online dating service

Free Dating Site    

REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES
Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Sex and Dating  > BDSM to heighten the experience      Mod Threads Home login  
Page 3 of 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 Author Thread: BDSM to heighten the experience
 MdmeButterfly

Joined: 2/28/2007
Msg: 51
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/17/2007 2:15:17 PM

Yar, that's why they're having the subs sign forms. It's because they're 'in-tune', and it has nothing to do with merely covering their a***s in the law if something goes wrong(er).


Wow, you are very uninformed... its not meant for the Dom/me its meant for the submissive... they are not trying to cover their asses they are merely make sure that the submissive knows exactly what will happen, and make sure that the sub is safe and secure in their Dom/sub relationship.

Its not the fact that I am all knowing, its the fact that I have been in MORE relationships as a Domme and myself I do not hurt my subs in ways the don't want to, yes I may attempt to push the boundry but as soon as I see they are uncomfortable and or are saying their "word" I stop, this is how many Dom/mes work.
 MdmeButterfly

Joined: 2/28/2007
Msg: 52
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/17/2007 2:16:57 PM
Also, if you "greengreyblack" aren't into the whole scene then why put up such an arguement, specially when you have already said "its not for me" Have you actually been in these type of relationships?
 basicallyforums

Joined: 3/9/2007
Msg: 53
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/17/2007 2:25:50 PM
You know...you are so typical vampgoddess. Anyone that is just not into BDSM is just not informed. It actually is a very loving type relationship...isn't it? Where you learn trust from the person that inflicts pain. It is actually a very healthy type of relationshp to be in. Women should just induldge in their inner subs...being the whores that they are. After all as women we love men to tell us what to do and make us do things we really don't want. We need men to show us the way...especially the abusive type. We all just need to be educated.

Wow... you must be really good that when you hear the "word" you stop the pain you are inflicting. That must take some real control. I think that is so sweet you don't hurt your sub. I'm impressed.
 Greengrayblack

Joined: 11/25/2005
Msg: 54
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/17/2007 2:32:05 PM
basicallyforums:

After all as women we love men to tell us what to do and make us do things we really don't want. We need men to show us the way...especially the abusive type. We all just need to be educated.


*chuckles*

Be fair, Basic... She's not saying you should love just abusive men, she's a champion of the abusive woman as well.

VampGoddess :


I have been in MORE relationships as a Domme and myself I do not hurt my subs in ways the don't want to, yes I may attempt to push the boundry


Ah, you reinforce my earlier point of the unhealthy nature of this when you point out that you push their boundries until they say no, or rather 'banana', or indeed any number of possible safe words.

You're conditioning them to tolerate ever-greater abuse. Hardly healthy for them, not that they're that healthy to begin with.

Sadism and masochism emotional or physical is just not good. Certainly not a something that has a place in a healthy relationship.



Also, if you "greengreyblack" aren't into the whole scene then why put up such an arguement, specially when you have already said "its not for me" Have you actually been in these type of relationship?


Why, I do so as if I didn't you'd be making these claims unopposed by my own arguements. If I felt someone made my points as well or better, I probably wouldn't bother.

You are correct. Not suffering from any deep-seated self-loathing or despair, nor being of a sadistic or masochistic bent, I have not been in any such abusive relationships.

I know this will boggle your mind, but I'm going to admit that I think this is a rather good sign.

Furthermore, I'm going to say that not being a sadist or masochist physically or emotionally is a good thing.

Call me a rebel.
 IdoAllmyOwnStunts

Joined: 1/24/2006
Msg: 55
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/17/2007 9:05:53 PM
i want to see Martha Stewart do a BDSM show.. ive seen her prepare a roast so i know shes good with rope..

