online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Current Events  > Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'      Mod Threads Home login  
Page 40 of 41 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41
 Author Thread: Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 976
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/15/2009 7:29:18 AM

... the greedy, killer Zionists ...


Keep it up. You sound ever more shrill every time you post.

We just had no better a lesson in the discrepancies between Israel and it’s neighbors than the recent Iranian election. The election was obviously rigged, with the result broadcast long before the polls even closed, allowing an avowed Israel/Jew-hater and Holocaust denier to keep his presidency. As was reported, Iranian authorities shut down all electronic messaging (Internet, texting, twittering) in order to quell dissent and disrupt any coordinated response by the opposition, also detaining opposition candidates for “questioning”, but since the median age demographic in Iran is under 25-yrs-old, this medieval reaction by the real rulers, the council of conservative mullahs, to a growing thirst for moderation is bound to fail.

Obama is the best weapon this country has when it comes to fighting the militant message of those who hate us. I firmly believe his recent speech in Cairo galvanized the opposition in Iran and made things tough for the political status quo. We need more of this, not less. The only way to combat the distorted and mindless propaganda against us is to expose the hypocrisy, denial, and lies of the messengers.

Mo
 cotter

Joined: 10/17/2005
Msg: 977
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/15/2009 10:30:38 AM

Keep it up. You sound ever more shrill every time you post.
All posters have the same options in here. If they don't like what someone has posted ... they don't have to read it and they don't have to respond to it.

... allowing an avowed Israel/Jew-hater ...
The man merely stated that as long as the greedy, killer Zionists are heading up the regime in Israel, there can be no peace. I agree with that. If he hated "Jews", why are there "Jews" still living in Iran?

The only way to combat the distorted and mindless propaganda against us is to expose the hypocrisy, denial, and lies of the messengers.
The only way to combat ANY distorted and mindless propaganda is to expose the hypocrisy, denial, and lies of the messengers.

That's why I have been encouraging people to read that article that exposes how the press is not really covering the Israeli / Palestinian problem fairly. We're only getting one side of the story ... we're getting the side of the story that represents the owners of those newspapers and the ONLY side they want us to know about.

For those of us who have friends there and tell us what is really going on ... we have a whole different view of things ... eh? Many do not speak out because they are afraid they will be chastised as is done to me, but I just don't care. I could care less how many degrading remarks are posted about me because of what I post. The main thing for me is that I'm finding the websites to point out the atrocities and shed light on it.

I believe with appropriate exposure of what is really going on, others too might understand why I have such strong feelings about the land-grabbing, the killing, that the Zionists are perpetuating.

I still say that if we are going to continue to support the genocide, the torture, the land grabbing ... we might as well be there pulling the trigger, breaking those bones, running the bulldozers as well.

---->>>As long as we continue to turn our heads and support and finance that kind of behavior ... behavior we know is used to recruit more terrorists and trigger more hate for the US ... we WILL BE their targets.

Ironically, we got that information WITHOUT torturing anyone ... it was given to us openly and freely by many of those interrogated without the use of water boarding.

But that's not the kind of information the "Shrub" and the "C0ck" were looking for, so that was just not important.

Well, it's important to EVERYONE who has been affected by the loss of life as a result of illegally invading a sovereign nation related to false confessions given while being illegally tortured. What about all those Iraqis who have paid for it dearly with their lives?

It's important to EVERYONE here in the US who has lost a soldier or loved one because of an illegal invasion of a sovereign nation.

It's important to EVERYONE who has lost so much through it that they can no longer even afford the roof over their head and their loved one has been cast out by the VA.

It's important to EVERYONE who has welcomed home a loved one who has been maimed, mutilated, or mentally impacted/impaired as a result of an illegal invasion of a sovereign nation ... becoming a person who can no longer function appropriately to support their family or be an equal partner to their spouse or parent their children.

Consider the hate for their government these children and family members must be feeling that because their government tortured people into false confessions and then illegally invaded a sovereign nation, their lives have now forever been impacted in a very negative way.

Who needs to go on foreign soil to recruit people who hate us? We have enough of it growing here at home.

But that's not something anyone wants to hear ... eh?

I hear it when I go out and take care of the families that have been abandoned by our government as a result of the illegal war.

And people have the gull to insinuate "Torturing saved lives"?
 Kaos86

Joined: 3/7/2007
Msg: 978
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/15/2009 10:41:29 AM

Consider the hate for their government these children and family members must be feeling that because their government tortured people into false confessions and then illegally invaded a sovereign nation, their lives have now forever been impacted in a very negative way.

Probably similar to the feelings of the families of Daniel Pearl and the 911 victims.


And people have the gull to insinuate "Torturing saved lives"?

Now don't tell me birds were tortured.
We will not stand for this.
Oh the gall of those evil torturers. First dogs barking and now bird mutilations.

Well one thing this froum achieved, if not consensus on "waterboarding saving lives" we did expose a couple Jew hating race baiting thugs.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 979
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/15/2009 11:50:28 AM
Yep, Kaos. The problem with critics is they NEVER hold terrorists up to the same standards of those who fight them. Terrorists are given a free pass while our military and intelligence services are scrutinized, ridiculed, and demonized to the point of comedy. For once, instead of saying how "evil" we are, I'd like to hear critics give an unqualified acceptance that the terrorist agenda is wrong and their brutal tactics need to be answered. Instead I get terrorist apologists that equate Israel with Nazi Germany and America as the worst evil that ever befell the universe. Completely idiotic reasoning that defies intelligent debate.
 cotter

Joined: 10/17/2005
Msg: 980
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/20/2009 6:54:41 PM

... I'd like to hear critics give an unqualified acceptance that the terrorist agenda is wrong ...
Seems to me that when you go around antagonizing others, there will be some sort of fall out ... eh? So suck it up and evaluate what it is you're doing to antagonize others and stop doing it.

