|
|
|
|
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/11/2008 4:44:10 AM | Actually, every illegal alien is a criminal. Sorry, should have been more specific.
I'm not quite sure what's going on in Alaska...they had a drop in violent crime in 2005, only to jump drastically the next year. Like the news articale said, a large amount of prison inmates were released (bad idea) and more people up there have cellphones and coverage, which leads to more reports of crime. But then, most CONUS Americans are about as up on Alaskan issues as we are about Canada's internal politics...the only thing we get about Alaska on TV is about the Ice Road Truckers & the Fishing Industry...
maybe the cold is making them crazy?? Even in the 1800's Alaskan's have been some violent mofo's...your RCMP has a wonderful article about the comparison between Alaska & Canada on their history website. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/11/2008 10:50:51 AM | Alaska is great.! You can carry your weapon displayed in public! Just like Wyatt Earp!
GUN CONTROL IS HITTING WHAT YOUR AIMING AT. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/11/2008 7:37:37 PM | Only six states in the US prohibit Open Carry...Florida being one of them, but there is a growing coalition trying to get Open Carry passed into law here...just takes time & effort.
Altho, concealed carry makes a bad guy have to wonder a bit...hehehe Recently a 71-yr old retired Marine shot two bad guys who robbed a Subway and then tried to force the old guy into the restroom...(for those of you who don't know, if you are forced into the back of a store during a robbery, chances youa re going to die go up 92%) welp, he had a CCW, and being a Marine, shot one in the head and the other in the chest. Headshot died, chest wound just got a life sentence for using a Gun in the commission of a Felony. Gotta luv Florida's 10-20-life law :) | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/12/2008 4:55:27 AM | Florida was also, as best I can recall, the first state to pass a Will Issue law for CCW permits. At the time the law was passed, there was a HUGE outcry that there would be blood in the streets, and crime would skyrocket out of control.
Last I heard, Florida's crime rate had been in decline ever since passage of the Will Issue law for concealed carry. Maybe the criminals know a little something that the gun grabbers don't. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/12/2008 2:55:55 PM | Anyone who lives in Chicago, Wash DC, or any other gun ban city can now legally own a gun, and if your city tries to stop you from purchasing or arrests you for possession of a firearm, you can sue the living stuffings out of 'em and have an easy win. The Supreme Court has Done The Job :)
Gonna be a lot of lawsuits in the next few months... | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/12/2008 3:30:45 PM | | hello all i live in london england were we are not allowed to arm our police or ourselves and i have read all your posts about gun control. I dont advocate violence or carrying knives or guns but in our country it will soon head that way because although we dont all carry guns people ar e starting to ask why not if someone breaks in our houses or attacks us in the street we have no way of defending ourselves. 20 children were stabbed to death over 2 days just this week by teenage gangs carrying knives and we are getting sick of it. So i say Koss what you are saying is a load of rubbish, unfortunatly there are groups of people in this world who want to hurt others for reason of jealousey envy greed perversion what ever they cant be cured they cant be locked up so if u meet one of theses on ur street or in ur house what will you do? when he waves his gun or knife at you? Talk to him hope he wont kill you rape your daughter ur wife your mother.......you?????????? Yes it would be lovely not to have to meet viloence with violence but in this world today it is getting harder and harder to have ourselves defended and protected by those who do that job ie our police forces. Some may feel that they have no choice and if the usa wishes to protect themselves in that way then so be it because one day we might have to make that same choice. But do not stand there saying that no one should be allowed to defend themsleves once i was nearly raped outside my own door and if id had a gun in my bag id have used it. As they say in the bible an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth and yes i know they say those that live by the sword die by it but that cuts both ways. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/12/2008 4:20:51 PM |
hello all i live in london england were we are not allowed to arm our police or ourselves and i have read all your posts about gun control. I dont advocate violence or carrying knives or guns but in our country it will soon head that way ...
Well, I lived in London for three years and from reading the papers every day got a lot of surprises.
Anybody who thinks that having fewer guns makes London a primrose garden with peaceful butterflies and birds singing in the sunshine, needs to take a closer look.
