Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Current Events  > Do you really support our troops?      Home login  
 AUTHOR
 jed456
Joined: 4/26/2005
Msg: 226
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?Page 10 of 11    (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)

And you cannot suport the troops and be against the war.


Utter nonsense!


But I do think we attacked the wrong country[


Gee you think so?


its stupid and maes no sense whatsoever


Your entire rant Yes I couldn't agree more!
 crazytimes1
Joined: 3/24/2008
Msg: 227
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 1:20:43 AM
If I supported them anymore I would have been over there. Oh... I was. Well, I guess I really support them. Being one helps.

No dramas with the wars. No dramas with being there in both. We all die some day, I would prefer to die doing something I believe in. I have stood by my words in the past.

How many people can say the same?
 woodenmike
Joined: 6/17/2007
Msg: 228
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 6:33:02 AM

I too, think it is disgusting how the U.S. treats their people once they are out of the military. During Vietnam they denied agent orange, In desert storm they denied something was dropped on our soldiers, yet they come back with all these delibating injuries and they claimed nothing was sprayed on them. Yet the children that are born after the gulf war have horrendous birth defects. But they weren't affected by anything dropped on them or exposed to them. We are all gung ho, when the soldier is over there. But once he is injured, sick, or discharged we don't want to fess up to their injuries. This war especially, the guys are going crackers from being over there too long. Do I support the troops. Hell yes, I started Soldiers Nightingales here in Ohio. We send care packages to the troops overseas. We also make blankets for the wounded here stateside,we also crochet and knit stump covers,trach covers,slippers for the wounded.


If you're a Veteran, I'm pretty sure www.thepowerhour.com will give you a free copy of Joyce Riley's "BEYOND TREASON" on request.
It's about the depleated uranium munitions and how the government not only treats the soldiers badly, but actually experiments on them!

Thanks for your work to help our troops.

Maybe you could help educate them as to the real enemy being our government, too?


My son is in the British Army... about to do his third tour in Iraq...I dont know how the american government treat their troops but unfortunately over here in the UK they are treated worse than second class citizens...they are not allowed to wear their uniforms in public...in case they offend our "ethnic" citizens...they are spat at in streets by the scum who would rather beat up old ladies than fight for the country they live in..and as for housing ...apparently they havent even earnt the right to a roof over their head when they leave the forces...its absolutely disgusting!!!!!!!!! And as for Bush and Blair...I expect they can sleep well at night... none of their loved ones are putting their lives on line so they can sleep safe at night...ok so our boys and girls choose to join up...but that doesnt mean they deserve no respect from the rest of us. In this country if u are a sciver, or an immigrant...be it illigal or otherwise you are treated like royalty...but live here all your lives and work hard paying taxes or even be prepared to give up your life ..forget it ...So yes I do think we should support our troops...both UK and USA......its the politicians who should be spat on!!!!!!!


The politicians deserve far worse than that, such as charges of treason, conviction, and punishment to the fullest extent of the law.

If you haven't seen "V for Vendetta", I highly suggest you watch it!

You may also want to look into Tony Blair's occult activities, do a search or two and find out what a really whacked out evil bloke he is!

My Godspeed your son's safe return, and may he join in the fight against the real enemies at home.
 designingwoman
Joined: 9/4/2005
Msg: 229
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 10:46:36 AM
Our "leaders" of late have done little to truly support the troops. Their efforts are sorely under funded, and our warriors are grossly under paid. Our VA doesn't do enough to help those who have served our nation--thanks to the government underfunding it so consistently. Our local VA hospital only recently had air conditioning installed, for example.