When we go around supporting terrorist behavior ... which we do ... and also unilaterally invade sovereign nations (also terrorist behavior) ... then it's a big possibility that there will be others who do not view that approvingly. Hmmmm ... maybe we should be more picky about who we support and in what way? Maybe we should be more careful about going around illegally invading sovereign nations?

OT ...
Maybe we shouldn't have been water boarding people into false confessions about something we already knew didn't exist? Look at how many lives were affected by that.

It's pretty apparent that water boarding did not save lives ... but it did ruin a lot of lives.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 981
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/23/2009 5:55:23 PM
When we go around supporting terrorist behavior ... which we do


How? Show me where we have a national policy of supporting terrorist organizations?

... and also unilaterally invade sovereign nations (also terrorist behavior) ... Maybe we should be more careful about going around illegally invading sovereign nations?


The first WTC bombing happened BEFORE Iraq. 9-11 happened BEFORE Iraq. The African embassy bombings, Khobar Towers, and USS Cole happened BEFORE Iraq. Your irrational hate for Bush makes you distort facts and squeeze everything through the prism of Iraq.

FACT: Radical terrorism has been around way before Iraq was even a glimmer in the Bush administration's eye.

FACT: Bush didn’t invent or create modern international terrorism. Its exact origins maybe disputed, but the general consensus is it first germinated in the late 1960’s, and not by the policies of the United States, but by the Soviet Union.

FACT: The plans for 9-11 were finalized “before” Bush was even elected. Bin Laden and al Qaeda had NO way of knowing who would win the 2000 election, Gore or Bush. They were dedicated to 9-11 no matter WHO won.

FACT: Bush is no longer in office, and the policies of Obama by "any" stretch of the imagination can NEVER be compared to Bush’s, yet Bin Laden, as spokesperson for the terrorists movement, still vilifies Obama with the same amount of venom and vitriol. This tells “any” reasonably intelligent person that it’s NEVER been about Bush and ALWAYS been about hatred for what the US and the West stand for.

I also need to go back to a previous post…

Me: Let's just agree murder and terrorism in the advancement of "any" religion is morally wrong and shouldn't be tolerated.

You: No problem agreeing with that.


You’re hypocritical. Your own words in too many posts to count goes against the position above?

You accept radical Islamic terrorists who recruit suicide bombers to kill themselves and murder innocents in the name of Allah (an absolute and unambiguous religious motive).

Radical imams or surrogate leaders teach hate and violence and death to all non-believers in hundreds, probably thousands, of madrasses (Islamic teaching centers) throughout the world. These centers are the incubators and hothouses of hate that stoke the fires of radical Islamic terrorism. They are the most direct method used to replenish the ranks of suicide fighters and spread indoctrination to more impressionable minds to create even more grist for the terrorist mill. The 'scale" of this should be of definite concern, that is if what you wrote is really true.

The terrorist agenda is steeped in religious idolatry and cloaked in explicit religious foundation. This isn’t happening in the Middle Ages or centuries ago, or even 60 years ago, but right now—it’s the present state of affairs. To pretend otherwise or throw all the blame on Bush is ridiculous.

If you think I’m making all this up you really need to educate yourself. All you need do is make a quick search using keywords like “the roots of Islamic terrorism” and you’ll get back literally thousands of articles detailing it. Some you can dismiss out of hand depending on the source, but most are written by reputable authors from respected publications or prestigious centers of academia. People that are experts on Islam and know exactly what they’re talking about.
 Montreal_Guy

Joined: 3/8/2004
Msg: 982
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/23/2009 6:41:10 PM

How? Show me where we have a national policy of supporting terrorist organizations?


Did the USA ever take much of a strong stance against IRA supporters, and the collection of money there ? The Armalite AR-18 was perhaps one of the most iconic weapons used in that struggle, and it was supplied to the IRA by American citizens - as were millions of dollars.

OK, that's an error of omission, one set against an "official" policy of seeing it as a illegal terrorist organization.

Perhaps a better example is US (and Western) efforts to subvert legitimate democratic leaders, and or eliminate them. One can trace a long pattern of this type of covert effort through the history of the Middle East and South and Central America. America (and again other Western countries) fully supported such efforts, and those efforts involved "freedom fighters" ......which is what the other fellow (at the other end of the gun) calls a terrorist.

The overthrow of the legitimate leader of Iran ?


The ejection of Western oil companies from their Iranian refineries triggered the Abadan Crisis and nearly caused a war. Britain accused Mosaddeq of violating the legal rights of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company and mobilized a worldwide boycott of Iran's oil that plunged Iran into financial crisis. The British government tried to enlist the United States in planning a coup, but President Harry S. Truman refused. However, his successor Dwight D. Eisenhower allowed the CIA to embark on its first covert operation against a foreign government.The British and U.S. spy agencies replaced the government of the popular Prime Minister Mosaddeq with an all-powerful monarch, Mohammed Reza Pahlevi who ruled for the next 26 years until he was overthrown in 1979.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat


The horrific abuse under the Shah was what helped to spark the Islamic Revolution, three decades later.

The SOA ?


The School of the Americas (SOA), in 2001 renamed the “Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation,” is a combat training school for Latin American soldiers, located at Fort Benning, Georgia.

Initially established in Panama in 1946, it was kicked out of that country in 1984 under the terms of the Panama Canal Treaty. Former Panamanian President, Jorge Illueca, stated that the School of the Americas was the “biggest base for destabilization in Latin America.” The SOA, frequently dubbed the “School of Assassins,” has left a trail of blood and suffering in every country where its graduates have returned.

