|
|
|
|
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/23/2007 6:52:27 PM | I guess I was wrong; Canada ALONE gives us more oil than all of the middle east.
U.S. Imports by Country of Origin Period - Canada - Persian Gulf (Combined) Apr-07 - 74,375 - 65,769 May-07 - 76,311 - 66,596 Jun-07 - 71,240 - 71,171 Jul-07 - 73,150 - 65,061 Aug-07 - 77,822 - 67,295 Sep-07 - 75,063 - 70,004 Total - 447,961 - 405,896 Source: http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_impcus_a2_nus_ep00_im0_mbbl_m.htm
Seems like your data are wrong. Wanna try again?
Remember what I said about stupid questions? | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/23/2007 6:59:16 PM | People wait for months on end in the USA awaiting approval from the insurance carrier to have surgeries performed. THAT is unacceptable!!
John Stossel on 20/20 is a lying piece of junk. He lies through his teeth to press a nutty conservative agenda. After all this is the same moron who built a multimillion dollar house in the sand at Westhampton Beach and the house fell into the ocean. Idiot! Even a dog knows that you don't build houses in the SAND with no barriers to protect the house. That is so stupid! Even people I know who have houses on the shore have a barrier up, rocks and regular soil to keep the house firmly in place during storms. Not idiot Stossel. What a moron! I would not want someone working as a journalist who is so stupid as to build a house in the sand LOL
| |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 3:50:02 AM | >>>THAT is unacceptable!!
So a healthcare system that you choose that screws you over is more unacceptable than the healthcare that you are forced to agree with through violence? BOTH systems have redictuless waiting periods- but one of them gives you the freedom to take your business to the company that works harder for you.
>>>Even a dog knows that you don't build houses in the SAND with no barriers to protect the house.
Luckily we're discussing political theory, not construction methods. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 5:18:53 AM | Its curious when you look at all these proposals from the clowns that are running for president, both sides. The GOP's basically say everyone has to have a policy, and if someone can't afford it, they will get a tax credit. The dems have all kinds of schemes, where employers or the government ponies up money to cover everyone. The common flaw: The health care industry, which inflates costs at near double digit rates per year, is a sacred cow. In other industries that have oligopolistic and monopolistic power, like pipelines, regulation or trust busting has been used. The problem is market power.
Another problem with this is the insurance industry, per se. Insurance is about spreading risk. The Medicare system worked reasonably well controlling costs through the setting of customary and reasonable rates for its large group. Recent changes to the system go in the opposite direction--creating smaller groups of seniors.
Other countries may not have perfect systems, but when they buy Lipitor, they pay a hell of a lot less for it than we do, because their governments are large scale buyers of products and services. In any town, hospitals and clinics are at best oligopolies. We grant drug companies temporary monopoly power through patents. The list goes on, but again, the problem is not about covering everyone, but really about exploding, uncontrolled costs. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 6:49:02 AM |
Another problem with this is the insurance industry, per se. Insurance is about spreading risk. The Medicare system worked reasonably well controlling costs through the setting of customary and reasonable rates for its large group. Recent changes to the system go in the opposite direction--creating smaller groups of seniors.
HR 676 proposed which is co-sponser by Dennis Kucinich who is running for President is expanding Medicare to ALL americans and therefore creating the largest risk pool possible in the USA.
HR 676 will use the existing medicare system and only needs to purchase additional computer hardware and additional staff to handle processing of applications for people under 65.
Ron paul's proposal is the closest one to HR 676 of any of republicans and he is a critic of the health care industry.
HR 676 is really UNLIMITED vouchers for all americans and they can use them at any hospital or doctor who SIGNS up for the system created by HR 676
It could be up and running within a year after the NEW president signs the bill.
Other proposals are only band-aids and will NEVER solve the major problems in the American Health Insurance system.