Support the troops--bring them home-- or at least redeploy them where they are needed in other parts of the world! Give them a break--multiple tours of duty in Iraq is too much to ask of our soldiers. Other parts of the world need attention, and we are ignoring them at our peril. We have gotten so fixated on Iraq that it's wearing our military personnel thin.
 Ralph C.
Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 230
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 11:07:28 AM
Thank God we have a Government that seeks freedom and democracy for all citizens on earth we've shed our blood in past wars so you anti this and anti that can spew on this and other post, God what's wrong with this picture!
I have and always will support democracy whether here or abroad
Take care
Ralph8119
 whiskeypapa
Joined: 6/7/2007
Msg: 231
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 1:07:30 PM
which government is that ralphie? It certainly isn't the US government. If it was there would be a US type democracy in: Viet Nam, Cambodia, Laos, Grenada, Lebanon, Somalia, Columbia, San Salvador....
 Montreal_Guy
Joined: 3/8/2004
Msg: 232
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 1:12:53 PM
What's wrong with this picture ?



Dr. Steve Rathburn is the acting head of the biostatistics department at the University of Georgia. CBS News asked him to run a detailed analysis of the raw numbers that we obtained from state authorities for 2004 and 2005.

It found that veterans were more than twice as likely to commit suicide in 2005 than non-vets. (Veterans committed suicide at the rate of between 18.7 to 20.8 per 100,000, compared to other Americans, who did so at the rate of 8.9 per 100,000.)

One age group stood out. Veterans aged 20 through 24, those who have served during the war on terror. They had the highest suicide rate among all veterans, estimated between two and four times higher than civilians the same age. (The suicide rate for non-veterans is 8.3 per 100,000, while the rate for veterans was found to be between 22.9 and 31.9 per 100,000.)

"Wow! Those are devastating," said Paul Sullivan, a former VA analyst who is now an advocate for veterans rights from the group Veterans For Common Sense.

"Those numbers clearly show an epidemic of mental health problems," he said.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/111407O.shtml


6,256 suicides, of Iraqi combat vets - verified state by state.


November 6, 2007 (Washington, DC) — Estimates of the rate of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among veterans returning from Iraq range from 12% to 20%. With deployment topping 1.5 million this summer, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) having treated more than 52,000 persons, the greatest effect of those mental health issues has yet to be experienced. These problems and interventions were presented here at the American Public Health Association 135th Annual Meeting.

Evan Kanter, MD, PhD, staff psychiatrist in the PTSD Outpatient Clinic of the VA Puget Sound Health Care System, said that estimates are for a minimum of 300,000 psychiatric casualties from service in Iraq, to this point, with an estimated lifetime cost of treatment of $660 billion. That is more than the actual cost of the war to date ($500 billion).

"A study of the first 100,000 [Iraq and Afghanistan] veterans seen at VA facilities showed that 25% of them received mental health diagnoses. Of these, 56% had 2 or more mental health diagnoses. The most common were PTSD, substance abuse, and depression," Dr. Kanter said. "The younger the veterans are, the more likely they are to have mental health conditions."

Evaluation immediately on return from deployment suggested that 5% of active duty and 6% of reserve personnel had a significant mental health problem. When reassessed 3 to 6 months later, 27% of active duty and 42% of reserve personnel received that evaluation.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/565407


A minimum of 300,000 PTSD cases, directly attributed to this war.



May 2, 2007

Key US Army ranks begin to thin

The reenlistment rate for mid-grade enlisted soldiers dropped from 96 percent in 2005 to 84 percent in the first quarter of this year.

Washington - Thousands more mid-level enlisted soldiers are leaving the Army than in each of the past two years, forcing the service to increase its use of pay-to-stay programs and find other ways to keep GIs in the fold.

Four years into the fight in Iraq, the Army continues to be successful in retaining enough soldiers overall – "a miracle" to some observers, because the war has lasted so long. But that success masks a growing problem within the ranks: Fewer mid-grade sergeants are opting to stay in the Army as many face yet another deployment to Iraq – and, more important, Army officials say, less time at home.

While a reenlistment shortfall in any Army group is cause for concern, many consider the declining rate among mid-grade sergeants to be a sign of potential bigger reenlistment problems for the Army down the line. In addition, the fact that more mid-level soldiers are leaving could have a long-term impact on the Army's ability to grow future leaders.

