| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 2:09:42 PM | I agree with the sexy response--for the record I agree with the original topic that there is something a little odd about the average girl on this site. I never thought I would be able to think of Myspace being better than anything.
But in the girls' defense a guy shouldn't shower them with compliments either. Usually they are some kind of "attention whores" and get their fix so they have nothing left to say after the guy complimented them and wrote them back. Of course there are exceptions though. | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 8:49:02 PM | There isnt a stretch, they bothy imply the same thing. The first guy just thinks he is being "slick" the only girls who think being called sexy by a guy theyve never met online is a compliment are ugly fat women who NEVER get any compliments and will take whatever they can get.
I understand that you are a creep so you do not see my point, of course a creep is going to stick up for his fellow creeps. I dont expect you to get it. | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 9:28:01 PM | Thank you for not disappointing me in the fact when a person has no abilty to argue their point and is out of any ideas whatsoever to support their point, they always resort to personal insults cause god forbid you don't agree and buy what they say and you dare oppose it.
Thank you for proving that age old fact. It never, ever fails. LOL
One thing that I am truly envious of you for, is your luxury of knowing everything about everything at 21 years of age.
I wish I would have been so blessed. It could have saved me the time of having to learm anything new, since I already knew it all LOL
| |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 9:49:24 PM |  I am sure most are...........great response. Myself, I am SO over the whole illiterate redneck types messaging me. WTF? Do I present myself as someone who would be into that type of guy?  | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 10:10:17 PM | Girls are fickle! Don't you know, you are cute, young you should have no problem.. Be patient! Maybe you should try the old trick of putting them on your favorites list and then they will see that.. and maybe correspond.. There is no one answer for your delima.. Take care Cary | |
|
CTR916
|
Joined: 11/27/2006
Msg: 31 | |
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 10:59:29 PM |
it makes them sound CREEPY like pervs who read playboy and think its "art" and that it makes them "classy" and "intelligent" or like men who think body paint is "art." They are sick
One guy just emailed me telling me he wants to bone me....and he genuinely thought it was a COMPLIMENT!! jesus christ! how clueless are you people?
being called sexy and seductive only makes me feel like trash. like ugly trash who isnt beautiful enough for a relationship, only sexually attractive enough for a one night stand.
The pictorials in Playboy are art. The articles can be pretty good too. Why do women like to make fun of us guys for being visual? Didn't the independent women's movement let Playgirl go bankrupt? Body painting is art, just as much as painting on canvass can be called art.
Perhaps the guy should have asked if he could stroke your ego, instead of boning you. Isn't ego stroking a form of compliment?
Why would you consider being called sexy and seductive a negative comment? Besides, if you are sexually attractive enough for enough one night stands with the same person, you could imply that you are beautiful enough for a form of relationship. Don't be so negative about us guys and our desire to compliment you. :) | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 11:04:27 PM | wtf are you talking about? its common sense
if you tell a pedophile that liking little boys is not normal, he is going to disagree because it is normal for HIM. You are accustomed to women with no self esteem, so you think sexy is a compliment...its not. Maybe if it came from someone you loved and trusted, but definately not from strangers! it just sounds wrong coming from strangers
"hey girl you're sexy"
i mean come on, doesnt that just sound sick? | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 11:06:22 PM | "The pictorials in Playboy are art. The articles can be pretty good too. Why do women like to make fun of us guys for being visual?"
lmao i have proven my point. just look at this guy. Smart sophisticated men dont read playboy, rednecks who want to believe they are classy and sophisticated do. they dont realize how idiotic they sound worshiping porn! | |
|
CTR916
|
Joined: 11/27/2006
Msg: 34 | |
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 11:18:51 PM | I don't think the ancient Greeks would have agreed with you. I am not sure I follow your logic. Are you implying that if I tell a beautiful woman she is sexy, she may be offended if I am a total stranger? I don't think telling a girl she is sexy sounds sick. I think it can be a compliment.
Appreciating women looking pretty while posing for us is not an attempt at being smart and sophisticated. Why is porn, in the form of nude sculptures; not considered porn, but art worthy of being placed in a museum?
You are welcome to your opinion. Why does it seem like you have an attitude problem? Would you like me to stroke your ego to make you feel better? | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 11:18:55 PM | Now, according to you, telling a woman she is sexy is comparable to pedophilia.