Dennis Kucinich is interested in forming a ticket with Ron paul and the Republican party does NOT want him to run for president since he can NOT be bought by special interests. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 7:47:22 AM | Free Universal Heath coverage is not free. Everyone pays through taxes. Currently, here in the US, our health care system exists only for the benefit of the wealthy drug companies and insurance companies.
We have a military that exists to protect the interests of this nation and it's citizens. It is paid for by the citizens. There is no reason we can not have a health care system that serves the same purpose.
Imagine an invading army attacking the US. They storm into a city and are met by American Solders. The captains of the opposing forces meet in the town square. The US commander hands over a list. Says: "These are the addresses of people who have been unable to pay their Invasion Insurance premiums. Kill them if you wish as we will not be protecting them." | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 8:22:10 AM |
Free Universal Heath coverage is not free. Everyone pays through taxes. Currently, here in the US, our health care system exists only for the benefit of the wealthy drug companies and insurance companies.
If HR 676 had been passed and signed by president bush then Nataline Sarkisyan would have been on the transplant list Status 1A” for a liver transplant and might be still alive NOW.
Profits for the health care system in the USA are MORE important then peoples lifes.
Health insurance companies know MORE than doctors .. right ?
http://www.calnurses.org/media-center/press-releases/2007/december/rn-s-statement-on-death-of-nataline-sarkisyan-cigna-should-have-listened-to-her-doctors-and-approved-the-transplant-a-week-ago.html
RN's Statement on Death of Nataline Sarkisyan: 'CIGNA Should Have Listened to Her Doctors And Approved the Transplant a Week Ago' The California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee today blasted insurance giant CIGNA for failing to approve a liver transplant one week earlier for 17-year-old Nataline Sarkisyan, who tragically died last night just hours after CIGNA relented and agreed to the procedure following a massive national outcry.
On Dec. 11, four leading physicians, including the surgical director of the Pediatric Liver Transplant Program at UCLA, wrote to CIGNA urging the company to reverse its denial. The physicians said that Nataline “currently meets criteria to be listed as Status 1A” for a transplant. They also challenged CIGNA’s denial which the company said occurred because their benefit plan “does not cover experimental, investigational and unproven services,” to which the doctors replied, “Nataline’s case is in fact none of the above.”
“So what happened between December 11, when CIGNA denied the transplant, and December 20 when they approved? A huge outpouring of protest and CIGNA’s public humiliation. Why didn’t they just listen to the medical professionals at the bedside in the first place?” asked Geri Jenkins, RN, a member of the CNA/NNOC Council of Presidents who works in a transplant unit at the University of California San Diego Medical Center.
On Thursday, CIGNA was bombarded with phone calls to its offices across the country while a rally sponsored by CNA/NNOC, with the substantial help of the local Armenian community, drew 150 people to the Glendale offices of CIGNA – all of which produced the turnaround by CIGNA to finally reverse its prior denial of care.
CNA/NNOC Executive Director Rose Ann DeMoro called the final outcome "a horrific tragedy that demonstrates what is so fundamentally wrong with our health care system today. Insurance companies have a stranglehold on our health. Their first priority is to make profits for their shareholders – and the way they do that is by denying care."
"It is simply not possible to organize major protests every time a multi-billion corporation like CIGNA denies care that has been recommended by a physician," DeMoro said. “Having insurance is not the same as receiving needed care. We need a fundamental change in our healthcare system that takes control away from the insurance giants and places it where it belongs – in the hands of the medical professionals, the patients, and their families."
| |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 10:32:01 AM | Rick makes a really good point about Lipitor--with universal health care prescription costs would go DOWN as the gov't becomes a bulk buyer for the medications.
 | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 11:28:55 AM |
might be still alive NOW. Or she might be just as dead after the insurance company paid out 100,000 thousand dollars. Citing examples of people who have died because Insurance companies didnt cover the cost is not a good stategy. There are millions of Americans who are saved every year because their Insurance companies did cover their treatments. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 12:50:59 PM |
Or she might be just as dead after the insurance company paid out 100,000 thousand dollars. Citing examples of people who have died because Insurance companies didnt cover the cost is not a good stategy. There are millions of Americans who are saved every year because their Insurance companies did cover their treatments.
