|
|
|
|
|
| | are the gas prices killing you yetPage 23 of 27 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27) |
Which was, goverment waste. If you're going to gripe about waste, make sure it swings both ways.
You may want to fly those expensive turds, but the actual pilots are refusing to fly them because they tend to asphixiate the pilot, along with other flaws.
However flawed the products are at least we did get something for the money spent. With obozo's buddies they just took the money and ran.
Besides the money spent was supposed to create jobs. Solyndra employed 1100 people. This shows why government can't create money making jobs. spending over half a billion to create 1100 jobs is not very cost effective.
Though I am sure there is some left winger out there that can explain to us dim witted conservatives how it actually makes good fiscal sense. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 1:45:22 PM |
Obama crackdown on oil speculators is 100% BS... ...I am one of those oil traders, I'm one of those a-holes, that's me :) I take risk with my money to make a few dollars and you benefit by not having large price swings in gas prices. If you do not understand that oil prices are mostly affected by oil speculators, then I would say you need to close your e-trade account and stop pretending that you know what you are talking about. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 1:54:23 PM | The problem isn't speculators per se.
Speculation does effect the price of oil traded on the commodities exchange. But most of the oil we consume is not bought or sold on any commodities exchange. When oil companies price gasoline according to the price on the commodities exchange that is price fixing. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 1:57:34 PM |
Besides the money spent was supposed to create jobs. Solyndra employed 1100 people. This shows why government can't create money making jobs. spending over half a billion to create 1100 jobs is not very cost effective.
I see the modern global economy escapes you....Facebook has about 1000 employees and they are supposedly worth $100 Billion according to our venerable banks and investors. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 2:02:15 PM |
Speculation does effect the price of oil traded on the commodities exchange. But most of the oil we consume is not bought or sold on any commodities exchange. When oil companies price gasoline according to the price on the commodities exchange that is price fixing.
Not to mention that much of that oil is being extracted from public lands....and yet we get diddly squat for it...no consideration except pure profit for the oil companies. Countries like Venezuela subsidizes their domestic pricing to ensure their citizens can afford it, it's like 20 cents a gallon. Why we have to pay the absolute highest price even as we subsidize the oil companies should make us wonder why we help them at all. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 2:44:40 PM | I see the modern global economy escapes you....Facebook has about 1000 employees and they are supposedly worth $100 Billion according to our venerable banks and investors.
Facebook is a great example. A man started this with minimal funds and the market made it into a money making business.
It was not something the government tried to force onto the market.
Thank you for proving my point about government can't make money making jobs. That is up to the free market and the people willing to risk money.
I built two business' and during that time I had some things that made money and some that didn't. I moved on from the looser's and worked harder on the ones that made money.
It is not the governments job to make actual jobs.......Their job is to create a environment that lets people make jobs.
Again look at post WWII times. The government lowered taxes but the revenues went up because it allowed the men returning from war to build companies and employ many people. That provided a bigger tax base as people spent money for all the new products that was being made.
Like it or not the government was not formed to take care of every need of everyone. It was created to give each person a chance to be the best they can be.
If they choose not to do so why is that now the taxpayers problem?
It all boils down to personal responsibility. I have done pretty good, others have done better and some haven't done so well.
This quote from Thomas Jefferson sums up the truth.
A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circlue of our felicities. Thomas Jefferson
This shows the thoughts of the forefathers when this country was founded and we need to return to them post haste. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 4:25:02 PM |
It was not something the government tried to force onto the market.
Indeed, unlike oil companies, cable companies, telephone companies, natural gas companies, farms....the list is pretty long on types of companies that government assistance and subsidies on a regular basis. The reason Facebook does not need assistance is because they don't provide services that are necessary to society.
Thank you for proving my point about government can't make money making jobs. That is up to the free market and the people willing to risk money.
I don't think government should make money making jobs. I think they can be the last option when the economy is going badly, or new technology that provide services everyone uses need to move up. But I guess you hated the fact that Bush started the program you so despise.