I have heard of pretzel logic, but that takes it to an entire new level, i'm sad to say.
But alas, I certainly can't argue with that logic.
I won't even try. | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/9/2007 11:39:21 PM | Nude sculptures may very well have been porn.
but nude sculptures do not have come hither looks, orgasm faces, masturbating women, girls on girls, and they arent sold to the public so that men can masturbate to them...playboy IS. the purpose of the photos of playboy are so that men can masterbate to it. that makes it porn
and yes of course you dont get it. someone as creepy looking as you would think its perfectly okay to disrespect a woman.
and you "stroking" my ego would only make me sick, so please refrain from it. | |
|
CTR916
|
Joined: 11/27/2006
Msg: 37 | |
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 12:12:01 AM | Ok. I will not try to stroke your ego. What if I told you that your insults only make me think that you really love me and want to have sex with me .
If porn is a picture representation of an actual woman, would that mean that masterbating with a nude woman can also be considered porn? What if we are in a relationship? | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 12:23:17 AM | I wrote back to you...
You and I just didnt "mesh" very well, but at least I was honest. You just need to be you, dony try to "be" what you think girls want you to be. You can't be in the wrong if you are putting 100% Travis out there each time.
Best Of luck with your Search Travis! Thanks Again for the great dinners and if you like Ill write a testimony for your page.
-ashley | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 1:09:47 AM | "What if I told you that your insults only make me think that you really love me and want to have sex with me ."
id use it as more proof that you need help!!
good lord you are stupid. ITS ABOUT INTENT.
If your girlfriend was featured on display for people to masturbate to, then YES it would be PORN, not art.
If it was featured as part of an exhibition of say like women in their 30s who date ugly rednecks, then yes it would be considered "art" and im being very lenient here.
its not whether people actually jack off to it or not that matters, its the INTENT. Playboys intent is to AROUSE. people jack off to ****ing toys are us catalogs, doesnt mean that is porn. | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 8:44:10 AM | Thank you Krysta, you hit the nail on the head.
I am finding that there is a great many game players out there that are nothing like their profiles. They are all looking and hoping for the perfect lok, or ripped bodies. They are expecting perfection in a world where even the most beautiful of people have flaws. So to the author Therrin, there are a few sincere individuals on this website and I hope you have thwe patience to endure what some of these folks are ready to dish out, whether it be truthful or an out and out lie. You see, they never have toface you if they don't want to. You are actually blind to them, so let the games begin.
I wish youy the best of luck at your quest. And remember, it is nothing you are doing wrong, your answering on deaf ears my friend. | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 9:15:01 AM | | What really gets to me is when I write a nice email and send it, then the person reads and deletes it without giving at least a courteous response. Its just plain rude. If someone takes the time out of their day to write me an email, Im at least going to give them the respect to reply in some fashion. Is there anyone else on here who feels the same way I do? | |
|
| |
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 10:14:09 AM | | If you're looking for common courtesy on the internet, you should probably look elsewhere. After all, the internet in general, and this website as well, encompass people from several different backgrounds, lifestyles, and sets of values. You can't expect everyone to adhere to the same codes of conduct that you may find valuable, or worthwhile. It just isn't going to happen. You only have control over your own actions, so try to conduct yourself in the way you see honorable, and for the others....well, at least you don't have to deal with them on a regular basis. | |
|
CTR916
|
Joined: 11/27/2006
Msg: 44 | |
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 10:41:32 AM |
id use it as more proof that you need help!!
good lord you are stupid. ITS ABOUT INTENT.
If your girlfriend was featured on display for people to masturbate to, then YES it would be PORN, not art.
If it was featured as part of an exhibition of say like women in their 30s who date ugly rednecks, then yes it would be considered "art" and im being very lenient here.
its not whether people actually jack off to it or not that matters, its the INTENT. Playboys intent is to AROUSE. people jack off to ****ing toys are us catalogs, doesnt mean that is porn.
You are always welcome to your opinion. So what you are telling me, is that art can be subjective. What you may consider art may not be what I would consider art, and vice versa. You still haven't replied to my question of whether you and I would be considered porn, if you and I were nude and masterbated each other. Would you consider us porn, or two human beings enjoying their sexuality as a form of art?
I am not sure Playboy magazine actually cares about what people do behind closed doors. They did not go bankrupt due to lack of interest. Women let Playgirl go bankrupt due to lack of interest. I am sure the professional photographers who do the pictorials consider their work, art.