The Army has seen the reenlistment rate of mid-grade enlisted soldiers drop 12 percentage points, from 96 percent during the first quarter of 2005 to a low of 84 percent for the first quarter of 2007, according to Pentagon data. As of March, the Army is as much as 10 percentage points behind where it was in retaining mid-grade soldiers at that time in 2005 and 2006. (The overall retention goal for mid-grade soldiers in fiscal year 2006 was about 25,000.)

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0502/p01s01-usmi.html


Declining re=enlistment numbers....

And in response ?

The maximum age limit for enlistment increased to 42 years old, seven years older than it was in Jan 2006.

A fifteen month enlistment minimum, down from two years previously.

A tripling of enlistment bonuses for the National Guard.


Armed services having trouble finding qualified recruits

By Otto Kreisher CongressDaily March 24, 2008

The armed services' struggle to attract the number of young men and women needed each year to maintain their required force levels is increasingly handicapped by a hard set of demographic facts that sharply reduces the pool of potential recruits and by emotional barriers that may block access to the best prospects.

"We should not lose sight of the fact that, although the youth population is large, a relatively small proportion of American youth is qualified to enlist," David Chu, undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness, testified recently. "It is an unfortunate fact that many in the contemporary youth population are currently ineligible to serve."

Chu and service officials point out that only about three of every 10 Americans of military age -- generally considered 17 to 24 years old -- can meet the standards for military service.

In testimony to Congress, Chu cited the grim statistics: About 35 percent are medically disqualified, with obesity a large contributing factor; 18 percent are barred due to a record of abusing drugs or alcohol; 5 percent have serious conduct/criminal problems; 6 percent have too many dependents, and 9 percent scored in the lowest aptitude category on the enlistment test. Another 10 percent are qualified but considered unavailable because they are attending college.

That leaves fewer than 5 million potential recruits out of the total of about 31 million Americans of age to serve in the military. From that reduced field, the services need about 300,000 recruits a year for their active, reserve and National Guard forces.

The number of potential recruits is reduced by the Pentagon's requirement -- based on years of studies on what qualities indicate a high probability of being able to perform necessary tasks and completing a term of enlistment -- that 90 percent of recruits have a high school diploma, or a GED.

Nationally, 70 percent of young people graduate from high school, with the averages as low as 50 percent in some urban areas and among minorities. Military recruiting officials note that many young people with high school diplomas cannot pass the enlistment tests.

http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=39592&dcn=todays_most_popular


Declining enlistment standards.


February 2, 2008

Declining Army standards


THE U.S. Army met its enlistment goal of 66,000 new recruits in 2007, but that happened, in part, because the Pentagon lowered its educational standards.

At the same time, reports continue to circulate documenting increased gang activity in the military.

That's not to say that these troubling trends are interrelated, but they are occurring in tandem for the first time, which does not bode well for the discipline and readiness of America's voluntary forces.

A study from the National Priorities Project, a Massachusetts-based research group that has been outspoken in its opposition to the Iraq war, reports that the percentage of new recruits entering the Army with a high school diploma declined last year to just under 71 percent, its lowest level in 25 years. In 2005 the comparable figure was a little more than 83 percent.

In addition, the percentage of recruits designated as "high quality," those with both a high school diploma and a score in the top half on the Armed Forces Qualification Test, declined from 56 percent two years ago to 45 percent last year.

To make matters worse, the study found a secondary trend: A disproportionate number of recruits are coming from families earning less than $60,000 per year.

The Army's stated goal of 90 percent of its recruits having a high school diploma is based on research, including a 2004 Pentagon report, that suggested a high school diploma was a good predictor of a recruit's success in the military. But the Army admits it hasn't met that goal since 2004.

http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=101733




March 08, 2008
A senior Defense official says U.S. military recruitment is declining despite studies suggesting the armed forces are more diverse and educated than ever, The Washington Times reported Friday.