Like it or not the government was not formed to take care of every need of everyone. It was created to give each person a chance to be the best they can be.
By your logic, gainful employment is a good place to start, wouldn't you say?
It all boils down to personal responsibility. I have done pretty good, others have done better and some haven't done so well.
Well, whatever....we'll just have to take your word for it, but that's not such a big accomplishment considering you most likely got education and other services provided by the government (whether you know it or not). I'd be more impressed if you were born in the wastelands of Afghanistan and still got to where you are now...which you probably wouldn't have. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 4:40:04 PM |
Indeed, unlike oil companies, cable companies, telephone companies, natural gas companies, farms....the list is pretty long on types of companies that government assistance and subsidies on a regular basis. The reason Facebook does not need assistance is because they don't provide services that are necessary to society.
No company should need government assistance. They should either sink or swim on their own just as I did.
I don't think government should make money making jobs. I think they can be the last option when the economy is going badly, or new technology that provide services everyone uses need to move up. But I guess you hated the fact that Bush started the program you so despise.
The advances will be made when there is a demand for them. The government has a way of messing up everything they touch.
By your logic, gainful employment is a good place to start, wouldn't you say?
Yes it would and when the government gets out of the way gainful employment is easier to obtain.
Again look at the boom after WWII.
Well, whatever....we'll just have to take your word for it, but that's not such a big accomplishment considering you most likely got education and other services provided by the government (whether you know it or not). I'd be more impressed if you were born in the wastelands of Afghanistan and still got to where you are now...which you probably wouldn't have.
Yes I took the same education that is provided to everyone and used it to my benefit. Again personal responsibility.
I noticed you ignored the quote from Thomas Jefferson. It is hard to argue points for socialism when the founding fathers was so against it. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 4:47:25 PM |
Yes I took the same education that is provided to everyone and used it to my benefit. Again personal responsibility.
So you took it but think that it was all your own doing, just because so did everyone else? What if there wasn't a school for you to go to? What if schools were not available just in your area because the people in your city decided it was unnecessary?
I noticed you ignored the quote from Thomas Jefferson. It is hard to argue points for socialism when the founding fathers was so against it.
Well yes, because I doubt you understand it....or just unnable to recognize what he meant and only apply it to what you think. Where were you when Reagan was running up a huge defense tab? Or Bush, who has spent 7 times as much as Obama has just trying to undo what Bush did? All rightwingers are only for their own type of socialism...no let me rephrase that...you don't realize all spending is spending...only the spending you don't like falls under what you call "spending". | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 5:26:31 PM | [quot]You and all other leftists who try to make the argument that schools, fire depts., police depts., are examples of socialism couldn't be more dead wrong....... All that shows is that humans have the capacity to work together in communities..... FAR, FAR from socialism........................ THAT is an example of people working together as a community, far, far from socialism....................
I have no idea what you're talking about. If you can find where I ever said municipal or government workers were example of socialism (other than as a tongue in cheek snark for you rightist benefit) please point it out.
They are civil workers.....that's not socialism, that's just a job which happens to be surving the public...and I respect them waaaaay more than you do...all of them.
So then according to you, Bush spent 7 times as much as obama, and on what? And what was obama trying to undo, that Bush spent seven times as much as obama did............... HUH?
The two wars, TARP, tax cuts and prescription drug bill.
You do know that the national debt increased more in obama's first three years than all 8 of bushs'.................
You do know that there is a lapse time period from when the money is granted until its spent and the bill comes in, right? | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 5:28:27 PM | Where were you when Reagan was running up a huge defense tab? Or Bush, who has spent 7 times as much as Obama has just trying to undo what Bush did?
I love it when the lefties say something so easy to disprove. You might want to lay off the kool aid.
From NPR via the Weekly Standard:
In his State of the Union address tonight, President Obama will reportedly issue a call for “responsible” efforts to reduce deficits (while simultaneously calling for new federal spending). In light of the President’s expected rhetorical nod to fiscal responsibility, it’s worth keeping in mind his record on deficits to date. When President Obama took office two years ago, the national debt stood at $10.626 trillion. It now stands at $14.071 trillion — a staggering increase of $3.445 trillion in just 735 days (about $5 billion a day).