Over its 59 years, the SOA has trained over 60,000 Latin American soldiers in counterinsurgency techniques, sniper training, commando and psychological warfare, military intelligence and interrogation tactics. These graduates have consistently used their skills to wage a war against their own people. Among those targeted by SOA graduates are educators, union organizers, religious workers, student leaders, and others who work for the rights of the poor. Hundreds of thousands of Latin Americans have been tortured, raped, assassinated, “disappeared,” massacred, and forced into refugee by those trained at the School of Assassins.

http://www.soaw.org/type.php?type=8


Death squads killing innocent people, whose only crime was to support the rights of their people to a better life.


The worst of the military's violent purging from society of thousands of Chilean Leftists and suspected Leftists — by killing or forced disappearance — occurred in the first months after the U.S.-sponsored coup d’état. The military imprisoned 40,000 of their political enemies in the National Stadium of Chile; among the tortured and killed desaparecidos were U.S. citizens Charles Horman , and Frank Teruggi. Chilean song-writer Víctor Jara, and other 70 political killings were perpetrated by the death squad, Caravan of Death (Caravana de la Muerte) in October 1973.

Some 130,000 people were arrested in a three-year period; the dead and disappeared numbered thousands in the first months of the military government. Those include the British physician Sheila Cassidy, who later brought awareness to the UK public of human rights violations in Chile. Among those detained was Alberto Bachelet (father of incumbent Chilean President Michelle Bachelet), an air force official; he was tortured and died on 12 March 1974, . The right-wing newspaper, El Mercurio (The Mercury), reported that Mr Bachelet died after a basketball game, citing his poor cardiac health. Michelle Bachelet and her mother were imprisoned and tortured in the Villa Grimaldi detention and torture centre on 10 January 1975.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_Chilean_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat


That's another Sept 11th, that people in another nation still remember. I've talked with a few of them, who moved to Montreal to escape the horror of that US sponsored reality.

I won't even start to speak about Pinochet, and his reign, also supported by the USA.

Or Operation Condor :

"The declassified record shows that Secretary Kissinger was briefed on Condor and its 'murder operations' on August 5, 1976, in a 14-page report from Shlaudeman. 'Internationally, the Latin generals look like our guys,' Shlaudeman cautioned. 'We are especially identified with Chile. It cannot do us any good.' Shlaudeman and his two deputies, William Luers and Hewson Ryan, recommended action. Over the course of three weeks, they drafted a cautiously worded demarche, approved by Kissinger, in which he instructed the U.S. ambassadors in the Southern Cone countries to meet with the respective heads of state about Condor. He instructed them to express 'our deep concern' about 'rumors' of 'plans for the assassination of subversives, politicians and prominent figures both within the national borders of certain Southern Cone countries and abroad.'"

Kornbluh and Dinges conclude that "The paper trail is clear: the State Department and the CIA had enough intelligence to take concrete steps to thwart Condor assassination planning. Those steps were initiated but never implemented." Shlaudeman's deputy Hewson Ryan later acknowledged in an oral history interview that the State Department was "remiss" in its handling of the case. "We knew fairly early on that the governments of the Southern Cone countries were planning, or at least talking about, some assassinations abroad in the summer of 1976. ... Whether if we had gone in, we might have prevented this, I don't know," he stated in reference to the Letelier-Moffitt bombing. "But we didn't."

Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State in the Nixon and Ford administrations, was closely involved diplomatically with the Southern Cone governments at the time and well aware of the Condor plan. According to the French newspaper L'Humanité, the first cooperation agreements were signed between the CIA and anti-Castro groups, fascist movements such as the Triple A set up in Argentina by Juan Perón and Isabel Martínez de Perón's "personal secretary" José López Rega, and Rodolfo Almirón (arrested in Spain in 2006)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Condor#U.S._involvement


The list goes on and on, including the use of Islamic fundamentalists in the struggle against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Those men, some still alive today and important players, were doing the same things they did to Russian soldiers then - when they were paid operatives of US interests (albeit in many cases unknowingly) and were considered heroes by people like Reagan.


STEVE COLL: It’s interesting to go back and look at the public discourse about this. During the Reagan years in particular, it was a very superficial, certainly, Reagan often used the terminology of his, you know of freedom. These were freedom fighters. These were noble freedom fighters. I don’t want to overstate this, but the Afghans were regarded with some distance almost as noble savages in some sort of a state of purity fighting for an abstract idea of freedom. The idea that Afghanistan was a messy place filled with complexity and ethnicity and tribal structures and all of the rest of what we now understand about Afghanistan was it was generally not part of American public discourse.

http://www.democracynow.org/2004/6/10/ghost_wars_how_reagan_armed_the


So any belief that the USA somehow always wore a white hat, and never got it's hands dirty with terrorists, is based on a historical record that shows otherwise. Sadly, like so many other Western nations, that's been the case for decades.

Such interventions, done for political or resource based motivations, helped to create the Petri dish of terrorism ; the lack of education, and poverty that empowers such people to take up arms. For every stone thrown into the lake, a hundred ripples spread out across it in every direction.

Some lap at our feet, decades later, when we stand there forgetful of who threw the stone - and when.
 whiskeypapa

Joined: 5/19/2008
Msg: 983
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/23/2009 7:09:37 PM
The US founded al Queda and used it to destroy the Taraki government and drive off the Soviets using terrorist tactics clearly demonstates a national policy of supporting terroist organizations. The School Of The Americas where torture was taught to right wing extremist governments further demonstrates that fact. Israel, apparently needed no instruction in torture but its tactics were supported by the US.

While presenting the list of attacks on the US may gain some justification for the invasions of sovereign countries it must be noted that the attacks were in retaliation for US supported oppression in the Islamic world, Palestine most notable. Being paid in your own coin can cause bitterness .

The consensus on this and other threads is that torture did not save lives.

Further, the consensus is that indulging in all that is base and perverse during the Bush administration took the US to depths that the US will take a long time to recover from.
 Montreal_Guy

Joined: 3/8/2004
Msg: 984
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/24/2009 6:11:36 AM
Also , if it was as successful as claimed, it would have never been used as many times as it was on so few suspects.


