|
|
|
|
|
quebra
| Joined: 1/7/2007 Msg: 301 | |
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/28/2007 2:14:44 PM | what i find hard to understand is why so many americans seem to think that following through on a bad decision is better than admitting your mistakes and looking at alternatives. it seems to me that many americans view george bush's refusal to get out of iraq as a strong leadership quality - he fcuked up, but at least he's not wavering on his badly thought out, badly executed plan. its the same thing with watada, people seem to think that him having a conscience is a sign of weakness, like its better to stop thinking once you've made a decision instead of being conscious of your actions and decisions. basically, that lt. watada would be a better man if he shut his mouth, did what he was told and didn't gripe about fighting a war which has killed over 200,000 civilians without any justification.
what gives? | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/28/2007 2:35:36 PM | | What gives is this soldier takes orders that he has to follow weather you like it or not you have to follow orders thats all part of joinin the military and they teach you that from day one . Its not that hard to comprehend is it? You dont just pick and choose the orders you wanna follow. Now do you get it? | |
|
| Do Not Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/28/2007 7:02:43 PM | I think it is so funny how so many people get duped into following a false prophet.
Sign up today, give up all your worldly belongings (to me) and stand by me (Heavens Gate, or the Johannesburg Cult?). So that tomorrow we all shall commit suicide in his name to glorify us, mentality.
To glorify this scum tells me there are a lot of miss guided souls out there. If he has conned you this well, he has a bridge for sale also.
What is also funny? When I first saw this thread I read the op's link. It mentioned the ACLU. I made my post about that several days after a little research. Today I looked at that link and ACLU can not be found. So did ACLU wise up and realize they were being had? Our does the op's website no longer want to give the ACLU credit for their work.
Thank You strangebloom for your post. They were a delight to read, all of them.
I only have one tidbit of advice if he is your "Champion."
Don't drink the kool-aid.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9703/28/mass.suicide/links.html
 | |
|
quebra
| Joined: 1/7/2007 Msg: 304 | |
| Do Not Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/28/2007 7:40:44 PM |
What gives is this soldier takes orders that he has to follow weather you like it or not you have to follow orders thats all part of joinin the military and they teach you that from day one . Its not that hard to comprehend is it? You dont just pick and choose the orders you wanna follow. Now do you get it?
and do you get that "just following orders" has led to some of the most horrific crimes against humanity of the last century? | |
|
| Do Not Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/28/2007 8:46:34 PM |
I think it is so funny how so many people get duped into following a false prophet.
Sign up today, give up all your worldly belongings (to me) and stand by me (Heavens Gate, or the Johannesburg Cult?). So that tomorrow we all shall commit suicide in his name to glorify us, mentality.
To glorify this scum tells me there are a lot of miss guided souls out there. If he has conned you this well, he has a bridge for sale also.
You are referring to Bush, right? | |
|
| Do Not Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/28/2007 9:04:33 PM |
and do you get that "just following orders" has led to some of the most horrific crimes against humanity of the last century?
And.... do you 'get it' that 'just following orders' has led to you having free speech and a whole helluva lot of other freedoms? It works both ways. | |
|
bobby7
| Joined: 3/22/2006 Msg: 307 | |
| Do Not Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/28/2007 9:51:06 PM | "And.... do you 'get it' that 'just following orders' has led to you having free speech and a whole helluva lot of other freedoms? It works both ways."
I admire the courage of this soldier, and as for the freedom of speech: Sure, that has been the case, in the past..Not so now! Bush is eroding all rights, the most important ones, at that..
Like Habeas Corpus...How did that song go??
Oh, yeah..."When will they ever learn". | |
|
| |
| Do Not Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 5:43:37 AM | Odd the anology used between Nazi Soldiers following orders and illegally Mass-Murdering UNARMED CIVILIANS in WWII, and this Incident of a Soldier refusing orders to confront ARMED Iraqis who can shoot back.. There really is no way to compare the Legality or ethical value between the two.
