|
|
|
|
|
| Hillary or Barack: Who Is Your Choice and Why Posted: 6/3/2008 1:22:20 AM | Polls say that Hillary has substantial leads over Mccain in key states, like Ohio, and FLA. Obama, on the other hand is trailing Mccain. We will know in November. In Any case, itf it is Obama against Mccain, I think it pits the 2 best from each party agaisnt each other. Let the best man win! | |
|
| |
| |
| Hillary or Barack: Who Is Your Choice and Why Posted: 6/5/2008 12:41:37 AM | I am glad it is down to 2, I guess this answers the question of the thread. It is in now, OBAMA. I will congradulate Obama on being the 1st Black man to get the nomination. NOW the question is, Mccain or Obama?  | |
|
| |
| |
| Hillary or Barack: Who Is Your Choice and Why Posted: 6/10/2008 8:22:20 PM |
Barack will be the first Black President of the United States!!!!!!!!! - Ms. Foxx Uh, I thought that bill clinton was the "first black president"? Or so I've always heard... | |
|
| Hillary or Barack: Who Is Your Choice and Why Posted: 7/12/2008 7:22:33 AM | So many Americans are enthusiastic about having a black president. Their enthusiasm I understand. Their lack of research into this man's true motives is obvious. This initial enthusiasm apparently was all that was needed for them to choose their candidate…which is what I classify as suicide. If you do not take the time to learn about the candidates you are one dangerous voter. You should not listen to what a candidate proclaims. You should study every thing of his past, who he/she really is, what have they actually achieved and supported in any office they hold or have held, and what is going on behind what the media reveals. Americans have become quite naïve and this only marks us as one foolish nation. Vote for Obama and open the door to the down fall of our nation …what America was built upon and stands for…changing “America, the home of the free” to “America, the home of the fools”.
Obama has no executive experience in government. He is trying to move center (as all leftist Democrats do when running, and all rightist Republicans do when running) because that’s the only way he can win. Remember he’s had 143 days of ACTIVE Senate experience. That’s sure not much. There is no major legislation either in IL or the US Senate that he has sponsored. His economics is grounded in theory at Harvard. While it’s a great school to graduate from he has gotten no practical executive experience in the “real world” since then. He talks about laws he passed (he can’t by himself) and other use of words that implies things that are not so on their own. Believe his words and magnify just how naïve you are.
The more and more I learn about Obama, the more I pray God will protect America from him. Recently I forwarded an email to a family member that was disturbing to me. His reply to what I sent him was even more disturbing.
The email I sent:
Read Below and ask yourselves, is this REALLY someone we can see as the President of our great nation!!!! Below are a few lines from Obama's books; In his words!
From Dreams of My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'
From Dreams of My Father : 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.'
From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'
From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names..'
From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'
And FINALLY the Most Damning one of ALL of them!!!
From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'
The reply I received:
There is no question in my mind, at least, that Obama is not only dangerous but has definite goals in mind to sabotage this country. Following is an excerpt from a writer with the New York Times which is nothing but a liberal rag sheet. For her to be making these statements is really interesting.
OBAMA'S TROUBLING INTERNET FUND RAISING Certainly the most interesting and potentially devastating phone call I have received during this election cycle came this week from one of the Obama's campaign internet geeks. These are the staffers who devised Obama's internet fund raising campaign which raised in the neighborhood of $200 million so far. That is more then twice the total funds raised by any candidate in history – and this was all from the internet campaign. What I learned from this insider was shocking but I guess we shouldn't be surprised that when it comes to fund raising there simply are no rules that can't be broken and no ethics that prevail. Obama's internet campaign started out innocently enough with basic e-mail networking, lists saved from previous party campaigns and from supporters who visited any of the Obama campaign web sites. Small contributions came in from these sources and the internet campaign staff was more than pleased by the results. Then, about two months into the campaign the daily contribution intake multiplied. Where was it coming from? One of the web site security monitors began to notice the bulk of the contributions were clearly coming in from overseas internet service providers and at the rate and frequency of transmission it was clear these donations were "programmed" by a very sophisticated user. While the security people were not able to track most of the sources due to firewalls and other blocking devices put on these contributions they were able to collate the number of contributions that were coming in seemingly from individuals but the funds were from only a few credit card accounts and bank electronic funds transfers. The internet service providers (ISP) they were able to trace were from Saudi Arabia, Iran, and other Middle Eastern countries. One of the banks used for fund transfers was also located in Saudi Arabia. Another concentrated group of donations was traced to a Chinese ISP with a similar pattern of limited credit card charges. It became clear that these donations were very likely coming from sources other than American voters. This was discussed at length within the campaign and the decision was made that none of these donations violated campaign financing laws. It was also decided that it was not the responsibility of the campaign to audit these millions of contributions as to the actual source (specific credit card number or bank transfer account numbers) to insure that none of these internet contributors exceeded the legal maximum donation on a cumulative basis of many small donations. They also found the record keeping was not complete enough to do it anyway. This is a shocking revelation. We have been concerned about the legality of "bundling" contributions after the recent exposure of illegal bundlers but now it appears we may have an even greater problem. I guess we should have been somewhat suspicious when the numbers started to come out. We were told (no proof offered) that the Obama internet contributions were from $10.00 to $25.00 or so. If the $200,000,000 is right, and the average contribution was $15.00 that would mean over 13 million individuals made contributions? That would also be 13 million contributions would need to be processed. How did all that happen? I believe the Obama campaign's internet fund raising needs a serious, in depth investigation and audit. It also appears the whole question of internet fund raising needs investigation by the legislature and perhaps new laws to insure it complies not only with the letter of these laws but the spirit as well.
| |
|
| Hillary or Barack: Who Is Your Choice and Why Posted: 7/15/2008 12:35:45 AM | Loreli, Thats pretty scary . although it isnt the 1st time a democrat presidential candadate took money from international contributors! As we know, Bill Clinton sold top secret missile technology to the chinese for 1996 campain funds. Al Gore took money from Buhdist monks for the 2000 campain. Looks like Obama is just taking it to the next level. What scares me more, is this. I heard this on the radio, so I will repeat it the best I can. Obama has apparently been taking campain advise from someone that was involoved in the planning of 9-11 . Now THATS something they wont put the headlines now isnt it? How true that is, and to what extent this guy was involved in the planning of the biggets terrorist attack on the USA, I dont know, but I do know it does bring Obamas motives into question. A Borrower is seervant to the lender, and if Obama is taking campain funds from MUSLIM groups, Taking advise form one that ATTACKED US, why in the world would anyone even think about voting for this guy? If we dont, andf all this about him is wrong, what have we lost? NOTHING. IF it is all true? what do we stand to lose? EVERYTHING. Just ask yourself WHAT IF??????? | |
|
|
| Page 21 of 21
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 |
|