C.I.A. interrogators used waterboarding, the near-drowning technique that top Obama administration officials have described as illegal torture, 266 times on two key prisoners from Al Qaeda, far more than had been previously reported.

The C.I.A. officers used waterboarding at least 83 times in August 2002 against Abu Zubaydah, according to a 2005 Justice Department legal memorandum. Abu Zubaydah has been described as a Qaeda operative.

A former C.I.A. officer, John Kiriakou, told ABC News and other news media organizations in 2007 that Abu Zubaydah had undergone waterboarding for only 35 seconds before agreeing to tell everything he knew.

The 2005 memo also says that the C.I.A. used waterboarding 183 times in March 2003 against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-described planner of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The New York Times reported in 2007 that Mr. Mohammed had been barraged more than 100 times with harsh interrogation methods, causing C.I.A. officers to worry that they might have crossed legal limits and to halt his questioning. But the precise number and the exact nature of the interrogation method was not previously known.


A footnote to another 2005 Justice Department memo released Thursday said waterboarding was used both more frequently and with a greater volume of water than the C.I.A. rules permitted.

The new information on the number of waterboarding episodes came out over the weekend when a number of bloggers, including Marcy Wheeler of the blog emptywheel, discovered it in the May 30, 2005, memo.

The sentences in the memo containing that information appear to have been redacted from some copies but are visible in others. Initial news reports about the memos in The New York Times and other publications did not include the numbers.

Michael V. Hayden, director of the C.I.A. for the last two years of the Bush administration, would not comment when asked on the program “Fox News Sunday” if Mr. Mohammed had been waterboarded 183 times. He said he believed that that information was still classified.

A C.I.A. spokesman, reached Sunday night, also would not comment on the new information.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/20/world/20detain.html


So there goes your "ticking time bomb" "24" inspired scenario, placed in it's proper context with both the number of incidents of use - as well as the breaking of standards for volume of water and frequency. It's quite a logical deduction that such measures would not have occurred had the initial session(s) been as productive as claimed.

Place that against a historical context of what constitutes effective interrogation (and that is both an art and a science) , as well as the historical moral outrage against it from the West, and you have the seeds for making a bad situation much worse.

As those much mentioned seconds tick away, one simply spends more time filling up the bucket, and endlessly repeating the same experience. Done improperly, this very action can result in brain damage or mental problems - and that starts to complicate the interrogation process.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 985
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/24/2009 7:40:10 AM
I'll say it again. Islamic terrorism has been around for decades. It was neither created nor propagated by the Bush administration. Daffy Duck could have been in office the past eight years and terrorist organizations would not have closed up shop and retired. They would have simply used some other pretext (Israel, continuing American influence in the Middle East, etc) to plan and carry out attacks.

The basic argument with critics is invading Iraq and using harsh interrogation techniques inflamed Muslim hatred and expanded terrorist recruits. We "gave" them ammunition by such acts.

What is glossed over is the foundation of terrorist hatred was already firmly in place well before these circumstances. The terrorist network that culminated in 9-11 was established and well organized before Bush even took office. In fact, it was our "response" to 9-11 and international terrorism that created the mindset that produced Iraq and the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, not what created the terrorism in the first place. Too many critics are putting the cart before the horse and distorting facts with a false scenario. Any person that's done even a cursory research into the matter should know that.

The simple truth is there hasn't been one major domestic terrorist attacks on US soil since 9-11. And I firmly believe, even with Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, etc, that hasn't come about by blind luck or terrorist bungling and incompetence, but the measures our intelligence services and law enforcement have done behind the scenes to ensure it.

I also think president Obama is the perfect antidote for the terrorist message. The fact an African-American (Hussein is his middle name, for crissakes) became president laughs in the face of their cynicism that America is dead and can't renew itself. It shows how hypocritical they are when their own platform shows their intolerance and hatred for anyone that doesn't fit their narrow definition of acceptance.

As for waterboarding, I still want "all" the evidence regarding KSM and Abu Zubaya to come out so we can truly answer the question that, in this particular instance, it really disrupted another 9-11, so saved lives.

I will agree that any instance of waterboarding, even in a "ticking time bomb" scenario, has the prospect of being de facto policy and used indiscriminately. With the fierce backlash that's come out in this case, I sincerely doubt it will ever be used again.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 986
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/24/2009 9:21:29 AM
The US founded al Queda


Citations to back this up??


While presenting the list of attacks on the US may gain some justification for the invasions of sovereign countries it must be noted that the attacks were in retaliation for US supported oppression in the Islamic world, Palestine most notable. Being paid in your own coin can cause bitterness .


Tired and flawed argument that I’ve shot down many times before. It’s one of continually apologizing for terrorists and defending their acts against us by saying, “We have it coming”.

To put that logic in starker relief, one can stretch it to the never-ending penalization of historically great European powers like Great Britain, France, and Spain. Any subsequent generation that still feels aggrieved over their ancestors past sufferings under all the acts of colonialism and conquest throughout these nations histories (which spanned “centuries”, not decades) are completely justified in reprisal attacks and terrorism against present-day civilians. Germans should forever pay for starting WW2 and perpetrating the Holocaust. Japan should never be forgiven for the trying to annex most of Asia and committing unspeakable atrocities in China and, later, during WW2. Russians should be continually penalized for enslaving half of Europe and perpetuating a reign of terror in the Eastern Bloc for 50 years. I could go on and on.