To put that into perspective, when President George W. Bush took office, our national debt was $5.768 trillion. By the time Bush left office, it had nearly doubled, to $10.626 trillion. So Bush’s record on deficit spending was not good at all: During his presidency, the national debt rose by an average of $607 billion a year. How does that compare to Obama? During Obama’s presidency to date, the national debt has risen by an average of $1.723 trillion a year — or by a jaw-dropping $1.116 trillion more, per year, than it rose even under Bush.
While Bush spent a lot of money much of it was to keep us safe. You might think the wars were unnecessary, I think they were very necessary.
Obozo himself said.
“I will be held accountable,” Obama said. “I’ve got four years and … A year form now, I think people are going to see that we’re starting to make some progress, but there’s still going to be some pain out there … If I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition.”
So it is very disingenuous for him and his followers to still try and hang this economy on Bush.
Obozo has spent $1.116 TRILLION a year more than Bush.
So just how did Bush spend seven times more? | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 6:35:17 PM | Going to war with a country for no reason kept us safe?
Did Obama double the national debt like Bush did? Did congress change their spending habits? Nope, they kept it exactly the same because they refused to deal with Obama. Did Obama cause all of the unemployment that gets paid out of the budget? Nope.
Fact is, his spending is to keep what congress has already started and refuse to cut whatsoever. He didn't put the stuff on the budget, Bush did, and congress refuses to cut it....well, they only want to cut what they want to cut, so they are deadlocked. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 6:45:44 PM |
While Bush spent a lot of money much of it was to keep us safe.... Yes because we would not want the boogeyman to get you.
You might think the wars were unnecessary, I think they were very necessary. Necessary for what?
So it is very disingenuous for him and his followers to still try and hang this economy on Bush... Why is it disingenuous?
Bush started with a surplus and left the economy is the shitter, Obama has turned around the job loss, cut spending and even tried to get some of that tax money back that bush gave away while he was ****ing the economy and if he could do that there would be even more money ~300 billion a year more than then could be used to create more jobs and heling even more.
So I can only assume that you are all for the tax cuts to expire, or do you believe in socialism for the top 2%? | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 6:53:36 PM |
Going to war with a country for no reason kept us safe?
Did Obama double the national debt like Bush did? Did congress change their spending habits? Nope, they kept it exactly the same because they refused to deal with Obama. Did Obama cause all of the unemployment that gets paid out of the budget? Nope.
Fact is, his spending is to keep what congress has already started and refuse to cut whatsoever. He didn't put the stuff on the budget, Bush did, and congress refuses to cut it....well, they only want to cut what they want to cut, so they are deadlocked.
We went to war to stop the terrorist's from attacking us. we went where they were. There were eight unanswered attacks on us under Clinton's watch. Bush did what Clinton should have done years ago. Clinton had the chance to kill OBL many times and wouldn't do it.
obozo has not had a budget since he has become president. And you talk about Bush doubling the debt in eight years and obozo has spent more than that in 3 years. I have shown above your statement of Bush spending seven times more than obozo is just not true.
And obozo had a democratic congress in both houses for the first two years so how can him or you blame congress for being deadlocked?
The unemployment rate went up under obozos watch. And he is the one that wanted ninety nine weeks of unemployment so yes that is on him.
I'll give you this you sure try to spin it to obozos good. No matter what the truth is.
***********************************************************************************
Bush started with a surplus and left the economy is the shitter, Obama has turned around the job loss, cut spending and even tried to get some of that tax money back that bush gave away while he was ****ing the economy and if he could do that there would be even more money ~300 billion a year more than then could be used to create more jobs and heling even more.
So I can only assume that you are all for the tax cuts to expire, or do you believe in socialism for the top 2%?
