| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 6:58:47 AM | I truly beleive taking time and enjoying all there is to offer. Exploring each other sensually, heightens the experience. As men were not endowed with the ability of continual multiple orgasms, it is more exciting to have the woman enjoy the experience to its fullest. It relates to flying, " Take her to the heavens as she's never been before then bring her gently back to earth." Although, there is the thrill of being caught there are some places that heightens the experience. This is not for all, everyone is an exhibishonist at heart, there are only a few that actually can enjoy the thrill, so being daring and changing it up once in a while can go along way. Years ago I used to be able to go all nite, but I also found the same problem, the women can get sore, or just dry out.. SO in short its not worth the all nite. Average sessions can be more enjoyable for both as well as mor satisfying. ( a quicky when the mood strikes can be just as satisfying to both once in a while. )
 | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/2/2008 7:01:14 AM |
Most sex will last 5, 10 or 15 minutes. Some lovers can go as long as 30 mins or more. What is the longest sexual experience you've endured? Was it pleasurable or did it become long and boring waiting for a man/woman to cum?
When people state that they can make love all night...is this true? Have you ever made love to someone all night?
In your experiences is the best sex wham bam over in 10 minutes or making it last as long as humanly possible?
Think back to your best sexual experiences.
Depends on who your with....
Sometimes all night is not long enough....
Sometimes 5 minutes is too long....
Depends on your partner | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/18/2008 5:38:34 PM |
Depends on who your with....
Sometimes all night is not long enough....
Sometimes 5 minutes is too long....
Depends on your partner
Well stated Cocytus. Been there and done all the above and prefer the hours upon end.
Pardon pun. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/18/2008 6:36:46 PM | 5, 10 or 15 minutes!!!! That's gotta be illegal or immoral or something! OMG I would feel so ripped off by that.
Yes, some people can last all night. The best, however, is somewhere in between the 10 minute quickie and the all night sessions. The best is where there is a lot of emotion involved. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/18/2008 9:18:19 PM | wow great information deuce98 for men who are way too quick
for me its until i orgasm and they orgasm which can vary
from from 10 to 20 mins depending
diff needs at diff times
but too quick is totally never enjoyableeeeeee ugh
i love the kissing
that should last foreverrrrrr | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/18/2008 10:04:44 PM | Its been my experience that in an circumstance most men last around 3 minutes the first time through, after people can vary.
How ever when I drink I can go for just around an 1hour 1:20 Ill take the pepsi challenge anyday. Funny thing is I dont drink any more....
K | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/18/2008 10:59:17 PM | I'd say my longest was pushing 2 hours of almost all the time being physically coupled at the groin. Gotta say it was Viagra-assisted. Don't really need the things, but I got a sample pack from the MD anyway (figured WTF, why not have them around). And it happened to be with somebody I was hugely attracted to and who could have sex 6-8 times a day. But this was a case that even when we weren't actively fvcking (like getting drinks of water between moments), she was astride me with me in her.
But after a couple of hours, it wasn't fun anymore. I'd say the best usually lasts between 30-45 minutes.
And for those that haven't take Viagra, Cialis, etc., it may help for you to understand that those meds to give you an erection, they allow you to have one. You still need the partner and your own feelings to be in sync. But when they are all REALLY, REALLY in sync, those meds can indeed cause the (by now historic) 4 hour erection problem
 | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/18/2008 11:21:35 PM | RE: First post.
Hard to answer. My longest sexual experience could be termed as "all night long" but not like... continuously. Most of that was foreplay and pawing and exploring etc. Actual intercourse all told throughout the night was probably 4 times spaced hours apart and adding up to probably... gah, who knows, I'll say 1 hour and ten minutes. As for how long actualy intercourse SHOULD be, no matter the variety of positions you change to, I think it gets boring for me after 25 mins and anything more than 45 and it just goes straight downhill into like... "I wont even be able to finish." Plus there can be chafing. ^_^
20 is ideal for me but with lots of "fun" beforehand. Best I can answer that question. Hahahaha, not sure if I could do an all nighter again(I could if she was ridiculously sensual I guess. Hahah). Im only 23, but I still dont have the energy I did 3 years ago. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/19/2008 11:32:08 AM | Over the years I've had three experiences with women which stay stuck in my mind...one girl I'd never date again, one I'd not mind dating again and the last I'd marry in a heartbeat. All nighter's each one...
One was a fantastic lay every night but had a dark soul  ...one could literally blow you until you were walking backwards on your elbows trying to escape because you thought your brain was going to explode if you came again  , and one was the perfect combination of lovemaking, heart & soul... 
What would you rather have, orgasm after glorious orgasm with women you care about or just one pop-shot?? In my case I'd rather have the all-night until we were so exhausted we could only lie there & snuggle. But not every night...just on the weekends  One or two hours a night is quite sufficient...and quite a good workout!  | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/19/2008 1:51:21 PM | | I think it just depends on the persons schedule. I've had sex all night long many times and I prefer it that way. But something is always better than nothing. But the "wham bam thank you ma'am" thing can get old very quickly. If you are sexually compatible with someone it's hard to say how much is enough. I'm one to get totally addicted to anything I enjoy. I've also talked to women that has sex for obligatory purposes, but it always seems they are in the relationship for the wrong reasons or something is emotionally wrong with them. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/19/2008 2:07:33 PM | 3 hours, in a car. It was good but we were both very, very sore the next few days. She felt bad because she didn't think she was any good. I felt bad because she didn't think she felt any good (but was in-fact amazing). I was also a little embarrased by my inability to orgasm. It's happened before, always after very long periods of no sex.