Such reasoning is patently false, illogical, and absurd. But that is exactly what you’re advocating when it comes to the US? Moreover, I for one would also “strongly” dispute putting US actions on the same level as Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, and the Soviet Union. If one does, I would be extremely skeptical about your powers of intelligent deduction.
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 987
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/24/2009 2:45:13 PM
^^^^
It does not condone the violence to say that "we had it coming", it only attempts to explain why and perhaps offer clues as to how to avoid such unpleasantness in the future.

btw. we did have it coming.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 988
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/24/2009 3:03:14 PM
btw. we did have it coming.


At least you have the guts to proudly say it. I completely disagree, but give you points for not hiding behind rhetoric and hyperbole as so many other critics do on here.

Critics say America is the greatest threat in the Middle East because of Iraq.

I happen to think finally ridding the region of Hussein and his Baathists, giving Iraqis free elections, and providing the country a chance at even a seminal form of democracy isn’t all bad? (I’d ask the leaders of Iraq’s neighbors, like Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Israel, in a moment of complete candor and honesty, if they concur with the first point, and ask ordinary Iraqis if they concur with the following two.)

However, the mistakes we made after toppling Hussein were many and profound, contributing to the later problems. Mistakes not the least of which include having nowhere near as many troops needed to insure security at the start; not having an army of civil servants, construction crews, and diplomats at the ready to fix or restore basic services and mediate local disputes before they exploded out of control; and disbanding the Iraqi army, thereby throwing hundreds of thousands of disgruntled, disaffected, angry, and most specifically, “unemployed” ex-soldiers back into a lawless population, contributing to the creation of an insurgency we later had to combat and exacerbating inter-ethnic/religious blood feuds that continue to this day. Basically, we had NO plan after the invasion, and for that I squarely place blame on the Bush administration and no one else.

But I digress ....

Are critics as outraged over the sham election and brutal crackdown against the voices of freedom by the thugs of the theocratic dictatorship in Iran? The recent “elections” laid bare to the world the Iranian government’s true stripes and vicious intent to dominate the will of its people. The absence of outrage from the critics is deafening?

Where was the critics' outrage with virtual Syrian annexation of Lebanon and its reign of terror over the Lebanese people? In case you need a refresher on that one, when the Lebanese Civil War broke out in 1975, Syria took the opportunity offered by the savagery to occupy Lebanon for thirty years. The occupation was brutal, characterized by the “disappearance” and torture of opponents, political assassinations, and exploitation of Lebanon’s economy. And, of course, Syria “still” continues to supply Hezbollah with Iranian arms, making Hezbollah a profoundly destabilizing force in Lebanese politics and a true barrier to the ultimate two-state solution for the Palestinians.

But, as with all America haters and terrorist apologists/sympathizers, outrages done by others can be explained away, minimized, and dismissed—unless, of course, there is “any” American connection (no matter how slight or tenuous) to gleefully allow a redirection of blame back on the US instead of the real culprits.

The core problem I have with critics is their amazing selectivity when it comes to US actions compared with the rest of the world. The brush they paint is certainly “not” all-encompassing and has many blind spots. I’m just calling them on it.
 Montreal_Guy

Joined: 3/8/2004
Msg: 989
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/24/2009 5:32:34 PM

I happen to think finally ridding the region of Hussein and his Baathists, giving Iraqis free elections, and providing the country a chance at even a seminal form of democracy isn’t all bad? (I’d ask the leaders of Iraq’s neighbors, like Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Israel, in a moment of complete candor and honesty, if they concur with the first point, and ask ordinary Iraqis if they concur with the following two.)


How about asking Sunni Muslims (90 percent of the Islamic world) how they feel about the creation of a SECOND Shia lead country, thanks to the USA ? There's no love lost between those two groups, and this has upset the apple cart of the Islamic world. The minority Sunnis in Iraq, the former masters, suddenly realized it was payback time from the Shia masses they'd brutalized.

Even worse, ensure it's right next door to Iran - the FIRST Shia Islamic country.

Which also reduces the historic geopolitical counterweight that Saddam provided against Iran, one that was supported by most of the Sunni Arab world - and the USA. That was the reason Saddam was such a friend to the West (and especially the US) in the first place.
 xzanthius

Joined: 9/28/2004
Msg: 990
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/24/2009 7:47:01 PM
I suggest everyone to invest a little time and research the doings of the CIA in cental and south america, southeast asia, central asia, and the middle east. You will see a consistent pattern of destabilization, coup d'etas (often to place brutal dictators), viscious proxy wars, etc. MILLIONS of innocents have died.

I know that it is hard to stay on top. I know that today's politics force superpowers to play hardball, China, Russia and much of Europe are no better, really. But just as when an individual lives by the sword and dies by the sword. So to a country, the United States (and the 'West' in general) have attracted to themselves a lot of justified rage and it is only natural that the violence will be brought home, eventually.

We had it coming.

And until we find another way of dealing with the Earth's resources than owning them and charging others for their access we will always have it coming.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 991
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/24/2009 7:59:03 PM
True, MG, many people think Bush bungled big time by allowing a Shia majority to take control in Iraq. It was actually in his interests to "keep" Saddam and the Iraqi Sunni minority in power as a counterweight to Shia-dominated Iran.

Obama's stated goal of a major withdrawal in the near future may also create the possibility of forcing Saudi Arabia to finally quit watching on the sidelines and intervene to stop a predicted Sunni genocide in the vacuum we'd leave behind.

But critics can't have it both ways now. They want American withdrawal asap and apparently don't give a damn about the consequences. I'm sure if we do get out quickly, and the result is an orgy of Shia-Sunni violence that overtakes the entire country (on a level that would make everything we've seen up to now mild by comparison), they'll probably be the first to scream it's all Obama's fault?

I would submit the problems in the region should have been the responsibility of the nations actually "inhabiting" it in the first place, but as we all know the area is patently incapable of policing themselves and have no dominant power to enforce its will for peaceful purposes, instead being comprised of petty dictatorships that are politically inept and corrupt (everywhere but Israel, of course, but I know what most people on here think of "them").
 whiskeypapa

Joined: 5/19/2008
Msg: 992
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/27/2009 9:50:57 AM
Regarding US founding of Al-Quida.