Source ?
On Dec. 11, four leading physicians, including the surgical director of the Pediatric Liver Transplant Program at UCLA, wrote to CIGNA urging the company to reverse its denial. The physicians said that Nataline “currently meets criteria to be listed as Status 1A” for a transplant. They also challenged CIGNA’s denial which the company said occurred because their benefit plan “does not cover experimental, investigational and unproven services,” to which the doctors replied, “Nataline’s case is in fact none of the above.”
This just proves that the first priority of a private health insurance companies is to MAXIMIZE profits.
The liver transplant was HER only hope and she died because an insurance company disided it was TOO much money to save ONE person life. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 2:34:09 PM |
The liver transplant was HER only hope and she died because an insurance company disided it was TOO much money to save ONE person life.
Apparently you haven't read the entire sotry. Nataline Sarkisyan had multiple organ failure due to complications from a bone marrow transplant. CIGNA had already paid for chemo and the bone marrow transplant to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The news article linked below states that states that Nataline had been in a vegetative state "for weeks" and on December 11, 2007 doctors recommended a liver transplant. So the bottom line is doctors were recommending a liver transplant for a patient in a coma who had other organs failing besides her liver.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/12/21/health/main3639402.shtml
Very sick people in vegetative states rarely wake up. Further, I'd say the chances of her surviving the surgery were rather slim.
At some point there has to be a time when you aren't going to put someone through anymore torture, and also when it's appropriate to let someone with terminal disease pass on.
It's always sad when a young girl with lots of potential dies, but the chances that she was going to recover from a coma after chemo, a bone marrow transplant, and then a liver transplant were minimal.
Putting the monetary resources into a terminal patient, not to mention donated organs, which are in short supply is just wrong.
I know it's hard to say goodbye, because I've had to do it under similar circumstances. But sometimes it's the right thing to do.
 | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 3:48:10 PM |
Putting the monetary resources into a terminal patient, not to mention donated organs, which are in short supply is just wrong.
By the same logic ... then why spend hundreds of thousands of dollar on a person who has stage 4 cancer or have them be seen by the best cancer doctors in the USA or be sent to a hospital thousands of miles away.
Sounds like a WASTE of money by that logic but in American the rich get the best and the poor get the scraps.
With HR 676 passed then EVERY american will be guarantee at least good medical treatment
The family is planning to sue the insurance company, their attorney said Friday.
Attorney Mark Geragos said he also plans to ask the district attorney to press murder or manslaughter charges against CIGNA HealthCare for the death of Nataline Sarkisyan.
The insurer "maliciously killed her" because it did not want to bear the expense of her transplant and aftercare, Geragos said at a news conference outside his downtown Los Angeles office. He did not say when or in what court he would file the suit.
Nataline had been battling leukemia and received a bone marrow transplant from her brother. She developed a complication, however, that caused her liver to fail.
Doctors at UCLA determined she needed a transplant and sent a letter to CIGNA Healthcare on Dec. 11. The Philadelphia-based health insurance company denied payment for the transplant.
I guess health insurance companies are more expert in health care matter than doctors ..
Wierd concept ... must be ONLY an american concept. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 3:51:31 PM |
With HR 676 passed then EVERY american will be guarantee at least good medical treatment Not only every American but any where between 12- 20 million illegal aliens and any one visiting the U.S., all thanks to a tax burden that will be carried mostly by the middle class. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 3:56:26 PM |
Oh not again. Herbie is 35 years old for Pete's sake. If you have to dig back 30 years for a story it's not worth repeating.
Without the help of the people of Toronto then Herbie would have DIED.
They could not get the surgery in the USA since they did NOT have the money to pay for it.
