| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 3:31:43 PM | Foreplay is the best part of sex... Not only do you satisfy your partner, but you are also satisfied. And, it adds to what is going to come.
I had a boyfriend and we could have sex for several hours at a time. It involved a lot of communication, as well as switching up the positions.
The best sex I ever had lasted for a total of 45 minutes. That included some foreplay and then about 30 minutes or so of amazing sex. Neither of us were bored, and I was completely satisfied several times...
I have had sex for 4 hours before and it became uncomfortable and I found myself saying...I wish he'd just finish so I can go to bed.
The best sex happens when both parties communicate, and are looking to completely satisfy each other.  | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 3:50:55 PM | | if people can say that without get to now you a bit i,t mite get dry this girl and i where were so hot for each other after the family diner and dropping every off we went to a hotel and of and on we did it all night.i like makeing i,t last! | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 4:25:25 PM | Longest was an allnighter, 6 hours, the most amazing man I have ever encountered, however, someone mentioned pace and I think that is absolutely the key.
I have also had some absolutely mindblowing 10 minute sessions too. All depends on what you want at the time.
Chacon son gout. To each his own, i guess. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 4:30:24 PM | I think good sex takes at least an hour. Starting foreplay with lots of teasing even before the nipples are touched then licked then sucked. Then working down to the lower areas where each new thing is approached slowly and in stages. When the tongue finally does it's thing the woman should be about ready to cum. Then before penetration the penis is rubbed on the clit gently for a bit before just a little penetration. this is slowly worked in deeper and just as slowly pulled out. Taking time like this drives the woman into a state of extacy. She will begin to beg for more penetration, which is only very gradually allowed. Eventually it will be going in all the way and the cumming will be quick and intense.javascript:smilie(' ')
javascript:smilie('') | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 4:46:46 PM | Depends on the circumstances. I generally go around 30 minutes but in cases where there is considerable anticipation or more of an arousal factor, that can be quicker. In other cases where, for example, it is the second time around, I can go a longer time sometimes reaching exhaustion before orgasm.
I have sort of done it all night in that we had sex several times through the night between snoozes. I mean, we weren't literally doing it ALL NIGHT, but we did it several times through the course of the night. Sometimes I would initiate, sometimes she did.
The VERY best sex I ever had was probably when we both reached orgasm quickly because we were already quite aroused before we ever got our clothes off. And a second time when I was taking longer but she was quite into it and had several orgasms in the course of mine. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 4:51:39 PM | 5 minutes???
Buy your boyfriend some Viagra.lol
lol and lol and lol ohhhh yes it's all soooooooo funny ha ha ha.
It's called a quickie which can be a lot of fun too.
"Let's meet for lunch sweetie and I'll fcuk you in the public restroom before we have to go back to work."
I take it you've never experienced this before LUV | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 5:20:36 PM | Okay, I'm getting various replies all over the board and not to mention some strange questions via email.
I posted this thread to read many different replies and I've enjoyed reading them all. However, I do have an underlying reason for this.
I've been in 2 very long term relationships and I've had sex and made love in just about every way possible. In these relationships, I had fast sex and love making that lasted for several hours, but I met a man 2 years ago that I dated for 2 months before we became sexually active.
In one of our numerous conversations (before intimacy) he stated that he had couldn't cum therefore he could have sex all night. We talked more about this and joked around but eventually he told me that he had never met a woman that could make him cum. Yeah, okay and I'm not stupid so I left with the impression that this was just a come on. Within the next few weeks of dating, we made love for the first time and I thought I was going to die. He was a passionate lover and the foreplay was unreal. Still after 6 hours of butt busting, I could not make him cum. I was completely exhausted. This was some of the best sex I've ever had but I was determined to make this man have an orgasim. We dated for another 5 months and yes, he did!!!!!! I might add that after 50 or so sexual sessions with this one lover, the sex always lasted 2 hours or longer and he cam maybe a dozen times. All the other times we just collapsed and fell asleep.
What makes a man this way? | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 6:40:13 PM |
the sex always lasted 2 hours or longer and he cam maybe a dozen times.
...
What makes a man this way?
LSD apparently because you're trippin'
A guy who "always" cums a dozen times and can screw for hours ... "always"? | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 7:45:39 PM |
LSD apparently because you're trippin'
A guy who "always" cums a dozen times and can screw for hours ... "always"?
"LSD and trippin" oh you're soooooo funny. Let me think about a lol here...No I think NOT!!!!!!