What I saw was that street gangs were doing an awful lot of damage without guns. You wouldn't believe the stories in the papers about slashings. Apparently many scumbags roam around with knives and blades ready. There are also an awful lot of muggings and purse-snatchings without guns being used.
In America I have never known a woman's purse to be snatched by some thug on a bike who grabs it and speeds away - but it seems that kind of thing does go on over there in London.
They have other problems, too. My train to Brighton was stopped and they transferred all the passengers to buses to complete the trip. the reason is that their trains run on third rail electric systems, and children who wander onto the tracks and touch the 660 volt rail get fried. and it is NOT an unusual event; the Londoners are quite used to it. However, while that is violent death it is not about crime.
I concluded that violent crime is NOT a "gun problem," it's a "people problem." Fussing about the hardware does not deal with the problem of criminals - the criminals are PEOPLE. A criminal will commit crimes with or without guns. Law-abiding citizens will NOT commit crimes even when they DO possess a gun. Let's focus on the real problem, the criminal, and not be distracted by gun issues. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/12/2008 4:47:16 PM | My 2 cents:
Guns are not the problem the problem is criminals and lawyers. To me we could stand to lose a few on those 2 sides. The average American gun owner is a law abiding person...it only takes a hand full of crooks (yes also the lawyers not much difference anymore) to try to take away the power of the people. Our forefathers stated that the USA would be corrupt within 400 years and if the average law abiding citizen still had guns they would have to stand up and RESTORE our country to its former greatness. We are at the point now. Any attack on gun owners or gun control is made by those who want ABSLOUTE POWER over the masses.
I respect the law but even our own law enforcement is getting out of hand now. Every day it is getting to be that of a paramilitary force. Cops should wear police uniforms not run around in black suits like they are special forces or CIA. The other thing is most law enforcement in small rural areas they are NOT showing up to save you until they think it is over with(they do not want to be shot either) so a person must be able to defend his home and family. You can not depend on any government or police force to protect YOU the only person to depend on is yourself. Ask yourself this why do so many police men have fully automatic weapons(weapons of mass destruction)in their own personal homes and these are their personal weapons? NOT as easy for a law abiding citizen to get that same permit?
Look at the idiot we have in office right now....he has broken the laws many many times while in office...he lied about the intel in Iraq...he claims to be a religious person but dishes out TOURTURE and denied human rights...he has a hand in the oil problem(he is getting rich) didn't you people figure out yet that most of our oil pumped in the USA soil is being sold because they passed laws that our oil in Alaska is to loaded with sulfur to be used in the US? So they get to sell it at the 100 plus price and make the few that have control rich while destroying the USA middle and lower class. So gun control is BS a loaded gun will not fire on its own it HAS to have a human finger some where to fire it. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 2:24:55 AM |
The dirty little secret of the Gulf War is that "friendly fire" accounted for 24 percent of the U.S. dead. A rate this high is not an inevitable consequence of the "fog of war." According to a study done at the Army's Command and General Staff College, "friendly fire" casualties accounted for less than 2 percent of all those occurring in battle during World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. Nor was the Gulf War statistic skewed by one or two anomalous incidents—the Pentagon found that during the 100-hour Desert Storm ground war, there were 27 separate cases of fratricide. No, what has happened is not inevitable—it's the result of expanding our offensive capability in such areas as night-fighting and beyond-visual-range targeting without commensurately expanding our capability to identify targets. This is like a car company building bigger engines without building better brakes. http://www.slate.com/?id=2064055
Tsk Tsk, the battlefield is no place for the "cowboy mentality" whether you are a Warthog crewman or a simple ground pounder. The US has traditionally had higher than normal friendly fire incidents, enough that allies often take not and start to duck when Americans open fire. Professional soldiers are another story, I might suggest training with Canadian sniper/spotter teams and British S.A.S. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 5:14:45 AM | No guns in the UK? PLEASE!!!
Constables in the rougher parts of London have been carrying revolvers, Smith & Wesson revolvers last I knew, for years. Though, it's not well known, it is fact.
I have seen photographs of English Constables practicing shooting techniques on an underground range in the UK. The same techniques developed by, and taught, by US firearms instructors.
