|
|
|
|
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/20/2006 1:51:54 AM | Rory, I'll answer your posts with my take on things in bite size pieces because they are complex questions.
One thing that frustrates me about your OP is that it's completely vague, (the call for "positive" music, whatever that means). Rory, I did give some thoughts on this one in message 111 which I'll more or less reiterate and add to here: I agree that a steady diet of nothing but "bland, didactic, preachy 'feel good' words" in songs or other artistic/literary efforts would be pretty insufferable. There are some tastefully done examples of songs with an undeniably "positive" message. Much of it was done in the 60s, for instance, "Get Together" by the Youngbloods. A song like "What the World Needs Now Is Love" is another example. I particularly admire artists who can pull off a new song with that kind of message which doesn't sound schmaltzy and cliche ridden. Phil Collins "Another Day in Paradise" is a more recent example of a song that really has a positive lyrical message in that it brings attention to the plight of homeless people -- and it does so in a creative, entertaining and musically satisfying way. Ya gotta love old Phil.
But I agree with you: how many times can you redo and restate that kind of thing before we all get bored out of our minds?" We all want a little "bite" in our entertainment too.
Granting your point that the primary function of entertainers is not necessarily to teach or to preach but primarily to entertain -- one might consider that in itself to be a positive use of one's artistic talents. We all want to hear a haunting melody, a great guitar riff, an infectious rhythm, a thrilling chord progression, etc, etc. Those things bring joy to our lives so that in itself is positive enough. The lyrics don't always have to be profound; even silly little love songs have their place.
It's when vile lyrical messages get thrown into the mix -- such as those that glorify and glamorize murder, etc -- that I get upset. In those cases, it seems to me that everyone involved -- the musicians, the "industry" and the public itself -- shares in the responsibility for what I consider to be a violation of their obligations as responsible and moral persons. If you can pardon a dramatic analogy here, in these cases, one might call the musicians and others involved on the "creative" end to be the "prostitute", the industry to be the "pimp" and the public who clamor for this kind of thing to be the "John". Now, I can expect to get blasted from someone for that one, I suppose; if so, bring it on, what else is new? Nevertheless, it occurs to me now, after using that analogy, that I'm as likely to be successful in restraining this so called "artistic expression" as human societies have been in curbing the so called "oldest profession"!
So, I'll stick with my music association and hope that we and the artists who emerge from our midst -- in part at least due to our efforts because one of our purposes is to discover and help develop emerging artists -- can function as a sort of oasis in the desert. We can't really change what goes on in the world out there. All we can really do is to be an example of something better.
Response to your other points coming later.... as mentioned, and as you know, they are pretty complex and deep questions. I don't just want to bang off something that doesn't do them justice. Take care, my friend. | |
|
late™
| Joined: 1/9/2005 Msg: 151 | |
| The power of music Posted: 1/21/2006 5:58:31 PM | Many people know, but many more would be shocked, if they knew how much "selective programming" is already in place, as in your instance, to combat the spread of bile and hate, but also, as I have pointed out, many other creative efforts that can be mistakenly interpreted as "offensive" to some person, to certain groups, or even to "the moral foundations of society", to be grandiose about it.
When it looks like a hidden agenda, walks like a hidden agenda, talks like a hidden agenda......
Try this on for size:
15) What about profanity? Why won't CAMEO allow the use of profanity in the songs performed at their events? What's the big deal? The airwaves today are full of it.
CAMEO chooses to be an organization with a touch of class. The popular music industry survived quite well for many years without foul language. We too will survive and prosper without it.
A single word can kill? rape?
It's not just about gratuitous violence, ideas. It's about the mentality that some feel they are the arbiters of "class". Some believe it's not up to the artist to be allowed the distinction of honest expression over gratuitous, nor is it up to the observer.
Take a bad example, say ...gangsta' rap, ...and run with it, apply it to everything that offends you.
I bet you end up with a ton of "Singers" this way, "Idol" style ones.
Is this a song celebrating violence?
"Clockwork Chartreuse"
I got the black belt You got the gun Let’s team up tonight Have some fun
Let’s drink some drink Let’s find us some fight Come on come on come on It’s Saturday night
I’m very angry And you’re hopping mad Let’s hurt some people Hurt them bad
Let’s bust some heads Let’s break some teeth Come on come on it’s Saturday night Let’s get some relief
We’ll get our rocks off We’ll rape a Coed, fa la lala lala lala lala laaaaaaa Beat on a wino Until he is dead
1’11 slug a hippie You plug a cop We’ll go on a rampage We won’t wanna stop
They say he is helpless But I do not care, Let’s get the guy In that wheelchair.
God I hate women They mess up your life 1’11 kill your mother If you kill my wife
It’s a hard day at the office One needs to unwind Let’s mix up some****ails The Molotov kind
Let’s burn down the high school And the synagogue Let’s burn down McDonald’s Let’s go whole-hog
I know a roof top Don’t you say nope Let’s try out your rifle The one with the scope
Tomorrow is Sunday There’ll be some parades And back at my house I got some grenades
I got the black belt You got the gun. Let’s team up tonight Have some fun
?????????????????
Is it gratuitous violence?
