|
|
|
|
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 8/24/2008 9:43:08 AM |
As far as some of the people who continuously criticize David DeAngelo's programs they do not have much basis for doing so. Simply for the fact, they have not gone through or read the majority of his programs. First, go through all of his programs then criticize. But to criticize before reading all of his materials does the author injustice. And [u]exactly[/u] how much do all his materials cost total? I know he's got several different DVD sets out as well as e-books. A guy would be much more likely to get a good return on his investment by hiring a prostitute for a couple of hours. The drawbacks to that are: 1) it's illegal except in Nevada, 2) no kissing or intimacy, and 3) you have to keep your guard up so she doesn't steal your wallet. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 8/24/2008 11:02:01 AM | Retro I don't know you for adam, but based on your posts. I think your problem might just be negativity. You believe that you will not be successful with women based on past experiences. I totally understand and know where you are coming from. I think you have to just be more positive that you will be successful with women. Start sincerely believing that you will be more successful with women and I think your odds will increase at the least.
I don't think your doomed to a life of singledom.
Always remember that even naturals get rejected...... I knew a couple of guys when I was in the Marine Corps who were some of the best men ever as far as attracting women is concerned. Even they would get rejected from time-to-time.
For the guy who just posted: Actually you can order the materials preview them for a month and send them back free of charge. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 8/24/2008 2:44:35 PM | I actually have read a lot of David Deangelo and think his stuff is really great. I would highly recommend they for every single guy and I would even say for women to read them. My love life has changed dramatically after reading them. However I think its important for guys to realize that his writtings are just a map, you still have to make the trip. I also feel girls have a good BS radar on them, so if your faking stuff girls are going to know. But I do think Deangelo stuff is exstremely usefull but they need to be applied to you. I also think a lot of his teaching get misunderstood like**** comedy. It's not about being a jerk, which I think most guys make the mistake of. Its totally about joking around and having fun, not being all serious. If you neg a girl, it shouldn't be to hurt her or put. There is this amazing energy and connection however if you get a back and forth teasing type deal. But I would warn everyone you need confidence, because most girls are going to fire back at you which is actually fun if you understand whats actually going on. But have seen guys use this only to have the girl say something like nice pink shirt, its kind of gay and have the guy completely freeze up. I also think his stuff is great as far as understanding how interactions work. I'm far from a natural, and was raised to be a very polite, I mean I'm still very polite and gentleman like with women. But I came from a mother who raised me really to respect women, and to treat them like princesses. I have no idea how many times I would meet a girl and act liked like she was Gods gift to men. I would buy her nice stuff because I thought it showed I liked her. I would call her right after a date not because I was needy because I liked the feeling of being with her and wanted that feeling again. The type of guy that asked 10 times if everything was okay when a girl was quite. I know if a girl is reading this shes probable cringing because she probable has dated a lot of guys like this, who she put in the "friend" category. I also think everyone has a lot of sides to them and as humans we are kind of complicated. A lot of David D's stuff to me wasn't about becoming someone else, rather projecting the sides of myself that attract women. I'm really sarcastic and I just like to say crazy things to make people laugh. The easiest and biggest change for me was instead of doing stuff that made me look needy, just to come out with my sarcastic side off the bat and my results have been 100 times better. I'll be honest I don't get every girl I try for, but its rare that I can't get a good conversation down. I also would like to say it's complete BS if your doing things right that a girl will know you read this stuff. She will pick up if your being fake with the material very easy. Understand the concepts and applie them to yourself. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 8/24/2008 3:52:40 PM | My last and final post on this.
I don't think I am 'negative' per say. Realistic is a better outlook. I believe my sarcasm comes off a bit scortching and since we are on the Internet, it comes off a bit outward.
I won't bore you with situations I have been in, nor am I looking for pity, because I don't need it.
I think DeAngelo is a fraud. I think his semimar is a waste of money, and if anyone asks me about him, I'll tell you about him. | |
|
eazk
| Joined: 9/8/2006 Msg: 705 | |
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 8/24/2008 8:09:48 PM | OK...everybody who's here, line up. Now, if the person in front of you is more negative than you, you swap places. Retro~...there are only about 10 people in line behind you...that I've seen post on the fora.