What are they putting in y'alls kool aid must be some good stuff to make believe that crap. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 7:03:21 PM |
We went to war to stop the terrorist's from attacking us. we went where they were... I will just point out you invaded Iraq, not Saudi Arabia in case you got them mixed up.
What are they putting in y'alls kool aid must be some good stuff to make believe that crap. I will take you inability to refute my statement as your inability to refute my statement and I will leave it at that, as it is clear you are either just a troll or you really are that misinformed. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 7:18:20 PM | | I got stationed in Japan, and I'm not allowed to have a car for the first 6 months that I'm here. Gas prices can be $100 a gallon for all I care. lolz | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/8/2012 7:20:20 PM | I will take you inability to refute my statement as your inability to refute my statement and I will leave it at that, as it is clear you are either just a troll or you really are that misinformed.
Not that I couldn't just that a second grader knows better that the crap you have posted.
Bush started with a surplus and left the economy is the shitter,
Bush was left with a surplus from a GOP controlled congress. Clinton had to work with them so no glory for the left there,
Obama has turned around the job loss,
On the first Friday of every month, I update the unemployment numbers so that I can compare the unemployment rate under President George W. Bush with the unemployment rate under President Obama at that time. The genesis of this ritual began when I felt compelled to respond to some left-leaning sites that were comparing Obama’s first two years and four months in office with Bush’s last and worst economic year (the above chart shows the most recent incarnation of this narrative).
In January, the private sector added a robust 257,000 jobs in the twenty-third consecutive month of private sector job growth. This development is very positive news. The country also had a net employment gain of 243,000 total jobs (private and public). More importantly, 243,000 exceeds the 125,000 jobs needed each month just to keep pace with the growth of the working-age population, which is also very encouraging news.
More importantly, January 2012 is the first month in which the overall number of jobs lost during the Obama administration is lower than the number lost during the Bush administration. That said, the unemployment rate is still about a percentage point worse today than it was during President Bush’s last full month in office.
The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate declined from 8.5% to 8.3% — the second lowest month of unemployment during the Obama presidency. This number remains 1.0 percentage points worse than President Bush’s last full month in office in December 2008. It also marks 36 consecutive months in which the unemployment rate has been 8% or higher in the 37th month of the Obama presidency.
Really shouldn't say crap that is soooooo easy to disprove.
cut spending and even tried to get some of that tax money back that bush gave away
Really obozo cutting spending? LMAO
I posted this in message 579 but here it is again.
From NPR via the Weekly Standard:
In his State of the Union address tonight, President Obama will reportedly issue a call for “responsible” efforts to reduce deficits (while simultaneously calling for new federal spending). In light of the President’s expected rhetorical nod to fiscal responsibility, it’s worth keeping in mind his record on deficits to date. When President Obama took office two years ago, the national debt stood at $10.626 trillion. It now stands at $14.071 trillion — a staggering increase of $3.445 trillion in just 735 days (about $5 billion a day).
To put that into perspective, when President George W. Bush took office, our national debt was $5.768 trillion. By the time Bush left office, it had nearly doubled, to $10.626 trillion. So Bush’s record on deficit spending was not good at all: During his presidency, the national debt rose by an average of $607 billion a year. How does that compare to Obama? During Obama’s presidency to date, the national debt has risen by an average of $1.723 trillion a year — or by a jaw-dropping $1.116 trillion more, per year, than it rose even under Bush.
So pray tel me how the anointed one is cutting spending and getting back money Bush spent while he is spending 1.116 Trillion more a year than Bush did.
As far as the tax cuts even Clinton said they need to be left alone for another year so the economy can recover.
So now will you tell me what they are putting in y'alls kool aid or do you even know? | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/9/2012 9:23:50 AM | Yes contango the curve on the futures contracts. Up is contango and down is known as backwardation. In the recent past post 2008 crises we were firmly in backwardation for some time. We are more of less flattened out for the time being. You could say contango is an inflationary expectation. And backwardation is a deflationary expectation. Trading that can be very rough if those curves unexpectedly sharply change. Remember know one knows the future.