...........Is it up to somebody to decide this for both the artist AND the listener both?
How 'bout:
"Crime of Passion"
Take me in your arms, snuff me with your charms Crime of passion, crime of passion When my soul has fled, keep my carcass in your bed Hard times rationed
What a way to go! Think of my death-throe, It would thrill me, it's gonna thrill me What a way to die, wedged inside your pie It would kill me, it's gonna kill me
Well it's a kind of suicide that simply must be tried Must be delicious, must be delicious The coroner could not erase the silly smile upon my face He'd be suspicious, gotta be suspicious
Care to venture a guess as to why these two songs were written, and what they mean?
How about this one, would CAMEO allow it?
"Mr. Guilty"
Call me Mr. Guilty Mr. Guilty is my name Without a doubt it's all my fault I am the one to blame. You say that you're unhappy I do believe it's true And I'm the one, the no-good bum That did it all to you. I'm so sorry, sorry as a man can be I'm so guilty, this is my apology You have been a victim A pawn in my cruel game I done you wrong And now I'm full of shame To compensate for damage done There's not much I can do So I sit and I drink And I sit and I think About all I've done to you You're a martyr to take it all this time I'm a villain, guilty of a dreadful crime All your tearfull logic Finally made me see I deserve the shame, I deserve the blame The guilt belongs to me You're innocent and you are pure As pure as driven snow You've been had, I'm a cad At least at last I know.
................Do you think that this song is meant in the literal sense? Do you think the author is being contrite?
If so you probably don't "get" the first two either. Better not sing them, 'cause somebody might not "get it".
All three are by Louden Wainwright III, a controversial, but honest and deliberate artist. Some are ignorant, and arrogant enough to think that they "get" his message when they condemn the style in which it's expressed. Fortunately, the small minded have never stopped him, and while provincial attitudes towards his music have caused him to be shunned in some circles by both Christian groups, AND Radical Feminists (what a pair!), he has a great time in Europe, especially the UK where his performences are always well attended by those who "get it".
This kind of "arbiters of decency" crap has crossed the line in Canada before, when a Conservative M.P. from Sault Ste. Marie, had obscenity charges brought on "McLean & McLean in the early '80s. I recall seeing this on the CBC's "The Fifth Estate", at the end of the piece, they showed Blair McLean on the phone getting the good news from his lawyer that the case had been thrown out, "Does that mean I can call him an asshole now?"
Tragically, Gary MacLean was diagnosed with throat cancer and he died on December 5, 2001. They had their last performance together at a benefit held for Gary and his family where they showed the crowd of over 2600 people that they still had it. Their comedy, their integrity and their indomitable spirits had overcome every roadblock thrown their way but Gary's illness was something they could not conquer.
I have about as much respect for any CAMEO artist as I would for any gangsta' rapper..... they've both sold their "soul".
RIP Gary MacLean, this one's for you:
MacLean & MacLean "Dildo Dawn"
http://www.robrob8.com/rude_and_crude/dildo_dawn.htm | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/21/2006 8:38:34 PM | Late, I see you've done your homework, good on you. I'm actually flattered in a strange sort of way.
I haven't identified the organization that I represent because I wanted to be free to speak as a private individual here and not necessarily as the spokesman for the organization. I am the president and principal founder of CAMEO and therefore, naturally, many of the ideals expressed in our constitution and in our policies are based on my own philosophy; certainly, I am not in disagreement with them. Nevertheless, I am not the dictator of the organization, I have not discussed representing the organization in this forum, and I speak here not on behalf of CAMEO but as a private individual expressing his own thoughts. Contrary to your implication, I am not here to solicit memberships or press some point for political reasons -- or whatever else it is that you imagine (at which I can only guess) to be my "hidden agenda".
You raise some good points. Deciding what songs we choose to feature at our events, what songs we might "ban" and what songs we might choose to sponsor as worthy of our organization and not in contradiction to our mission statement, our policies and our ideals -- these are very complex questions and often require considerable soul searching to answer. I've never claimed that the answers are simple. One thing that I do appreciate is that Rory and yourself have caused me to think -- again -- very deeply about these issues. Nevertheless, it would be nice if you waited for me to answer the questions before you assumed my answer and proceeded to bash my organization and the members of it so rudely and inaccurately.
"CAMEO chooses to be an organization with a touch of class. The popular music industry survived quite well for many years without foul language. We too will survive and prosper without it".
It's not just about gratuitous violence, ideas. It's about the mentality that some feel they are the arbiters of "class". Some believe it's not up to the artist to be allowed the distinction of honest expression over gratuitous, nor is it up to the observer. Since the cat's out of the bag, so to speak, and now that I feel that my organization has come under attack -- and you no doubt feel, rightly or wrongly, that we are attacking others which perhaps explains your hostility here -- I will defend our policies.