I prefer my foreplay about an hour and sex no less than half an hour and no more than an hour.
Otherwise girls get dry, and soreness the next day is inevitable. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/19/2008 5:10:24 PM | Okay, sex in a car is yummy, quick, a craving desire to just get "laid".
Quickies should be quickies. No more than 15 minutes, everyone enjoys themselves and handles their business and moves on.
Hours of sex, all night, well lets just say that it doesnt happen like in the movies. I would consider my all nighters as this: dinner, back to my your/his/her place, sex begins around say 10:00pm, and continues until around 2:00am. There is of course fun, laughter, talking, teasing, drinks in between.
So I'm all over the scope on this topic. All is good, and its title basically states what the act is. Quick or Long... Doesnt matter as long as it serves it purpose and you both walk away SMILING | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/20/2008 7:36:26 AM | | I always found that condoms do make a difference. Without, I usually last from 20-30 minutes of penetration, but without one it lasts a lot longer, almost to the point of frustration. The longest 'session' I ever had was with someone I did not love but was very attracted to. We started at 8PM and went to 9AM with very little sleep. In that time, we had actual sex 22 times. No, that's not bulls***, and it was the one time, and there were a few when I did not reach climax, but got too tired to go on. I will say that for me, personally, the first time usually goes maybe 20 minutes, but the second round, if within an hour, lasts a lot longer. Too long, really. Then #3 is quicker. Goes like that in rotation. Usually if it goes too long, tho, I find that that the girl gets too sore to go on. | |
|
| |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/20/2008 7:13:17 PM | my longest session took about 3 hours but felt like days exspecialy if you have something before hand and during like a little smoke of something to get you going and i only cum twice while my partner come at least 8 time she thought that was fantastic concidering we are both in our late fiftys  | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/20/2008 9:47:36 PM | For me, first-time sex can last for a long time. Eventually, one of us gets so tired that it's distracting from the pleasure. Then, it lasts even longer. Ans I have to make a conscious decision to make my delivery, and really focus on it, before my partner gets too sore and tired.
After first-time sex, foreplay can last all day and all night. Then, the best sex just takes the amnount of time that it takes. For me, that's generally 15-20 minutes.
Generally, keeping my partner in a state of right-now pleasure is much more important than risking making her sore or tired.
The right experience takes the right amount of time. | |
|
smd83
|
Joined: 1/17/2008
Msg: 69 | |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 2:33:08 AM | | All night.. yeah can be done, as can all day in bed.. it can be pretty exhausting lol those were pretty wild sessions... but then again a 5min quickie somewhere were you shouldn't be can also be just as hot | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 5:04:11 AM | 1 day, a few years back, over an 8 hour period 6 of them were spent having sex, the first sessian was about 3 hours, the second was about 2 and the third was actually ridiculous painful and lasted an hour, still good but wow I should have stopped after the first 5 hours haha.
It was epic, but I had trouble with my pants after and she literally had difficulty sitting down for a week. While it was one of the more impressive encounters, I think she probably enjoyed it more than I did haha, multi-orgasms aren't something I can pull off so I had to hold off for extremely long and arduous amounts of time.
I ain't dating her anymore however, but at least I'm pretty much guaranteed not to be the worst she's ever had haha. | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 5:24:15 AM | Longest has been 4 or 5 hours...I lost count.
It got sore and boring after a while.
An hour of sex (post foreplay) is good for me...longer than that and I start to run out of steam (if thats what the kids are calling it these days) | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 8:41:47 AM |
Bull Shit LOL. Unless his name is Superman you are totally full of crap.
Aaronohaaran,
Read the forums and posts before making a stupid comment. Read my post #36.
He DIDNT cum 12 times in one night. This man rarely cam and could last for hours on end. Of all the great sex we had during the course of several months, he cam about a dozen times. He was like Superman or the Energizer Bunny.....he kept going and going and going and collapsed after many hours without ejaculating. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 9:25:26 AM | Can I ask a favour of all the ladies actually reading this thread? Most complain about men who finish too quickly and then don't take the time to work on their women to let them have an orgasm afterward, leaving them unfulfilled. But some of us guys have the other problem where sometimes they can go for hours and it's exhausting TRYING to peak. The first time, and usually the second, I can usually cum but I have to work at it and really concentrate the second time. If there's time and energy for a third round though I find it nearly impossible to peak without oral or manual stimulation. But some of the girls I've been with have refused to continue. They have the attitude that "I'm sorry you can't cum, let's go to bed already". Take a few minutes and get the guy off! LOL Sheer penetration, no matter how slow and soft or fast and vigorous it is I can last for hours. I have no idea how long because I have not had trouble holding back or had the opportunity to just orgasm without having to really work at it and position myself or her correctly. But with manual or oral stimulation I can get off pretty quick if I relax. I shouldn't have to go to the bathroom and finish myself off while you drift away to sleep! I know another guy who has this same problem, so to speak (a lot of guys will want to lynch me probably for calling it a "problem"), and he has mentioned the same complaint in his relationships or conquests if you will.
And on another note, I can't see anyone wanting to cum more than four times in a night! Even if you were a minute man I think it'd hurt like hell after three or four! I feel like I got kicked in the junk after three times. It hurts to touch, hurts to pee, hurts to anything! But maybe that's attributed to the time spent in the sex. Who knows. Anyway you get it I guess is good, and most will take whatever they can get in terms of quantity. I can't say I've said no because I was too sore before. Maybe asked to take it easy. | |
|
Home
login 