The US right to keep and bear arms was derived from English Common Law. In fact, English statutes are cited in the most recent US Supreme Court decision, discussing the individual right of gun ownership. If I recall correctly, it was on the basis of English Law, that the Court made the majority decision that firearms ownership in the US is an individual right.
The gun control issue will likely be argued for many years to come. However, for the moment, the US Supreme Court has ruled that the right to keep and bear arms is an Individual Right, that pre-existed the drafting of the US Constitution.
Don't like guns, don't get one.
However, when you call for the Police, you have to survive until they get there.
As for the poke at Police not responding until the danger has subsided. I strongly suggest that anyone who believes such garbage to either go on a Ride Along with a Police Officer, or take on the job themselves. Speak from first hand experience, and not new reports, or garbage you find on the internet.
Having been on the back side of a badge, I speak from experience. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 10:17:42 AM | Lostcauz is correct:
The US right to keep and bear arms was derived from English Common Law. In fact, English statutes are cited in the most recent US Supreme Court decision, discussing the individual right of gun ownership. If I recall correctly, it was on the basis of English Law, that the Court made the majority decision that firearms ownership in the US is an individual right.
The gun control issue will likely be argued for many years to come. However, for the moment, the US Supreme Court has ruled that the right to keep and bear arms is an Individual Right, that pre-existed the drafting of the US Constitution.
The INDIVIDUAL right to bear arms was affirmed by the English Bill of Rights when the Catholic-dominated regimes of the Stuarts had denied the right of Protestants to be armed as individuals. The formation of a Jacobite army was a threat to a disarmed English population.
In "A History of English Law," 241, 7th edition, Holdworth reports that the Bill of Rights complains of "the denial of the right of the subject to petition the king, and of refusal to allow Protestants the right to carry arms for self-defense."
The first ten amendments to the US Constitution are commonly called the "Bill of Rights," in recognition that a century earlier the English had instituted the Bill of Rights.
The US Bill of Rights consists of two parts:
1. Petitioning the government and bearing arms, which are individual rights;
2. Everything else - which is all about restricting the power of government.
We do indeed owe the INDIVIDUAL right to possess arms to England. It is a tragedy that the English have largely lost their Anglo-Saxon love of freedom and are becoming Europeanized, taking on characteristics of those societies that gave the world the Bourbons and the Third Reich and the Soviet Union.
Continental Europe was infatuated for centuries by the ideas of Jean Bodin, who teaches in his "Six Livres" that the authority of government derives from God and flows downward to the people through a monarch. The Americans in 1789 reversed this and affirmed that rights are inherent in We the People and our government gets only powers assigned to it - revocably - by the People. That's why we are not a "Christian nation" like the Europeans. We are a secular republic, with We the People the highest authority. And We the People must be armed.
We are NOT docile Europeans taught to be submissive by centuries of bowing to gods and kings. Americans do not belong on their knees to ANY authority. Like the free citizen of ancient Athens, who was identified as free by the visible sword on his side, a right withheld from slaves, the free American is an armed individual. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 2:20:03 PM | Lostcauz, I understand your position as someone who has been a police officer. Perhaps the poster should have been clearer that he wasn't refering to police as individuals?
I had a personal experience where it took several hours for the Police to show up. I called them after over a half an hour. I forget the exact words used, but they didn't want me to call back until something happened. Thank goodness the window that got kicked in is too small for a musclebound guy or any of his 4 freinds to fit through. Thank goodness the door and the person leaning against it held up as long as it did and the guy attempted to be clever before it broke. I don't know how they expected me to even be capable of dialing 911 again if the door did come down. I have all the respect in the world for cops (as long as they aren't crooked), but I'll never expect the police to get involved before it's too late. I learned my lesson on that subject. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 3:28:24 PM | i could really go on a rant here from local cops attitude to the feds, but won't. all i say is, keep those guns handy, we're going to need them for the next revolution. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 6:41:15 PM | Loonytunz please tell me your not insinuating that The U.S. Military doesnt have professional soldiers. That would be extremely interesting as I would invite you to train with a U.S. Marine Force Recon or FAST team or the Scout sniper program, which helped set up the canadian sniper program. I would be happy if you could just make it through bootcamp. Not everyone can and it isnt due to just the physical aspect of it. Hell not even Evander Holifield made it through Marine Bootcamp, but I have alot of respect for the man for trying. Granted I only served in the Corps but I am sure my brothers and sisters in the other services are just as professional as those you listed.