EVERYBODY IS REALISTIC in their own mind. Sheeessshh, otherwise it would be like a computer trying to convince itself that it is wrong. Your brain has already completely justified every negative thought.
Do yourself one gigantic favor, go watch the DVD "The Secret" and try for just 1 week to apply it...just one week. And to defend EVERYTHING you've ever said, Retro~...you're absolutely right...100% absolutely right!!! WE'RE born with it! Each and every one of us...Including you. The problem is, over 90% of the adult males have not developed it. It is like a muscle...it needs training and work and confidence and opportunity...and the damn thing just works...it's amazing.
 | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 8/24/2008 8:27:43 PM | I wouldn't bother taking advice from someone telling people how to be a "pick-up artist".
I suppose that if a person is just looking to stroke his own ego by picking up a lot of shallow women, or by going on numerous meaningless dates with numerous women, then David DeAngelo's tips may be useful. But, in my personal opinion, they're totally useless at helping a person find, and maintain, a real relationship.
If you meet a women, by trying to play the role of a stud hero, which you learned from a pick-up guidebook: chances are that woman, who was initially attracted to your fake persona, won't stick around once she gets to know the real you.
I have no desire to feed my own ego by proving that I can pick up numerous random women. I'd just like to find one woman, who likes me for myself, for a stable lasting relationship. I figure the best way to do that is to just be myself . Rather than put on some bullshit act to impress women who really wouldn't be interested in my real personality. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/19/2009 4:44:05 PM |
have no desire to feed my own ego by proving that I can pick up numerous random women. I'd just like to find one woman, who likes me for myself, for a stable lasting relationship. I figure the best way to do that is to just be myself . Rather than put on some bullshit act to impress women who really wouldn't be interested in my real personality.
It's not about ego at all. I used to do some of the stuff he said, way before I heard about it. I used to work with the public so I used to do it a lot. I made many of my customers laugh and smile. It is not about acting. People do tell jokes. I suppose you don't watch movies with actors right? LOL You just don't get it, it is about having the balls to make a woman laugh and have fun in the process. You're just a coward that's no fun that's why you're on here and still single. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/20/2009 2:14:51 AM | Yeah, I've read a few of this guys online articles. He's just a book pusher that's trying to hock his product.
I can see his techniques working on girls rather easily, but let's face it, the girls these things would work on aren't the kind of girls you want to bother getting into a relationship with.
Most of his advice relies on you changing everything about yourself and essentially pretending to be something you're not. Let's say for instance that you are a good guy that is pretending to be a bad guy to entice a girl that attracted to bad guys. Let's also say that the girl falls for you pretending to be a bad guy, how long do you think you can keep up the lie?
Self improvement is masturbation. Especially the stuff this guy spews. | |
|
| |
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/20/2009 12:07:57 PM |
I figure the best way to do that is to just be myself .
If "being yourself" is giving you a satisfactory love life by your own standards, continue doing so by all means. But if you're sitting there "waiting for the right person to magically come along," you might want to reconsider your strategy. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/20/2009 1:05:42 PM |
Most of his advice relies on you changing everything about yourself and essentially pretending to be something you're not.
Okay imagine yourself going to law school. Would that turn you into something you are not. How about when you take a class on public speaking, is that make you a fake now?
Self improvement is masturbation. Especially the stuff this guy spews.
It is masturbation because masturbation is all you got.
Would you read Dale Carnagie? Or 7 habits of very efficient people or Leadership 101? Would reading this would make you less of you?
Someone said that the first step to achieving something is to dream about having something, in fact they said fake it until you make it.
For example, this guy was saying that if you say something like, The apple is red. It has absolutely no meaning or sex appeal. Now say the same thing, but say it with authority and conviction. The apple IS red. Then add to the same statement some sensuality, a little Hey baby, the apple is red. Repeat a few times. Then add a touch of humor and fun, even a little mischievous giggle.
"Hey, you know. The apple IS red."
You see is not what you say but how you say it and the conviction you have saying it. You are still yourself, but discovering and untapping the self you never knew you had. Instead of your usual masturbatory chump complaining about those beautiful b itches that do nothing but ignore you. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/20/2009 3:50:59 PM | Just because you say the apple is red doesn't mean it is. Sure it may be red before but it's not sitting there waiting for you approval in commanding it to be red, if you get my meaning.