Regarding profanity and "class": Profanity is not disallowed at our events because it violates our constitution. It is disallowed primarily because our events are attended by persons of all ages and backgrounds. Offensive as it is to some, including young children and senior citizens, we made a decision to disallow it because we feel that is the classy and common sense thing to do. In addition to not wishing to offend the patrons of our events, we feel that once you allow one "f**k", there's no end to it and, in general, use of such language increases the probability of confrontation among people -- particularly at events which sometimes feature alcohol service. If you and I are arguing, for instance -- imagine that -- and I say, "what's your point?" that's one thing but if I say "what's your f***ing point?" I've moved the disagreement to another level. Really, I think it does show "a touch of class" when you refrain from certain language where it's not necessary or appropriate. Would you not consider it, for instance, a breach of class (and common sense) if the prime minister of Canada were to use such profanity in public? Suppose Paul Martin came out and said "what the f**k are you doing in Iraq anyway, George?"
In my own personal life, I have been known to utter words that many would call profane. Nevertheless, I restrain myself and do not use them at CAMEO events or in connection with CAMEO projects because that is our policy. Interestingly enough, POF, which you represent as a moderator, seems to have a very similar policy.
What's your take on that? Why does POF disallow profanity -- maybe because THEY think it's the classy thing to do? If so, hats off to POF for that! But how can you work for an organization that seems to think it's an "arbiter of class"?
A single word can kill? rape? Where it is that I -- or my organization -- are supposed to have claimed such a preposterous thing, I have no idea. Is this just another example of what you call logical argument? How about showing some class yourself and not ascribing to me ridiculous arguments that I have never made?
I have to head to work now but I may address both the good and bad points you have made in the last post when I can.
See you Later. | |
|
late™
| Joined: 1/9/2005 Msg: 153 | |
| The power of music Posted: 1/21/2006 10:07:20 PM | Late, I see you've done your homework, good on you. I'm actually flattered in a strange sort of way.
It was nothing, found it in an unrelated search on "Censorship" in the Canadian music scene. I didn't even know it was your non-profit organization (I don't know who you are).
It IS however, an example of what happens when a slippery slope scenario bears fruit, illustrated perfectly in this FAQ exerpt. = equivocation
15) What about profanity? Why won't CAMEO allow the use of profanity in the songs performed at their events?
CAMEO chooses to be an organization with a touch of class. The popular music industry survived quite well for many years without foul language. We too will survive and prosper without it.
Censorship is valid in a context of being "family" and "child" appropriate, this is not the answer in the FAQ though is it? Nor is it part of any of the statements affirming the organizations pro-censorship stance. Instead another idea stands in the place of what would have been a reasonable motive.
The underlying rational is no different than the one you espouse in the OP, which as a professional musician, I am not alone in finding offensive. I doubt you will ever understand why, though I do hope you may someday.
Why does POF disallow profanity
In practice?
Not when used in context, only when the intent to offend is blatant and in violation of decorum. If you need to understand why? Visit usenet.
As I would never have anything to do with a music association that insisted on censorship via such speciousness? If this site's policies aren't up to any users standards, the door is just two clicks away.
Suppose Paul Martin came out and said "what the fuck are you doing in Iraq anyway, George?"
My faith would be restored in Canadian politics, I would applaud. I wouldn't see the use of "what the fuck" in this context, as being gratuitous, ...I would see it as an honest expression of incredulity.
IMO, you have a belief based on speciousness, in regards to how, why, and who is behind pop culture's lowering of the bar of decency, and it shows in the language and the ideas you choose to express it.
Just as you are offended by the dreck offered up by pop culture shills, I am just as offended at this dreck being used as a vehicle to drive misguided placing of blame, which to me; seeks to absolve by degree: accountability and responsibility in those who are at the point of root causality of the problem.
That there is a "problem" is not a point of contention.
I have seen this approach in the way you view the world, in other threads. ...So I don't for a second, expect you to understand why some would find it offensive and insidious.
But some do.
Nevertheless, it would be nice if you waited for me to answer the questions before you assumed my answer and proceeded to bash my organization and the members of it so rudely and inaccurately.
Didn't know it was you, I only pulled up the "censorship" link, I had no interest in exploring further.
Believe it or not, though organizations like CAMEO may not be my cuppa' tea, I have no problem with such a policy being in place in an organization in order to keep it family and child appropriate, what raises my hackles is the mission statement's implied message. One which I find offensive, and dangerous.
Other than the idea of the rational behind the censorship, and my speculation as to what it leads to, I said nothing about the organization or it's members except for.
I have about as much respect for any CAMEO artist as I would for any gangsta' rapper..... they've both sold their "soul".
For this I apologize and retract the statement, and rephrase it:
Culture has enough going against it, mainly pop culture. IMO. to view them as equals only serves to bolster pop culture. I don't consider pop culture: Art, I don't consider P. Diddy and Eminem: Musicians
Where you may see culture harming society, I see the converse.
Musicians have a responsibility to make good music, not out of any debt to it's listeners, but as a duty to music itself. Those who don't have this sense of duty are not musicians, to me. | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/22/2006 2:10:40 AM | Well, Late, I appreciate the apology to CAMEO members -- though I find it pretty hard to believe that you typed in comments from the CAMEO statement without knowing that this was the same organization I am part of. Pretty bizarre "coincidence" if you ask me.
