|
|
|
|
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 12:26:30 PM | My all time record is 10 hours 47 minutes, that includes a 15 minute lunch break, as well as 2 15 minute hydration breaks.
The key point was that she was into working for it too. My last girlfriend and I tried and she gave out consistently after around 3 hours 45 mins even with about 15 bucks worth of ky
If you want to learn how to last longer you have to (this is for the guys) unlearn everything you learned by yourself, when your parents could walk in at any time
most guys train themselves to take as little time as possible and we are generally lazy so we stick with what works. Only problem is in this instance it only work for one person.
Kama Sutra is supposed to be good too but I haven't tried so check it out
Have fun trying | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 12:37:44 PM | | I find it funny how people time their efforts. I have no clue what time it is usually when we start or finish. And I don't equate being able to have sex to orgasm 6 times in a 7 hour span the same as having had sex for 7 hours continuously without having to stop for pee breaks, drinks, smokes, food, or to rest or perform oral sex so taht you can last longer. When they ask how long is your longest performance they are asking how long can you go before you blow. Any minute man can go for hours if he is prepared to spend 95% of those hours with his face buried in the mound. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 5:14:20 PM | Mhmm... I really do not know what to say.
My best experiences have nothing to do with "how long" or "how many times". Let's say that it depends alot on how the chemical is working. There are women that are very sexy but then, in the bed, there is no "feeling". Others can be really able to get me deeply involved, although I initially thought they might have been "cold".
In a few words, "it depends".
P.S. Sorry for my bad English. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 5:25:46 PM | One recent encounter lasted about 30 minutes following a 30 min break, and then back at it again. I usually take a while to cum but I came quicker then ever with this partner and enjoyed every lasting second  Quickies less then 30 min never do much for me because I takes me a while.
I have had one experience that lasted 7 hours but there were frequent breaks and lapsed times in between. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 10:12:08 PM |
Can I ask a favour of all the ladies actually reading this thread? Most complain about men who finish too quickly and then don't take the time to work on their women to let them have an orgasm afterward, leaving them unfulfilled. But some of us guys have the other problem where sometimes they can go for hours and it's exhausting TRYING to peak. The first time, and usually the second, I can usually cum but I have to work at it and really concentrate the second time. If there's time and energy for a third round though I find it nearly impossible to peak without oral or manual stimulation. But some of the girls I've been with have refused to continue. They have the attitude that "I'm sorry you can't cum, let's go to bed already". Take a few minutes and get the guy off! LOL Sheer penetration, no matter how slow and soft or fast and vigorous it is I can last for hours. I have no idea how long because I have not had trouble holding back or had the opportunity to just orgasm without having to really work at it and position myself or her correctly. But with manual or oral stimulation I can get off pretty quick if I relax. I shouldn't have to go to the bathroom and finish myself off while you drift away to sleep! I know another guy who has this same problem, so to speak (a lot of guys will want to lynch me probably for calling it a "problem"), and he has mentioned the same complaint in his relationships or conquests if you will.
Deuce98,
Thank you, this is what I've been speaking of throughout this thread.
Having sex with this man lasted many hours which included lots of foreplay and oral sex, but I've never been with anyone that had the stamina that he had. The first penetration of the night may have lasted 30-45 mins. He could make me cum 5, 6, 7 times, but most times he couldn't cum. After having oral sex with him, this usually got him off but if it didn't, we would go back to straight sex and he could go another 30 mins or longer. After 3-4 rounds of this, we began to get sore and stop or collapse and fall asleep.
To me sex is always good whether it last for 15 mins or an hour, but there was never a quickie with this man. Before we started having sex, he told me he could make love for hours without having an orgasm. He said that he had always been this way and he didn't know the reason how he could last so long.
Believe me, I loved it. The sex was great, but at times it became frustrating to me that he didn't cum. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/21/2008 10:26:53 PM | And many men feel this way about women......so.....tit for tat....or ball for vagina...... 