As for the books you are listing, yes, I would consider them to be a joke as well. Let's look at the bottom line, these people could care less about helping you, they want to sell their product. End of story.
I say play to your strengths, everyone has weaknesses and if you're having ot go look at a book to figure out how to be a person then...
Some are born leaders with the qualities that make them successful, others "fake it till they make it" and end up being pretty much useless.
With these books that the OP is talking about, the woman isn't talking to the real guy, she's talking to his spokesman so to speak. He's going to have ot keep the front up 24/7 or it's going to fall apart.
And quit honestly, those books are great if all you're wanting to do it to get laid every weekend with a different girl, but if you want a real relationship, don't listen to this guy. Eventually she's going to want to know you better, then what are you going to do? Make a witty comment and avoid the issue? That's what he tells you to do in his articles. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/20/2009 4:59:38 PM |
As for the books you are listing, yes, I would consider them to be a joke as well. Let's look at the bottom line, these people could care less about helping you, they want to sell their product. End of story.
They want to sell their product, sure, but do you know anything about any of these guys and their respective histories? These are not naturals who have always been good at what they do. The majority of them were lonely losers who would have been posting "Why don't girls like nice guys?" threads on this forum like half the people here.
Having figured out how to remedy the endless grief of the average frustrated chump, you don't think they take pleasure in sharing this with others who are just like they were?
I say play to your strengths, everyone has weaknesses and if you're having ot go look at a book to figure out how to be a person then...
And what about your weaknesses? If you're not having the kind of success you want, your weaknesses are probably outshining your strengths. You should certainly showcase your strengths, but you should fix your weaknesses as well. That's what these kinds of books teach. Patching up holes in your personality. If your love life is not exactly as you want it, then you probably have more holes in your personality than you are willing to admit.
Some are born leaders with the qualities that make them successful, others "fake it till they make it" and end up being pretty much useless.
So you're saying that every personality trait and skill set that you will ever have, you're born with. If you weren't born with it, you'll never have it. It's impossible to develop anything new, change, or become a different person.
Wow, that's a rather gloomy outlook on life. So I take it you were one of the privileged few that was born strong, athletic, good looking, and charismatic then? I sure hope so. Because if not, then that means you've accepted that life is somehow just inherently unfair and that you will never have what you want because you weren't born with it.
With these books that the OP is talking about, the woman isn't talking to the real guy, she's talking to his spokesman so to speak. He's going to have ot keep the front up 24/7 or it's going to fall apart.
This is what you detractor people don't seem to understand. You keep saying, "Yeah, but what happens when you let the front down?" It's not putting up a front. A front is pretending to be something you're not. What these things teach is how to become something better than what you are. After you get the hang of what you're doing, the "front" doesn't ever come down because it's not a front. It's who you really are.
And quit honestly, those books are great if all you're wanting to do it to get laid every weekend with a different girl, but if you want a real relationship, don't listen to this guy. Eventually she's going to want to know you better, then what are you going to do? Make a witty comment and avoid the issue? That's what he tells you to do in his articles.
I just have to ask. Have you ever personally applied any of the knowledge from these books? Have you ever gone out and used any of it? Just curious. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/20/2009 5:31:03 PM | Having figured out how to remedy the endless grief of the average frustrated chump, you don't think they take pleasure in sharing this with others who are just like they were?
I'm just saying don't trust their professed motivations. Sure they may have been hopeless losers that have tapped into the secret of success, but in all likelihood they are natural born swindlers that are preying on other people's insecurities to line their wallets.
And what about your weaknesses? If you're not having the kind of success you want, your weaknesses are probably outshining your strengths. You should certainly showcase your strengths, but you should fix your weaknesses as well. That's what these kinds of books teach. Patching up holes in your personality. If your love life is not exactly as you want it, then you probably have more holes in your personality than you are willing to admit.
Yes, I have flaws. Everyone has flaws. I don't have a problem with fixing something that is broken, but a lot of these books are convincing people that what are actually strengths are flaws and need to be changed. Not just in love but in other matters as well. Ever been to a management training seminar? One of the first things they teach you is that honesty is a weakness, you always have to put a spin on things to make it look and sound better than it is. Much of what these books teach are similar to that concept. The bottom line is that in their opinion, "You are no good as you are, you must change and be more like we think you should be or you're going to be alone forever and not be successful. So buy our book and be successful."
