should these corrupt or careless firearms dealers get a pass when they furnish the means for violent crimes? | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/26/2008 7:30:52 PM | | At the end of the day, as a Veteran who spent four years in the service I hold all our freedoms and rights dear. Even though I don't currently own a gun, I do not want to give up the right to own a gun in the future. I also don't feel it's right for those who haven't spent their time on the wall to speak for me in this respect. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/26/2008 7:58:28 PM | Alcohol addiction, cigarette addiction and firearms abuse all cause deaths that can be reduced. We already have plenty of laws that prevent you from brandishing a gun on the street and from drinking a beer on the street. We pretty much eradicated the problem of people spitting on the street, and hopefully public smoking of cigarettes will be the next to go. That's where the attention should be focused.
Prohibition does not work, whatever you try to prohibit. We learned that the hard way when we tried to prohibit alcohol. If guns are banned, that will be just another doomed policy - prohibition of gun ownership will not work any better than prohibition of alcohol worked. The bad guys will always get guns - even if you make guns illegal - that's why they are bad guys. They don't honor laws.
As to cigarettes, these too should NOT be prohibited, but, as with public spitting, there should be education to make it clear that the habit is repulsive and disgusting. Smokers stink; guns don't stink. Social disapproval will take care of the smokers, in public, and what they do behind closed doors, on their own dime, is their own business.
The big difference between guns and those two other issues is that the civilian population must retain at least some degree of ability to resist improper seizure of power by its own government. Cigarettes and alcohol only have to do with habits in private life, but your right to bear arms is essential to the preservation of democracy. The government should not even know who has them, and gun registration sucks. A free people should not fear its government; the government should fear the people.
| |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/27/2008 6:45:11 AM | Well put,Fra59e, Personal problems are just that-personal problems,be they addictions or trigger happiness(BB gun-as a kid-worked it out) which every individual has to face. We should bolster our legal system to PUNISH PEOPLE who are out of control. Over-regulating law-abiding citizens is just as bad if not worse than prohibition. I find it very odd that the very congress and senate that's spending us into oblivion can't write a couple of simple laws regarding prosecution of offenders which cause legal gun owners so much misery. | |
|
_JAFO_
| Joined: 11/9/2007 Msg: 1996 | |
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/27/2008 11:38:45 AM | As part of a deal announced last week with a coalition of the nation's mayors, Wal-Mart--the nations's largest gun retailer--will track gun sales more closely. Wal-Mart will videotape all gun transactions and run criminal background checks on store employees (novel idea?) who handle guns. The agreement was spearheaded by New York City Mayor, Michael Bloomburg.
Gun control advocates are hoping this will be a standard.
As for me. Should I ever be confronted by a person trespassing within my domain I'd like them to do so with the one single thought in the back of their mind...
Does she own a gun and will she shoot to kill? Without the threat of that risk, criminals have no reason to hesitate.
I hear there is nothing more intimidating than a criminal standing in a dark house they're intending to rob only to hear a crisp clear sound in the dark of a gun being racked. (is that the term when you chamber the ammunition?) | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/27/2008 11:51:08 AM |
I hear there is nothing more intimidating than a criminal standing in a dark house they're intending to rob only to hear a crisp clear sound in the dark of a gun being racked. (is that the term?)
If you have a shotgun, that's the term.
The only thing more intimidating than that would be hearing two OTHER shotguns being racked - by those in the next room.  | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/27/2008 11:59:46 AM | | I would think,JMO, that the experienced criminal would fear a more available,silent,deadly type of weapon which is wielded by a vicious,angry, alert homeowner in the dark. Them that only gets shot be the lucky ones... | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/27/2008 3:13:04 PM |
Personal problems are just that-personal problems,be they addictions or trigger happiness(BB gun-as a kid-worked it out) which every individual has to face. We should bolster our legal system to PUNISH PEOPLE who are out of control. Ummm you do realise that means someone is likely dead of maimed so that you don't have to suffer the inconvenience of a proper background check? Okay, well start punishing Cho.... can't do that can we and it won't re-animate the kids he shot either. Gitta love the solution from the one gun dealer that sold to Cho (a known mentally disturbed individual) ..... let's sell students at Va Tech arms at or near cost (again without verifying that they are NOT some sick freak). Yes that will help.
Punishing under US law doesn't seem very effective, Texas has approx 20% of it's adult male population either in custody or on parole and still an outrageous violent crime rate. Not to say these people should be coddled, they are scum and deserve to be treatted as such(most atleast hard to hold someone with an IQ of 70 that accidentally shoots someone with a legally aquired gun 100% responsible for his actions) The reasons motivating the violent crime should be looked at very closely, and as MG pointed out the issue of illict sales by dealers is another problem that needs to be dealt with.
As for crooks worrying about being shot...... if you were a criminal and had that fear wouldn't you just be more inclined to go in with a round already chamberred and fire before the occupant has a chance to reach for their gun? Even slime have a sense of self-preservation. Now knowing someone was less likely to shoot you would the crook not then realise that a burglary charge could cost them time, but murder in the commission of a crime is likely to see them in an electric chair/gas chamber/lethal injection not be more inclined to threaten with a weapon but not actually shoot? End result you are out a tv and some trinkets till the insurance comes in but you are still there the next day to raise your kids etc. the reality is that if I wanted someone dead bad enough no matter how many guns they own I could still easily succeed. Really it is a false sense of security, other than for say a ranch-hand toting a Contender for grizzlies etc. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 4/27/2008 7:04:16 PM | Posted By: rivereye on 4/27/2008 11 46 AM Subject: gun control in the usa Message: I would think,JMO, that the experienced criminal would fear a more available,silent,deadly type of weapon which is wielded by a vicious,angry, alert homeowner in the dark. ................................................................
If the purpose of the homeowner was to shoot the invader, then indeed a silent weapon would be preferred. But the purpose is to get him to leave. That's why the sound of a shotgun being readied is more effective than the silence of a pistol.
The criminal knows full well that a pistol shot has to find its mark accurately, and it's easy to miss. But a blast from a 12 gauge shotgun is likely to blow his guts out wherever it hits. When he hears you chamber a round he is not going to hang around long to find out how good a shot you may be because he knows you do not need to be. | |
|
|
| Page 80 of 86
|
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 |
|