Al-Quida, (The Base) according to Robin Cook is nothing more than the computer files of the Mujihadeen operatives fighting in Afghanistan. The Mujihadeen were foreign fighters recruited from throughout the middle-east to destroy the Taraki government and drive off the soviets. They were paid indirectly by the CIA through the ISI.

Al-Quida is not a monolithic organization bent on a world-wide Caliphate but, rather, more like a mass movement; people who resist the corrupting influence of the West whos' only goal is to steal their natural resources.

The Bush administration labeled all who resisted US hegemony as Al-Quida. Every false-flag, every bonafide attack is attributed to the late Bin Laden and his so-called world-wide organization. Al-Quida is the boogyman used to extort funds for the fight against "terrorism" . A technique now used sparingly by Bushlite.

It should be noted that Iran had a democracy and constitution emulating the US as early as 1909 and again in 1959. While both were destroyed by outside forces but this amply demonstrates the ability to govern themselves without the chauvanism of the mighty US.

Enthusiasm for torture and admiration of the apartheid, torture state of "them" seems to be hand in glove, no surprise there.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 993
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/27/2009 3:32:23 PM
Brief History of al Qaeda ( http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/07272007/alqaeda.html )

1979-1989: Soviet War in Afghanistan and the beginnings of al Qaeda

The true roots of Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network stem from the decade-long conflict that plagued Afghanistan from 1979-1989. After Afghanistan was invaded by the Soviet Union, the Afghan Islamist extremists found a rallying call for their cause, as young Muslims from around the world came to Afghanistan to volunteer in what was being called a "holy war," or jihad, against the invading Soviets. One of these young Muslims was a 23 year old from Saudi Arabia named "Usama" bin Ladin.

Son of a wealthy construction magnate, bin Ladin had taken to the religious sermons of Abdullah Azzam, a Palestinian and disciple of Sayyid Qutb. While he participated in few actual battles in Afghanistan, bin Laden became known for his generous funding of the jihad against the Soviets.

However, bin Laden's ambitions extended beyond the boarders of Afghanistan, and he began to develop a complex international organization. He set up a financial support network known as the "Golden Chain," comprised mainly of financiers from Saudi Arabia and Persian Gulf states. Using this immense new fund, bin Laden and Azzam created a "Bureau of Services," which helped channel recruits for the jihad into Afghanistan. With Saudi Arabia and the United States pouring in billions of dollars worth of secret assistance to rebels in Afghanistan, the jihad against the Soviets was constantly gaining momentum.

1989-1996: Early al Qaeda attacks from Sudan

When the Soviets pulled out of Afghanistan in early 1989, bin Laden and Azzam decided that their new organization should not dissolve. They established what they called a base (al Qaeda) as a potential general headquarters for future jihad. However, bin Laden, now the clear emir of al Qaeda, and Azzam differed on where the organization's future objectives should lie. Azzam favored continued fighting in Afghanistan until there was a true Islamist government, while bin Laden wanted to prepare al Qaeda to fight anywhere in the world. When Azzam was killed in 1989, bin Laden assumed full charge of al Qaeda.

After leaving Afghanistan and being exiled by Saudi Arabia, bin Laden moved to Sudan, and with him went the base of operations for al Qaeda. From the sanctuary of Sudan, bin Laden began synching up with groups from all over the Middle East and northern Africa, and began laying the groundwork for his jihad against the West.

Beginning with a fatwa called against the United States' deployment to Somalia, bin Laden would continually plan and aid attacks against the United States. Al Qaeda trainers allegedly aided in downing two Black Hawk helicopters in 1993. Bin Laden and al Qaeda also took credit for the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. In 1995, al Qaeda associates were responsible for a car bomb that exploded outside a Saudi-U.S. joint facility in Saudi Arabia that was used to train the Saudi National Guard.

1996-2000: The rise of the Taliban resurrects al Qaeda

Due to mounting international pressure, Sudan forced bin Laden to return to Afghanistan, where he struggled to rebuild his terrorist network. It was not until the rise of the Taliban that bin Laden had al Qaeda working again, and had enough confidence to issue his 1998 fatwa against the United States and its citizens. By this time, al Qaeda had merged with the Egyptian Islamist Jihad, headed by Ayman al-Zawahri, who would become number two in command to bin Laden. Al Qaeda was now the general headquarters for international terrorism.

While previous acts by al Qaeda had involved training, funding and aiding other groups, the new refuge in Afghanistan allowed for bin Laden to take his organization to the next level. In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were attacked by terrorists, yet this time, it was planned, directed and executed solely by al Qaeda and bin Laden. Al Qaeda would also be responsible for the 2000 strike against the U.S.S. Cole in Yemen, which left 17 American sailors dead.

2001- September 11 and al Qaeda Today

On September 11, 2001 al Qaeda executed its most devastating attack against the United States, killing nearly 3,000 civilians. However, the United States military response in Afghanistan would serve to cripple al Qaeda for a significant amount of time. With the protection of the Taliban gone and bin Laden in hiding, al Qaeda became far more decentralized, with operational commanders and cell leaders making the command decisions previously made by bin Laden. However, as a recent National Intelligence Estimate report showed, al Qaeda is once again gaining strength, and has significantly rebuilt itself despite U.S. efforts.

Whatever monies the mujahideen got from the CIA via Pakistani intelligence didn't mean we "created" bin Laden and al Qaeda? His religious convictions were already fully formed and his wealth made him quite self-sufficient.