So you're saying that every personality trait and skill set that you will ever have, you're born with. If you weren't born with it, you'll never have it. It's impossible to develop anything new, change, or become a different person.
Wow, that's a rather gloomy outlook on life. So I take it you were one of the privileged few that was born strong, athletic, good looking, and charismatic then? I sure hope so. Because if not, then that means you've accepted that life is somehow just inherently unfair and that you will never have what you want because you weren't born with it.
I'm saying that people are predisposed to being good at something. You can train and train and train at something and better at it but in the end you're only partly successful and more than likely never be as good as a person born with the talent naturally.
For example, I love the idea of playing guitar. I've been taught the basics and fundamentals and even though I understand it I struggle with it a lot more than a person who is predisposed to musical talents. In the end I'll never be as good as someone that is born with the gifts already so my time is better spent on building my own strengths and leave the music to the musicians.
Of course the argument could be made that no matter how good you are there is always someone better so why try, but that's taking things a bit far in my opinion.
People have it in their heads that relationships are what life is all about and what everyone should be motivated towards and is life's ultimate goal. To tell you the truth, it is my belief, and I'm probably going to catch a lot of hell for it, but I think that if you're failing to get in a relationship then you're probably going after the wrong people and in the most extreme way of thinking, maybe you just weren't meant to be in a relationship at all. It's not the end of the world. It sucks, yes. But it sucks that I'm not that great at guitar. Same concept in my mind.
This is what you detractor people don't seem to understand. You keep saying, "Yeah, but what happens when you let the front down?" It's not putting up a front. A front is pretending to be something you're not. What these things teach is how to become something better than what you are. After you get the hang of what you're doing, the "front" doesn't ever come down because it's not a front. It's who you really are.
I don't agree with these books because they automatically talk down to you like you're less of a person than when you picked up the book.
What these things teach is how to become something better than what you are. I take issue with this line of thought. We are less than the author therefore in the best sense of the word and assuming that they really do care and aren't just hocking product, then they are taking pity on us poor lesser people and are trying to build us up to their level.
I just have to ask. Have you ever personally applied any of the knowledge from these books? Have you ever gone out and used any of it? Just curious.
No I have never bought any of this guy's books and have never tried them. I have read a few of his free online articles and newsletters but they don't really have much to say other than how most guys are spineless wimps and throw themselves at women so you need to buy my book so that I can teach you not to be such a pansy.
I kid you not one of his articles actually said that the best way to get a woman's attentions is to start a conversation and then ignore her for a week even if she's calling you already. This guy is just propagating the myth that all guys are just playing games, which this fellow is. It's not so much a how to manual as it is a game guide. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/20/2009 6:52:22 PM | I'm just saying don't trust their professed motivations. Sure they may have been hopeless losers that have tapped into the secret of success, but in all likelihood they are natural born swindlers that are preying on other people's insecurities to line their wallets.
Awfully cynical there. Have you ever seen what Neil Strauss used to be like before his days of writing the Game? There’s footage of it on youtube. If he was a natural born swindler, the man must be an amazing actor as well.
Nevertheless, even playing devil’s advocate here and assuming all of these guys are just hustlers that care nothing for their clientele, if the stuff works and I get what I want, what do I really care what their motive is? I still got what I wanted. I got what I paid for. I have no reason to be anything but happy.
Yes, I have flaws. Everyone has flaws. I don't have a problem with fixing something that is broken, but a lot of these books are convincing people that what are actually strengths are flaws and need to be changed. Not just in love but in other matters as well. Ever been to a management training seminar? One of the first things they teach you is that honesty is a weakness, you always have to put a spin on things to make it look and sound better than it is. Much of what these books teach are similar to that concept.
Similar how? By telling you that being a nice guy doormat is a bad quality? Because being a doormat is not a virtue to most people. Which is why people with this quality often fail at dating. I don’t recall ever reading one that suggested to blatantly lie or be dishonest. What other alleged strengths are being presented as flaws?
