| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/9/2007 4:03:36 PM | I think that women are beautiful enough without tattoos...usually at least for me the tattoo detracts from their natural beauty...not opposed to tattoos on women just think that they are superfluous.... | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/9/2007 4:16:01 PM | | Armoured Knight needs to actually read that book he keeps preaching from and learn from the man who died on that cross. You need help AK, badly. You are judgemental person with no clue what people are really like. You just run that mouth and fingers, spouting garbage. | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/9/2007 7:15:34 PM | Interesting that tattoo's on women or anyone for that matter becomes a matter of religion. Conform or you'll never be successful or happy. Fairly fascist thing to say, god please. What having a tattoo comes down to is personal choice in its purest form, its your body and you can do what ever you want. Women with tattoo's are hot. If i think about it i figure my last three girl friends had tattoo's.
Dave | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/10/2007 8:17:00 AM | | So does anyone know what is the attraction of tattoos? (Don't just say they're hot and sexy, tell me why.) Or is it one of those things people just can't explain? | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/10/2007 8:52:15 AM | ^^^ You must mean like how can a mutli story steel frame skyscraper that was never hit by an airplane can suddenly collapse kinda not being able to explain thing. Or you must also mean how could a former U.S. state Attorney while Mayor of New York remove all evidence from a mass murder scene without it being investigated first kinda thing that has no explanation. :)
I'll take the bait though. It is my belief it is mostly used as a freedom of expression in an otherwise repressed individuals life. For myself the attraction is a tasteful tattoo/piece of art on a womans body where it is pleasing to the eyes/senses.
I thank you.
@armouredknight. You betcha there is alot of sick fvcks out there sir. Ever check in with the goings on of many Catholic priests? Their dirty laundry is finally coming to the light.
I believe (strongly) the catholic sect of the christian belief to be one of the really bad ones. Any religion that denies a MAN the RIGHT to be with a woman as their dogma states they must be married to the lord is a recipe for disaster. Pedophiles? The catholic priesthood has to be one of the biggest pedophile rings in existance.
| |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/10/2007 2:41:50 PM | From Post # 556:
I believe (strongly) the catholic sect of the christian belief to be one of the really bad ones. Any religion that denies a MAN the RIGHT to be with a woman as their dogma states they must be married to the lord is a recipe for disaster. Pedophiles? The catholic priesthood has to be one of the biggest pedophile rings in existance.
Yes, wars, culture, and many individual's lives have been altered by following *Lies*. But haven't the Islamic people illigetimatized Mohammed's Koran some as much as some professed Christians have B---tardized the scriptures for their own agenda. IE. Heard some Moslem nations remove a girl's clitoris to keep the incidence of adultery down; I doubt that is prescribed in the Koran.
IE. It's said in some Islamic nations when there is a rape, they kill the girl as she is thought to have dishonored the family; lead it on and asked for it. I trully doubt Mohammed said this was the way to remedy rape.
IE. Is it possible that in Buddism, Hinduism, and other faiths that they illigetimatize the teachings also to suit their own needs? Doesn't every culture use the dominant religion as a tool to continue their madness and agenda as the USA has in the deception and Rape of Irac?
The Point I'm trying to make as far as the 'tatoo saga' goes is it it Biblically endorsed in scripture or is it a No-No as pre-marital sex and non-heterosexual unions are definite sacriledges from the Biblical standpoint.
What scrpitural basis can a Christian justify their tatoos as they walk the 'Christian walk'? 
As for those who just don't get the religious connection, does everyone have beleifs? What are our beleifs based upon?
I once talked to a University Professor who claimed to be an atheist but beleived in Science. I said "Isn't science a beleif in empirical thinking using our subjectivity as our measurement tools to search for truth? In other words *Is Not* the beleif in anything, science or otherwise a faith, or a religion?
Since this cosmos is creasted by some force greater than mankind I personally seek to find the paths that are true. And as a Judeo-Christian beleiver, who understands the Bible is a collection of documents for mankind's benefit, should Christians follow it's teachings regarding the 'stinkin-inkin' trend or should we be conformed to the ways of the 'World'?
One does have to justify what they do in life don't they, and is that why this planet is in the state of affairs it is in?    | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/10/2007 5:19:34 PM | You're an interesting cat my friend. I think we both know how christian scripture and (all others for that matter) has been **stardized to suit the agenda of whoever is in POWER at that given time. We are all victims of our enviroment. The Islamic people are playing catch up. I would say 200 years catch up (in my opinion.) They follow their religious leaders (without question). FEAR is a huge factor in enviroments where religion and state are one and the same. Sound familiar?