Perhaps you're right that our stance re profanity at our events should be elaborated in more detail. Nevertheless, I stand by the statement that we choose to be an organization "with a touch of class" and, in my opinion, that in itself is sufficient reason to ban profanity at our events. And if Paul Martin or any Canadian prime minister came out with a public statement including profanity -- especially if it was directed at a foreign head of state -- as a Canadian citizen, I would find that offensive and classless whether I agreed with his sentiments or not. On the other hand, if I heard that Martin used the word in private, I wouldn't care at all. Even Trudeau, caught reacting to a statement by an Opposition MP in Parliament and mouthing the word "f**k" to himself, certainly never intended this kind of thing for public consumption and defused it by referring, tongue firmly planted in his cheek, to it as "fuddle duddle".
The debate about "what is art" has gone around and around and it is pointless in the context of my original post. I don't consider the work of such as Eminem "art" either -- certainly not in the truest sense of the word. Nevertheless, much of the world does consider it "art", these people are called "rap artists" and this is the type of "art" that I am standing against. I've made it pretty clear that we are not really in disagreement on that point. Nevertheless, you keep hammering away at it.
It's interesting that you can post the "F" word here when most of us can't even say "dam*"! Ah, the power of "moderation"! | |
|
late™
| Joined: 1/9/2005 Msg: 155 | |
| The power of music Posted: 1/22/2006 2:28:22 AM | I would find that offensive and classless whether I agreed with his sentiments or not.
I believe you.
It's interesting that you can post the "F" word here when most of us can't even say "dam*"! Ah, the power of "moderation"!
Nope
The power of "edit". (it's to the left, right under your avatar)
Nevertheless, you keep hammering away at it.
I always will. pop culture, and those who suck at it's teat, both the producer and the consumer are anti-art.
Culture is an endangered species, ...not because of artists, but, in spite of them.
it is pointless in the context of my original post.
Disagree, it is central to understanding those who are offended by what is implied by the OP | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/22/2006 4:09:00 AM | "It's interesting that you can post the "F" word here when most of us can't even say "dam*"! Ah, the power of "moderation"!"
Nope
The power of "edit". (it's to the left, right under your avatar) Gotta admit I got a chuckle out of this one, Late! It's OK though; I wasn't really complaining. I kind of like it that it's not that easy to swear around here -- as you can imagine. And now at least I know how to do it if I really need to, damn it!  | |
|
late™
| Joined: 1/9/2005 Msg: 157 | |
| The power of music Posted: 1/22/2006 9:21:48 AM | Well, it's mostly useful for making sure there is clarity for things like:
arsenal Bruce Cockburn Dick Smothers etc. | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/22/2006 3:14:41 PM | | Music is the most powerful drug available today, like Im sure a few of you will agree, how bout it Late, can you imagine life without your guitar....... | |
|
late™
| Joined: 1/9/2005 Msg: 159 | |
| The power of music Posted: 1/22/2006 4:00:40 PM |
can you imagine life without your guitar.......
Which one?
Music is the most powerful drug available today, like Im sure a few of you will agree
drug
n : a substance that is used as a medicine or narcotic
Mmmmmmmmmm...nope.
music
n 1: an artistic form of auditory communication incorporating instrumental or vocal tones in a structured and continuous manner | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/22/2006 8:58:50 PM | | The power of music,the reason i think music hits us so hard,is it something we understand,feel and are.music is about emotion and life in general,either if its bad or good,or sad or happy,and so on.sometime its also because we think we understand what the person is feeling in are own expressions and thoughts.music is power by being it has, meaning.i have a open mind so i dont listen to one type of music or feel.i listen to them all.they all have diffrent meanings to me.no matter if it its,rap,rock,classic,blue,pop,country,metal and grundge.all and all its what we all are.i think music is a release of one persons mind too another.everyone has there own out look of music.there all right,i agree with everyone on this sight about the power of music.peace........... | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/23/2006 12:01:50 PM |
Why does POF disallow profanity
In practice?
Not when used in context, only when the intent to offend is blatant and in violation of decorum.
decorum n. Propriety of speech, appearance, or behaviour; seemliness; decency
Sounds a lot like what I call "class". Yet you label our reasons for banning profanity "specious".
If this site's policies aren't up to any users standards, the door is just two clicks away. Are you inviting me to leave, Late? Despite the fact that you know quite well that I have no problem with "censorship" on POF? Can't handle it when your own argument is turned back on you?
"Suppose Paul Martin came out and said "what the **** are you doing in Iraq anyway, George?"
My faith would be restored in Canadian politics, I would applaud. I wouldn't see the use of "what the ****" in this context, as being gratuitous, ...I would see it as an honest expression of incredulity. If I were not accustomed to your own "speciousness" by now, I would give my own "honest expression of incredulity" in response to this. Do you not think it would be rather "a blatant attempt to offend and a violation of decorum" if a Canadian Prime Minister used such language referrring to the head of state of a foreign country? No, of course, you don't! On the other hand, I doubt that you'd be so approving if he said, "why the f*** are all these people complaining about the U.S. being in Iraq? Someone had to do something about that murderous f***er Saddam!"
Whatever ... would it be in violation of decorum to ask why the f*** I bother to argue with some people?