The bottom line is that in their opinion, "You are no good as you are, you must change and be more like we think you should be or you're going to be alone forever and not be successful. So buy our book and be successful."
Dude, you’re really missing the point here. It’s not that they don’t think you’re any good as you are. It’s that the women you’re attracted to clearly don’t think you’re any good as you are. Or at least not good enough to date. If they did, they’d be with you. These books just simply tell you what to do to become “good enough” in the eyes of the people you want to be with.
You sound like you’re taking this way too personally.
I'm saying that people are predisposed to being good at something. You can train and train and train at something and better at it but in the end you're only partly successful and more than likely never be as good as a person born with the talent naturally.
For example, I love the idea of playing guitar. I've been taught the basics and fundamentals and even though I understand it I struggle with it a lot more than a person who is predisposed to musical talents. In the end I'll never be as good as someone that is born with the gifts already so my time is better spent on building my own strengths and leave the music to the musicians.
See, that’s funny because Michael Jordan got cut from his high school basketball team for not being good enough.
You have a seriously defeatist attitude toward life. You seem to think that anything that requires any kind of work must be impossible and that if something doesn’t come easy, you should just give up right away. You’re not going to accomplish anything in any area of life with that mentality.
To tell you the truth, it is my belief, and I'm probably going to catch a lot of hell for it, but I think that if you're failing to get in a relationship then you're probably going after the wrong people and in the most extreme way of thinking, maybe you just weren't meant to be in a relationship at all. It's not the end of the world. It sucks, yes. But it sucks that I'm not that great at guitar. Same concept in my mind.
This right here proves exactly what I said in my last post about some people having more holes in their personalities than they want to admit. Man, you’re sitting here blaming concepts like destiny and fate for your lack of happiness when the truth is that you are refusing to take responsibility for anything. At the risk of sounding like an ásshole here, it’s your own fault that you’re not good at these things. You haven’t put any effort into getting good at them. And what’s worse is that you’ve made up some excuse in your head to justify it that, “That’s just the way it is. I can’t do anything about it.”
I don't agree with these books because they automatically talk down to you like you're less of a person than when you picked up the book.
Talk down to you? Now you’re getting your feelings hurt over how the narrator of a book is addressing you? Like I said earlier, you seem to have a tendency to take things way too personally.
I have yet to read one book of this nature that talks down to the reader or makes them feel inferior. Rather what they do is instruct the reader what to do. I think some people just feel somewhat embarrassed that they are having to read about such things because they were unable to figure them out on their own and therefore feel insulted by what they are reading. It’s natural. But that’s really just ego getting in the way of learning.
I take issue with this line of thought. We are less than the author therefore in the best sense of the word and assuming that they really do care and aren't just hocking product, then they are taking pity on us poor lesser people and are trying to build us up to their level.
For crying out loud, man! If you bought the book, you bought it because you wanted to obtain the knowledge within it. It doesn’t make you a lesser person for not knowing it. It just makes you less educated on the subject being taught. Did you feel like teachers in school were taking pity on you for not knowing math and science? It's no different at all.
No I have never bought any of this guy's books and have never tried them. I have read a few of his free online articles and newsletters but they don't really have much to say other than how most guys are spineless wimps and throw themselves at women so you need to buy my book so that I can teach you not to be such a pansy.
So you’re sitting here proclaiming to know what these things are good for and what they’re not despite having no actual experience to back up such a claim. Only theory, which gauging from much of what you’ve said in your last couple of posts, is clearly biased in the negative and cynical. That’s not the best way to establish credibility.
Dude, I’m sorry you feel so hopeless about the romantic world, but an honest word of advice here. You’ll get a lot further trying new things and sticking with them until you are good at them than you will by just throwing your hands up and sitting there saying, “Well, there’s nothing I can do. Woe is me. Life sucks.”
Your problem isn’t your genetic roll of the dice. It’s your pessimistic view on life. And the sad irony is that you claim you have no problem fixing your flaws yet you refuse to even acknowledge your biggest one. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 3/20/2009 7:29:37 PM | Hey ease up. I'm not being defeatist and if I was giving up then I wouldn't be here.