......................................................................................................................................
 ~curlygirl~

Joined: 4/22/2006
Msg: 56
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/17/2007 9:35:14 PM
while i haven't dabbled in s&m, or bondage (tho i'm somewhat curious about the latter)...i have a bit of a thing for some d&s kinks. i love the hair pulling, spanking, dirty names, & being controled by my partner (in a trusting, consentual situation). i can also be a bit of a switch...sometimes i like to take control, hold down, bite & scratch my partner too. i like sex to be intense, and tho i'm certainly not vanilla, i wouldn't consider myself to be hardcore either...just a little kinky ; )
 box

Joined: 1/25/2007
Msg: 57
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 2:20:35 AM
Sadism and masochism emotional or physical is just not good. Certainly not a something that has a place in a healthy relationship.

WOW......!!!!!!!....I HAVE BEEN IN A DOM/SUB RELATIONSHIP...BOTH OF US BEING SWITCHES..IT WAS QUITE POSSIBLY ONE OF THE MOST SATISFYING AND HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS I HAVE BEEN IN...STRAIGHT UP AND ALWAYS RESPECTFUL......BDSM IS A LIFESTYLE TO SOME AND TO OTHERS I FEEL A CURIOSITY......BUT I STRESS...VERY HEALTHY AND VERY GOOD...
 cndnldy

Joined: 7/2/2005
Msg: 58
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 7:58:38 AM
well...maybe we can all agree to disagree regarding this topic!!!!!!
the OP's question was one of curiosity, she was wondering if BDSM can heighten the experience in bed. If she and her partner want to explore this side, my only advice is to both be on the same page about what each other would like to try....because you never know until you try. she may like it, she may not. and it all doesn't have to be about "whips and chains"....maybe try some light bondage, SAFELY, sensory deprivation..i.e. a blindflold.....
BDSM can be from the mild end of things to the very extreme, just depending on what you want and/or want to try. I see nothing wrong in exploring all sides of yourself.
 JerryInTampa

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 59
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 3:01:54 PM

I don't know. I'm still busy enjoying normal sex. But if I reach that point I'll be sure to let you know.
That seems an odd criteria. I'd hate to imagine how little I would have done in my life, from mounted police work to travelling if I had waited until I was bored with what I was already doing.


So, what's up with those guys who like daddy scenerios? Do you think they get off on little girls?
Not generally, no. Guys who get off on little girls generally predate on little girls.

Here's an experiment. Dateline has been showing for a year or more now "to catch a preditor". Go see how many of the men involved were involved in daddy/daughter relationships with women. I haven't seen a single one.


Don't you think that a lot of doms are really abusive men? I can see how that would be the case.
Don't you think a lot of non-Doms are reallt abusive men and women? I can see how that would be the case. Moreso, I can prove that it is the case.


It seems to me that those into BDSM are just really into abuse in general. Can someone tell me how it would differ? The only obvious difference is you're getting the other person to consent.
Seems to me that those into sex are really into rape in general. Can someone tell me how it would differ? The only obvious difference between sex and rape is consent.


A healthy relationship with sadism and masochism...

That's a bit of an oxymoron.
Don't tell that to a Muslim. The Quran requires beating (lightly) your wife if she comes out of line. There's only a couple billion of them though.


After all, a masochist is ultimately ever-conditioning themselves for greater abuse. Particularly when mental abuse is involved as well, such as humiliation and insults.
I'm an avid martial artist. I go down to a school several times a week and hit people and get hit by them. Does that mean that all these people are abusive because they hit me?

I doubt highly that you follow your own standard. What's the difference between battery and a boxing match? Consent? Do you think a boxing match is abuse?


In regards to submission/domination, you're still dealing with people getting off on power trips. I personally feel that a person who gets off on that might want to do a bit of honest self-evaluation as to why...
Perhaps God told them:
http://www.bible.ca/marriage/submission-independent-of-culture.htm
"Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." (I Timothy 2:11-14)

"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything." (Ephesians 5:22-24)

"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." (I Corinthians 14:34-35)


I had this guy tell me about an experience he had with a woman who he flogged. He justified it by saying that was what she wanted.
I knew a guy who had sex with a woman and justified it by the fact that the woman wanted to. Strange people.