Just as you are offended by the dreck offered up by pop culture shills, I am just as offended at this dreck being used as a vehicle to drive misguided placing of blame, which to me; seeks to absolve by degree: accountability and responsibility in those who are at the point of root causality of the problem. "Absolve by degree"? Which one of us here is doing the "absolving"? Throughout this thread I could hardly have made it more clear that I don't absolve ANY party responsible for the dreck that I am objecting to. Talk about specious argument! | |
|
late™
| Joined: 1/9/2005 Msg: 162 | |
| The power of music Posted: 1/23/2006 4:11:04 PM | I believe that songwriters and musicians have far greater power than they realize -- or perhaps than some would care to acknowledge -- and should therefore take some thought as to how they use that power. Songs that glorify rape and murder, for instance, are a blatant example of musicians misusing their gifts for the sake of the almighty dollar or the fame that such a misuse of their talents may bring them in this world that these days seemingly can't get enough of the worst excesses of human behaviour.
Disagree.
As a blatant example, some years ago a number of women were attacked and sexually assaulted in Central Park, New York by a gang of young thugs who chanted the "lyrics" to a rap song and imitated the action in the video for that song by pouring beer on their helpless victims. Media darling Eminem has made a killing from "songs" about raping his mother and worse things. A sample line: "If you see my dad, tell him I slit his throat in a dream I had". There are numerous other examples that are too sick to even print here. That's what our kids are getting a steady diet of. Some may say, it's only a song.
Disagree, why?
Some say it doesn't meet that criteria at all:
Song
n 1: a short musical composition with words
Music
n 1: an artistic form of auditory communication incorporating instrumental or vocal tones in a structured and continuous manner 2: any agreeable (pleasing and harmonious) sounds; "he fell asleep to the music of the wind chimes"
Artistic
adj 1: relating to or characteristic of art or artists; "his artistic background" 2: satisfying aesthetic standards and sensibilities; "artistic workmanship" 3: aesthetically pleasing;
artist
n : a person whose creative work shows sensitivity and imagination
Some say it's a manifestation of pop culture.
Popular culture, or pop culture, is the vernacular (people's) culture that prevails in any given society. The content of popular culture is determined by the daily interactions, needs and desires, and cultural 'moments' that make up the everyday lives of the mainstream. It can include any number of practices, including those pertaining to cooking, clothing, mass media and the many facets of entertainment such as sports and literature.
entertainment
n : a diversion that holds the attention
Society
n 1: an extended social group having a distinctive cultural and economic organization
Do you really believe that if impressionable young people constantly hear musical lyrics that glorify rape and murder, for instance, that it will have no effect upon them, particularly, as you note, upon those who for whatever reason were a little "unbalanced" to begin with? Do you not think that all of this implies that artists should take some responsibility for what they present in their art?
musical
adj 1: characterized by or capable of producing music
responsibility
n 1: the social force that binds you to your obligations and the courses of action demanded by that force
See: "Music", "Artist", "Pop Culture"
Points of contention on the whole ball o' wax.
1) You base your view on terms that I don't think you are using according to their meaning the way I understand them anyway. You also attach aspects of theology to the idea of art and artists that I don't subscribe to, and in fact ...still have nothing to do with....
2) You see pop culture as a product of artists, I see it as a product of the mainstream, manipulated by anything BUT artists.
2) You see a cause, where I see an effect.
Now we've drifted off from the terms of reference of art/music (which we don't agree on), and into the realm of sociology, and as far as the issue of "reponsibility" is concerned?
I still think you have it a little sideways and backwards in regards to "cause and effect" and the sociological context.
Re: Youth crime: rape, murder etc.
See: "Culture of Violence".
It's one thing to take something that offends you and critisize it, it's another thing to take it one step further and demonize it by attributing to it causualities that aren't substanciated by anything other than, "I think that...."
Taking it to another level and using the "I think that...." as a rational for policy is yet another thing all together.
Now we've gone from, "I think that......." to, "We're doing this because......."
Here is were the house of cards falls. Your assertion of causality isn't substanciated by any of the studies on "youth violence", by developmental psychologists, of which there are many.
| |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/23/2006 7:09:50 PM | Late, I refuse to go around the mulberry bush with you any longer. You have your definition of music and it is clearly out of tune -- pardon the pun -- with what most of the world defines as "music". If it has musical notes, rhythm and melody, it's music -- period! I didn't come here to get into an argument about what "art" or "true art" is either.
The point of this thread is a discussion of the power of music and the responsibility of those who create it to do so in a way that is creative as opposed to destructive. Whether the musicians are the only ones who have responsibility in this matter is completely irrelevant -- and, in fact, I have made it crystal clear that, in my opinion, SOME -- not all -- musicians are responsible but they are NOT the only guilty parties; so your entire argument is against a straw man that you yourself have erected for God only knows what reason. Oh, sorry, I mentioned the word God ... is that "attaching aspects of theology" according to your bizarre methods of analyzing someone else's argument?
If you insist on derailing this entire discussion with pointless arguments about fine distinctions that exist in your head but are irrelevant to the point of the thread, knock yourself out. If so, I will exercise my own right to ignore your so called arguments.