The surgery was in 1979 ... which is about 28 years ago...
IF there was universal health care in the USA then Herbie would have gotten the life-saving operation in the USA and not have to come to canada to save his life. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 4:05:55 PM | Stronach went to U.S. for cancer treatment: report
8/14/07 ctv.ca
Liberal MP Belinda Stronach, who is battling breast cancer, travelled to California last June for an operation that was recommended as part of her treatment, says a report.
He said speed was not the reason why she went to California.
Instead, MacEachern said the decision was made because the U.S. hospital was the best place to have it done due to the type of surgery required.
While it is rare for MPs to seek treatment outside Canada, MacEachern said Stronach was not lacking confidence in the system.
Stronach, who announced last April she would be leaving politics before the next election, paid for the surgery in the U.S., reports the Star.
"In fact, Belinda thinks very highly of the Canadian health-care system, and uses it when needed for herself and her children, as do all Canadians. As well, her family has clearly demonstrated that support," MacEachern told the Star. Let's see...40 preems..and a government official...shall we see just how many are coming south? | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 4:22:59 PM |
Liberal MP Belinda Stronach, who is battling breast cancer, travelled to California last June for an operation that was recommended as part of her treatment, says a report.
He said speed was not the reason why she went to California.
Instead, MacEachern said the decision was made because the U.S. hospital was the best place to have it done due to the type of surgery required.
While it is rare for MPs to seek treatment outside Canada, MacEachern said Stronach was not lacking confidence in the system.
Stronach, who announced last April she would be leaving politics before the next election, paid for the surgery in the U.S., reports the Star.
"In fact, Belinda thinks very highly of the Canadian health-care system, and uses it when needed for herself and her children, as do all Canadians. As well, her family has clearly demonstrated that support," MacEachern told the Star. Let's see...40 preems..and a government official...shall we see just how many are coming south?
I know what type of surgery it was but i will not say it in a public forums since she deserves her privacy and it was NOT medical neccesary and NOT covered under any health insurance policy in CANADA and the USA .
She had breast cancer and they removed all of her ...
You can guess for yourself what it was ...
40 preems out of a country of 33 million is almost nothing and most of the populaton of canada lives within 100 miles of the USA border and in some cases the nearest major city is hundress of miles away and the american hospital is under 50 miles.
Her dad recently gave $6 million to the 3 local hospitals where most of his employees work.
She is the head of the fund raising commitee for one of these hospitals
Frank Stronach who is her father built a small town near New orleans for flood victums ..
Cherry picking stories ....
how is 40 preems compared to refusing to pay for a life saving transplant for an american is the same .
The insurer "maliciously killed her" because it did not want to bear the expense of her transplant and aftercare, Geragos said at a news conference outside his downtown Los Angeles office. He did not say when or in what court he would file the suit.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/12/21/health/main3639402.shtml
(CBS/AP) A 17-year old died just hours after her health insurance company reversed its decision not to pay for a liver transplant that doctors said the girl needed.
Nataline Sarkisyan died Thursday night at about 6 p.m. at University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center. She had been in a vegetative state for weeks, said her mother, Hilda.
"She passed away, and the insurance (company) is responsible for this," she said.
The family is planning to sue the insurance company, their attorney said Friday.
Attorney Mark Geragos said he also plans to ask the district attorney to press murder or manslaughter charges against CIGNA HealthCare for the death of Nataline Sarkisyan.
The insurer "maliciously killed her" because it did not want to bear the expense of her transplant and aftercare, Geragos said at a news conference outside his downtown Los Angeles office. He did not say when or in what court he would file the suit.
Nataline had been battling leukemia and received a bone marrow transplant from her brother. She developed a complication, however, that caused her liver to fail.