You completely misunderstood me. Read again! Out of 50 60 or whatever sexual encounters we had together, he cam maybe a dozen times. I didn't type he cam 12 times in one love making session. HE VERY RARELY CAM BUT LASTED FOR MANY HOURS! | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 9:18:11 PM | | Personally- I prefer it to last as long as possible. I like to play for a bit, take a break, play some more... you get the picture. I guess its like building up as much sexual tension as possible and then letting us both explode when it seems right. But dang- an entire night filled with sex play is the best. yummy. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/1/2008 9:19:41 PM | You know OP i thought about your last post, and i tend to think that there is biological consistancy with regard to male preformance and time, as youve mentioned your experience of him climaxing a dozen times. The sensation is still there but a tad bit duller as time goes on. But he wasnt losing out, just experiencing a different sensation. IMO a guy doesnt have to ( but its certainly as tony the tiger would say GGGGRRRREAAAATTTT!!! ) cum for a great experience. Long lasting love making adds more of a mind to the experience and is still euphoric physically. So in that respect its almost apples and oranges
Men are biologically primed for quick sex. We are no different than animals in this regard. Not to say that we cannot enjoy longer sesions but the pleasure is a bit different. | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 1:42:11 AM | javascript:smilie(' ')
javascript:smilie('')
If I had not been there, I would not believe this story......
It started between 9:30 and 10:00 pm on a Friday night....
None stop... this way, that way, this variation, that variation, oh turn over now, let me change this and get a new one on. Ohh, need a pillow here... :D
At one point my dear love looked at me breathlessly and smiled the biggest smile. With a grin and a new one on I said to her jokingly,"Are you ready for round two?"
Her mouth fell open and she screeched, "ohmigawd! Again??"
I just looked at her and thought about it for a second,"Well, yeah! Why not?"
We eventually stopped because the blinds were not shut enough to keep the sun out of our eyes. The blinds were then closed and the cuddling began. It was about 7am and 1 1/2 of those 12 pack boxes were used. I never slept so hard in my life. Dead to the world but happy as happy could be. There wasn't any of that pain or trying to get the other to go problem either.
The problem was that I ran into her friends one day and they were acting weird. Yep, she told them all about it. javascript:smilie('')
javascript:smilie('')
No drugs or help toys were used in this performance. I'm also not sure if I could do it again and live through it.
javascript:smilie(' ')
javascript:smilie('') | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 1:47:17 AM | Through some quirk of fate over the last few years I have been able to come to the point that I can go 1-2-3 hours without an orgasm in a sexual encounter go to sleep and then go at it again for another couple of hours.
Not sure for the reason for this, but I have come to rather enjoy it.I have come to realize as I approach 40 very soon, that it is about the journey and not the destination. I enjoy pleasuring a women and bringing her to orgasm several times to my one or none.
That said, any encounter that is pleasurable to both partners inspite the fact that neither partner may not orgasm or orgasm is allllllll good. So 10 miniute quickie or 5 hour marathon are ok in my book. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 3:21:00 AM | From my personal experience going all night is never a problem. For me i get my sexual pleasure from seeing my sexual partner climb the walls with pleasure, then and only then can i climax myself.
There is a time and a place i think. Sometimes you can get the job done in 30 mins sometimes it takes all day or night. Whichever it is i have allways been up to the challenge.
I would like to know how some men can get the job done in under 10 minutes, seems like an impossibility to me.
At the end of the day we are all individuals and there is a perfect sexual partner out there for everyone. | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 5:00:13 AM | | i've never watched the clock while having fun!! as has been said before,i guess it depends on the mood you're in..i find starting out the evening with a candle light dinner and slow dancing can lead into hrs of making love, but at the same time quicky spontaneous love making done unexpectedly and in an unusual place can be quite the experience as well. | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 5:56:21 AM | | heres a tip for those whom are premature,as ive always been.get your partner to get round 1 off,whether by a bj or by hand,and in my own expieriance,after thats done and i start intimante foreplay with her and going down on her mr happy is once again at attention and much less sensitive,which allows for a much longer penatration session | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 6:31:10 AM | I know I shouldn't be posting here, due to the fact I cannot delete it and it is going to show up on my profile, but I am anyways because I can.
let's see quick or lasting?? as long as I am having fun, it doesnt matter to me. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 6:42:09 AM | | jizzyn1, just as every guy has more or less stamina so do girls. Some girls can not miss a beat and just keep going, while others might slight your throat if you move inside them after they cum or touch them bc they are so sensitive, and some women can finish in a few minutes whereas others are more than an hour or never! I've been told by a few that their stamina depends on the emotional connection with the person. If they like the person and have deep feelings for them they can finish easily but if they don't or they are not happy it will likely not happen at all regardless of how good the guy is in bed. I've had a girl finish as quickly as about 2 minutes. I coudlnt' beleive it bc I was used to others taking 10, 20, 30 minutes.....had never heard of a minute woman before! LOL Thought that title was limited to male members only! | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 6:47:43 AM | sex is great if the mate makes it good.......5,10, 15 minutes..that will just piss me off! that ain't sex..intercourse guess that's what u would call that!
yeah, i've had it all night and it was great ..cause he had it like that!
best sex is when time is taken to make sure it is good...10 minutes, lol not 4 me | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 6:49:18 AM | In my opinion Quick or long depends on what you mean= penetration, foreplay?
For me i treat it like a seven course meal.... Long time with lots of detail, its in the
preparations, delivery. As for the length of time > I'm not concerned with it. If its
quiet and no response then i'll stop... | |
|
Home
login 
