^^^Read it again, and you'll find your snafu is also mine. Like I said, if you were right the first time, then my comments to you would have made sense....obviously not a lie, if I took you at your word. But don't worry, I won't hold it against you. ;)

So then you admit my facts are sound yet you try and call me out on a mistake of inverting the words state and federal.

I guess when you can't win on the points of debate a hallow victory that shows we all are human is better than nothing.

Oh, the irony, it buuuuuuuuuuuurns. Nothing I say will ever mean a thing to you, so I guess I'll just drop out here.....have fun.

I obviously saw you admitting to the inversion AFTER I made my comment by the gas price going down because of Obama, which was also a snark, because I ALREADY know gas taxes had not changed. You screwed up first, and that's that.

the major difference between Bush and Obama is that Obama wants high gas prices....Green agenda more important than citizen welfare

the major difference between Bush and Obama is that Obama wants high gas prices....Green agenda more important than citizen welfare

If you do not understand that a green agenda is for just that, citizens welfare, then you clearly do not understand anything other than what they tell you to think on cable tv.

Unless you can show a direct correlation between the cost of gas at the pumps and any clean energy policies that have been created in the past 3 years.

It would take me 320 months just to break even on the investment. That is 26.67 years. Now factor in the cost of replacing batteries and solar panels as needed and it is just not feasible.

In other words it will cost more to use the "free" solar energy.

Please quote source, time and date where Obama said he wanted "high energy prices...LIAR!

In another clip from the same January 2008 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle in which Barack Obama promised to bankrupt anyone foolish enough to build coal-burning power plants, he also made an interesting admission about his entire energy plan. Obama told the editors that his policies would make energy prices “skyrocket” as the energy industry passed along the exorbitant costs of his cap-and-trade policy:

I already dispelled your claim of 40K for solar panels, I checked and found several outfits that would do such a job for 20-22K. You also fail to take into account tax abatements, and rebates, in your 320 months again LIAR!

and if you actually understood that it is that way because the oil and coal companies get massive subsidies and the solar industry gets a pittance in comparison then you would understand why that is the case.

So the government should be investing in future technologies to help create infrastructure and development and then you would see the cost go down, but for some reason there seems to be this movement that only wants to give breaks to industries that are already making billions and not move forward.

But hey if you like big corporations being able to monopolize the market with old tech and screw you over at the pumps that is your right, but just make sure that you are heavily invested on oil and coal because if you think you will get a break at the pumps because of who is in office you really do not understand how the market works.