Doctors at UCLA determined she needed a transplant and sent a letter to CIGNA Healthcare on Dec. 11. The Philadelphia-based health insurance company denied payment for the transplant.
| |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 4:28:18 PM |
Not only every American but any where between 12- 20 million illegal aliens and any one visiting the U.S., all thanks to a tax burden that will be carried mostly by the middle class.
Many American are paying more federal income tax because of the war in IRAQ and that money would have easily paid for health care for ALL uninsured american.
Illegals will NOT apply for UHC since then the government will know where they live and might deport them.
Already americans are paying for health care for illigels but now it is done in an ER which is much more expensive than any other place.
Another red herring excuse. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 4:30:42 PM |
By the same logic ... then why spend hundreds of thousands of dollar on a person who has stage 4 cancer or have them be seen by the best cancer doctors in the USA or be sent to a hospital thousands of miles away.
Sounds like a WASTE of money by that logic but in American the rich get the best and the poor get the scraps.
If a patient is stage 4 when DIAGNOSED with cancer, the odds of survival are small, 20 percent at best. However, some stage 4 cancer patients are healthy and feel good except for the cancer growing inside them (my husband, who I assume you are referencing, was one of those people). A late stage cancer patient with an otherwise healthy immune system will be offered at least one round of curative therapy if they want it, and the doctor thinks there's any chance of it working.
As an example, Lance Armstrong had what most doctors would describe as terminal testicular cancer (it had metastacized to his brain). But because he was healthy, and in very good condition, he was a candidate for treatment. My ex-husband who had acute lymphoblastic leukemia was also that type of patient. He had very advanced disease, diagnosed while he was still in supurb physical condition (he was also an elite bicyclist as a hobby). His chance of survival was just 5 percent, but nonetheless, he's still alive 35 years later.
This was NOT the case with Nataline Sarkisyan. She'd already been through two potentially curative procedures and was in a persistent vegetative state after the second one. This is from the Washington Post, which is a pretty "left" leaning newspaper:
Nataline was diagnosed with leukemia at 14 and received a bone marrow transplant from her brother the day before Thanksgiving. She later developed a complication that caused her liver to fail. She was in a vegetative state for some time, her mother Hilda said.
Nataline was taken off life support at the University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center on Thursday, her mother said. Nataline died within the hour.
In a Dec. 11 letter to Cigna, four doctors had appealed to the insurer to reconsider. They said patients in similar situations who undergo transplants have a six-month survival rate of about 65 percent.
One of Nataline's doctors, Robert Venick, declined to comment on her case. UCLA Medical Center staff refused to make her other doctors available for comment.
The case raised the question among at least one medical expert over whether a liver transplant is a viable option for a leukemia patient because of the immune-system-suppressing medication such patients must take to prevent organ rejection.
Such medication, while preserving the transplanted liver, could make the cancer worse.
Transplantation is not an option for leukemia patients because the immunosuppressant drugs "tend to increase the risk and growth of any tumors," said Dr. Stuart Knechtle, who heads the liver transplant program at the University of Wisconsin at Madison and was not commenting specifically on Nataline's case.
The procedure "would be futile," he said.
Geragos' attempt to get the district attorney to press murder and manslaughter charges against Cigna would be difficult to prove unless the defense can show that the company somehow intentionally caused Nataline's death, said Rebecca Lonergan, a law professor at the University of Southern California.
"My personal opinion is that this is a little bit of grandstanding," said Lonergan, a former Los Angeles County and federal prosecutor.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/21/AR2007122100843.html
So are we supposed to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars for a 65 percent chance at keeping a terminally ill patient alive, but in a vegetative state for another six months?
What fricking kind of life is that?
At some point you just have to sign the DNR, hug your loved one and tell them it's OK to go. It's the hardest thing you ever have to do for someone you love, but if you really do love them you do it rather than making your child's death into a circus or a political statement.