David Chu, undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness, and other military and data analysts discussed the issue Thursday at the Heritage Foundation, the Times reported.

The longevity of the Iraq war, a negative view of military life and rising obesity rates nationwide were cited as principal reasons for the decline, the Times noted.

About a third of potential military recruits are rejected because of an inability to meet physical standards, according to Department of Defense material presented by Chu, the paper reported.

Lawrence Kapp, a specialist in military manpower policy for the Congressional Research Service, said it is difficult to convince high school graduates that the military is a viable and worthy endeavor. CRS studies reveal a large number of people with the "propensity to enlist," but 85 percent of them don't, according to the Times.

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,163553,00.html


Military equipment wearing out faster, and increasing costs.

Military Equipment Takes a Beating in Iraq

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are taking a toll not only on U.S. troops, but also on their equipment — the tanks and Humvees and helicopters. The Pentagon is asking Congress for more than $13 billion to repair and replace machinery.

"The extended use of the vehicles in theatre of course, just the desert itself causes more wear and tear on the vehicles," Wescott says. "As well as some of them have sustained battle damage and so forth. So they do the repairs here, and when it comes back, it's in like new condition."

Getting equipment back into new condition can be challenging. Many vehicles have severe body damage or are in need of complete engine overhauls. Out of a recent group of 38 Humvees that arrived here, only eight ran. Sgt. Ceferino Lopez — a mechanic from New York — says vehicles coming back from the Middle East often look ready for the junkyard.

"Some of them, they've been hit with who knows what over there, ran over who knows what over there, or just got smashed into," Lopez says. "You know, if you're taking fire from one side or the other, and people have a tendency to either hit the brake or hit the gas. And if someone hits the brake in front when you while you hit the gas behind them, they come back pretty messed up, some of them."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7662481


God what's wrong with this picture ?

Thinking that allowing all of this to happen is "good" for the military, and the nation's future, and thinking supporting the troops doesn't mean considering this aspect of the situation whatsoever before rendering an opinion.

That's what's wrong.
 Ralph C.
Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 233
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 5:37:22 PM
My Dearest Papa Whiskey;
Are we talking about democracy not communism, question how was the weather in Canada when you defected back in you're day?

Take Care
RALPH8119/Not Ralphy
 Ralph C.
Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 234
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 5:48:59 PM
Montreal guy;
With all due respect too all you wrote and my friend I'm not going to dispute anything, (No Time) all I have to write is WAR IS HELL! WAR KILLS ! WAR MIMES! WAR HARMS! WAR ISN'T PRETTY! But guess what bud, war in the past, present, future will guarantee you're freedom too write this crap any time any place!
Thank you
Ralph8119
 OneBlend
Joined: 3/31/2007
Msg: 235
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 6:14:54 PM
I support our troops - bring them back home and alive and direct your anger to those who have encouraged this illegal "for profit" bloodbath. Many of these young boys were lured into joining the services by false promises of a free education, college tuition or were encouraged by those who believed the lies. Don't think there aren't many out there who haven't contemplated a way out. They should be free to walk, but instead they are stuck by contractual obligations.

Yes, support them. Bring them home.


At least you have the option to vote there are people in Afghanistan and Iraq that have died and will continue to die for that very privilidge you take for granted.

We have the option to vote but our elections are not fair elections. (Two terms for GWB) Is there a remote possibility the people weren't stupid enough to vote him in twice and our elections process is predetermined before we even get the chance to step out to the voters booth? Don't kid yourself.
 Ralph C.
Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 236
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 6:38:29 PM
Dear Oneblend;
So much hate for G.W.B. who are you going too hate in the next administration, Obama, Clinton, McCain, or GOD!!!!!
Please take care
Ralph8119
 bernie62
Joined: 1/20/2008
Msg: 237
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 7:00:17 PM
I agree with crazytimes totally, (well done you and your colleagues) brave men and ladies with more about them than most of us care to display but I am sure enjoy the ultimate freedom if gives us.