[qoute]btw...what is wrong with making love to someone with out inflicting pain? Why does pain have to be brought into this? Nothing wrong with sex without oral sex. I know you've never had a blow-job, right?
 JerryInTampa

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 60
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 3:12:52 PM

Yar, that's why they're having the subs sign forms. It's because they're 'in-tune', and it has nothing to do with merely covering their a***s in the law if something goes wrong(er).
I'm sure it's just rumor, but I heard that some non-BDSM people were signing pre-nuptual agreements. Really "in-tune" there huh?


You know...you are so typical vampgoddess. Anyone that is just not into BDSM is just not informed.
Perhaps you are not informed as to what a "straw-man logical fallacy" is. It's when you take someone's statement (say "people badmouthing BDSM are uninformed") and replace it with a statement that was not made (say "people not into BDSM are uninformed") and pretend that it was said by the person you are arguing with. You then find fault with the statement that you were the one to make, and pretend that it has something to do with what the other person actually said.


It actually is a very loving type relationship...isn't it? Where you learn trust from the person that inflicts pain. It is actually a very healthy type of relationshp to be in. Women should just induldge in their inner subs...being the whores that they are.
This is another excellent example. You do know that most submissives are men right?

I guess not. Nor do I believe any BDSM proponent has put it in gender-terms (except me in the post above where I offered religious mandates for D/s and discipline that were gender specific).

So you pretended that gender had been used, then imagined a rational that was not accurate, then proceeded to hack away at that straw man.


Wow... you must be really good that when you hear the "word" you stop the pain you are inflicting. That must take some real control. I think that is so sweet you don't hurt your sub. I'm impressed.
Here you conflict with your own position. Having just asserted that the pro-BDSM argument was based on female subs, you now speak to the poster, a woman, as s Dom in direct contradiction to your position a few sentances before.

And yes, for those who inflict pain until someone safes out, most do stop immediately. Just like most people who have sex with their wives would not have sex with them if the wife said "no".

But, perhaps that's something that's beyond your ability. If so, I pity your sex-partner.


Ah, you reinforce my earlier point of the unhealthy nature of this when you point out that you push their boundries until they say no, or rather 'banana', or indeed any number of possible safe words.
so "do it until I tell you to stop" is unhealthy because...

Though, in fact, many of us have never heard a safe-out from our subs. We know them well enough to gauge what we are doing well ahead of their need to call safe. For some couples the safeword is an emergency stop; for others it's just the sub indicating that s/he's gotten where they wanted to go.


Sadism and masochism emotional or physical is just not good. Certainly not a something that has a place in a healthy relationship.
So you keep saying, but not supporting.


You are correct. Not suffering from any deep-seated self-loathing or despair, nor being of a sadistic or masochistic bent, I have not been in any such abusive relationships.
Prejudicial language which assumes your conclusion. That BDSM is abusive is the topic at hand, and one which has not found consensus. You are attempting a proof by repeated assertion.


the OP's question was one of curiosity, she was wondering if BDSM can heighten the experience in bed. If she and her partner want to explore this side, my only advice is to both be on the same page about what each other would like to try....because you never know until you try. she may like it, she may not. and it all doesn't have to be about "whips and chains"....maybe try some light bondage, SAFELY, sensory deprivation..i.e. a blindflold.....
Yes, the rule to run by is "Safe, sane, consentual, and INFORMED"
 basicallyforums

Joined: 3/9/2007
Msg: 61
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 6:43:59 PM
^^^I don't have time to read nor address all this. All I can see from skimming over it is you mention religions i.e., muslim and how if women get out of line it is okay to...I don't really know what you were getting at. But, I can tell you this, many religions look at women as second class citizens so I am not surprised. That still does not help your argument towards BDSM. Also you mention preditors and how many are not into BDSM. How would you know? I bet they would jump at the chance to play out these scenerios including rapists.