Why do you feel the need to be so judgmental? | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 4:56:19 PM | Smart sophisticated men dont read playboy, rednecks who want to believe they are classy and sophisticated do. they dont realize how idiotic they sound worshiping porn!
being smart and sophisticated is not mutually exclusive from reading playboy. there is no relationship between the two. your statement is an absolute. can you honestly state that every man that reads playboy is not smart and not sophisticated? or perhaps stated affirmatively - are there any men whose intelligence and sophistication, having been proven in some other arena, that also read playboy? | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 5:54:23 PM | omg/....
NO WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT IF THE INTENT IS PORNOGRAPHIC THEN THAT MAKES IT PORN. it is not "subjective" it is what it is. BAD ART is still labeled art. Classy porn is STILL LABELED PORN. if the intent was for people to be arroused by it, it is PORN, not art. It is not "subjective." honestly, go back to school, i have explained this 3 times already and you still do not get it.
"You still haven't replied to my question of whether you and I would be considered porn, if you and I were nude and masterbated each"
NO THATS CONSIDERED SEX YOU MORON. YOU ARENT ****ING WATCHING ANYTHING YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING it isnt art either. what ****ing crack are you smoking? You think masturbation is art? holy crap, you really have issues.
um playboy IS going bankrupt. Why do you think they bought club jenna?
No the photographers consider their work A JOB, not art. there is NOTHING artistic about playboy.
if you think porn is a bad thing, thats your problem. im just caling it how it is
"an you honestly state that every man that reads playboy is not smart and not sophisticated? "
yes i can
"are there any men whose intelligence and sophistication, having been proven in some other arena, that also read playboy?"
no, there is not | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 7:24:52 PM | OK, I'm going to dip my toe into the stupid pool and just say to you guys;
Why are you giving this insolent little brat so much of your attention? She apparently has some deep emotional hangups about men being men. There is no changing her mind, and the more you disagree, the more she feels victorious. Leave it alone! She's taken on the role of puppet master and she's pulling your strings.
This thread is about women who initiate contact but don't RE:RE: when you respond.
So back to the OP, I've had the same experience several times. I think it's just the mars/venus thing. I've had women write me 'just to tell me they thought my profile was hilarious', which I thought[as a man] meant they were interested in me. Looking back, maybe they were just trying to tell me [as women] they thought my profile was hilarious. So I let it go. I don't get many, but enough women who are genuinely interested in me enough to tell me so. | |
|
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 7:32:25 PM | | It's not you bro, they do it to everyone... They may go as far as chatting with you for hours and then never respond again! Don't take it personal, just keep on fishing... | |
|
CTR916
|
Joined: 11/27/2006
Msg: 49 | |
| ***What is it with the Girls On Here??***
Posted: 3/10/2007 7:33:05 PM | omg/....
NO WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT IF THE INTENT IS PORNOGRAPHIC THEN THAT MAKES IT PORN. it is not "subjective" it is what it is. BAD ART is still labeled art. Classy porn is STILL LABELED PORN. if the intent was for people to be arroused by it, it is PORN, not art. It is not "subjective." honestly, go back to school, i have explained this 3 times already and you still do not get it.
"You still haven't replied to my question of whether you and I would be considered porn, if you and I were nude and masterbated each"
NO THATS CONSIDERED SEX YOU MORON. YOU ARENT ****ING WATCHING ANYTHING YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING it isnt art either. what ****ing crack are you smoking? You think masturbation is art? holy crap, you really have issues.
um playboy IS going bankrupt. Why do you think they bought club jenna?
No the photographers consider their work A JOB, not art. there is NOTHING artistic about playboy.
if you think porn is a bad thing, thats your problem. im just caling it how it is
"an you honestly state that every man that reads playboy is not smart and not sophisticated? "
yes i can
"are there any men whose intelligence and sophistication, having been proven in some other arena, that also read playboy?"
no, there is not
I understand what you are saying, but I don't agree with you. Why do we have any art at all, if art is not subjective enough to be called "art"?
I think it is debatable whether performance art porn is any different from still life forms of porn.
I am sure Michael Angelo thought it was just a job, too.
You still haven't told me why you are being subjective enough to be judgmental when you could be more artistic. | |
|
| |
Home
login 