I'd rather talk about the point than get into personally insulting. You see me as cynical, (which I am to a point, sadly enough I'm usually right), but I just see this as being a case of people with low self esteem being taken for a ride by somone that's trying to sell their image of what a REAL man should be like. Sadly enough people are buying it and judging those that aren't buying the idea as being insultingly limited.
No I haven't ever seen Neil Strauss, Deangelo is the person I'm mostly concerned with and I see him as a slimy hustler. I'm not worried that he's got more game than me, or that you have more, if guys wants meaningless relationships with random hotties instead of a real relationship with someone that they actually connect with then more power to them. There's always tons of bar flies out there looking for their next hookup. I'm looking for something more and if I have to change my essence to fit the mold of someone that wouldn't give me the time of day, then chances are they aren't the right person for me anyway.
Now you mention that I seem to have a give up attitude, quite the opposite. I say stop going with what society deems your goals should be. You can spend all day bashing your head against the door in the hopes that it will open, or you can kick the door in and go on through, but god forbid you use the handle. I'm sure my metaphors are probably completely lost on most people, but they work for me, they're just not as obvious.
Dude, you’re really missing the point here. It’s not that they don’t think you’re any good as you are. It’s that the women you’re attracted to clearly don’t think you’re any good as you are. Or at least not good enough to date. If they did, they’d be with you. These books just simply tell you what to do to become “good enough” in the eyes of the people you want to be with
I find this hilarious. It doesn't matter which way you look at it your being judged. If a girl doesn't want to be with me because I'm "not good enough" for her, then to hell with it. Would you want to be with someone that you constantly have to impress and finagle just so they don't judge you as beneath them? As has been stated previously by multiple people, these techniques will work wonders if you're looking for a one night stand, a brief fling, or you're just wanting to date girls that aren't very smart or that don't have much self esteem.
Talk down to you? Now you’re getting your feelings hurt over how the narrator of a book is addressing you? Like I said earlier, you seem to have a tendency to take things way too personally.
Deangelo calls his readers, wussies, pansies, and chumps in his articles. I wouldn't put up with someone calling me that in real life let alone pay money to hear it in book format.
This right here proves exactly what I said in my last post about some people having more holes in their personalities than they want to admit. Man, you’re sitting here blaming concepts like destiny and fate for your lack of happiness when the truth is that you are refusing to take responsibility for anything. At the risk of sounding like an ásshole here, it’s your own fault that you’re not good at these things. You haven’t put any effort into getting good at them. And what’s worse is that you’ve made up some excuse in your head to justify it that, “That’s just the way it is. I can’t do anything about it.”
I think you're misreading me here. I'm not blaming destiny or fate. I'm just saying that the ugly truth of the matter is that some people will never be good at these things. Even after buying the books and using them to set up dates and have the relationships fail because**** and funny will only go so far, and when the real person is revealed and it's completely unlike the guy they have been pitched from previous dates, things are going to get ugly.
See, that’s funny because Michael Jordan got cut from his high school basketball team for not being good enough.
How many times did he try? Michael had a natural athletic ability, something he excelled at. He was also decent at baseball if I remember correctly. (sorry not a big sports guru) so he had the talent to begin with. He refined it and became good at it. He was judged by a guy that, (if he's anything like my basketball coach) couldn't make a 3 pointer himself let alone a jump shot. Michael new he had talent and he knew it. He had an aptitude for it. I know I'll never be a mathematician because my math skills are atrocious, but I have talent in writing, (troll me I dare you ) so if I went to school for it and actually tried really hard at it, I know I would could be really really good at it in the end. Accepting what you are isn't weakness and I have no problem with changing a self destructive habit or tendency but completely altering who you are is something different.
Going from being a nice guy to a jerk is something different, and yes Deangelo is a jerk. He's even admitted it in several of his papers, citing that the reason he's a jerk is because women like it.
Excuse me if I don't want to be a jerk.
I'm fine with being an ***hole however. (Inside Joke )
Nevertheless, even playing devil’s advocate here and assuming all of these guys are just hustlers that care nothing for their clientele, if the stuff works and I get what I want, what do I really care what their motive is? I still got what I wanted. I got what I paid for. I have no reason to be anything but happy.