For anyone who remains in doubt about the power of music and the fact that this power is being used for destructive purposes in this world, here's some information about bands -- yes, bands that play actual instruments and songs with melodies, such as they are, NOT rappers! The information below is excerpted from an article that may be read in full here: http://www.aijac.org.au/review/2000/258/sounds.html
They call it a lot of things – White Power Rock, Oi!, Hatecore, Volk Music. There is even something called White Power Country and Western. But it all has something in common – it is today perhaps the most important tool of the international neo-Nazi movement to gain revenue and new recruits. And those recruits are in turn inspired by this music to engage in acts of racist violence.
The most popular form of such music is a variety of heavy metal accompanied by lyrics which repeat slogans of white Aryan Supremacy, glorify racial violence and Nazism, and call for various forms of "White revolution" and murder.
The Nazi music business has grown throughout the 90s, thanks largely to the internet and the ability it gives skinheads and other neo-Nazi groups to set up internet businesses to sell this music, and the organisational advantages it gives to them in avoiding the racial hatred laws that they frequently breach....
Many people are unaware of the direct connection between music and the growth of the neo-Nazi skinhead movement in the 1970s.The skinhead movement is actually the **stard child of British musical counter-culture mated with soccer hooliganism. Despite a brief skinhead counter-culture in the late sixties, the skinhead "movement" really took off on the back of the punk music revolution in Britain from 1976 onwards.
The skinhead movement was originally tied up with a an offshoot of British punk called "Oi!" music. This was punk music which was influenced to some extent by Reggae and Ska type music, but also sought to be explicitly an expression of the British working class. Certain Oi! bands developed an extensive skinhead following which they were unable to shake even when they desired to do so, especially SHAM ’69, the Angelic Upstarts and the****ey Rejects. Skinheads began appearing at their concerts shouting fascist slogans and starting fights with the non-skinhead punks in the audience. The Oi! movement as a whole, though mostly non-racist, rejected criticism of their racist followers because this was seen as interference by the outside "middle-class establishment." Overtly skinhead Oi! bands such as the 4skins began to appear.
In the late 70s, the Rock against Racism initiative in Britain succeeded in uniting most of the punk movement against the skinhead fringe and against Britain’s National Front, a rapidly growing neo-Nazi political party. As more and more Oi! concerts increasingly led to violent skinhead attacks and riots in the early 1980s, police began to shut down Oi! Concerts and record companies refused to produce new Oi! records.
The National Front responded in the early 1980s by attempting to harness skinhead music for their own purposes. They started their own record company, White Noise Records, and published a series of magazines devoted to overtly racist music. They particularly championed the band "Skrewdriver", led by Ian Stuart Donaldson, a long-time NF activist convicted of a racist attack on an elderly black man. At the same time, racist music began to appear elsewhere as the skinhead movement spread to Germany, the US, and Scandanavia, as well as Australia. Certain alternative record companies in France and Germany began issuing racist records.
Ian Stuart Donaldson later led Skrewdriver and some other bands to split off and form Blood and Honour in 1987, as the National Front was collapsing. By the early 1990s, this had been taken over by Combat-18, a violent thuggish neo-Nazi fringe spinoff of the racist British National Party (the 18 refers to Adolf Hitler’s initials, the first and eighth letters of the alphabet.) After Donaldson’s death in a car accident in 1993, he became a martyr to the cause, and the name of the record division became ISD Records in his memory. Combat-18 successfully turned ISD Records into a major money spinner for the movement and eventually broke into using the internet as their key sales tool. Other racist groups saw the opportunity, and purveyors and producers of purely racist records quickly sprang up around the world, including Sweden’s Nordland Records and Resistance Records, founded in Detroit by a Canadian adherent of the World Church of the Creator, a violently racist pseudo-religion....
Today, there are literally dozens of websites available on the internet where one can buy white supremacist music, and the total number of different albums available in the various racist sub-genres is well in excess of 400.
With the internet, Nazi music is flourishing. In fact, it is probably the most successful part of the international skinhead movement, and clearly serves to provide financial support and recruitment to a variety of racist organisations around the world.....
However, in addition to creating vast e-commerce opportunities for neo-Nazis, the internet is also clearly creating a cooperative trans-national community which facilitates the spread of this sort of music, especially in the face of legal barriers....
The various Nazi bands compete with each other to be more violently offensive in their lyrics, while the vendors use the extremity of the lyrics as a selling point. Thus, for example, one site lauds "Barbecue in Rostock", an album by British Nazi band No Remorse, as "easily one of the most racist, violent, offensive White Power albums ever done." The site is not exaggerating. Not only does the album contain songs such as "Zigger! Zigger! Shoot those ****ing ni**ers", "Belsen was a Gas, Exterminate ya!" and "Zyklon B", but the very title of the album is about the worship of racist violence. It refers to a German city where neo-Nazi arsonists burned to death several asylum seekers in a refugee hostel in 1992, while the cover art of the album shows a skinhead spit-roasting a man with a large nose.
While that album is now several years old, contemporary productions are capable of being just as violent and offensive. For instance, the Combat-18 band Warhammer this year put out an album entitled "Valhalla’s Warriors" which contains songs such as "Die Jew Die" and "Hang ‘em all", referring to "Jews", "Ni**ers" and "Reds".