I think the US Military has proven their willingness to courtmarshal soldiers who murder civilians. Following orders of Combat engagement is NOT Illegal if Civilians are not targeted. The Nazi Soldiers would have been ethical in refusing to kill civilians, yet they didn't!
NO Nation can remain whole for long if their Soldiers pick the Battles or orders they want to follow.
This Soldier may protest by refusing to deploy, but he should expect to be punished by whatever means and rules of Military Law.
Personally, I feel it is better for our troops that WILL Stand Loyal that he is not allowed anywhere near a weapon or even breathing the same air, much less being expected to cover their asses. I wouldn't want him anywhere near mine, for sure!
The Idea of our troops ending the war by ALL refusing to fight in Iraq is one Stupid, ****ed up Idea.. Scary Mentality, for Sure | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 7:05:57 AM | His human rights have not been violated. He wasn't forced to join, he had a choice, I don't think the Nazi's did. Apples and oranges. My family has a long military history, both on the Native and caucasian sides. Many horrible things happen at war. He signed up for it. Speaking against his Government is an act of Treason. I don't agree with this war, as I have stated before. I just hope the U.S. can clean up their mess. | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 7:45:48 AM | | the man has a right to be against the war, but not to defy orders! This guy graduated from college and THEN joined the Army, going to Officer Candidate school, AFTER we had already started the Iraq campaign just to claim it was an "illegal" war when his unit is called to go. I think he planned it all along as a publicity stunt. otherwise, the possibility of his having to go to iraq should have crossed his mind. i'm interested to know where he gets the idea that our current occupation of Iraq is illegal anyway. Congress supported the continued action through appropriations and the United Nations Security Council specifically authorized (unanimously) the current coalition military operations in Iraq. and btw, if you believe he is right by refusing to serve in this "illegal" war, you are also claiming that every serving officer in iraq is a war criminal | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 9:22:26 AM | >well its hard for some people to understand what it means to give your word that you will follow all and any orders
This is a sheep's mentality. Just follow orders no matter what the consequence. People were born with brains and a mind for a reason. Use it or lose it. | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 9:29:40 AM | ^^^
If your boss tells you to do something and you disagree do you not do it? I bet you'll do it regardless. If you do it then you are also "following orders" only in your case the worse that will happen is that you get fired. You may think you're not a sheep, but you are. | |
|
| |
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 10:57:43 AM |
Speaking against his Government is an act of Treason. It's not even close to treason. Please do us all a favor and look up definitions of words you don't understand before you post.
He will, however, almost certainly be found guilty of conduct unbecoming an officer, missing movement, and contempt toward officials.... the actual charges brought against him.
Unfortunately for him, as a servicemember he is not afforded the same free speech rights as a civilian: Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733 (1969) states "the fundamental necessity for obedience, and the consequent necessity for imposition of discipline, may render permissible within the military that which would be constitutionally impermissible outside it". | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 11:45:11 AM | | The word has a very broad definition......I define it as being grossly disloyal to ones country....The guy signed up for duty, when it came time to fulfill a promise he had made he reneged on that promise, then he decided it would be a good idea to create a media circus around his decision and condemn his government for decisions it made. If I did that to my own family they would have a difficult time forgiving me, and they would say that I was "grossly disloyal"......people who love me, I am not their property......your government does not love him and he is their property. | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 12:30:58 PM |
I think it is so funny how so many people get duped into following a false prophet.
Sign up today, give up all your worldly belongings (to me) and stand by me (Heavens Gate, or the Johannesburg Cult?). So that tomorrow we all shall commit suicide in his name to glorify us, mentality.
To glorify this scum tells me there are a lot of miss guided souls out there. If he has conned you this well, he has a bridge for sale also. You are referring to Bush, right?
That was funny.
The word has a very broad definition......I define it as being grossly disloyal to ones country.... Legally, 'treason' has a very specific definition. You can define it any way you want, but it doesn't make it correct. Legally, technically, in English, he didn't commit treason. | |
|
| |
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 1:58:34 PM | The crimes "conduct unbecoming an officer", "missing movement", and "contempt toward officials" are different and lesser crimes from treason, in the same way that robbery, counterfeiting, and jaywalking are also different.
