j-mix
|
Joined: 10/4/2005
Msg: 101 | |
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/12/2005 5:34:31 PM | ok... i'm not circumcised.
for many women in us it is just interesting because everybody is circumcised. And it is more fun for girls to play with ;-)
p.s. my opinion, natural is better! | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/13/2005 7:01:16 AM | ****KKKKK NO. do not cut the penis. Down wit circumcision. Being non circumcised keeps the penis SENSITIVE. Nuff said.
only problem i'd see if man the first time i got a blow job my****got some long n hard, bigger than when u normally get horny at that age, well basically the skin had to stretch and im thinking because of that lil attachment line thing was pulling my skin. This is very hard to describe using words and this isnt the site to just post a picture of it. but anyways, the skin around my head swoll up for about a week lol, i had to wear a sock around it with a rubber band to keep it in place lol, that was so damn funny. at the same time i was thinking "damn is this normal" LOLOL 
so DONT CIRCUMCISE, just tell em what may happen. I was raised to clean my penis properly so there are no health reasons for getting a circumcision. oh yeah and with me being un circumcised, when i was a kid. If i'd pull back the skin and let my penis head out while i walked around (fully clothed) the feeling would irritate my head which if left that way would have caused my penis to desensitize itself.  | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/16/2005 10:47:39 PM | | I have to come out in favour of uncut...It is more sensitive for sure...especially when you are young...to this day I could not pull my forskin back and put it in my pants it would hurt...I have to mention...I'm not sure if what the fellow ahead of me experianced is the same but he reminded me the first time as a young boy I drew my forskin all the way back it hurt...sort of like a male virsion of loosing your virginity...it was fine but it did hurt the first time...I do not remember needing to clean under it until after that time by the way...it does have some minor problems...not the least of which is that I actually can contract a yeast infection...my doctor advised against soap the first time this happened to me and it helped...I've rarely had a problem since...lol...I can't beleave I'm saying all this to a bunch of strangers...lol...I hope it helps you a bit anyway...talk to a doctor...but I think if a guy had both when he was older he would not want to be cut...I don't know anyone who isn't cut who goes to get it later in life... | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/16/2005 11:17:40 PM |
I don't know anyone who isn't cut who goes to get it later in life...
Ah, but there are men who choose to be circumcised later on. Check out the link I posted on the previous page, it's a very informative site which is in favour of circumcision. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/17/2005 1:56:08 AM | I'm copped and PROUUUUUUD.......I love it and so have all the women I dated or been with. It's clean, sex is phenomal....I don't care what anyone says......especially for the women ;)
let's face it you'll seldom run into a one minute man that's circumsized....and most of all ya....after taking a pee there's no dribble's left hanging around in foreskin so once again....it's super clean  besides i really think chopped looks better....I mean....our packages aren't the best looking thing sout there, but I do think this helps. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/17/2005 9:00:10 AM | i had a neighbor, years ago... her husband and three sons were done at the same time and the youngest boy was like 10 or 11 at the time. they actually healed faster and she told me they didn't have much pain in recovery. she said it was uncomfortable for them but wasn't a big deal... i can't remember how we got onto the subject or why they waited so long or why they did it as a family but it does happen and they all seemed to handle it well.
that's not to say i'd encourage it but i'd rather my son make that choice for himself. if done correctly, it should heal faster than it would have if i had it done to him when he was in diapers. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/17/2005 1:46:46 PM | | uncut is nasty...its not health and yuk. i though all guys do it.......( hey i guess the bible tells you to cut it) | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/17/2005 2:07:37 PM |
uncut is nasty...its not health and yuk.
