New Law passed / gold digging Free Dating, Singles and Personals

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.

Show ALL Forums

> Single Parents

> New Law passed / gold digging

Mod Threads

Home

Page 2 of 2

1, 2

Author

Thread: New Law passed / gold digging

SimbadSailor

Joined: 11/8/2005
Msg: 26
view profile
History

New Law passed / gold digging Posted: 10/4/2006 8:33:44 PM
No, I don't think is fair. Why? Because the ex had nothing to do with whatever he did to improve his income -perhaps he worked his ass off 16 hours a day, perhaps he started a business, etc. She didn't do a thing to collaborate with him. Why should she reap the benefits of his work?

LoonyTunz

Joined: 8/11/2006
Msg: 27
view profile
History

New Law passed / gold digging Posted: 10/4/2006 9:21:18 PM
^^^^ that is why I asked for clarification on if this is spousal or child support. Both totally different in my books, your kids have every right to an increase if you get one your ex does not.

ingraceigo35

Joined: 7/21/2006
Msg: 28

New Law passed / gold digging Posted: 10/5/2006 2:43:33 AM
If you didn't report your income, then yes - of course....this is not money for the EX, this is money for THE CHILD - if you were both together, the child would be benefiting from the increased income, and has a right to benefit from it if you are apart.

LoonyTunz

Joined: 8/11/2006
Msg: 29
view profile
History

New Law passed / gold digging Posted: 10/5/2006 2:59:38 PM
ingraceigo, around here maint. on sposal support IS for the ex not the kids, and as I stated the ex deserves squat for changes you make later after separate, the kids however I think almost all of us agree DO deserve the increase. Sposal support continues after the kids ore no longer eligible for child support or if the move in with the other parent etc.... The custodial parent can be the one paying more to the ex in this case and in that TAKING AWAY from the children.

ingraceigo35

Joined: 7/21/2006
Msg: 30

New Law passed / gold digging Posted: 10/5/2006 3:52:49 PM
loonytunz, I agee spousal support is ridiculous if the ex is capable of working. That part I would agree on 100%. Child support is different, and I think as you said, we are all in agreement that kids should never go without.

ChainedAngel

Joined: 9/22/2006
Msg: 31

New Law passed / gold digging Posted: 10/6/2006 4:50:56 AM
Why should she reap the benefits of his work? The child support isn't to allow her to reap the benefits of his work. Its for the children. Even if it gets used on rent, food, gas for the car...those are all for the benefit of the children, they haveto have a place to live, food to eat and other necessities. As for purely spousal support ? Abolish it.

Page 2 of 2

1, 2

Show ALL Forums

> Single Parents

> New Law passed / gold digging