What about the christians that ink Jesus or crosses on their bodies as a tribute to their faith and Lord? I think defiling ones temple (body) to mean an alcoholic, drug addict, person of loose morals, or anyone who abuses themself. Regardless of any of this. It is a personal choice.
I like tattoos (within reason.) | |
|
| |
506guy
|
Joined: 8/30/2007
Msg: 559 | |
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/11/2007 8:33:53 AM | I vote against tatts in general. I'm an old fogie perhaps, but big tattoos, arm or ankle "bracelets" don't do a thing for me. I keep thinking of the future.
If you don't like a piercing, you can take it out and that's about it. A tat is there to stay unless you want imperfect, expensive removal.
Now genital piercings -- those I find hot! | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/11/2007 11:10:11 AM | I like tats on girls so yes definate turn on.
I think it comes more from the idea then the tat itself, perminantly marking your self with art to me is expressive and bold.
Im not so much into the "safe" tats like a buttlerfly on the ankle or something but a girl with a niece peice on her arms or body thats yumm | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/11/2007 11:26:57 AM | ADBC...
First; If practically everyone under 30 has a tattoo then tell me why i am the only person in a community of 500 that has one?
Second; I challenge you to find someone who has the same ones I do, since I drew all of my and then had an artist ink me.
Tattoos are all about expression of one's self now not rebelling aginst something. Each of mine has a meaning or a story behind them and that will never change. When I'm 80, sagging, and hideous I'll never forget why that is there, what happend for me to have gotten it, and most important I'll never have to miss anyone who is no longer alive because I have them with me in a manner that they can never be taken away. | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/11/2007 4:46:28 PM | From the brother in Post # 558:
What about the christians that ink Jesus or crosses on their bodies as a tribute to their faith and Lord? I think defiling ones temple (body) to mean an alcoholic, drug addict, person of loose morals, or anyone who abuses themself. Regardless of any of this. It is a personal choice.
Isn't that *very simular* to the Irish preists of so-called Christianity shortly after the Roman occupation of the British Isles that flogged themselves with ruthless torture?
Or what about the latest illusion, a movie based upon 'The Gospel of Mary Magnalene', the craze and fictional fad of those who thgink the *The Da Vinci Code* is actually fact.  I mean notice the white-haired dude flogging himself and murdering anyone the Church sanctions to be a threat!
Are any of these two examples Chistianity just because our Lord was whipped with a Cat of Nine tails; so we need to be Christ-Like and get down to the S & M Saloons in San Francisco and be whipped and punished immediately? :run
:
What about the Roman Catholic preists who follow celibacy, *no Wife for them*, when the scriptures they recorded according to the Documents that Paul is said to have said condemned, the 'celibacy trip' in the preishood as far as being forced by the Church is heresy?
I mean I live in a nation that says the blasphemic lic, the 'Sacred Lie', of 'Freedom of Religion'. Do you think these idiots who merely follow will allow the Aztec believers in Sun worship and sacrifice of the people by their hearts being ripped out to insure the Sun will rise the next day?
In Principle *If* they trully beleive the 'sacred Lie' of Freedom of religion do they not have to honour Aztec ceremonies as much as they allow the Plain's tribes Sun Dance or the Southwestern 'peyote cult?
So what if some twisted females, and you and I have never seen any under this flag, want to symbolicly get artificially inseminated and call it a re-creation of the 'virgin birth' tribute, will that make the action sacred?
I've heard there was a Pentecostal Church in Tennessee that worshiped with poisonus snakes as it was in scripture; taken out of context for sure. A few died due to bites in the religious rites. Too bad the 'Holy Harlot on Manhattan Isle' repealed their right(????) to worship and kill themselves in Christ's(?????????) name?
Where oh where in the 66 cannonized books that the Council of Niscea endorsed is their a scripture *In Context* defending the adornment of the 'temple of God'{Our Bodys} by the 'stinking inking' that so many sheep seem to be lead by some questionable philosophy?
Ya know I live in Reno, have seen so many heretics IE.****ail gals saying they are serving God, Women preachers, Prostitutes walking the streets claiming they are doing God's work: ever see the current 'Zorro' film and listened the the villian claiming to be doing God's work in that film?
I wonder if the Lutherans and Catholics in Gemany in WWII who followed Pious(?) brother Adolf's advice and Persuassion to merely follow the leader; will they recieve rewards in the afterlife for devoutly following the movement?