While in the service I was a Military Police officer and qualified as an expert with the rifle and pistol, all Marines train to fire at a distance of 500 yards. I also trained as a member of the special reaction team (kinda like swat but for the military) as a urban sniper. But hey according to you unless I was a canadian sniper or a British SAS I wasnt a professional. Which is kinda deragotory to all the other members of the canadian and british military. It funny how you only list the special forces teams as professional soldiers, I have some old mates in the Royal Marines who may take issue with that statement of yours.
The only thing of value that you said is that the "Cowboy attitude has no place on the battlefield". The "Cowboy attitude" is not a reality in the U.S. Military, in movies you see that type of crap all the time but in the real world that isnt the case. No one lives long in combat or in a hot zone without keeping a level head. Cowboys get there buddies killed which is why you wont find them on the battlefield cause his buddies will straighten him out before the enemy has a chance to. Hopefully you can distinguish between reality and the fantasy that hollywood puts out..
Now as your little quote is intersting in that it doesnt specify how the friendly fire incident happened. Was it an airstrike? small arms? tank attack? Now beings as the topic is gun control. wouldnt it be prudent if your attempting to make a point to have those numbers? Or is it you just enjoy insulting the U.S Military and are purposfully being vague in order to try and make a point. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 8:23:26 PM | Ummm Canadian and British military created the model the US uses for sniper/spotter teams. Until we switched to those useless C16 rifles (you know them as M16) we regularly trained upto 800 yards, the effective range of our old Fabrique Nationale 308's (which incidentally would punch right through light armour that the C16's 223 barely dents). That isn't to say there are not capable and professional soldiers within the US military. But to assume all are is only deluding yourself. As it relates to this topic, there are soldiers that do not in all honesty belong in any military just as there are civilians that really shouldn't have easy access to guns.
Now how to prevent the flakes from easy access while not infringing upon the abilities of normal, sane and stable citizens if they so choose? As I've said before, looking from the outside the vast majority of the problem seems to stem from varying rules and regulations between each state (which are usually so geographically small that laws in one are easily bypassed simply by going for a short drive). FEDERAL gun control which is uniformly applied requiring thorough background checks, adequate training, stiff penalties for use of firearms in the commission of any crime and stiffer penalties for illegal sales would be the best place to start. Minor variations only being in the hands of individual states as many have mentioned the only people likely to voluntarily follow a law is a law abiding citizen which is not your target for the control. And honestly the NRA would be far more believable if they supported prosecution of dealers making illegal sales just as much as they oppose those hoping to outright ban guns. Those dealers are the reason or atleast a big part of the reason there are too many guns in the wrong hands in the 1st place. I could be wrong though, since from south of the border we hear mostly all or nothing type BS which serves no one and solves nothing. But I have been convinced that it can't really be that black and white but rather the media showcasing the most foolish examples of both ends of the spectrum.
Oh and for any inter-state sale to be legal the dealer should be required to ensure the item shipped complies with any of the local minor state variations i.e. Maximum magazine capacity for a given calibre. Prevents an easy bypass and an otherwise honest citizen from becoming an unwitting felon. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 8:47:52 PM | Actually your ill informed the sniper spotter combo had been used for years in the U.S. even in world war 1 and before that the boxer rebellion, civil war, spainish american war, and so on. The modern sniper methods used on both sides of the pond where developed by Gysgt Carlos Hathcock who created the modern sniper methods and helped to set up the scout sniper program in Quantico virginia the teaching of shooting from cover and concealment, of one shot one kill, of taking days to stalk, wait, and take the shot. Snipers from all over the world have used the scout sniper program. Let me be the firstto say that urban sniping is a hell of alot different then scout sniping. Remember scout sniping is also being trainned as a forward observer.