The Saudi's also bankrolled billions to the cause of funding the mujahideen in expelling the Soviets. Again, their case doesn't prove that "because" of it they hold ownership? Bin Laden is a self-made America/Western hater and terrorist that turned on his previous benefactors. His hate intensified when the Saudi's had the audacity to grant permission for US forces to be staged on sacred Saudi soil for Gulf War 1, and the US accepted. Remember, all this happened "years" after the height of the Soviet-Afghanistan War and the funding we're talking about. He hates Israel with even more venom, if that's possible, so even if the CIA had not given the mujaheddin a dime back in the day he would still hate America for its support of Israel and carried out his terrorist attacks.

Why people continually make excuses and apologize for the man still mystifies me? All the things covered above didn't even happen on Bush Jr's watch? Will his critics cut him as much slack?
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 994
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/27/2009 4:14:52 PM
And MG, regarding supporting terrorist organizations, you’re confusing what went on during a war. There is no question during the Cold War we did many reprehensible things in the name of national security, as is done by all nations in times of war. The Soviets, Soviet-controlled Eastern Bloc, their African proxies, the Chinese, Great Britain, France, Israel (in the name of national “survival”), and many others, "also" did many reprehensible things they thought justified to insure their national security. This means “many” other nations have similar blood on their hands, so please don’t single out the US.

It was a “war”, if you remember, even if it was fought clandestinely and through secret channels. Why? Because to fight openly in a conventional war would have meant WW3—nuclear Armageddon. We’d be talking about planet extinguishing, my friend, not political coups or targeted assassinations.

I for one would have gone after terrorist by targeting their leaders and taking them out, one by one. That means assassination, and I’d have no problem with it. Wouldn’t that be much more humane and preferable than an all-out war where hundreds of thousands of innocents die? Clinton secretly “tried” to take out bin Laden and always came up short. That was a loss for all the victims on 9-11. Better to deal with a few terrorist leaders than wait for things to fester and become something like a 9-11.

We're actually in another war right now, and I'm not talking Afghanistan or Iraq but the general war to combat terror and avoid another 9-11. Bin Laden and the Islamic terrorist network certainly "treat" it that way, even if they can't muster a conventional army to fight it. To pretend otherwise is silly.
 Fandango!

Joined: 4/20/2009
Msg: 995
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/27/2009 6:49:13 PM
Whiskypapa
They were paid indirectly by the CIA through the ISI.


Source please. As far as I know, the CIA gave funding in the form of weapons and bribes rather than taxable income complete with medical, dental and a golden pension or buy out plan on retirement.

Whiskypapa
Al-Quida is not a monolithic organization bent on a world-wide Caliphate but, rather, more like a mass movement; people who resist the corrupting influence of the West whos' only goal is to steal their natural resources.


You have a credible source that says Al Qaeda is going to dismantle itself if the West stops buying oil from the Middle East? And, will the Middle East use the oil themselves and starve or, will they sell it through some organization such as OPEC to the west as they are now in order to support themselves? I ask this as I can't for the life of me think of any major industry that can support a billion people in that area other than oil revenues.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 996
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/28/2009 1:06:27 AM
^^^^ So true.

The Arabic world is incredibly insular. If you take away oil, it's said the entire Arab world, from Morocco to Pakistan, produces less economically than the Finnish company Nokia. Despite its abundance of oil, the Arab world has failed to produce a single successful economy.

Statistics tell an ugly story about the state of Arab civilization. According to the U.N.'s Arab Human Development Report (2005):

There are 18 computers per 1000 citizens compared to a global average of 78.3.

Only 1.6% of the population has Internet access.

Less than one book a year is translated into Arabic per million people, compared to over 1000 per million for developed countries.

Arabs publish only 1.1% of books globally, despite making up over 5% of global population, with religious books dominating the market.

Average R&D expenditures on a per capita basis is one-sixth of Cuba's and less than one-fifteenth of Japan's.


Other information...


At the start of the century, the Arab world has 60 million illiterate adults (the majority are women) and a declining education system, which is failing to properly prepare regional youth for the challenges of a globalized economy. Educational quality is also being eroded by the growing pervasiveness of religion at all levels of the system. In Saudi Arabia over a quarter of all university degrees are in Islamic studies. In many other nations primary education is accomplished through Saudi-financed madrassas, which have filled the void left by government's abdication of its duty to educate the young.

In economic terms the combined weight of the Arab states is less than that of Spain. Strip oil out of Mideast exports and the entire region exports less than Finland. According to the transnational Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), regional economic growth is burdened by declining rates of investment in fixed capital structure, an inability to attract substantial foreign direct investment, and declining productivity — the economic trinity of disaster.

Economic stagnation coupled with rapid population growth is reducing living standards throughout the region, both comparatively and in real terms. In the heady days of the late 1970s oil boom, annual per-capita GDP growth of over 5% fueled high levels of expectations. GDP per-capita grew from $1,845 to $2,300. Today, after adjusting for inflation, it stands at $1,500, reflecting an overall decline in living standards over 30 years. Only sub-Saharan Africa has done worse. If oil wealth is subtracted from the calculations the economic picture for the mass of Arab citizens becomes dire.

Things are indeed bad in the Arab world and will get much worse.

This statement should not be read as mere opinion. While predictions of the future are usually fraught with peril, those based on demographics are, barring some unforeseen plague or truly catastrophic war, uncannily accurate. Using even the most optimistic assumption—that fertility rates drop by fifty percent in a generation—the respected Population Resource Center, based in Princeton, New Jersey, expects Arab populations to grow from 280 million to almost 460 million by 2020 and to over 600 million a generation later. On the face of it the Arab world is staring political and economic disaster in the face. Arab governments and institutions are already failing to meet basic human needs in many Arab countries. It is hard to imagine how they will cope with the stress of such a massive population increase.

Source: http://www.military.com/NewContent/0,13190,NI_0905_Arab-P1,00.html

Only about 10,000 books have been translated into Arabic in the past millennium, according to a 2003 study by the U.N. Development Program. That's less than "one" typical book store (Borders, Barnes and Noble) stocks in the US!!