There really are no secrets from me. The problem is kind of two fold One the public is not the all that interested in the truth, really its boring, and when their problems are their own fault they sure dont want to hear that. Two the manipulators of the general public's mind have there agendas. Blaming the oil speculator for higher gasoline prices is good politics, for one they dont exist so how can they be a real political threat, yet you get the benefit of someone taking the blame.
The implication is the speculator is moving the market around. This is like saying there are some people moving Mount Everest around, It sounds impossible because it is. To put on trades that would move the market be so large it would introduce all sorts of other issues, too many to go into here. There is another problem, try to make the speculator trade work on a small scale is also not easy. If anyone can give me an actionable speculator trade. I would really like to know what it is. I mean I'll put it on. We will see if it can make any real money before you go broke. I will try to help a little here and propose some bets you could make:
We can add leverage to this, how much you want? Bet oil is going up so you agree to pay more in the future for oil. Or bet is oil is going down so you agree sell oil for less in the future. Here is one more trade you make a bet on a price range the wider the range the less profit, you can also use leverage on that one too. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/9/2012 9:57:54 AM | WOW!! Has this made for an interesting read! So much mis-information...so little time to dispel it!
Dealing first with the OT part of the discussion. Despite all the opinions, some of you hold, I begin to think you know little of how the oil industry works, or how gasoline prices are affected by decisions made within that industry. Also what role the government has in this.
Those of you with conservative/republican leanings, must stick to your side of the argument. You can't call out Obama for too much regulation one minute, than accuse him of too little 2 sentences later. It's disingenuous.
The oil industry works this way. The oil companies explore and find the crude. Then set up a drilling operation, to pump it out from where they found it. It is then sent to a refinery, where it is broken down into various petroleum products, including gasoline. That gasoline is then sold to distributors, who through a central hub, sell it to your local gasoline station.
While that maybe a simple explanation, and ownership may vary, in different oil company's operations, it is usually the same process and there are ALWAYS, 4 seperate steps in the process. Drilling/pumping...refining...distribution...retail sales.
First why don't we look at who is benefitting from "are the gas prices killing you yet":
In 2011 profits from the oil industry's first quarter is as follows, Exxon $10.7 billion, up 69%, Shell $6.3 billion, up 30%,Conoco Phillips $3 billion, up 43%, BP $5.48 billion, down .05%(oil spill related), Chevron $5.2 billion. In case you think this a fluke let's review first quarter 2012.
In 2012 Exxon $9.4 billion, Shell $7.7 billion, Conoco-Phillips $2.9 billion, BP $5.92 billion, Chevron $6.5 billion.
Now color me crazy, but almost all have made tremendous profits on oil. WHICH when oil prices are high, causes higher gasoline prices in the end.
I will note here that one poster seems mistaken on some key facts. He expressed a problem with drilling restrictions in the gulf. Please note that those restrictions were put in place at some time AFTER 4/20/10 the date of the beginning of BP's oil spill in the gulf. They were also RESCINDED on 10/12/10, after some new rules were set in place. I mean you should be able to understand new rules, or we might end up with more BP/Horizon type of problems..
Next you may go to nj.com for a story dated march 23rd, 2012 entitled "As Refineries Close Experts Say US Gasoline Shortages may strike at peak driving season" excerpts from the article are as follows:
"The biggest wave of refinery closures on the US east coast is raising the specter of gasoline shortages during the peak demand driving season."
"The region will have lost almost half of its refining capacity in 6 months."
"Sunoco and Conoco have shut 2 plants in PA. Hovensa LLC closed a plant in the US Virgin Islands"
So while there is an abundance of oil, a bottle neck due to less refining causes distributors to bid up the price of gasoline, to make sure their retail stations have ample supplies.
As to that same posters lament of "why not build more refineries?"