Now I can hand you a M16 A2 service rifle and tell you to shoot at a target that is 800 yards away big whoop the max range for an area target IS 800 yards. Now for a point target (Man sized target) using Iron sights (no scope) its 600 yards.
What is your diffinition of light armor 1/4 inch steel plate? level 3 tac vest with trauma plate? Because just using an M16 A2 I could punch through Light armor at 200 yards. Not that I would want to what idiot uses a assualt rifle to punch through an armored vehicle even a lightly armored one, when your squad has a crew served weapon like a 240 gulf or a 50? Not to mention 40mm grenade launcher or AT4.
I didnt make the assumption that all in the US Military are fully 100% professional (though by text book diffinition they are, considering they are getting paid to do their job hence professional ) You however made this statement "....when Americans open fire. Professional soldiers are another story, I might suggest training with Canadian sniper/spotter teams and British S.A.S." the implication was that the only professional soldiers are canadian sniper/spotter teams and british SAS which is insulting to say the least to all the services, american or otherwise unless you happen to be in those two special ops groups. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 8:53:07 PM | I have a carry permit and will do so until I die. I was in the military for 10 years and was on a rifle team. I went through the Hurricane ( Katrina) in Mississippi and carried openly during our martial law period. I saw looting and law enforcement that could not handle all the activity that happened there.
I sometimes worked people that knew people in gangs and that sold drugs. He told me once that they were scared to go to the country where people were most likely to have guns. They would go to nicer neighborhoods for house burglary because they had less of a chance for people resisting if they were caught by the home owner.
Straight from the source. So........... which person would you rather be? With, or without a way to protect yourself or loved ones? | |
|
NERO1
| Joined: 3/8/2008 Msg: 2093 | |
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 9:42:37 PM | I am anti-gun, all in all, and feel the American "way" of citizens being armed, and so forth, is unacceptable and yet another way America is very backward socially compared to other Western democracies, *IMO*. I don't feel there's any need for anyone to own a firearm (much less carry one on a daily basis!!) unless one is a police officer in an inner-city area perhaps , on-duty. Other than that, regardless of what anyone says, IMO if America re-amended the Constitution to effectively ban guns and made gun possession a serious crime punishable by prison in and of itself you will see the gun violence rate in this country drop dramatically. It's the way of the future, one way or the other. If not for this generation then for a future one certainly.
http://www.bradycampaign.org/
^^ In 2004, guns murdered 5 people in New Zealand, 37 in Sweden, 56 in Australia, 73 in England and Wales, 184 in Canada, and 11,344 in the United States.... | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 10:11:46 PM | loonytunz,
Now how to prevent the flakes from easy access while not infringing upon the abilities of normal, sane and stable citizens if they so choose? As I've said before, looking from the outside the vast majority of the problem seems to stem from varying rules and regulations between each state (which are usually so geographically small that laws in one are easily bypassed simply by going for a short drive). FEDERAL gun control which is uniformly applied requiring thorough background checks, adequate training, stiff penalties for use of firearms in the commission of any crime and stiffer penalties for illegal sales would be the best place to start. Minor variations only being in the hands of individual states as many have mentioned the only people likely to voluntarily follow a law is a law abiding citizen which is not your target for the control. And honestly the NRA would be far more believable if they supported prosecution of dealers making illegal sales just as much as they oppose those hoping to outright ban guns. Those dealers are the reason or atleast a big part of the reason there are too many guns in the wrong hands in the 1st place. I could be wrong though, since from south of the border we hear mostly all or nothing type BS which serves no one and solves nothing. But I have been convinced that it can't really be that black and white but rather the media showcasing the most foolish examples of both ends of the spectrum.
Oh and for any inter-state sale to be legal the dealer should be required to ensure the item shipped complies with any of the local minor state variations i.e. Maximum magazine capacity for a given calibre. Prevents an easy bypass and an otherwise honest citizen from becoming an unwitting felon.
Seems you don't know a whole lot about the NRA. First...they expect everyone to obey the law regardless of how stupid it is. The NRA doesn't associate themselves with crooked gun dealers. If someone breaks the law the NRA expects that person to pay the price. Often times the NRA encourages stiffer penallities against law breakers that use a gun.