I don't care what people do in the privacy of there bed rooms. But, it is not healthy. I am not uninformed and I don't need to be educated. I know what BDSM is about through experience. And it is not healthy and it does attract some of the very worst society has to offer.
 JerryInTampa

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 62
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 7:31:19 PM
I don't have time to read nor address all this. All I can see from skimming over it is you mention religions i.e., muslim and how if women get out of line it is okay to...I don't really know what you were getting at. But, I can tell you this, many religions look at women as second class citizens so I am not surprised. That still does not help your argument towards BDSM.
That's what happens when you respond without reading. I was not making a positive argument in favor of BDSM when I made those comments, therefore you are hacking at a straw-man. You admitted that you didn't know what I was getting at, but then responded as though you did.


Also you mention preditors and how many are not into BDSM. How would you know? I bet they would jump at the chance to play out these scenerios including rapists.
Because I've watched more than 100 get grabbed on dateline and none showed, nor had mention, any inclication towards BDSM. Again, had you actually read before responding you would have seen my support.

Of course, I'm sure that there are some psyco-nutjobs (sorry if that's technical jargon ;) ) who are into BDSM. But that's not really the point.


I don't care what people do in the privacy of there bed rooms. But, it is not healthy. I am not uninformed and I don't need to be educated. I know what BDSM is about through experience.
And we get to the heart of the matter. You had a bad experience and so are campaigning against a lifestyle.

I know people who have had bad experiences with dogs, horses, swimming, etc and have the same reaction. It's pretty normal, but not very healthy. Perhaps with some theremy you can overcome your PTSD, I hear that there's excellent work being done with confrontational theremy on that.

I'm not saying BDSM will ever be "your thing". Certainly, it's not everyone's interest. But there's a vast gulf between "not for me" and your apparent response.
 Greengrayblack

Joined: 11/25/2005
Msg: 63
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 7:57:30 PM
Funny, JerryInTampa, but I can't really tell wether you're supporting sadomasochism or just assaulting religion. Perhaps both. I wonder why you're dragging religion into it though.. I assume it must be part of a personal agenda, as I for one didn't invoke it.
I think you're more than a little confused.


I'm an avid martial artist. I go down to a school several times a week and hit people and get hit by them. Does that mean that all these people are abusive because they hit me?

I doubt highly that you follow your own standard. What's the difference between battery and a boxing match? Consent? Do you think a boxing match is abuse?


What is the point of martial arts? To take pleasure from causing one's opponent pain? To take pleasure from being pained by an opponent? I didn't think so... Boxing? Is that the point of boxing?

I didn't think so. Your comparison is poor. You might think that's the point of them, but then you have basically said you're a sadist and/or masochist. Given as you paint yourself as a 'dom' ..

Though, in fact, many of us have never heard a safe-out from our subs.

Call me absurd for suspecting you lean heaviest towards sadism. By the way, given those never-heard-of safe-outs the abuse conditioning must be going splendidly.

I won't be answering all of your statements, as not all of them seem wholly coherent, and most seem to grasp at largely irrelevant technicalities. Here are two of several possible examples.


GreenGrayBlack: Yar, that's why they're having the subs sign forms. It's because they're 'in-tune', and it has nothing to do with merely covering their a***s in the law if something goes wrong(er).

JerryInTampa: I'm sure it's just rumor, but I heard that some non-BDSM people were signing pre-nuptual agreements. Really "in-tune" there huh?


Duh, they're covering their a***s as well, though surely for different reasons, such as suspecting that their relationship isn't as solid as it may seem.



Basicallyforums: You know...you are so typical vampgoddess. Anyone that is just not into BDSM is just not informed.

JerryInTampa: Perhaps you are not informed as to what a "straw-man logical fallacy" is. It's when you take someone's statement (say "people badmouthing BDSM are uninformed") and replace it with a statement that was not made (say "people not into BDSM are uninformed") and pretend that it was said by the person you are arguing with. You then find fault with the statement that you were the one to make, and pretend that it has something to do with what the other person actually said.