Nope. If you're down with changing yourself to be more enticing to drunken club girls more power to you. May your STD's be few and your unplanned pregnancies be far between. | |
|
| |
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 4/5/2009 11:04:09 AM | I think David Deangelo should be required reading for any woman over the age of 18. There is a woman who posts in relationships who keeps us up to date on her love life. Sheesh! She is a living, walking example of some guy using chapter and verse to lure her, and she is falling for it hook, line, and sinker.
Heck, the guy must have graduated with top honors, because this adult woman is behaving like a love-struck teen aged girl.
I've known other guys who tried the techniques that fell flat on their faces. I wonder what is the difference? | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 4/25/2009 6:45:54 PM | Although I have not bought this program, and tried it, I think that I am going to call call B/S on this one.
Simply put, the only guys that are really going to get away with this crap, are the ones that have alot going for them in the first place
I am talking about good looking, in shape, good conversationalists. Basically the top ten percent of men.
An average looking, average physically attributed guy would never get away with this the attitudes and B/S that David tells you to use in his system.
That having been said, he does make a good point, and that is this:
Woman are not attracted to guys that swoon over them, and are not attracted to "wuss's", as he puts it. If you let a woman walk all over you, and constantly compliment her, then you are giving her nothing to work for. There is something to be said for MAKING HER CHASE YOU A BIT as well.
The reality is that even the plain jane looking woman has a better chance of guys chasing her than her male counterpart.
So theres my 2 cents. | |
|
| |
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 6/1/2009 10:40:24 AM | | I think his basic message is sound. I have tried being not rude, but**** and funny, and it works better than just being nice, especially on the first date. The theme is that women like funny, confident guys, and he gives some good tips. I read what he says, at least. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 6/1/2009 12:10:08 PM | | DeScamgelo is a COMPLETE sleeze. He's taking money from completely desperate lonely people and feeding them garbage info or telling them the obvious. It makes me sick when I see dating sites trying to peddle that crap. Why he hasn't been charged with fraud is beyond me. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 6/1/2009 1:26:06 PM | I receive David DeAngelo's email mesages encouraging me to buy his programs. I haven't yet. Probably never will. But I am able to glean some good tips from some of his emails. I share these with other male friends. I have a buddy at work, who is happily married, but is a natural when it comes to women. He often engages women in conversations when he goes out with his buddies, just to show them how easy it is to do so. He says his friends are in awe of his abilities. If you know someone like this friend of mine, I would suggest you just go out with him and pay attention to what he does, and how the women behave around him. ..................................................................................................................... One friend said all you need to do is flip the girls some bullshit. That's what they like hearing. And this guy has many dates. He's heavier than me, and he doesn't shower very often, but he's beating the girls off with a stick, so many of them want him. This just doesn't compute in my brain, yet it is working for him. DeAngelo offers basically the same information, with the same results.
So there has to be some truth to the things he says.
I look forward to reading his emails, but I will probably never buy his programs. Because they cost a fortune! And there are so many different progams to buy! | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 6/1/2009 4:57:39 PM | | His tips work, but I bought the book several years back, and it's a kind of a rip off. I wouldn't spend money on it. I have read books about dating from many sources, and they were all very helpful. Just pay attention to advice in "seduction" forums. The most important tip is be confident. Notice your strengths and accentuate them. | |
|
| David Deangelo Double Your Dating - Any feedback? Posted: 6/2/2009 12:32:07 AM | I bought his Ebook a long time ago, probably around 2002-2003 ish. Unfortunately I don't have his book anymore, but from what I remember, his E-book is very in-depth. Lots of good juicy information in their, VALID, LEGIT material in there that, if applied, will help you get better with women. A lot of people here are (as usual) talking a lot of nonsense and they don't even know what he talks about in his book. If you want to up your game, I'd suggest at the least subscribing to his emails. If you like what he's got to say, then go ahead and get the book.
Now, to the part that I always love to address: LADIES. Please, can it with the "This stuff doesn't work! WE'RE ON TO YOUR TRICKS!"
No, you're not. I've been using techniques/concepts from pick-up artists like David, Mystery, Neil Straus, etc. And nothing cracks me up more than women come on here and say that stuff doesn't work, because it does. Learn a little about it, and THEN you can actually put in your 2 cents. Thanks!  | |
|
|
| Page 29 of 33
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 |
|