Many women will tell their man that it does not matter if they orgasm each time, and that is just part of life and love making, but god forbid a man does not reach each and every time......the world is falling apart if not, and what has she done wrong, or worse yet.....what is wrong with him.....lmao
If you can reach 4, 5, or 6 times before I do, then we are on target for what is good for the both of us......and if you are good, then you will make me reach as well.....but just as there are times that you may not reach......know for sure that it may also happen to your man.
Just my opinion......   | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/22/2008 3:21:23 AM | Neither is necessarily better than the other.
My most enjoyable (recent) experience was with a woman I had a massive physical connection with, and intellectual (alas, not the emotional, as much). We just decided we had to rush off to the bedroom .....
It was lust, pure and simple. It was hard, fast and damned sexy - standing up against a wall, the house literally shaking. It was noisy, sweaty, and urgent. It was amazing. I have not had had too many experiences like it.
On the other hand, I've experienced loving, slow, thoughtful sex that was intense, emotionally, to the point that intercourse itself was almost forgotten about. And, that, my friends, is my favourite - with someone you adore and connect with emotionally.
If you can have both types then you are indeed fortunate. I have.
Cheers,
Steve | |
|
| |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/22/2008 6:21:31 AM | Enfman, now if you can find a lady/man that can give you BOTH pleasures and you both match in terms of stamina and desires then you my friend have lucked out. I've met my maker in the sheets.......I really hope she breaks down her walls soon! All I can say is phenomenal when you do finally find that special person.
Why is it that women feel greedy when they have 3, 4, 5 or more orgasms in a single session and the guy has just one? I can have multiple orgasms without having to break in between. But I generally try and hold off as long as possible if I need to until she says she wants to finish me off. I feel that's her department bc I work hard to make sure she peaks. She should have a timeline in her head of when she wants me to as well. Reading taht back it sounded really selfish! LOL It's not actually and I hope you all recognize what it is I'm trying to say. As a guy, and I'm not sure but I think I speak for most, we feel proud of ourselves if we can make you cum even once. But if it happens more than once we are on top of the world and the experience is THAT much better! If your man is able to go that long embrace it because if you were on the other end, where he got off quickly and you were left hanging there or having to have him finish you off orally you likely wouldn't be so happy about the situation. | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/22/2008 9:33:37 AM |
If you can reach 4, 5, or 6 times before I do, then we are on target for what is good for the both of us......and if you are good, then you will make me reach as well.....but just as there are times that you may not reach......know for sure that it may also happen to your man.
Why is it that women feel greedy when they have 3, 4, 5 or more orgasms in a single session and the guy has just one? I can have multiple orgasms without having to break in between. But I generally try and hold off as long as possible if I need to until she says she wants to finish me off. I feel that's her department bc I work hard to make sure she peaks. She should have a timeline in her head of when she wants me to as well. Reading taht back it sounded really selfish! LOL It's not actually and I hope you all recognize what it is I'm trying to say. As a guy, and I'm not sure but I think I speak for most, we feel proud of ourselves if we can make you cum even once. But if it happens more than once we are on top of the world and the experience is THAT much better! If your man is able to go that long embrace it because if you were on the other end, where he got off quickly and you were left hanging there or having to have him finish you off orally you likely wouldn't be so happy about the situation.
Deuce98 and C Deacon,
So correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I'm reading this is that the primary goal for a man while having sex is in the performance to allow for multiple orgasms from his mate regardless if he blows or not?! This is the first time I have contemplated this from a man's point of view.
Wait now, don't misunderstand me. With all the sexual experiences I have had with a handfull of men, I never had one NOT cum until I met this one guy 2 years ago. As I have explained several times throughout this thread...we could go for hours with foreplay, oral, sensuous and rough hot sweaty sex and usually he didn't cum after I got off many times. The frustrating part for me was thinking something was wrong because he didn't peak each and every time. I did ask him "why" and he simply said "It doesn't matter why, just know that if you're satisfied, I'm satisfied and it's some of the best sex I've ever had." I never really understood this until now.