The U.S. Constitution, Article III:
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleiii.html
Does the legal definition not include "grossly disloyal to ones country or sovereign"......maybe I can't read? No comment.... | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 2:48:18 PM | for those who support what this loser did, what if it expands? in basic training, all the newbies can **** when they have to fold their underwear in 6 inch squares because it is stupid. a soldier in iraq can refuse to get up at 5am because he is tired! it will go on and on! everyone can just do what THEY think is right. that will make us really effective.
unfortunately, for an army to be successful there must be obedience. you might not like or agree with what you are told to do. oh well. you signed up for it and AGREED to do what you are told. if you can't follow orders, don't join. and like i said, this guy joined AFTER we were in iraq. he knew what he was getting into beforehand. i hope he goes to jail for a long time | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 3:04:34 PM | for those who support what this loser did, what if it expands? in basic training, all the newbies can **** when they have to fold their underwear in 6 inch squares because it is stupid. a soldier in iraq can refuse to get up at 5am because he is tired! it will go on and on! everyone can just do what THEY think is right. that will make us really effective.
unfortunately, for an army to be successful there must be obedience. you might not like or agree with what you are told to do. oh well. you signed up for it and AGREED to do what you are told. if you can't follow orders, don't join. and like i said, this guy joined AFTER we were in iraq. he knew what he was getting into beforehand. i hope he goes to jail for a long time
I completely agree that there must be obedience for an army to be successful. I think what Watada's case is that what Bush is trying to do in Iraq is immoral and he doesn't want the army to be successful.
He IS in the army. He has ORDERS to follow, not suggestions. If he fails to follow his orders, he should be reprimanded, court martialled, put in prison, or whatever it is that the proper punishment is for failing to follow his orders.
We all have choices. Even soldiers have choices. Their choices are much more limited than the averaged joe's choices. Do what you are told or there will be dire consequences.
I admire Watada for his stand and he's going to have to pay the price for refusing his orders.
Geez, I'd rather be in prison than going to a war I don't believe in too! | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 3:35:50 PM |
Odd the anology used between Nazi Soldiers following orders and illegally Mass-Murdering UNARMED CIVILIANS in WWII, and this Incident of a Soldier refusing orders to confront ARMED Iraqis who can shoot back.. There really is no way to compare the Legality or ethical value between the two. The comparison isn't to Watada, it's the "do what your told and do not question orders" thought process that led to the Jews being gassed by the Nazis that is being compared to the position that American soldiers are not to question orders. If it is unacceptable for soldiers to question orders, who's going to stop their superiors from ordering them to gas Iraqis? From what I am reading, many of those in the military believe that if they are ever given that order, they will do it... refusing to obey the order would be cowardly. So what differentiates a Nazi soldier from an American soldier other than uniform and/or the dictator giving the orders? | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 4:03:00 PM | | redsea, if he was so against the war, don't you think he should have assumed there was a chance he might get sent there when he joined? that is why it is so stupid. anyone that joined after we went to iraq has to assume there is a good chance they might get sent. if he was so against it, he never should have joined in the first place. i have a theory on why many of the small amount of soldiers who **** about being deployed do so. and this would apply more to those who joined before the invasion. they wanted all the benefits of the military while they were not willing to accept the risks. they want the school money, retirement, money, housing, etc. but without the chance they might actually have to participate in what the military is actually meant to do. | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 4:16:33 PM | >message 312.......I suggest you don't make promises you are unwilling to keep then.
Here's a situation that most certainly has probably happened in Viet Nam and other wars. You signed up, you get shipped off to war, you fight the enemy, you kill some, you see some of your buddies get killed. Under extreme pressure following orders from a very agressive commander involved directly in the taking of neighborhood or village, your commanding officer orders you to kill everybody even innocents?! Do you follow the orders blindly or do you use your own mind and risk disobeying your commander even if it means jail time or court martial? I would choose the court-martial and/or jail time because at least I could live with myself knowing I didn't kill innocent people because of the orders I was given. | |
|
| Support 1st U.S. Army Officer to Speak Out Against Iraq War Posted: 1/29/2007 5:12:12 PM | You want a great example of a heroic American officer, from the Vietnam war ?