‘Parasites’ — Fortress (Aust.)
Get outta our country…
Let into this country, to play with drugs and crime Hold the hands of them all, the’re never satisfied People who oppose them, are promptly locked away And those who thought they had a voice, no longer have a say
Get out! We don’t want you around Get out! Want the people to shout Get out! Get outta my sight Get out! Parasites…Parasites…Parasites
Legends of Eureka, turn over in their graves They can see what has happened to the Southern Cross today Laws made to put us down, laws are made to keep us quiet Jail all the racists who wanna keep this country white Reject an alien government, don’t recognise their laws It’s time to close the floodgates, it’s time to shut the door Repatriate, ship ’em out, send the **stards back If they don’t ****ing like it, it’ll be in body bags
Get out!... One of the most worrying trends to develop in the international Nazi music scene is the takeover last year of the US company, Resistance records by the American neo-Nazi group, the National Alliance (NA). The National Alliance has been adjudged the "single most dangerous organised hate group in the United States today" by the American anti-racism body, the Anti-Defamation League. The NA is led by William Pierce, the author of two books, The Turner Diaries and Hunter which have probably done more than anything else to promote the current tendency toward acts of terrorism by extreme rightwingers internationally. For instance, these books influenced both the Oklahoma Bomber, Timothy McVeigh, and the London Nazi bomber, David Copeland.
The National Alliance, meanwhile is a growing organisation of over 1000 individuals in 26 states across the US, generally well-disciplined, and includes both skinheads and more "respectable" and older racists. Like many white supremacists, it seeks to create "a racially clean area of the earth" for whites only, and believes that "Aryans" are naturally superior to other peoples. It’s program is consistent with The Turner Diaries, which is a novel that describes how groups of secret white supremacists cells successfully stage a revolution and then systematically exterminate all Blacks, Jews and other minorities.
The National Alliance, which has always been very adept at using technology to spread its message, has made Resistance Records into the giant of the international Nazi music market, especially, after the takeover of Swedish competitor Nordland late last year. The company now has probably the most sophisticated websites in the international nazi music scene, has more than 250 titles for sale, and also publishes a glossy 64-page magazine, Resistance, which promotes both hate music and National Alliance ideology.
But perhaps most worrying is the revenue Resistance Records is clearly generating for the National Alliance. They are reportedly receiving an average of more than 50 orders a day averaging around $70 each. This is well in excess of US$1 million per annum, the vast majority of which is profit which can go into the National Alliance coffers to promote the organisation’s plans for racist revolution.....
The time has come for governments, including Australia, to consider new policy responses to the problem of the developing trans-national neo-Nazi movement, and especially their music scene. If this large and largely illegal industry can be curtailed, so can the neo-Nazi movement and all the racist violence it brings with it.
No matter how you want to define "music", this is what is being done with it in the world today -- and this is a blatant example of the way that the power of music can be misused by immoral, sick people. | |
|
late™
| Joined: 1/9/2005 Msg: 164 | |
| The power of music Posted: 1/23/2006 7:58:34 PM | The point of this thread is a discussion of the power of music and the responsibility of those who create it to do so in a way that is creative as opposed to destructive.
It's one thing to say:
"This is offensive, I'm going to censor it". - Hey, .....no argument here.
However, when this is elevated, merely by speculative opinion to:
(This is what I'm getting from what I've seen so far)
"Art is a power embued by my creator, when it is practiced thusly, it is offensive, a gratuitous celebration of violence, but it is still the god given power of art; further, as I think art is a factor that causes impressionable youth to commit violent acts )- As evidence, violent acts are celebrated in this form of art -) it only follows that art can be good and bad. I will advocate against this bad art by putting a moritarium on it, the criteria of which will be decided by a commitee who agrees with the premise that: Bad art is a factor that causes impressionable youth to commit violent acts. We do this because we are a commitee charged with the responsibility of not promoting violent acts via this bad art."
I ain't buyin' ....because:
1) It's a combination of petitio principi and post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacies.
(I detest fallacies, they tend to influence people who don't see past them, as we've seen in tonights election)
2) It's not supported by those who study root causualities of youth violence, or the culture of violence. They see the "bad art" as a symptom of the problem, not a cause.
I understand though, that you have so much emotionally invested in this that you will advocate something like:
"Music is an art form which has mysterious powers which can be used for good or evil. Those so imbued with this mysterious god-given power of influence called art, have a special responsibility to be careful with this power; which can inspire some to rape and murder. All artists have this responsibility."
I still ain't buyin' and am offended by many facets of it.
I also am a little upset because I think things like this work against (via obfuscation). those who seek to curb the culture of violence and it's sub-set, youth violence by understanding it's causalities, and applying strategies based on the knowledge gained via empirical research like this:
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/youthviolence/report.html
"The dynamics of youth violence are best understood from a developmental perspective, which recognizes that patterns of behavior change over the life course. Adolescence is a time of tumultuous change and vulnerability, which can include an increase in the frequency and means of expression of violence and other risky behaviors. Understanding when and under what circumstances violent behavior typically occurs helps researchers craft interventions that target those critical points in development."