I know how hard it is to do this. I had to do it myself. But I never regretted my decision. And no matter how much money was available, no matter how much insurance coverage was available -- and we had both at our disposal -- to me it is unconscionable to try and keep someone alive when it's their time to go.
 | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 4:46:37 PM |
So are we supposed to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars for a 65 percent chance at keeping a terminally ill patient alive, but in a vegetative state for another six months?
What fricking kind of life is that?
At some point you just have to sign the DNR, hug your loved one and tell them it's OK to go. It's the hardest thing you ever have to do for someone you love, but if you really do love them you do it rather than making your child's death into a circus or a political statement.
http://www.theawfultruth.com/press/presssalon419.html
In one of the April 11 stories, Moore took up the cause of Chris Donahue, a Florida man with complications from diabetes whose HMO, Humana, denied coverage for the pancreas transplant he needed to stay alive. The footage of Moore and Donahue staging a mock funeral (complete with bagpipes and mourners) in front of Humana headquarters, and running up against the brick wall of corporate indifference in the form of an unyielding public relations flack, deftly brought together guerrilla theater, muckraking journalism and political satire. But why did Moore have to identify Donahue as "husband, father, dying guy" in his narration, and let the camera linger jarringly on Donahue's tears? (For the record, Humana reversed its decision after Moore's visit and paid for Donahue's transplant.)
Chris Donahue was denied approval for the transplant just to save money for Humana.
If michael moore did NOT have this on his show then Chris Donahue would have DIED years ago.
Under univeral health care then Chris Donahue would have been put on a waiting list for compatiable liver and NOT have to fight an insurance company to pay for it. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 5:03:49 PM | I know what she had, and your logic makes zero sense. If you are saying that ductal carcinoma in situ can not become invasive, you need to learn your facts. 40 preemies was one province, not Canada wide. We warned of ER deaths MDs: Doctors complaining of sub-par care for 3 years, reports show Barbara Yaffe, Vancouver Sun Published: Thursday, April 27, 2006
Internal hospital documents released Wednesday show doctors have been warning B.C. politicians for at least three years about patients dying in emergency department hallways.
They've also been ringing alarm bells about the unacceptable standard of emergency care available to people in Vancouver's outlying areas.Over and over, politicians and government officials were advised that patients were suffering, and dying, because all the demands on the health system were being permitted to back up into emergency departments.
A no-holds-barred memo from the B.C. Medical Association emergency medicine section to then-health minister Colin Hansen and his deputy, Penny Ballem, dated March 22, 2003 and titled ED overcrowding and poor quality of care, warned:
"We will be approaching the media soon."
This memo referred to one emergency patient suffering from meningitis, who "will never work again because of brain damage, as a result of a long wait in the waiting room and thus a delay in antibiotics." It does not specify the hospital where the tragedy occurred.
The doctors' memo also cites "cardiac arrest in the waiting room. Many examples here."
Other preventable deaths were also cited: "Some patients, such as those with stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, sepsis, myocardial infarction are thought to be dying directly because of delays to care because of Emergency Department crowding."
An equally alarming message, dated Dec. 23, 2003, was sent by Dr. Joe Haegert, then-head of the Royal Columbian Hospital's ER to Bob Smith, then-CEO of the Fraser Health Authority. It was copied to Hansen, Ballem and 11 other officials.
It stated: "Almost every week we have someone who has been waiting in the waiting room a prolonged period of time, and then ARRESTS in the waiting room.
"We have had a very large number of documented cases where the delay to treatment actually caused harm. In some of these cases, it is our opinion that the delay was contributory to death.
"For example, we have had many severe infections that, after waiting many hours in the waiting room, finally developed septic shock, intubation or death."
The letter complained about a backup of ambulance stretchers in the Royal Columbian's emergency department. "This is really unsafe, tying up our ambulances. . . One shift there were so many ambulance stretchers that the fire marshall threatened to close down the Emergency Department!"
Haegert wrote of his ER on occasion having up to 10 chest-pain patients, obviously at risk of heart attack, waiting for care, people in severe pain, "vomiting in a bucket or on the floor because we have no bed to treat them in."
