Free Dating Site    

I would have thought that term died after the 8th grade. It is so degrading and judgemental. As far as players are concerned, it is mostly used by silly women who believe everything they read about a man. Most stupid men are players in their own mind.

That is really double standards within your own class of social deviants!!!
That is very much laughable. You can not even accept your own breed of the similiar/same social deviant behaviours. If "slut" is a society's term for deviant behaviors, "male slut", "pig" and "dog" are just as descriptive for the deviant behaviour of the men.

A woman should be a slut to her man and only to her man...but a many men's slut is a cheap /free whore , which is very degrading to the woman. The end result is the men disrespect the female gender.

All these women who are NOT cheap/free whores are complaining that men are players, I wonder what/who has contributed to the problem?

Some of you may coin it as sexual liberation , freedom of choice or spice of life, I simply think it is a cover-up for shame, disrespect of self and lack of dignity.

I am NOT condoning the behavior. I am just explaining the instinctual reason behind what men want to do. And because men behave or want to behave a certain way by instinct, we had an entire movement that encouraged women to go and do the same even if it went against their own instinct, just to remove the so called "unfairness" and " inequality" in society.

But that's what liberalism is. It sees natural differences and inequalities in society and FORCES equality through legislation. Because otherwise it would be "unfair" to some. If some entrepreneurial types make it big and make a lot of money, they deem that unfair as if the money was ill gotten and then confiscate their wealth through punitive taxes. If some in school excel or consistently do better than others, it's deemed unfair to the "disadvantaged" and the whole thing is dumbed down or the high achievers are graded harshly until everybody does well and no one feels left out.

Research indicates that nature is working towards generating humans that more balanced in their sexual orientation and biology than in the past

One of the reasons we know this is if that was the way as a species we were, then men find a woman, shoots his load, job done. But research has found out that 90 percent of a man's sperm is not designed to swim and find that one egg.

You twisted my words. see msg 25, that is the mentality of most men. The "wrong thing" which is the social deviants behaviour is acceptable when they are the subjects but NOT acceptable when the women in his own classification mirroring the men's social deviant behaviour.

but a many men's slut is a cheap /free whore

You are saying something like, "If you do the wrong thing, you should be punished".

I would have thought that term died after the 8th grade. It is so degrading and judgemental.

For me it is leading on... saying that you want something else then to get laid so that you can get laid...
If you are honest in what you ask for and if both parties agree then no slut, no player...
it is as simple as the communication involved and that is it as far as i can tell!

There are things that people...not just women can do that perhaps would label them a "slut" or sexually irresponsible.

For me they are...Having sex with someone for what they have or will buy for you..."expensive dinner slut"

No I would not consider such individual to be a slut...
Nor such man in her case..

Any new "research" and it's findings mean little to me until I find out who the researchers are, the source of their funding , their political beliefs and the hidden political agenda behind the "research".

From the research you mentioned I have little doubt who they are and what they want us to believe but I will hold comment. Can you cite who the researchers are..or point me to their website ?

This is a stupid way to evaluate research.

So if you found out that the researchers were [insert whatever here] then would you instantly dismiss the research? That's a logical fallacy my friend - poisoning the well.

Typically you should evaluate the methods, the findings, etc. Check for peer review. But to start an evaluation of research with a quest to ferret out biases is profoundly absurd.

Again if this was his situation.... as the woman's in the original post....
NO... I would not hesitate....
Why??

(GEEZ, watch this come back and bite me in the ass... caling me a whore, **** , slut)....

I actually consider a player a player because I don't think it is about just going out for a hook up to me that is a hook up a player for me anyway is someone who pretends to be into you totaly until they get their way, then they drop you like a hot potato!

Sex is a gift from God and should be accorded the same respect! I don't care if your married or not, it should be between 2 consenting adults for all the right reasons not because your lonely, horny, available or hoping to connect.

If there honest & upfront, they are niether Sluts or Players... If they hide what they are after by deceptions,I guess thats the only time you could label them....