This'd be the grasping at technicalities. Basic's paraphrasing was accurate, and if she's guilty of any straw-manning then Vamp is surely guilty of the same. Moreso, in fact, as Basic made more of a distinction than Vamp bothered to by referring to those 'just not into BDSM' whereas Vamp tried to write off absolutely everyone who disagreed with it.
 Spiritualist

Joined: 7/9/2004
Msg: 64
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 8:07:15 PM
I personally don't think I would try it LOL, I had a friend who worked at photomat LOL many many years ago and he would develope pics for himself he thought were interesting to say the least and in one pic a woman had a man tied up to a wall with a huge flaming torch on his gonads and I just don't find that arousing LOL!
Poor guy LOL!

Shannon
 basicallyforums

Joined: 3/9/2007
Msg: 65
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 8:14:39 PM
If you could stick to one point I would be able to discuss anything you would like in detail. The problem is that this whole thing is just so scattered. I can't possible address it all. I am not even going to attempt to ... it is just not worth it to me. What I can do is pick up on some very common things that those in the BDSM community have to say. I can not tell you how many times I have heard them say, when someone says it is not for them, that the person is not informed or uneducated. They say how it is all about building trust. I know what it is about. My experience is not a "bad" experience. Nothing really happened to me. I don't like being degraded by dominating men. I don't see anything healthy about it. I don't like being slapped around...regardless if I have a "safe" word. There are other much more healthy ways to build trust.
 fierynette

Joined: 12/30/2006
Msg: 66
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 8:36:14 PM
I agree it does make it more exciting... however it has to be someone I trust or I get distracted by worrying they're going to go too far. Defeats the purpose then.
 JerryInTampa

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 67
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 9:19:51 PM
Funny, JerryInTampa, but I can't really tell wether you're supporting sadomasochism or just assaulting religion. Perhaps both. I wonder why you're dragging religion into it though.. I assume it must be part of a personal agenda, as I for one didn't invoke it.
You pretended to ask a question "why involve religion" so you could make an assertion as to the answer "anti-religious adgenda" and, preumably, instill a sense that my argument is somehow invalidated. The second half of that process is called an "ad homynim logical fallacy" where the poster is attacked rather than the post. The dirst half is simply intellectually dishonest.

To answer your rhetorical question anyway: I broughtup religion to establish D/s, and to a lesser degree BDSM, as a well entrenched and heavily practiced "norm", as illustrated by its inclusion in the worlds two largest religions.


What is the point of martial arts? To take pleasure from causing one's opponent pain? To take pleasure from being pained by an opponent? I didn't think so... Boxing? Is that the point of boxing?
Most martial artists take martial arts because they enjoy martial arts. Most boxers box because they enjoy boxing. Most BDSMers do BDSM because they enjoy BDSM.


I didn't think so. Your comparison is poor. You might think that's the point of them, but then you have basically said you're a sadist and/or masochist. Given as you paint yourself as a 'dom' ..
Actually, a Dom has no requirement to be into BDSM at all. Merely D/s.


Call me absurd for suspecting you lean heaviest towards sadism. By the way, given those never-heard-of safe-outs the abuse conditioning must be going splendidly.
Again you are rethorically assuming a conclusion you've utterly failed to support.


Duh, they're covering their a***s as well, though surely for different reasons, such as suspecting that their relationship isn't as solid as it may seem.
Which eliminates the stated argument that the issue is BDSM. I'm glad to see you agree with that part. It's interesting that you now disparage any relationship with a prenup; most couples-councilers, lawyers, and psyciatrists I can think of would consider them a sign of grounded realism and, by extension, quite healthy.


This'd be the grasping at technicalities. Basic's paraphrasing was accurate, and if she's guilty of any straw-manning then Vamp is surely guilty of the same. Moreso, in fact, as Basic made more of a distinction than Vamp bothered to by referring to those 'just not into BDSM' whereas Vamp tried to write off absolutely everyone who disagreed with it.
That would be a red-herring, where you attempt to distract from the invalidity of Basic's argument by asserting that someone else did worse.

