|
|
|
|
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 4/12/2009 6:27:07 PM | I've been on both sides and personally, I find a threesome to be more exciting as a concept, rather than in real life.
My personal opinion is that THERE IS NO BIAS. People should do what they feel comfortable with. If a woman feels comfortable or wants to do a FFM, but the man would be disgusted with a MMF, then why is it biased if he only wants to do a FFM?
And to those who cry out Homophobia, it has nothing to do with it. It has to do with personal comfort. On the other hand, if a woman doesn't want to an FFM, why isn't she ever called a HOMOPHOBE? | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 4/12/2009 6:52:14 PM | | I don't want to have to focus on more than 1 person at a time. I have a hard enough time not losing interest in the 1 person. There's no way I could handle 2. As for the mfm, fmf....everyone knows what they like or don't like. some don't want to risk having to touch another guy. some aren't worried about it. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 5/29/2009 7:27:12 PM | | It's really not much different than an orgy...except fewer people. As a guy you have to be secured in your sexuality. With the right people and chemistry it can be pretty erotic. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/10/2009 8:33:31 AM |
It's really not much different than an orgy...except fewer people. As a guy you have to be secured in your sexuality. With the right people and chemistry it can be pretty erotic. well said! but it's so hard to find men who r secure about themselves... most of them will not even entertain the thought of mmf...it's too bad... | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/10/2009 8:47:19 AM | This is why i love me bicurious and bisexual men - hot, sexy and totally hot and sexy oh wait i said that already. How about a 2fer1, a gorgeousTS with big boobs and a big c.ock, think you would enjoy it? OK for everyone that said ewww, read this again when your horny, your ewww will turn into a hmmmmm If your bicurious, bisexual or open to try anything at least once, lol. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/10/2009 10:33:47 AM | Its gay. No, but I got a buddies who's into that. Its a cultural thing, and with in our society we have a certain demographic's that are
more open to this then others. Might want to think hard about why it is your desiring this, might try cutting back on the porn for awhile their buddy. Or find some friends with similar interest. Either way, threesome are usually overrated. I'll wait to I get my break in the adult entertainment industry, their never quite what you expect, and certainly not at all like the movie's. But nothing ever is, and that might just be my experience with the whole mess. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/10/2009 7:08:55 PM | The reason there's a "bias" is because the porn industry promotes a bias. While there are plenty of MFM and FMF threesomes in most porn movies, the FMF ones are almost always shown as an interaction between all parties, including between the women. In the MFM scenario, the director cries "cut" if there's any hint of male-male touching.
Also, women tend to use their sexuality as a ploy. Therefore, a woman will sometimes agree to girl-girl action to please a third party, such as her boyfriend or husband, in order to obtain some benefit from him, such as financial.
Overall, I think that male sexuality is far more honest than female sexuality. Women don't need to be aroused in order to engage in sexual penetration, and they can fake orgasms as well. It lends an air of phoniness to female sexuality. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/10/2009 7:23:05 PM | | I can't fake orgasms well. I'm too busy having real ones. I don't have the muscle control to fake what happens to me naturally. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/10/2009 7:50:41 PM | | yes, it gets a little complicated. Threesomes with 2 women--not bad-- 2 women and 2 men- they could accidently touch each other!!!! hahahaha. most recent was 4some with 2 girls 2 guys- they never touched---never wanted to ...never ever will, but we all had a good time. everyone has to be mature and really good friends..which we are...so the better the party. And to comment, Im not gay either. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/10/2009 10:25:10 PM | MMF is all about the woman. Odds are it's unlikely the MM will be interacting very much. So it's basically a drill sandwich.
FMF is a lot more interactive. Unless one women objects, all parties have far more to do, thus why some men lacking confidence are overwhelmed. After all, a good number of men cannot satisfy one woman, how can they possible satisfy two?
I'm been involved in both and my ex-girlfriend and I enjoyed FMF far more than MMF.
It also lasts a lot longer. :) | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/11/2009 6:30:24 AM | I think an earlier poster made the best comment thus far:
"If you bring a third party into your relationship, it's you who may end up becoming the third party."
So true, and a good warning to anyone who thinks a threesome might be hunky dory. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/11/2009 6:41:13 AM | | I think it just highlights a difference between the sexes. Women are more comfotable with physical contact with their female friends while for men its an absolute no no - unless they are bi or gay. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/11/2009 6:45:15 AM | You may be right about that sometimes, mick, but so what? My philosophy is that I'm in a relationship because we want to be together, and if either of us is going to be happier with someone else, then that's where we belong. I don't "own" my partner, nor vice versa.