Also......I live in California. I have tried to buy guns in at least 3 states and no one would sell me a gun. Every gun was legal in the state of CA. As far as any guns that weren't legal in the state of CA......good luck finding a gun dealer that will sell you one.
Most guns that are used in crimes don't come brand new from crooked dealers. They are stolen from honest citizens. The bad guys also steal them from each other. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 10:19:26 PM |
In 2004, guns murdered 5 people in New Zealand, 37 in Sweden, 56 in Australia, 73 in England and Wales, 184 in Canada, and 11,344 in the United States.... Guns murdered people? People kill people, not guns. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 10:21:57 PM |
i could really go on a rant here from local cops attitude to the feds, but won't. all i say is, keep those guns handy, we're going to need them for the next revolution.
ummmm.....what revolution? | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 10:25:15 PM | Nero1,
am anti-gun, all in all, and feel the American "way" of citizens being armed, and so forth, is unacceptable and yet another way America is very backward socially compared to other Western democracies, *IMO*. I don't feel there's any need for anyone to own a firearm (much less carry one on a daily basis!!) unless one is a police officer in an inner-city area perhaps , on-duty. Other than that, regardless of what anyone says, IMO if America re-amended the Constitution to effectively ban guns and made gun possession a serious crime punishable by prison in and of itself you will see the gun violence rate in this country drop dramatically. It's the way of the future, one way or the other. If not for this generation then for a future one certainly.
Why should it be ok for a cop to have a gun in the inner-city but not an honest legal citizen? The bad guys don't shoot at cops until the cop trys to arrest them. But the bad guys are shooting at unarmed citizens all the time. Answer that for me please.
Also.......your statement about the violence rate dropping if all guns were banned? sorry.......you are wrong. Look at England and Australia. In both countries the violent crime rate went up over 300% in 3 years after they banned guns. It wasn't a outright ban...but too own a gun in England you have to be a member of a shooting club and keep your gun locked up at the club.
Americans will never give up our guns without a fight. A very, very fierce fight. | |
|
NERO1
| Joined: 3/8/2008 Msg: 2098 | |
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 10:33:49 PM | | ^^ Americans will give up their guns eventually, and voluntarily at that. The entire social paradigm and mindset will change. It's "cultural revolution", in a sense, which is being waged now, not only on this issue but on many others as well. This could take another generation or two; it likely won't happen in your lifetime. But social justice and other forces concerned with remaking American society in a better image are waging a sort of battle against the old guard way of thought, on a daily basis. New and different ways of thinking are presented to your childrens' generation via TV shows, the Internet, school (especially college), and so on. Once these take root the young inevitably grow up and come to further occupy administrative and teaching positions in academia, important positions in the media, and so on. It's a slow tide, sure, and there are setbacks, but eventually things will change here on this issue of guns and carrying guns on one's person will be a relic from a distant past, like so many other things that have been discarded by society over decades and centuries. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/13/2008 10:54:27 PM | ^^^^ahh controlled indoctrination, what you propose has frightening implications as a society that isnt allowed to defend itself is totaly reliant upon the government to do it for them. We can all see what a bang up job they do so far. If society as a whole decided that they didnt need it then will and good but if it takes controlled indoctrination to accomplish your goal then it isnt societies decision its the governments making it for you.
What exactly does social justice have to do with a law abiding person owning a fire arm which has now been recognized as a right in the U.S. constitution. Now if by social justice you mean that in the future there will be no need for a firearm. Then amen brother I am with you. I will gladly lay my weapon aside when it is no longer needed, but it will be MY choice that it is no longer needed, not the governments. | |
|
| gun control in the usa Posted: 7/14/2008 5:25:29 AM | Nero, you are dreaming. Sounds like you've got a socialist mindset which can never work in the US. The SCOTUS has laid down the law, and it is that people can & will own guns in the US...there cannot even be a serious challenge to that right for the next 200 years.
Anti-gun people in the US now have only two options...don't own one, or move to Canada. | |
|
|
| Page 84 of 86
|
46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 |
|