It's REAL simple, have you ever driven the New Jersey turnpike through Elizabeth? It stinks, and that smell is there 24/7/365 days a year! Who know what harmful chemicals and by products are inhaled by residents. So just like halfway houses, prisons and other things nobody wants next door, refineries are in that same category.
Additionally they have to be built on a huge tract of land with good access to and from the sea, so tankers can get in and out. With a road network so that needed parts and chemicals can be trucked in.
I would question why the same poster has such issues with Obama? It seems that most of this, is oil industry related and not of the governments making. But we'll come back to that.
Now some other fun posts:
"and what was Obama trying to undo, that Bush spent seven times as much as Obama did...DUH?"
Well lets see, there were the 2 wars of course, the unfunded medicare prescription plan, the vast expansion of government including, but not limited to Homeland Security, which alone has 87,000 subcontractors providing consulting information, btw here, there are instances of some of those subs, duplicating the same info as many as 5 times, and the government paying all. This of course, doesn't count the unfunded Bush tax cuts(see below).
"you do know that the national debt increased more in Obama's first 3 years than all 8 of Bush's"
Little wonder there, do you actually know what shrub's tax cuts cost the US government to date? 1TRILLION 34 BILLION and counting, most of that from the top 5% in the country. In addition to that, you haven't factored in the recession/depression which reduced tax revenue coming in, and strained government outlays going out in terms of benefits to the unemployed and underemployed(you do know that most who work at Walmart or other minimum wage jobs qualify for foodstamps, they are paid that little...). On top of that with each passing year, the cost to service that debt..piles up and increases government outlays for that.
In the end guys, why not come clean and admit, you just hate Obama. Now whether that is because you are bigots( and I can understand that, sitting here in georgia, during some conversations, I often hear the banjo's from Deliverance playing in the background). Or because you have overdosed on Rush, Hannity, O'reilly and faux news...and actually buy that tripe their sellin cause it fits with your beliefs.
It makes no difference to me, but at least try to get the facts of a story right..not that fairy tale you have in your head from rush! | |
|
| |
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/9/2012 12:05:39 PM | In the end guys, why not come clean and admit, you just hate Obama.
Obozo is most likely a nice man................. I don't hate him at all. I hate the fact he is trying to turn the USA into a socialist country.
The facts are there and the difference in the tax cuts since they were instated are about the same as just one years of obozos increased spending so seeing as they started years before obozo took office.
Had obozo done away with them the first day he took office, it still would not add up close to even one year of his spending.
So Mr. Bush's tax cuts have little to do with the horrendous debt obozo has imposed upon our children for the next three generations.
Besides you really can't count the cost of the cuts as if they had not been voted in many of the business' you were counting revenue from might have went under costing way more revenue.
As far as the refineries the government has to approve them and obozo has been very active in imposing new laws aimed at shutting down oil refineries and coal plants.
You know his war on carbon fuels while giving billions to his campaign contributors you know some of them the Solyndra.
You know the ones that took over half a billion dollars and filed bankruptcy.
So just why is the evil oil companies at fault for obozos war against them?
Besides the government make more money on a gallon of gas than the oil companies do.
The map above from API shows gasoline taxes by state (combined local, state and federal), which range from a low of 26.4 cents per gallon in Alaska to a high of of 66.1 cents per gallon in California, averaging 48.1 cents per gallon across all states. How does that compare to oil company industry profits per gallon? According to this post on Exxon Mobil’s Perspective Blog , “For every gallon of gasoline, diesel or finished products we manufactured and sold in the United States in the last three months of 2010, we earned a little more than 2 cents per gallon. That’s not a typo. Two cents.”
So the evil oil companies make $0.02 a gallon while the state and federal governments collect a average of $0.48 per gallon.
Now just who is the real evil empire here?
Again y'all really need to find out what is in that kool-aid they give ya. As it seems to block the ability to understand facts.
Nice rant I really liked the spin you tried to put on it to bad it was so easy to expose. See the truth doesn't need a kick stand it stands all by itself. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/9/2012 1:01:15 PM | (yawn) to be expected!