I am in the police force and deal with anti social youths on the streets a lot! personally I would have them all signed up and teach them respect for others and themselves!

Keep safe all current serving and past members of the armed forces xx
 woodenmike
Joined: 6/17/2007
Msg: 238
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 7:58:13 PM
We're supposed to be a REPUBLIC, not the Socialist survailance state we've become.

"War Mimes?" And I thought submarines were the silent service!

What freedom? Try practicing it on these boards! Ain't happening.

The current "war" is part of eliminating any opposistion to the "New World Order", the Global police state.

Nobody's getting freedom from this war, except the criminal politicians, global corporations, and bankers who want to be free to enslave the world.

Anybody that hates the Bush, Obama, the Clintons, and McCain is alright in my book!

While they all may think they're "God", I think they are much closer to Satan.
 grog27
Joined: 2/25/2005
Msg: 239
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 8:01:43 PM
"Thank God we have a Government that seeks freedom and democracy for all citizens on earth..."

And where is it, exactly, that you live?
Obviously NOT the U.S.A., since their government is totally corrupt and any actions they undertake on foreign soil have absolutely bugger all to do with "freedom and democracy."


"God what's wrong with this picture!"
--- Take a look at who's squatting in the White House.


"I have and always will support democracy whether here or abroad"
--- Perhaps you could give us your definition of "democracy."
Somehow, I don't think it will coincide with what people normally think of when they hear the word 'democracy.'
 Ralph C.
Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 240
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 8:06:41 PM
God Wooden Mike;
New world order, global police state, banker's, slaves, criminal politicians on both sides, white, black, brown people, SOCIALIST STATE WILL BECOME SOON, HATE, HATE, HATE, HATE, brother who do you love?

Ralph8119
 Witless Renegade
Joined: 5/13/2007
Msg: 241
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 8:20:41 PM
Of course it's possible to support the troops and be against the war. I was recent active duty and it didn't bother me one bit that some or a lot of civilians were against the wars, as long as they were respectful and didn't act like arrogant turds by spitting, protesting our recruiting centers, protesting at funerals, or try to hamper or harm the actual troops. The one thing that did piss me off with the anti-war crowd is that many seem to think that the average soldier or Marine is an ignorant fool, now I know it's probably just a minority of the crowd and they probably don't even realize they are coming off as arrogant but there seemed to be a fairly vocal belief that we only joined because we're "ignorant" of what's really going on, which just isn't true and is insulting.
 Ralph C.
Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 242
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/30/2008 8:23:28 PM
Grog27;
Living in Canada safe and sound in a socialist Government I wouldn't complain about another country which is and always will be their for you and you're family, the planes didn't hit the towers in Toronto or any city in the great country of Canada so bud back off my president!
What's wrong with this picture is that the complaining has nothing to do with this post, as always the left looks too use any opportunity to few their hate for this administration hey good luck, enjoy, call me names, the truth will never change, this war abroad may have had it flaws but better fight there then the middle east then here at home, their is a war people like it or not

Crap I'm tried choa
Ralph8119
 Zeppolino
Joined: 2/25/2008
Msg: 243
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/31/2008 2:06:37 AM
Wow! A lot of vitriol and flak flying around out there. The thread has veered off into territory outside of the original question, and seems to have touched off more than several nerves.

I don't want to debate politics. This is about our brothers and sisters, Americans no different than you and I, except that they freely signed an oath knowing that it could well cost them their lives, their bodies, their well being. They are our flesh and blood. I cannot imagine the terror and intensity of facing fire. It seems to me unconscionable to not have a great amount of respect for each and every one of them. The next thing I would add is genuine concern. Somehow I believe that just thinking about them helps sustain them. My applause to those that started programs to give cell phones, toiletries, write letters, etc., as I imagine these things bring some form of comfort and a little bit of home to an arrid, difficult environment.

