I personally don't believe that God would be deceptive, but I don't rule out the possibility. Romans 1:20 was mentioned as an argument against the possibility of God being deceptive, but the passage more correctly conveys the message that the reason we know God exists is because of all that has been created by him and does not convey that God is not deceptive. It's a long stretch to say otherwise. I don't know what version you used to interpret that verse, so I looked through several versions. Unless there is another passage that more clearly points out that God is not deceptive, than it's not "unbiblical". Besides, if God can be destructive (i.e. 40 days and 40 nights of rain), why can't he be deceptive?

It was impossible for God to lie"

In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began.

Thou art that God, and thy words be true.

So the question that comes to my mind is "Are there others out there that belive in God and understand Science and trust many of its observations?"

You can count me in. I've never experienced a conflict between believing in God and using science, but then I approach religions with a metaphorical frame of mind and not a fundamentalist one. Nor do I approach science with a fundamentalist mind. I think human beings use multiple epistemological approaches to deal with the world--logic, empiricism, testimony, experience, intuition, etc--and that these multiple ways to 'know' are all valid.

(As an aside: What annoys me about zealous empiricists and logicians is how they make a special pleading for logic and empirical observation, that somehow these are 'special' epistemological approaches that should be privileged over other approaches. Human beings in general make heavy, irrational and emotional investments in ideology, and empiricism is just as valid a candidate for that irrational emotional investment as historical materialism or Christianity. Rabid empiricists, from the stupider "science tells us" sort, to the more sophisticated ones who believe their ideology is covered by a special hermeneutics, an aegis against error, are comparable to an Islamic fundamentalist who has completely invested themself in the epistemological validity of revelation. Both are satisfying a deep, emotional need to "be right" and eliminate uncertainty, nuance and ambiguity from their world.)

does your religion allow for a deceitful God? My guess would be not, but I have not studied every religion so I cannot say.

Something that cannot be proven through science because it dose not depend on the Physical Universe as we know it.

If I believed in a creater who was a deceitful God, then given what we've seen of his handywork I would devote my days fighting him in the name of humanity rather than worshiping him.

Built to answer the most fundamental questions in physics, the LHC accelerator is assembled at the CERN in a tunnel which has a circumference of 27 km and is buried 100 metres beneath the Franco-Swiss border. It is composed of 1700 large magnets of which 392 are quadripole magnets designed to guide and focus the beams. It also includes a significant quantity of corrective magnets.

Religion basically has a book[quran,torah, old and new testament etc] that tells you to believe BECAUSE I SAID SO LMAO.

they plainly do not understand the definition of science and logic or their applications. Nor do they understand the definition of faith. Ultimately faith is about acting without proof. That's it. There is nothing in the definition that says faith is about acting unreasonably without proof

I am a Baha'i and as a baha'i one of the major principles we belive in is the fact that science and religion do go hand in hand and they need to for the betterment of todays society. If you can see science as the progression of humankinds enviroment and things like that and Religion as the moral ground and guideline on how to use the science we have in a correct propper way.