Google Hugh Thompson, Jr.( and his crew) / Ron Ridenhour, and My Lai.
The My Lai story is one of heroes as well villains. One such hero is Hugh Thompson, Jr., a helicopter reconnaissance pilot who came upon the My Lai massacre in progress. Chief My Lai prosecutor William Eckhardt described how Thompson responded to what he found when he put his helicopter down: "[Thompson] put his guns on Americans, said he would shoot them if they shot another Vietnamese, had his people wade in the ditch in gore to their knees, to their hips, took out children, took them to the hospital...flew back [to headquarters], standing in front of people, tears rolling down his cheeks, pounding on the table saying, 'Notice, notice, notice'...then had the courage to testify time after time after time."
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mylai/Myl_hero.html
Sometime later, we saw some people huddle in a bunker and the only thing I could see at that particular time was a woman, an old man, and a couple of kids standing next to it. We look over here and see them and look over there and see the friendly forces, so I landed the helicopter again. I didn't want there to be any confusion or something; I really don't know what was going on in my mind then.
I walked over to the ground units and said, "Hey, there's some civilians over here in this bunker. Can you get them out?" They said, "Well, we're gonna get them out with a hand grenade." I said, "Just hold your people right here please, I think I can do better." So I went over to the bunker and motioned for them to come out, everything was OK. At that time I didn't know what I was going to do, because there was more than three or four there, more like nine or ten or something like that. So I walked back over to the aircraft and kind of kept them around me and called the pilot that was flying the low gunship and said, "Hey, I got these people here down on the ground, and you all land and get them out of here." So he agreed to do that, which I think was the first time a gunship's ever been used for that. There's enough of them there that he had to make two trips and he picked them up and took them about ten miles or so behind the lines and dropped them off.
A short while later we went back to the ditch. There was still some movement in there. We got out of the aircraft and Androtta, my crew chief, walked down into the ditch. A few minutes later he came back up carrying a little kid. We didn't know what we were gonna do with this one either, but we all get back in the aircraft and figure we'd get him back to the orphanage or hospital back over at Quang Ngai. In examining him in the aircraft that day, the kid wasn't even wounded, or we didn't see any wounds, I'll put it that way. He was covered with blood, and the thought was going through my mind and my crew's mind, "How did these people get in that ditch?"
After coming up with about three scenarios, one of them being an artillery round hit them, you wipe that out of your mind 'cause every house in Vietnam, I think, has a bunker underneath it. If artillery was coming there, they would go to the bunker; they wouldn't go outside in the open area. Then I said, well, when artillery was coming, they were trying to leave and a round caught them in the ditch while they were going for cover. I threw that one out of my mind. Then something just sunk into me that these people were marched into that ditch and murdered. That was the only explanation that I could come up with.
Taking the child to the hospital was a day I'll never forget. It was a very sad day, very mad day, very frustrated and everything. So later in the afternoon, (this was brought up when everything hit and became public during interrogations, the Department of the Army IG was asking me about the incident and I had totally blocked it out of my mind. I had no idea what this guy was questioning me for), after the mission that day, I went back to our operations area, which is over in LC Dottie and I was very upset. I was very mad.
I reported to my platoon leader. He said let's go see the operations officer. In turn we went to our commander and the words were said for me that day that, you know, dean this up. "If this damn stuff is what's happening here," I told him, "You can take these wings right now 'cause they're only sewn on with thread." I was ready to quit flying.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mylai/Myl_hero.html #HUGH%20THOMPSON:
That people, is an officer in the best tradition of the US military. His actions proved that one man, with courage, can show great moral strength in the middle of the insanity of war.
The US military needs men like these, for without them the moral compass that guides the country is lost to the nation.
As I said, you lead ....from the front. | |
|
|
| Page 13 of 20
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 |
|