I'd like to share a story with you. A few years back I was working at one of the big bookstores, running the search services. An elderly gentleman walked up and asked me whether we had a book on the P-47's. As I looked it up we got to talking. I was a WWII airplane lover, and he said "I flew the P-47. In fact I flew one in the invasion of Normandy". To my disappointment (and his), no such book could be found. He was on his way out, thanking me for trying when I said,"No, thank YOU sir, for what you did." Tears welled up in his eyes and he said, "No one has ever thanked me before". Then I started crying to think of this humble yet proud man who had gone 56 years without being thanked.

So to all you soldiers out there, let me say THANK YOU.
 Montreal_Guy
Joined: 3/8/2004
Msg: 244
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/31/2008 7:13:06 AM

WAR IS HELL! WAR KILLS ! WAR MIMES! WAR HARMS! WAR ISN'T PRETTY!


I know.

I've talked with enough vets to know.....I'll never know it as they do. There will always be that wall between combat vets and anyone else who isn't.

Lucky that war is that horrible, otherwise we might really enjoy it all far too much.


But guess what bud, war in the past, present, future will guarantee you're freedom too write this crap any time any place!


That crap is called free expression in a democracy, the very thing this war's supposed to be about....isn't it ?

It's based on research, and talking corresponding with some vets (and friends and family of them) - including some from Iraq.

I didn't pull it out of a hat.

There's one thing that's quite easily found in a good combat unit. You know your brother/sister has your back, and you know no one's going to get left behind.

Soldiers have an obligation to defend us, and we have a responsibility to defend them too. If you see a military placed under great strain, then you speak out. You speak out because there are a lot of "military supporters" out there that simply enjoy the parades, flags, and martial music. They seek refuge in jingoism, while not really thinking much about the consequences of their actions.

People like Col. David H. Hackworth (now deceased) tore into this army and it's leaders regularly on his site. He didn't mince words.

http://www.hackworth.com/index2.html

And you CAN be against this war, and fully support the men and women fighting it - and making sure they get the back up they need every step of the way. Leaders start wars, not soldiers. They do what they have taken an oath to do.

No matter what you think about the war, never disrespect the warrior.
 woodenmike
Joined: 6/17/2007
Msg: 245
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 3/31/2008 10:23:59 AM

God Wooden Mike;
New world order, global police state, banker's, slaves, criminal politicians on both sides, white, black, brown people, SOCIALIST STATE WILL BECOME SOON, HATE, HATE, HATE, HATE, brother who do you love?

Ralphy8119


I love the patriots who have the balls to stand up to tyrany.

I love the soldiers and their families who are being fed bullshit by the criminal politicians, I support the troops, NOT the government.

I love the American people who have had enough of the broomstick up the keister.

I love Ed and Elaine Brown, Sherry Jackson, the Lakotah Nation, the Navajo Nation, all the RON PAUL supporters, Dave Von Kliest and Joyce Reily, Pastor Butch Paugh, Alex Jones, all the posters on here who see through the politicians lies, Officer Jack McLamb, the guys on the Egnar Fire department with me, the Farmers who are fighting against the N.A.I.S., all the Veterans here who are ready and willing to fight against all enemies of the United States Constitution, both foreign AND domestic.

I love the United States of America, the United States Constitution, our sovereignty and our liberty.

I love the freedom to worship as I please, to speak freely, to voice my opinion without fear of reprisal, to own a firearm to protect my property, my family, my country, and my liberty.

I love my neighbors, my dogs, my community, and my service to my community.