"obozo is most likely a nice man"
Well, that's nice of you to admit, although neither of us know him personally, so it's annecdotal at best. Though your comment does spark a question...why do you hate the USA? Whether you like the man or not, he was elected by a majority of votes, and like it or not..he is YOUR President as well. Which means everytime you disrespect him, you disrespect the office of President. I at least waited until after Bush left office to call him shrub!
"a socialist country"
Another interesting statement. The stock market has doubled under Obama's tenure. What's more corporate earnings have never been HIGHER in the ENTIRE history of the nation. Just on those 2 facts alone, this nation would hardly be thought of as socialist.
As for the tax cuts, and Obama's share of the debt, he didn't start the wars, merely took over their running, that's on Bush. As is the housing debacle, which hangs over us like a shroud. Not to mention that little recession shrub started that will take 10 years to dig out from. Your comparison, is like the captain of the Titanic saying to the first mate "your captain now, I know I hit the iceberg, but I'm giving you command and getting in a lifeboat!"
"obozo has been very active in imposing new laws"
See, there you go, off course again, the President, ANY President, imposes NOTHING...thy merely enforce laws, congress votes laws into effect, NOT the President. Better brush up on your knowledge of how government works.
I can see you want to hang your hat on Solyndra. I will be the first to admit, we screwed the pooch on that one. Poor planning, poor research, a rush to try and create new jobs and a bevy of other things led to that debacle. Still in all, better than the 7 BILLION spent on a destroyer(Zumwalt)!!!!
As for renewable energy, well stop and think a moment. There is a finite amount of oil in the world. We have already picked the low hanging fruit, so it will get much more expensive and risky(to the environment) to continue just using fossil fuels. Or possibly you don't have a cell phone, or an Ipad? You still have a rotary phone and a big box computer you use to post? Progress should continue and an answer found to change our lives for the better, that includes stopping carbon emmisions!
"So the evil oil companies make $0.02 a gallon"
Now we both know that's not true in many respects, why would try and foist a lie on all of us here?
You have totally discounted many factors and even your base premise is wrong. You forgot the $5 billion in tax breaks the oil industry gets. You forget the control they exert, when for their businesses best interest, they withhold product from going to market, to allow the price to rise. They ARE in the business of making more money doncha know!
Finally, why not click onto factcheck.org and have a gander at their article on gasoline prices? You will find the following quote in it: "We called ExxonMobil and asked how Cohen arrived at his figure. Spokeswoman Kristen Hellmar said it was determined by dividing "downstream earnings($694 million) by the number of gallons of gasoline and other products refined and sold during the quarter in the US(9,355 million gallons). The result is 7.4 cents per gallon."" This of course, belies the "hidden and indirect costs" they I'm sure factor in, such as the hundred million paid in salaries to Exxon executives alone. It's not like a business owner who knows what he paid for and what he sold things for, and the net is his profit...
That came from the horses mouth at Exxon, and STILL doesn't reflect all the rest they make, on YOUR back!
"the ability to understand facts."
Understand indeed, I don't think it is I, who fails to comprehend the facts.... | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/9/2012 1:16:19 PM | This website shows just how full of crap your claim of the president not imposing anything.
http://1461days.blogspot.com/2009/01/current-list-of-president-obamas.html
Really you need to get off the tit of the lamestream media........they are loosing market share for a reason......to many lies about the people's pockets they are in.
I do like how your sources are always rock solid but the ones posted by others are bogus.
You do realize that the liberal reign is about over. On Nov. 6th it will end. Wisconsin and the last election cycle should have been a clue.
Keep the faith and spewing the party line the American people are not buying the hope and change anymore. | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/9/2012 1:46:54 PM | Doncha just luv how they squeal, when confronted with facts? Facts to conservatives, are what garlic is to vampires!! hahaha!
"It is a very dynamic formula"
So is the calculator used to determine the cost of those cuts, taking previous averages of what has been paid.