Anyway, the risks are pretty small compared to many others, so that isn't much of an argument against threesomes of whatever flavor.
As for mfm vs fmf, there appears to be a good reason why fmf is more likely. Male sexuality is more polarized. Males tend to be either straight or gay, and fewer are comfortable in the area between. Female sexuality is more a spectrum, so more females are comfortable with varying degrees of bi-sexuality.
a new line of research is beginning to approach sexual orientation as much less fixed than previously thought, especially when it comes to women. The idea that human sexuality forms a continuum has been around since 1948, when Alfred Kinsey introduced his famous seven-point scale, with zero representing complete heterosexuality, 6 signifying complete homosexuality, and bisexuality in the middle, where many of the men and women he interviewed fell.
"We found that women's sexual desire is less rigidly directed toward a particular sex, as compared with men's, and it's more changeable over time," says the study's senior researcher, J. Michael Bailey, Ph.D. "These findings likely represent a fundamental difference between men's and women's brains." | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/11/2009 9:53:20 AM | | i think the male has to be in a strong relationship and confident me and my partner are looking to experance threesomes both ways as is fantisy of us both | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/18/2009 2:02:13 PM | my bias is based on i'd rather have two women to play with, than share one. because i'm straight. i also think it's a real turn on to see women comfortable doing things with each other.
that said, sharing one woman with a buddy is fun if you're already on a comfortable level with said buddy, and you know he's not going to try to cross your personal space, so to speak. then it can be fun, cuz you work as a team to really give the woman in the middle the work out she's been craving!
coming in as an "extra unit" to an m/f couple, you don't know what the intent of the M is, and it can make for some apprehension. cuz yes, a lot of guys out there are willing to do a lot more than they'll admit to, which i don't get. if you're into it, well this is 21st c., no point in making a secret of it. there's plenty of people who will willingly entertain your wishes. | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/18/2009 3:35:25 PM | Lol, you people are crazy.
First off some perspective from science, I recently read an article about studies done on the effects of MFM in terms of sperm and competition. The men who are involved actually ejaculate many many more sperm than normal, indicating a genetic level competition to impregnate the woman. So, yes in said circumstance from a subconscious (dna) level men are actually competing while making love to a woman at the same time.
To the people saying MFM is good if the dude never touches you you clearly haven't watched groupsex porn in your entire life! The dudes quite often do things together to women, entering the same hole is one example. Holding the girl in the air for his buddy is another. They are by no means sucking each other off but please you people really should not be in a MFM ever if you are that homophobic! I mean really, "he stays at the other end", wtf is that?! Under the right circumstances with teh right people involved I would have no problem DPing a woman, and that doesn't make me gay in the least.
I think it's hilarious all this bias and judging going on. Let's get one thing straight (ha get it?) openly gay men would not be involved in this, you know why? They like men!! They don't want to have sex with women!! Hello!
This reminds me of the homophobic comment, "I don't mind gay's as long as they leave me alone." Shit, ever think maybe gay guys wouldn't look at you anyway, you ugly ****? Ha! Anyway, that's my rant, carry on the homophobia!
Oh, wait just thought of one more thing, to the guy that doesn't find the male body to be attractive, including his own. Really?! You have that low of an opinion of yourself? You arethat disgusted with yourself? That's so sad it's pathetic! The cosmetics industry has fought hard to get women to HATE themselves and buy their products so they can finally like who they are and you just loath your body cause your a guy?? Dude, get a sex change. . . . will you love your body then? Doubt it. . | |
|
| Threesomes...why the bias?
Posted: 6/18/2009 5:25:33 PM | Most of the comments here are focused on actions rather than psychology.
I'm not saying I'm right, and I know this is controversial, but this is what makes sense to me:
1. All of our first loves are women, regardless of our gender. A woman carried us to term, nurtured, and (hopefully) nursed us. Therefore, it's a bit more natural for woman to feel comfortable with a woman than a man to feel comfortable with a man. Woman is God in the eyes of all children.
2. Face it, women are more aesthetically pleasing than men. They have more contrasts, more variation... If a genderless being from Europa landed on Earth, the genderless creature would find a woman more pleasant to look at than a man just as the creature would find, say, Run DMC more pleasing to listen to than Vanilla Ice.
"Word to ya motha!" | |
|
|
|
Home
login 