Cut is good? What would you think of the idea that women should have part of their genitals CUT off? Just curious, honest opinion please. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/17/2005 5:48:30 PM | | there's a big difference stupid.....foreskin a useless bit of skin is a whole different thing than a woman's genitals...besides, when in full erection it looks the same.....and no it isn't that painful at all, I had it done when i was 5 for religious purposes...there's absolutely nothing inhumane about it. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/17/2005 10:22:13 PM | | krazy... it suprises me that you have a penis and you're totally unaware of how it functions when left in tact. maybe at 5 years old your foreskin was useless but you no longer have it so not only do you NOT know what purpose it serves physically, someone forgot to teach you a little bit about your own male anatomy. do a little research or read a few pages of this thread, you'll find a link and some helpful information about your own body... or the part you're now lacking. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 12:12:29 AM | krazy:
Hmm! Did you call me "stupid"? My first thought after I read that was about that useless bit of skin between your ears. I guess it was removed just after birth too. No one will miss it. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 1:31:36 AM | | Listen Woman.....I did my research, and unless you have a penis anything you read is B.S. because it IS a useless bit of skin....what little nerve endings that are found there can only stimulate sex as much as a woman sucking my balls can.....what makes a man blow is the abundance of nerve endings found in the head of the penis....and ya goofball...you are an air head.....a man's foreskin is NOT the same as a woman's genitals...understand that and believe it.....and honestly.....2 of the 3 of world's largest religions require circumsition.....it's not barbaric at all, it actually (if research was done) is quite healthy and promotes infections and such. My orgasms I'm sure are just as good to me as an uncut guys....my freind got his cut at a later age due to medical reasons, and he's just as happy as he is now than he was before.......enough said....I'm out of this thread....but all arguments aside......I personally and all that i know who's got it done would have it no other way. That's my opinion. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 3:33:24 AM |
For those of you who had it done to your son(s), what were the reasons behind your decision, and for those of you who chose not to circumcise your son(s), why not?
We talked it over with our doctor and then did a little research ourselves on the subject. It seems that it's about an even split between the two. We decided not to have it done, even though I was circumcised. Then shortly after our son turned five he kept getting re-occuring infections. We knew it had nothing to do with hygiene, as we had been extremely careful in that department. Well it ended up he had to be circumcised after all. I think it's all in personal preference that should be discussed between both parents prior even to thinking about having children. We had a daughter as our second buddle of joy, but if it had been a boy we would have had him done. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 5:12:31 AM | I am so tired of this, but:
Ear infections, pink eye, toothache, headache...
Well? What are you going to do about those?! | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 7:30:18 AM |
I am so tired of this
Maybe because you refuse to even consider the 'other' side and respect the people who choose to have it done? Bottom line here is, making a decision to have a child circumcised is a personal one, and as long as it has been fully researched, you need to respect peoples decisions, just as you are respected for your reasons AGAINST circumcision. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 9:03:59 AM | | krazy... i didn't realize a 5 year old would know what a blow job was supposed to feel, like let alone be capable of blowing a load. like i said... you don't have your foreskin and haven't had it since you were 5 years old. each man's sensitivities are different, so to lump everyone in the same category of pleasure spots as you have is not reasonable in the least bit. how many men have to had sex with? | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 10:12:15 AM | My son is 25 and we decided not to have him circumcized because his father wasn't. I had some fears about him feeling "different" because of this. Most of the parents in this area were having it done at that time. He told me recently that he use to hide and change his clothes at the very last minute in swimming class when he was 10 because he was so self conscious. I told him he could always decide to have it done now if he wanted to- and I would pay for it if it was not covered by his insurance. I believe it's considered cosmetic surgery. He has a choice that males who ARE circumcized don't have. ..but at 25 he has decided that he likes the fact that he's uncut...