So, while a man is making love to a woman (aside from all the other feelings) his aim is to make her climax regardless if does or not; therefore, he has achieved what he was going after which makes for great sex in his mind. The more she cums the longer the sex is if he has the stamina. It's more of him getting off mentally than physically? Wow....my assumption of most men being selfish in bed has changed. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/22/2008 9:42:34 AM | | jtwaters, How many times have you had an encounter where he didn't make you cum though, and once he was done he was done? This seems to happen so often, and for those guys who do take a lot of time to orgasm it happens to us as well sometimes, although not as often as it probably happens to women. In bed my main focus is her pleasure. Any way you cut it I'm going to have fun and feel good doing it, unless it's really kinky and outside my comfort zone and I'll stop it before it gets there and say something. I don't INSIST on her having multiple orgasms but if she cums in 5 minutes and I don't want to stop and she seems intent on carrying on I want to give her more and more and more if I can. I feel as long as I can go, and she wants to go, and we have time on our side why stop to sleep or eat or whatnot?! I'm focused on her pleasure mainly. I like to explore. I used to tell my exwife when I wouldn't come that I was ok with it bc she REALLY wanted to stop due to pain supposedly, and I'd either roll over and go to bed or I'd go and finish myself in the bathroom. There are times when I can't cum no matter how hard I or she tries, but that is if I've already came a couple times that night and we've been at it for hours. If I'm REALLY tired my body just can't do it. But your assumption is correct, in my case at least. I KNOW there are men that don't think this way, and it's evident with all the women talking about how they just got off and go to bed afterward, leaving the woman unfulfilled. | |
|
| |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/22/2008 7:38:45 PM | | I think it all depends on how excited a person gets. Foreplay is a must of course but even then it still depends. My last girlfriend i was going for 2-3 hours constantly. went 4 hours a few times but she got sore. sometimes quick 30 minutes is nice and perfect. I think if your lasting to long you should figure out why its takeing so long try and get excited more. if your lasting to short 5-10 15 minutes.. try and relax. I would think 1 hour min would be a start. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/23/2008 12:54:16 AM | Hm. The person I am 'with' now sexually is a marathon man! Our longest session consisted of the following:
3 hours of me going down on him
1 hour of him going down on me
1 hour of sex.
And honestly, it was all kinds of awesome. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/23/2008 2:02:30 AM | | ive had sort one,s that were good but long one,s are the best to me it,s not good untill she has came at least twice and when were both in to a all nighter and she starts f.e.m.o.it makes me crazy and we both want more. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/23/2008 7:47:07 AM | I remember a very long sex session with this kinky, sexual freak of a woman I was going out with a few years ago. To be honest, we lost track of the time, but we were at it for like 4 maybe 5 hours, with breaks in between of course.
I lost count how many times she came, but I had to make sure I didn't cum once, because as well all know, once the man pops he stops!
I don't know if that counts because we did have breaks in between (watching her porn collection and stuffing our faces with fast food and junk LOL!), but it was a marathon session that's for sure. 
I was knocked out for like half a day when I finally had my release 
EDIT:
Definitely much, MUCH better long lasting (if the man can hold back that is!). | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/23/2008 8:03:11 AM | jt......
I hope that your impression and image of many men will change as you mature and understand that not all of us are just ONE way and selfish alone.....
Just as many women will have sex with their man, even though maybe not in the mood, because he wants it and they want to please, and that is a wonderful way to please and enjoy, even if not really in that mode at the time, men can and do become the same way.....
Pleasing the other is just as important, if not more, than pleasing yourself when it comes to sex. Seldom is there more of a turn on then feeling, seeing, and knowing that your woman is reaching multiple times, turned on that much to you and enjoying that experience. Once there and satisfied, it has a way of turning man on as well, and that orgasm can be oh so much more intense then just one pleasing yourself and not having your woman pleased the way you want and are.