The oil wealth is matched by social backwardness, and the only other region of the world with an income level lower than ours is sub-Saharan Africa. Productivity is decreasing, scientific research is virtually nonexistent, the region is suffering a brain drain, and illiteracy afflicts half of Arab women. The report was only diplomatic concerning implicit criticisms of extremist Islamist movements as a cause of the culture of backwardness and absence of fertile ground for democracy. Interestingly, the report found that the total number of books translated into Arabic yearly is no more than 330, or one-fifth of those translated in a small country like Greece.

Indeed, the total number of books translated into Arabic during the 1,000 years since the age of Caliph Al-Ma’moun [a ninth-century Arab ruler who was a patron of cultural interaction between Arab, Persian, and Greek scholars—WPR] to this day is less than those translated in Spain in one year. The report noted that Arab rulers stay in office all their lives and create dynasties that inherit power, and the peoples are unable to institute change.

The Arab development report hangs out the Arabs’ dirty washing before the world and offers a wealth of information that mars the image of the Arabs in the world...

Source: http://www.worldpress.org/Mideast/663.cfm

These are truly terrifying statistics! As anyone can see, without oil wealth the Middle East would be nothing. They have no intrinsic economic or academic productivity to speak of?

It should also be no wonder terrorist organizations can tap such a vast population for future jihadists? There is no shortage of empty, impressionable, ill-educated minds to corrupt.
 whiskeypapa

Joined: 5/19/2008
Msg: 997
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/28/2009 10:58:15 AM
This Moyers article has some errors, most notable: it begins the arrival of the mujhadeen after the soviet arrival, when in fact the CIA had already begun the attack on the Taraki government using mujhadeen fighters earlier. When the soviets arrived, at the behest of the Taraki government, the CIA was able to morph it into a holy war and recruitment of ready fighters was enabled. One of those recruited was Bin Laden.

It seems glaringly false to claim Al-quida as Bin Ladens then in the next breath, say :" With Saudi Arabia and the United states pouring billions of dollars worth of secret assistance to rebels in Afghanistan, the jihad against the Soviets was constantly gaining momentum."

Also, a Fatwa is a legal interpetation of the Koran usually issued by a learned scholar. Fatwas are not declarations of war and are as binding as the Abrahamic, Thou Shalt Not Kill.

Neither the Mujhadeen nor Bin Laden refer to themselves as Al-Quida. Al-Quida is a term used by Bushco to extort funds from a frightened congress. Like. "the boogyman is going to get you if you don't come home early." used on children. Most of the Mujhadeen in "the base" were killed during the invasion of Afghanistan with the assistance of Iran. People who monitored radio transmissions reported that Bin Laden ceased transmitting around the middle of December of 2001. It is likely he perished about that time.

This article by Moyers is self-serving and seems to have been dictated by the neocons out of the "lie factory". Blaming all attacks on US occupation forces in other countries on the monolithic Al-quida may put a face on the resistance but it is a false face used to distract from the immoral and illegal attacks by the US on those countries. You only see the attacks but the American public never asks why they are in those countries in the first place.

This last post on how evil and backward the Arabs are brings to mind the words of a great american thinker, Eric Hoffer, who wrote:

"The most effective way to silence our guilty conscience is to convince ourselves and others that those we have sinned against are indeed depraved creatures, deserving every punishment, even extermination. We cannot pity those we have wronged, nor can we be indifferent toward them. We must hate and persecute them or else leave the door open to self-contempt."
 Fandango!

Joined: 4/20/2009
Msg: 998
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/28/2009 2:58:30 PM
Whiskypapa
This last post on how evil and backward the ..............


I believe that Motown was simply illustrating that without oil, Middle Eastern societies don't have a lot on the go. Hence, they have to sell it so, are going to continue to have to deal with the west, east, south and north. This vision that some have that if everybody pulls out their economic interests in the area, all will be just great is wrong. They would simply starve.
 motownmaniax

Joined: 8/13/2006
Msg: 999
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/28/2009 7:34:59 PM
This article by Moyers is self-serving and seems to have been dictated by the neocons out of the "lie factory".


You are simply WRONG, Whiskey. Moyers can NEVER by any stretch of the imagination be termed a neocon. If anything he's been a huge critic of Bush's policies, and his enmity towards Rove, Cheney, et al is well documented. That's one of the biggest reasons I used him as a source---to counter any accusation of being biased. However, "your" response fully exposes just how partisan this debate can be and is typical of critics who offer no sense of balance and fairness.

I in no way want to see the Arab World fail. All that would do is fuel the ignorance and hate and misunderstandings between the Middle East and the rest of the world and radically "increase" the chances for more violence and war. But the outside world can't dictate, nor should they, the steps Arab countries need to take in order to reverse the trends I supplied above. They have to do it themselves. The problem is they have not shown the dynamic will to make that change yet, and until they do the future looks grim.
 whiskeypapa

Joined: 5/19/2008
Msg: 1000
view profile
History
Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'
Posted: 6/29/2009 9:14:21 PM
Yes, I was taken aback but the Moyers article but it is indeed slanted to transfer blame for the development of the Mujahideen from the US to Bin Laden. The use of the chronological falsehood, buzzwords, are simply demagoguery. I suggest reading an article in Counterpunch, Zbigniew Brzezinski: How Jimmy Carter And I started The Mujahideen. Also, read his The Grand Chessboard. Then reread the article by Moyers; you will see why I thought the article came from the "lie factory".

If you read The Grand Chessboard you will see what the people in Eurasia are up against and why they are so undeveloped in comparison to the Western World.
Page 40 of 41 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41
 
Show ALL Forums  > Current Events  > Ex-CIA agent: Waterboarding 'saved lives'