What vamp did or did not do in her argument is irrellevent as to whether Basic's was a legetimate response, or a straw-man.

And yes, I did notice that you completely failed to address basically every one of the fallacious pieces of logic I pointed out in your previos posts. You did not address your own inconsistancy regarding the "the only difference is consent" assertion, nor your numerous failings to mount even token support for your simply assumed (as you've done again in this post) conclusion.
 JerryInTampa

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 68
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 9:24:23 PM

I can not tell you how many times I have heard them say, when someone says it is not for them, that the person is not informed or uneducated.
If someone here says that then please call them out on it. I will support you entirely.

I know that I've never said it, and I have no recollection of ever having heard it said.

REGARDING THE OP:
I should have mentioned this earlier:

Fear, Pain, Aggression, and Arousal involve basically the same group of chemicals (as does chocolate and cocaine). Because of this, it's quite possible to increase the chemicals associated with sexal arousal by adding aggression, fear, or pain into the mix.

This is basically what BDSM does. It stimulates those other emotional centers in the brain to release (among other things) adreneline and endorphines. The result, for many, is a heightened sense of arousal and increased sexual enjoyment.
 Eternelle

Joined: 3/11/2007
Msg: 69
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 10:09:56 PM
Regarding consent forms. It was suggested that this was done to protect individuals legally.
Not so - consent forms are completely unrelated to the law

Those who are informed in bdsm are also aware that the law in most countries and bdsm are very much at odds with one another.Please note that laws are not necessarily equivalent with what is "right" and "wrong" rather they exist according to the zeitgeist of the recent past. Laws can be changed to reflect growing awareness, knowledge or public interest.

examples of some laws that have exisited/still exist in countries around the world
ie: laws against women voting
different races marrying
sexual acts - i.e anal sex
Jews owning property
women showing her hair in public

The spanner case in UK is probably the most famous bdsm case in which dominants were sent to jail despite the fact that their subs had consented. There are many other cases if you choose to research the issue.

Just wanted to educate those people on here who make statements that are incorrect
 Clematis

Joined: 6/4/2006
Msg: 70
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/18/2007 10:31:53 PM
I get scared when people label things.
Sex should be between just two people who want to be with each other.
When you start to label things like that, then it becomes part of the public consciousness and; therefore, can be politicized.
What happens between two people in private, should not be labeled or held up to public scrutiny and politicized.
I don't know how to express how I feel very well, here.
:/
 Greengrayblack

Joined: 11/25/2005
Msg: 71
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/19/2007 3:03:00 AM
Jerryintampa, you are rather simply in the habit of claiming any rational arguement against your hobby is some sort of trickery, usually referencing 'straw men' or other concepts I'm fairly certain you don't understand yourself.

I will commend you for at least offering some variety, whereas Happy1girl and many others use the old 'ignorance' line to write off everyone.

Meanwhile, ace, you're guilty of most of the errors you claim others are making and another healthy portion are fictional. You're the one who first launched into personal attacks, even.

For the record, I don't mind that so much, as given where you're coming from I find it hilarious.

I've rather decided that you personally don't warrant more than the most passing responses, given your hypocritical and rabid approach is pretty hard to follow, and you often insist on churning so much of it out at one time! It's smokescreen.

So, in parting, you should really visit a 'psychiatrist', which I am not (And given as you can't even spell it I'm inclined to believe you aren't either.) , and figure out what your issues are and how you might manage them without exploiting those with low self-esteem under the guise of increasing brain chemicals and sex games.
 JerryInTampa

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 72
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/19/2007 4:41:56 AM
Jerryintampa, you are rather simply in the habit of claiming any rational arguement against your hobby is some sort of trickery, usually referencing 'straw men' or other phrases I'm fairly certain you don't understand yourself.
OK. Considering the fact that I spelled out the error I had just mentioned, I'm sure you will support the claim that I didn't understand the fallacies I pointed out in your posts with an example.