Having that stamina is very important and that comes with maturity, experience, and desire to please as much as being pleased. Many will call it getting "over the hump", and there are those that practice getting to that point, but not over it, in order to last longer and please the one we are with. The potential down side to this, is that there are times that you just might want to please, but not in the mood to get over the hump, or you want to enjoy, but not sure if you are capable that particular time of getting that far.
Much has to do with mood, number of times having sex in a session, day, or week, and also your physical mood, stress, and all the things that many women have stated and used for years and years when not capable. There is nothing wrong with this, and very common, just needs to be understood, talked about and communicated in such a way, that neither of you feels slighted, frustrated, or misunderstood.
Just my opinion......... | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/24/2008 11:55:13 AM | The longest sex session I have had was with a ex bf, and he'd go for about 20 minutes, longest session was 25 minutes.....but sometimes all you really need is a good quicky, I have gone to my bf's place (while we were dating) during the lunch break in high school,and we'd have a quick 5 minute session and i'd go back to school all happy..
When me and my ex had sex, we would usually put on dance type music, and have sex to that. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/24/2008 12:00:01 PM | | Maybe this is why you are on here looking for intimate encounters with women then....because men have not satisfied you. Are you able to have an orgasm in 20 minutes?! I'd highly doubt it's possible in 5, but I do know one woman that if she's with someone she really cares for can in a few minutes. I'd hardly be smiling from a 5 minute encounter. | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/24/2008 1:30:54 PM |
jt......
I hope that your impression and image of many men will change as you mature and understand that not all of us are just ONE way and selfish alone.....
Just as many women will have sex with their man, even though maybe not in the mood, because he wants it and they want to please, and that is a wonderful way to please and enjoy, even if not really in that mode at the time, men can and do become the same way.....
Pleasing the other is just as important, if not more, than pleasing yourself when it comes to sex. Seldom is there more of a turn on then feeling, seeing, and knowing that your woman is reaching multiple times, turned on that much to you and enjoying that experience. Once there and satisfied, it has a way of turning man on as well, and that orgasm can be oh so much more intense then just one pleasing yourself and not having your woman pleased the way you want and are.
Having that stamina is very important and that comes with maturity, experience, and desire to please as much as being pleased. Many will call it getting "over the hump", and there are those that practice getting to that point, but not over it, in order to last longer and please the one we are with. The potential down side to this, is that there are times that you just might want to please, but not in the mood to get over the hump, or you want to enjoy, but not sure if you are capable that particular time of getting that far.
Much has to do with mood, number of times having sex in a session, day, or week, and also your physical mood, stress, and all the things that many women have stated and used for years and years when not capable. There is nothing wrong with this, and very common, just needs to be understood, talked about and communicated in such a way, that neither of you feels slighted, frustrated, or misunderstood.
C Deacon,
I completely understand all of this. As far as maturity?... Well, I'm 45 years old and a very open minded sexual woman. My late husband of 17 years was never selfish in bed. We always aimed to please the other and in return we were pleasing ourselves sexually. We were very much in love and sex was always wonderful with my mate whether it be a quickie or for several hours.
However, the primary reason I started this thread was regarding not only all nighters, but in regards to this one particular man that I met several years ago. After my second relationship ended, I began to date frequently and I noticed that a couple of these men were selfish in bed. It was all about them getting off and turning over going to sleep. Needless to say, these short-term relationships ended in flings (because I flung them.) BUT, of my 2 long loving relationships and the few flings I've had, I never had a man that did not cum with me until I ran into Mr All Night Man. Regardless of how great the sex was with him, I could never understand why he didn't cum each and every time as stated in my following posts.
With reading some of the great info here from fellow posters, I have been enlightened and know more of how a man can have much stamina and still find sex enjoyable even if he doesn't shoot a load.
Thank you to everyone for posting. | |
|
|
| Page 4 of 6
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
|
Home
login 
