Please post proof.

Well that is where the US government was sending the checks when they where funding and creating al-queda into the organization we know of today.

Unless you have proof that they where based somewhere else.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda

Congratulations on your fail.

...Activities ascribed to it may involve members of the movement, who have taken a pledge of loyalty to Osama bin Laden, or the much more numerous "al-Qaeda-linked" individuals who have undergone training in one of its camps in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq or Sudan, but who have not taken any pledge...

This is taken from the book "The Looming Tower" by Lawrence Wright

Which goes into details about how Bush drooped the ball with regards to warning of the attacks.


The Irony, it burns.

So if we went to war for oil why is it we didn't take any from them?

Because the Iraqis keep on blowing up oil supplies stored by American companies and in Afganistan the country is so unstable even private mercenaries can't provide enough protection for American companies to safely build transport routes for the exploitation of Afganistan mineral wealth.

Because the Iraqis keep on blowing up oil supplies stored by American companies ...

And because the Iraqi "desert dwellers" weren't so dumb as "Dumbya" assumed. The "High-Functioning MORON" wasn't counting on them seeing through his plan ... and when the oil contracts came due, they gave them to others ... other than the US.

"Shrubbie" thought he could manipulate the Iraqis into just turning all the oil over to us ... didn't work though. That's why we didn't take any from them. The little bit we were able to get our hands on has gone to the criminal contractors. But oh well ... you hire criminals to do the job, you gotta count on eventually being double-crossed ... right?

Mittens is headed for the same thing since he's nothing more than the "High-Functioning MORON" on steroids!

LOL...Haliburton tried to exploit Iraqi oil...and all they got was blown up pipelines, tankers, and storage facilities...google is your friend.

You mean one of the American companies that went to rebuild the oil fields for the Iraqi people.

Ya ... I had that pegged right.

LMFAO ... He'd be one of them that really believed Halliburton went to "rebuild the oil fields for the Iraqi people" ...


Someone give the guy an Oxygen mask for when we tell him what really happened ...

They went for "Dumbya"/"D1ck the torturer" ... to (GASP!!!!) STEAL the oil!!!

You mean one of the American companies that went to rebuild the oil fields for the Iraqi people.

Should they do it for free?

He can't relate to middle class folks so he'll resort to buying his way to the top. If you're working for a living and you vote for this man I'd have to ask you ...WHY?? He talks jobs, jobs but his policies are no different than Ex Pres. Bushes.

You really think a left wing nut is a source any one but other left wing nuts would put any faith in?

His policies are no different than Bush's you mean back when we had more jobs than we do now.......Why would you not want to go back to polices and times when we had more jobs?

I was quoting your source, not mine.

Are you not paying attention?


So now that we have established that your source is nuts, got anything else or are you going to contradict yourself again?

More derp.

Private & Government Jobs
Gained/Lost Under Obama
(May 2012 upate)

How many jobs (total, private, and government) have been lost or gained since Obama was inaugurated?
4,317,000 jobs (in seasonally adjusted numbers) were LOST in TOTAL from the time Obama took office until the "trough" of the recession in early 2010. That's a decrease of 3.2%.
3,745,000 jobs (in seasonally adjusted numbers) were CREATED from the "trough" of the recession until now, April 2012. That's an increase of 2.90%.
In total, 572,000 jobs (in seasonally adjusted numbers) were LOST from the time Obama took office until now, April 2012. That's a decrease of 0.43%. *

I was quoting your source, not mine.

Are you not paying attention?

So now that we have established that your source is nuts, got anything else or are you going to contradict yourself again?

Nice spin I quoted Wikipedia. You may have pulled it from the page but that was NOT my source.

You really are not worth my time as it is clear you either have no idea what you are talking about or are a troll, so best of luck with that.

Shrub created jobs and a stable economy???gasp...gee, I though the business practices the blossomed under Shrub threw the world economy into the toilet along with the American economy...and that a Republican House that isn't about stabalizing the economy or creating jobs, but is about "getting that black man out of the white house"

the economy was better.