As far as female circumcision goes- it continues to be done in many african countries. It IS mutilation in my opinion and can cause horrendous medical complications to those girls as they become women. I agree with the person who said that we should respect everyone's right to make these decisions, but unless it's for religious reasons, I think there is no NEED to have the procedure performed. It is a choice the parents of the baby make. They must accept the full responsibility for making this choice. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 1:35:00 PM | | whosyourbadkitty----I don't understand what your trying to say....but you do have to realise that the foreskin does not make that much of a difference. And honestly it isn't a big deal liek most are making it out to be. DJc and coffeecanuck have nailed itwith what they said, they said what I was trying to say in a more mature respectable and understandable way. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 7:16:35 PM | | krazy... to write off a man's foreskin as easily as you do seems a bit unfair to men who actually appreciate having that piece of "useless" skin as you call it. if you don't understand what i'm trying to say, i can't make it any easier for you to understand, i'll speak slower this time... you haven't had your foreskin since you were 5 years old, how would you personally know it makes a difference? | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 8:36:32 PM | | I already said a good freind of mine had his done at an older age...besides look at some of teh other posts on here....I'm not being unfair to anyone....just trying to make it loud and clear that my foreskin isn't equivalent to a woman's genitals....come on man, if it were that huge a difference all these adults wouldn't be getting it done anyways.....I don't want to argue on this lady's thread I simply stated my perspective of teh whole thing....and in all honesty, I really think some people have blown it out of proportion as though the whole male anatomy is getting cut.....It's just simply not that significant sexually. I'm sorry but that's the simple truth. the uncut penis maybe a bit more sensitive, but all in all, that's the only significant difference which I can be 100% sure of. My ability to reach peak orgasms is no different than other males that are uncut. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 8:56:34 PM |
My ability to reach peak orgasms is no different than other males that are uncut.
Ironically, the one man who I had been with, who experienced any kind of sexual dysfunction was an 'intact' man. Every other one (NOT that there have been hundreds!  of men), was circumcised and had no difficulties.
Now there is no need to jump on the bandwagon of.....'sexual dysfunction has nothing to do with being cut or intact'. I realize that, just wanted to point out something I had personally experienced. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/18/2005 11:21:43 PM |
I am so tired of this, but:
Ear infections, pink eye, toothache, headache...
Well? What are you going to do about those?!
If there was a way to stop ear infections, pink eye, toothache and headache's, where it involved removal of a very insignificant piece of skin, I'd have it removed as well.
MMMBaby I understand that for you it may be a religious or even personal belief and I respect that. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/19/2005 4:34:06 AM |
If there was a way to stop ear infections, pink eye, toothache and headache's, where it involved removal of a very insignificant piece of skin, I'd have it removed as well.
On a routine basis even when there has not been a problem? Gee, that makes a lot of sense!
Face it, circumcision is being performed and defended on religious grounds only, and if one is content being marked as a slave, then to each his own (or not, as the case may be). | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/19/2005 5:38:20 AM | | Come on be serious here. If it something that occurs rarely then of course not. If you think that is what I was implying, it was not. If however it was something that was happening on a regular basis, and it was a simple matter of removing an insignificant (IMO) piece of skin, to alleviate the problem, I would do it. Take tonsils for instance. Would you consider enduring constant pain and suffering, because they are a part of you as well are they not? Or would you have them removed, because they to are a useless piece of skin (IMO) as well. Show me some valid documentation that states that the foreskin is of value, as far as your personal physical health is concerned. Having ones foreskin removed does not make them any less of a man. By the way religion had nothing to do with the decision. | |
|
| Circumcision...To cut or not to cut?
Posted: 12/19/2005 6:21:10 AM | | krazy... i'm not arguing with you, i'm simply challenging you based on the fact that you haven't had your foreskin since you were 5 and you've talked to ONE friend that had this done later in life... that doesn't constitute research by any stretch of the imagination. i do agree with you, in that the woman's clitoris is a totally different issue because without it, it's said a woman will never climax, that just isn't the case with circumcised men. what i don't agree with you on is the fact that some men are far more sensitive than others, especially when they have been left in tact and you wouldn't have the slightest idea about how sensitive they can be given you've been without your foreskin since you were five. you and your buddy are two totally different men, with different likes and dislikes, different sexual function from one another and although he might tell you that there's no difference(which is probably entirely true for him) there are men out there that would feel completely different without their foreskin. | |
|
Home
login 