Hrm. No example again. No support at all. You've simply continued unsubstantiated assertion as your discussion tactic. This seems like a red-herring attempt to make a conversation about me and avoid responding to my points (some reiterated below)


Meanwhile, ace, you're guilty of most of the errors you claim others are making, and another healthy portion are fictional. You're the one who first launched into personal attacks, even.
I'm looking for where I've done the errors I've attributed to you (or others) and I don't see it. Again, I'm looking in your post for you to support this accusation and again it's not there. That would appear to support my belief that you are persuing a red-herring.

As to personal attacks, I did not so much accuse you of making them as I did accuse you of using them to distract from the topic at hand.


I've rather decided that you personally don't warrant more than the most passing responses, given your hypocritical and rabid approach is pretty hard to follow, and you often insist on churning so much of it out at one time! It's smokescreen.
Do you mean anyone to believe your "your making a smokescreen and that's why I'm not responding to any of the mny slient and supported points you've offered in rebuttal" to be anything but a smokescreen to apologize away your inability to address my points?


So, in parting, you should really visit a 'psychiatrist', which I am not (And given as you can't even spell it I'm inclined to believe you aren't either.) , and figure out what your issues are and how you might manage them without exploiting those with low self-esteem under the guise of increasing brain chemicals and sex games.
I'll take this to mean that you cannot support your accusation "They're not exactly keystone attributes of a well-adjusted person", though as has been pointed out, they are not keystones (nor is being 5' tall a keystone).

I notice that you still have not addressed any of the on-topic points in post 60. Shall I reiterate my responses to your many fallacious arguments?
 rissy85

Joined: 3/12/2007
Msg: 73
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/19/2007 5:19:26 AM
i tried this with a male friend who had been a master to many a person. I discovered that although im generally the one in control, the feeling of having someone control me is awesome.I think if ur doing it with the right person it can be absoloutely amazing (even the leather handcuffs felt strangely sexy lol)
 basicallyforums

Joined: 3/9/2007
Msg: 74
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/19/2007 6:34:59 PM
"Wow, you are very uninformed"

That was taken from msg. 51. So, Jerryintampa....I don't know where you come up with your straw-man argument. You yourself are inventing straw-men. As I have been saying, I read the same sh&t from the BDSM community over and over again. Nothing original. The only problem I have is with the people who try and make it look sexy. As if it is something to enter into casually with say others into it that you meet on POF. It's not, there are people out there with serious mental problems and believe me they are amoung those that really get off on this. Also, even in long term relationships it can be very damaging. People that are into abusive love this sort of thing. I know what I am talking about people. I am not uninformed.
 JerryInTampa

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 75
view profile
History
BDSM to heighten the experience
Posted: 3/19/2007 7:00:15 PM

"Wow, you are very uninformed"

That was taken from msg. 51. So, Jerryintampa....I don't know where you come up with your straw-man argument.
Message #51 was written by VampGoddess, not me.

So since a straw-man fallacy is where you attribute a position to your opposition that they have not expoused, and since you have just attributed something to me that I did not say...


The only problem I have is with the people who try and make it look sexy. As if it is something to enter into casually with say others into it that you meet on POF. It's not, there are people out there with serious mental problems and believe me they are amoung those that really get off on this.
The logic is flawed. There are plenty of people out there with "serious mental problems" getting off on people being called "fishies". I don't see how that effects me or the BDSM community.


Also, even in long term relationships it can be very damaging. People that are into abusive love this sort of thing. I know what I am talking about people. I am not uninformed.
Your inference that BDSM = abuse is wrong and demonstrably so. It is, therefore, quite uninformed.

But hey, if you keep saying "I know what I'm talking about" perhaps that will make it so... or at least stop the fact that people are telling you that you don't from making you uninformed.
Page 3 of 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Show ALL Forums  > Sex and Dating  > BDSM to heighten the experience