There you have it: skeptical, offended and a little ticked off.
There, that's it, I'm done on this. | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/24/2006 1:30:41 AM | artandsoul, I'm glad you mentioned again that the problem is a multi-faceted one, and your latest long citation of the skinhead situation in Europe brings up two additional specific problems to the mix:
I saw a great Czech movie two years ago (sorry, I've forgotten the name) dealing with the hilarious episodes of a small group of dysfunctional Oi! - ites. The director depicted them with pity and disgust, but not fear.
Again, the specific political realities here are the core, and not the spreading of hate "music" itself: Europe will have a majority Muslim population (please check world birth-rate demographics for this) in thirty years. I hardly need to emphasize the fear a young person growing up in Denmark, Germany, France, Sweden, has when he or she looks to the future, what with the Muslim violence (already) manifest in England, Spain, Denmark, and elsewhere. So it's a specific, psychologically understandable (though still deplorable) reaction against a coming unstoppable demographic tide, and in which additional context their respective governments have already sacrificed the young to high (and ever growing unemployment) as the growing senior demographic angrily objects to those same governments cutting back on any social program perks they have grown to feel as an entitlement. The young are going to bear a huge burden to support them. Simply put, the future is bleak for the young in Europe, and the "Caucasian" youth view the Muslim youth as competing, both politically and economically, for an ever-shrinking piece of the pie. The Oi ! thugs feel powerless to change anything on a political level, so they lash out at any immigrant out of fear and frustration. Again, not supporting in the least what they're doing: ideological violence is appalling in any stripe. It just emphasizes, once again, that you have to look past violence in a context of the unidimensional vacuum you see it in. Just because you acknowledge other factors into the equation doesn't mean you're absolved of seeing those different factors as they directly tie in to the specific examples you mention.
The other specific angle that is relevant to your example are the (relatively) new effects the internet has had on "music", as well as on communication in general. The internet is generally un-policed, free, and far-reaching: perfect for the socially and economically shunned.
It's appropriate I go back to an earlier point, at this time, and mention that you can't effectively fight crude lyrics, hatred, and the gathering influence they have by engaging those forces on their own low level. Just because a "musician", to use your all-encompassing definition of the word, spreads this bile, does not mean it is the best option to fight them by producing "positive" sounds via the internet or radio. This is just reducing the "fight" to a war of equally objectionable dreck (in musical terms), and it becomes a lesson in insufferable listening.
What is a great option?
Art.
Real art.
Dmitri Shostakovich fought Stalin and his willing bureaucratic scum ("time's flies") by composing unsurpassable classical music. He got away with it-- barely-- because (as I said earlier) music stirs emotions more by its sounds than by its words. (Otherwise, better to be a novelist, a journalist, a poet). And, of course, to further this, non-vocal music can create a much more oblique, ironical effect than can a blatant over-the-top vocal. The oppressed masses "got it", though.... they knew when they heard a long, piercing, agonizing, loud C Minor peroration, it represented Stalin's henchmen knocking on the door at four in the morning (in Symphony no 4; 1st movement, for example).
The skinheads are beleaguered kids trying to come to grips with terrifying change in their culture. Yes, I see the parallels with Hitler, just as I see the parallels with the terrorist camp on the other side. But "music" is just a means to vent their frustration. Any "message" which opposes them better take the larger current political reality seriously (in reference to your case) if it is to be effective. | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/24/2006 8:02:12 AM | | I am loving it....this has become comical...have you ever watched an adult try to explain a very abstract concept to a five year old! now THAT is entertainment! LMAO | |
|
late™
| Joined: 1/9/2005 Msg: 167 | |
| The power of music Posted: 1/24/2006 5:42:51 PM |
I saw a great Czech movie two years ago (sorry, I've forgotten the name) dealing with the hilarious episodes of a small group of dysfunctional Oi! - ites. The director depicted them with pity and disgust, but not fear.
Ridicule is always the greatest weapon against the ridiculous.
Beat's hiding it, anyday. | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 1/24/2006 11:13:38 PM | History and life are one big circle....350 years ago there was much uproar over that new music that was poisoning the minds and our very ways of life....shock and dismay we must stop this incidious beast. It threatens our very children and the way they act.
Sound familiar?
Glad they didnt stop that guy named Mozart! | |
|
| The power of music Posted: 4/21/2006 10:50:29 PM | someone once said (and sadly i can't recall who) that "without music, life would be a mistake". I've grown up with music in my life and I know it's something I can never let go. I sort of miss my highschool years (yes you heard me, i miss highschool) because I was in 3 choirs, the band, perussion ensemble and the musical for all 5 years. add private piano and flute lessons to that. And yet I didn't make it into York's music program...lol...but I'm not bitter, things happen for a reason and I actually ended up taking private voice lessons from an amazing jazz teacher...but i digress... music is expression when i play it or sing...and to hear it, some songs can have an profound affect on me, sometimes the music, sometimes the lyrics...i'm just really intense like that though. I honestly feel that there is little in life that can have the effect that music can. It's universal...and the psychologist in me says that it has healing powers for sure :) | |
|
|
| Page 7 of 7
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
|