Have a nice day, little Ralphy!
 Enigma252
Joined: 3/1/2008
Msg: 246
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 4/4/2008 3:07:33 PM
Yes, I send money to several charitable organizations. It's not much but I wish I could do more, such as visit the hospitals.
 packrat500
Joined: 1/13/2008
Msg: 247
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 4/5/2008 10:40:35 AM
troops, yes. war,no
 trubblemakr
Joined: 4/29/2006
Msg: 248
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 4/5/2008 11:01:34 AM
ill support the troops , ill start making coffins today. im a carpenter and im sure i can make rectangles with lids
what a joke support troops
the only people these morons are protecting is the rich parasites that start wars
your rights and mine all dissappear whenever someone starts one of these fights

as far as that loud mouth that attacks anyone who differs from his " kiss a soldier" mentality. well dude grab a brain and then a life
what rights do you think u can possibly lose from iraquis wishing to live the way they choose to?
if it wasnt for yankies tryin to force capitalism and opportunism down everyones throat, we wouldnt have any wars
perhaps you can read, try reading the history of the last 30 yrs, yanks have been at the middle of every single skirmish
they have been creating trouble and wars, just so they have a market for their guns and ammunition
and ralph..... where exactly do you see any remote signs of democracy?
a real democracy requires a minimum of 51% of total population to vote in order for anyone to assume control. there isnt a democracy in north america or on this planet



--------------------------------------------
I love the patriots who have the balls to stand up to tyrany.

I love the soldiers and their families who are being fed bullshit by the criminal politicians, I support the troops, NOT the government.
-----------------------------------------------
and to this guy, when the government turns on its people and calls for marshall law, who exactly do you think will be the ones marching down YOUR street with machine guns and calling for curfews?
its happened in may countries, when u have people stupid enuf to goto war when they "know" full well that it isnt a justified war. how much resistance do you think these people will put up when they get turnedloose on the populations of towns the government labels as traitors or terrorists
they are killing babies over there, children mothers pregnant women , men , alll types and forms of people
this is how the government desensitizes these robots
pretty soon they kill just for the hell of it
they get off doin it
i could see supporting them prior to their brainwashing , but when they come home, they are never going to be the samepeople you remember they used to be

 designingwoman
Joined: 9/4/2005
Msg: 249
view profile
History
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 4/5/2008 11:14:02 AM
We do have a plutocracy (rule by and for the rich) in the USA. There are a few nations that have democracies such as Sweden. Sweden is best rated in the world in terms of its democratic policies.

While I support the troops--I've sent care packages, and a club I belong to clips coupons for the Overseas Coupon Program so that military families stationed overseas can save money at the BX--I do not support the war in Iraq. It's time to end it and move on. The troops are needed elsewhere and there are other breeding grounds for terrorists that are being ignored (at our peril!) around the globe due to this crazy fixation on Iraq.

Bush is the last kind of "man" who should have been president--an AWOL coward trying to prove he has "balls" at the expense of our troops and Iraqi civilians.
 NewWayHome
Joined: 9/20/2006
Msg: 250
Do you really support our troops?
Posted: 8/28/2008 9:18:32 PM
This was the most current 'support our troops' thread I was able to find.

I'd like to take a moment to ask people to remove the crosses that they're applying to their profiles, in support of our troops.

American soldiers do not march under a cross, this is not a crusade. American soldiers march under the stars and stripes.

Many American soldiers are not Christian and do not embrace the symbol of the cross. If you use it, you are supporting only the Christian soldiers in our armed forces, and you are insulting the Jews, Muslims, Bhuddists, Hindus and myriad other religions represented in our armed forces.

I hope I have not upset anyone with this post, but it really bothers me when I see that support our troops cross on profiles. The crusades ended almost a thousand years ago and this is not a war against Islam.

Please, try a star, instead of a cross. If you're Canadian, go for a maple leaf. British, the Union Jack.

I served my country, and my son is serving it now. He'll be going to Iraq or Afghanistan by October. He's a Bhuddist. What do your crosses say to him? Do you support my son, the Marine, who might die for this country very soon?

If you do, take down your crosses.
Show ALL Forums  > Current Events  > Do you really support our troops?