Is it somewhat the same for 'skin graffitti' followers who use ink when the incidents of hepatitus are strongly noted?
*Where* is the scriptural justification for letting that ink needle slide into your skin?
Have a sister who admits that most women using the birth control pill have a higher incidence of miscarriage on the first conception. Could that be construed as harming the Temple of God; hers as well as the Fetus of a future child who could not come forth because of what the pill created?
Or can so-called Christians do any 'condemned thing' they wish as in the rape of the Middle-East and be as *screwy as Buggs Bunny would say(GRIN)* with their God-given body as they want? After all it's no longer God's body *if* they decide that choice is it? | |
|
| |
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 9/18/2007 9:11:57 AM |
Just thought i'd put this question out there. I've had a guy tell me that tattoos on women aren't attractive, that getting a tattoo involves pain, and therefore isn't "feminine". What does everyone else think?
For a start- maybe you should tell him that if tattoos are not feminine becasue they involve pain- that maybe he should start having children and going through child birth? is he completly void of intelligence?
I have a tattoo on my back (top middle but can hide it depending on what I wear). I didnt do it becasue I thought it was cool. Id always wanted a cross tattooed on me and when my mate said 'hey lets go get a tatt' I sed- yeah why not- im kind of random in that way.
Just becasue it involves pain doesnt mean its not feminine! I now design them too which is cool.
I will say this though- stick to the ones that are plain black- in my opinion coloured ones are a bit tacky!! | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 10/3/2007 8:07:07 AM | YES!! it is very sexy to see a nice piece of work on a woman, if they want they can place in "Private viewing places" or they can put it anywhere the so desire, My only hang up is I dislike huge pieces on a woman, lotsa of little ones, Great/Fantsatic!!!
Plus it is their bodies either love it or leave it, your choice!!  | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 10/3/2007 8:21:29 AM | | I see nothing with tattoos,I have one and have only gotten compliments,I think he just prefers his women not to have tattoos,its a matter of choice for you. | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 10/3/2007 12:44:38 PM | Tats are GTG. I personally love them. It is your body do with what you will. Just make sure its what you want...because it is a whole lot harder to take off than to put on!!  | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 10/3/2007 4:00:53 PM | Tattoos for are a big turn-off for me, but that's just me. Some people just don't like tattoos, just like some people don't like goatees. Problem is, you can SHAVE a goatee.
As far as "pain" not being "feminine", SINCE WHEN? Cramps, tenderness, water gain, childbirth... THAT's a pretty specious load of caca. He's probably just turned off by them. | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 10/3/2007 4:55:01 PM | same as on a guy, if they're good quality... grrrreat!
otherwise... GET OUT OF MY BEDROOM AND TAKE THE DODGY COMEDY DEVIL, BADLY SCRAWLED ON YOUR ARSE TOO!!!!! | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 10/30/2007 9:32:18 AM | Yes, I personally find if done in good taste and the one's that are small
near the erroneous zones or curves of the body are quite sensual and attractive.
I admire the very small tattoos on a women body, ankle, navel, pelvic, and so forth.
My only hang up would be on her chest, but that's just me.
A women's body is beautiful to begin with and whether it be some jewery, clothes, or even tattoo would accent her beauty. | |
|
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 10/30/2007 9:41:13 AM | I perfer a woman that i choose to NOT have them.... like, if it was a first impression that i saw tattoos before i knew her character.. i would be dissapointed.
But if i discovered her personality first.. thought she was kick ass awesome, then later found out she had tattoos.. it would be more forgivable.
I'm not a hardass about that stuff, but i just dislike tattoos as being the main thing to hook someone in like how i see a lot of profiles say "Tattoos turn me on"... well since i don't have any, there's no point in persuing. I feel the same way if a woman has tattoos.... she probably perfers a guy with them so i'm out of the equasion.
| |
|
9 to 9
|
Joined: 5/28/2007
Msg: 575 | |
| q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted: 10/30/2007 10:00:21 AM | Msg. 1
No. Simply because its way too over done. Every body and their lil' sister has one now. Now I remember when only a few people had them, and they had a reason for getting their ink. Now everyone is rushing to not be one of the few who dont have a tatoo, and thats the reason they are.
My My and such strategic placement of the TAT', right along with the rediculously meaningless tales of why they got them. Lets see...hmmmmm....its because everyone else was too.;)
And of course, its soo "sexy" (yawn), now that its soo overdone.
9 to 9 | |
|
Home
login 