He wrote: "It is clear that no where else in Canada comes close to our severe crowding problem. My colleagues at St. Paul's ask me: 'how can you keep working there?' "
Haegert reported, "our nurses break down almost on a daily basis because they are so upset at the poor access to care due to gridlock."
Doctors say the situation persists to this day. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 5:23:19 PM |
I know what she had, and your logic makes zero sense. If you are saying that ductal carcinoma in situ can not become invasive, you need to learn your facts. 40 preemies was one province, not Canada wide.
Cost is never an issue in the canadian health care system if it is an EMERGENCY.
With Federalized Health Care then the below story would not happen and the baby would be on organ transplants list waiting for a compatiable doner and NOT fighting an insurance company for payment for LIFE-SAVING treatment,
Cost in the American health care system is the MAIN issue and this is proven in the article below.
http://www.shakopeenews.com/node/4425
December 21st, 2007 3:26 pm Family challenged as baby awaits 7-organ transplant
By Ruth Anne Maddox / Shakopee Valley News
Babies are gifts from God but sometimes the pretty package is not as perfect on the inside as it looks on the outside.
Such is the case with Sidney Markie, a smiley 5-month-old from Shakopee who nearly died several times during the first nine weeks of her life as doctors worked to diagnose what was causing her little body to fail.
The good news is, they figured it out: Sidney has a rare genetic disorder called microvillus inclusion disease.
The bad news is, the 10-pound, 8-ounce little girl needs to have seven organs transplanted to hope for a viable future and physicians at Miami Children’s Hospital are among only a handful of doctors able to perform the surgery.
Sidney’s parents, Courtney Murray and Rick Markie, have been fighting for her life since before it was determined the multiorgan transplant was needed. Without the transplant, Sidney will not likely live past age 3.
The battle began on July 21 — just four days after Sidney was born. She was home from the hospital less than 48 hours when she started having difficulty breathing and felt cold to the touch. Murray said she took Sidney’s temperature and it was 91 degrees. She was sure it was just a faulty thermometer and sent Rick to the store for a new one. That one also showed 91 degrees. Luckily, a post-natal nursing visit was about to take place and, as soon as the nurse arrived, she called for an ambulance.
At the hospital, Sidney kept getting sicker and sicker. It wasn’t until the diagnosis was made that it was determined feeding Sidney is what was nearly killing her — with this disorder, the intestines can’t absorb any nutrients.
| |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 5:31:06 PM |
Illegals will NOT apply for UHC since then the government will know where they live and might deport them. Already americans are paying for health care for illigels but now it is done in an ER which is much more expensive than any other place Obviously you have not read HR676. As far as ER care for illegals I think that should stop as well for anything other than life threatening emergencies. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 5:35:19 PM | Obviously you have not read HR676. As far as ER care for illegals I think that should stop as well for anything other than life threatening emergencies.
I have read HR 676.... and to get an insurance card then they have to apply .and the application form will be a maxinum of 2 pages..
Without health insurance then people can ONLY get treatment in an ER and you mean that a person with diebitics should be refused medical treatment just because they are illegal.
Wierd concept and not the christian thing to do. | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 5:43:50 PM | >>>Wierd concept and not the christian thing to do.
Sounds awefully alot like you're imposing your religious views onto others....
(Yes, I am aware of the irony of that) | |
|
| FREE Federalized Health Care Posted: 12/24/2007 5:46:26 PM | | First of all "Christian" is not the issue, Secondly if they are here illegally and they have conditions that require medications for their survival they should go back to their home countries to receive the medications that they need.In Hr676 it states specifically that Social Security numbers are not to be used for qualifying, if this bill is not designed at least in part to cover illegals, why do you think they do not require social security numbers?after all,all citizens have them and they are used for most other Government programs.... | |
|
|
| Page 5 of 31
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 |
|