'That you call so many others "bigots","
I didn't call anybody a bigot..I said "now whether this is because you are bigots" then "Or because you have overdosed on"
Which means that yes, some are bigots. To believe otherwise, is foolhardy...just look at some of the reactions of a few in the Trayvon Martin case, to see it. Or take into account racial profiling..or any of a dozen other things. Frankly when I read a thread on here, for example, in the dating threads, when they say these guys do this or that, I never own that shit, if I am not guilty of it. If your not a 'bigot', it shouldn't bother you one bit.
"blogspot"
Really? Some random blog? That I suppose carries only one side of the argument? If you check the factcheck site, there is BOTH sides of the data pro and con...not a site that powderpuffs the spin, to make either side happy.
"how your sources are always rock solid"
hey...that wasn't my fact or your fact...that came right from the mouth of the spokeman for Exxon.
"You do realize that the liberal reign is about over"
Ahh, yes "the liberal reign", like he is acting as king and not trying to do the best for all in a terrible situation.
You may indeed be right, he may lose the election. Then we can return to the bush era style of economics, as though that worked out so well for all of us, now didn't it. You do know that Romney has hired many of shrubs economic advisers? He even stated he will return to bush style economics, so since you guys I doubt are in the 1% better lay in a good supply of vasoline! Hahahahaha!!!
As for "Wisconsin", yeah that was something to be proud of! Did you bother to read about the robo call that happened in the 2 days before the election? Where they said "if you signed the recall petition, your job is done and you don't need to vote on tuesday"...now that's a class act, fit for the republican tricksters like Karl Rove!
Mean while we will have to see if all that will happen is people ragging on Obama, or will Romney come out of "mittness protection" and address some of his issues, like 47th in job creation when he was governor of mass. or his getting 4 seperate defferments from the draft, now saying "I would have loved to go to Viet Nam" or his days as crasher in chief at Bain Capital where he never met a company he couldn't bankrupt! hahahahaha!!
It's a long way to november and we will see what happens...maybe Obama loses, maybe Mitt does...but things won't change...I have 2 daughters, almost as liberal as me...guess what...we may lose but we AIN'T goin away! | |
|
| are the gas prices killing you yet Posted: 6/9/2012 5:14:36 PM | Interesting comment, and typical of all things conservatives play at:
"You know, Ayers, Rev. Wright, etc"
Always looking for the cheap shots, always trying to hit below the belt..why? Because it's the best thing they have, and it allows them to feel all smug n shit! More crap related to trying to overthrow the country or make it socialist. Not a grain of truth, but mind you, like I said in my previous post, facts and republicants are strangers never destined to meet.
You'd think by now, that the single most watched man in America, who's every move is documented, ESPECIALLY by republicans, would have seen that neither Ayers or Wright have been hanging around the white house. Or they would have uncovered further interactions, or subplots between these men. I guess like I said, it's all about getting your news from the feel good blogs on the right or faux news.
Then on the other side of course, Mitt clay feet, can do no wrong... Here you have the perfect example of the hypocrisy from the right, you can refer and tie Obama to Rev. Wright, but you can't ask a question about mittens and the magic underpants..EVER!!! Oh no his religion is out of bounds, and all the bizarre beliefs that go with it.
Or the fact he is still invested in Bain Capital, earning money from the future bankrupting of companies. NOPE, that's out of bounds as well. Or the fact that the state he was governor of was 47th in job creation..nada..ain't gonna talk about that, Or that he was a draft dodger who hid out in France, getting 4 deferments. Or his gay bullying....no that was long ago, even if he laughs about it.
Yeah right...we'll just try and sneak that shit by, by bashing Obama for anything he does.
The odd part about all this to me is, none of these guys make anywhere near the amount of money to benefit from the mittsters agenda. He won't do dogshit for them, they don't have 100K to donate to his campaign, so using some famous words "no soup for you!"!! hahahahahaha!!!
Like I said earlier, buy a good supply of KY jelly, you're gonna need, when and if mitt comes home to roost! | |
|
|
|
|
Page
23
of
27 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27)
|
|