| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/24/2008 1:51:57 PM | | JTWATERS, it's good to hear you were smart enough to recognize the selfish ones and act on that. There are some guys that do care about a woman's needs and pay very close attention to them. Empirically speaking it is the pretty boys and the players that tend to be the more selfish as a rule, but there are always the exceptions to the rule. I've met my share of selfish women as well. The ones that expect you to go down on them for half an hour but then won't return the favour or refuse certain positions. | |
|
roddw
|
Joined: 1/7/2008
Msg: 102 | |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 1/24/2008 3:07:39 PM |
Empirically speaking it is the pretty boys and the players that tend to be the more selfish as a rule, but there are always the exceptions to the rule. I've met my share of selfish women as well. The ones that expect you to go down on them for half an hour but then won't return the favour or refuse certain positions.
I concur! The pretty boys that expect the 20 minute BJ and get off without attempting to satisfy me. Been there and done that a few times; not gonna happen again.
Thanks Deuce98 for all your input! | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/14/2008 11:45:45 PM |
thats funny cause I have gone for hours . my exs had to take breaks and onkly lasted max 20 minuts. and to this day I still have not been satisfied in bed
I'm not sure what's funnier...you having sex for hours and still not being satisfied or your ex taking breaks during 20 mins. of sex.
Good luck and happy  | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/15/2008 12:19:31 AM | Haha...looks like POF is the unofficial pornstar dating site. Hours?!?! Wow. Hearing that is like hearing about the guy who can pull a Volvo with a rope wrapped around his nuts. You wish him all the luck in the world and hope he doesn't break anything, but wouldn't put yourself in his shoes.
I'm more of a 10 min on, 10 min off, 20 min on, nap time! | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/15/2008 5:29:04 AM | best and memorable i had was all day foreplay and quickies trying different positions to the point of climaxing,then not a word,and only quick pecks of kisses THEN just leave the room-might happen up to 8+ times of the day,come that night -oh my god ravage each other with lingering passionate kisses and loooong slooooow love making,gees i should enter this in nancy friday 
i need to find a boyfriend quick I MISS IT !!! | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/15/2008 6:01:18 AM | Typically an hour or more. Shortest was 20min and was a lunch quickie. Foreplay is important and I love making the girl squirm, beg and or just make subtle noises. It's a pleasure for us both.
My best sessions were during my schooling for the army. Where sex only happened one night a week. I once spent the day with the girl I was with, ordered a pizza, ate it on the bed and continued our love making until we both fell asleep in exhaustion. I would say it was about 10 hours of on and off sex with only minor breaks for personal reasons, resting for refreshments or to eat. Now, when I had my last gf the longest was nearly the same with lots of foreplay. We both really just lingered on that and enjoyed the sex. Something you almost couldn't do during training for the military, everything felt rushed. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/15/2008 6:42:21 AM | | WOW I heard all the jokes from women, but Wow Sorry I never took less time than maybe half an hour. My EX had a few times asked me to hurry it up she didnt have a whole day to spend in bed. She was joking for the most part but I actually wish some times I could be done in 10-15 min. I guess its like they say"Be Carful What You Wish For" Being quick has its place i guess. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/15/2008 7:50:59 AM | hello , well to me it's not how long or how quick you can go but ( how good it is ) as you go , for me it's not about how many time's i get off or how many time's i can get her off...
in a man mind he's out to make the woman as satisfied as he can ...
i like a phone call the next day saying ------> 
just me ...... | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/15/2008 8:59:23 AM | i think the perfect time for sex is right around the 15-20 min mark and i never have a problem reaching that. the longest iv had was about 45 and it got really tedious at that point and we were both starting to get REALLY tired! I know there is a lot of men bragging about having sex for an hour + but in my mind there is no need for that. You both just get sore. 20 minutes of good sex is much more desirable.
and obviously im not talking about foreplay, strictly penetration. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/15/2008 9:19:12 AM | | vadim if you are just pounding away for an hour it'd get real boring for most. If you change up positions lots and flip back and forth between coitus and oral you should be able to maintain interest for hours if you can go that long. For me 20 minutes isn't enough unless it's a quickie/nooner or it's late and we need to get up early. But if the time is there I'd want much more than 20 minutes. Some women can't even cum in this short period of time. | |
|
| |
| |
Render
|
Joined: 4/18/2007
Msg: 115 | |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/18/2008 9:08:58 AM | Amazing how much response this thread has gotten in such short time! Sorry about the pun.
The first two girls I was with I would go for about three hours. I was 20 when I lost my virginity, so I was literally so tense that it wouldn't happen. When I met my ex, it was so natural, that it was about 20 minutes. Sometimes, when she just wanted it fast, she could get me there in 5.
Having been with one person from POF since the split, it took about 45 minutes with her, but there was about 90 minutes of foreplay and buildup first, and it was quite satisfying on my end. She told me it was the most times she had cum with a guy, and it made me sad for her. If she hadn't started talking dirty to me, I could have gone longer!  | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/18/2008 1:42:05 PM | Hi,
To be honest, it really depends on personalities... You may get satisfied within 5 mins and you may not even get that ultimate satisfaction within the night...
If a man has excellent stamina and a good control over his mind then definitely he can last as much as he can...
I have tried it and it works... Always have an awesome long lasting sex...
Most of women gets satisfied plenty of time in a single lasting sex... Where as few of them just don't want more then 5 mins...
It's really hard to say who is better?
Because even 5 mins of sex is enough for a best sex time ever you have had...
Keep this thing in mind... Sex is not a game between 2 legs it's always a game between 2 ears...
x | |
|
| |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/18/2008 4:31:06 PM | Re the Opost:
"Most sex will last 5, 10 or 15 minutes. Some lovers can go as long as 30 mins or more."
30+ minutes of penetration is more like it. With foreplay, 1 to 2 hrs total.
"What is the longest sexual experience you've endured?"
More than 1 hr of continuous penetration.
"Was it pleasurable or did it become long and boring waiting for a man/woman to cum?"
It is never boring when people are creative and playful even during penetration.
"When people state that they can make love all night...is this true?"
IMO, yes.
"Have you ever made love to someone all night?"
A whole weekend actually, including everything of course, including lunch breaks and chat breaks, in bed.
"In your experiences is the best sex wham bam over in 10 minutes or making it last as long as humanly possible?"
Not 10 mins, around 30 mins (penetration) is OK, more is good but between creative partners, IME.
There are two types of male stamina:
a) Erection
b) Aerobic
Spending lots of energy on love making rather than sports, house chores, career, etc, is a matter of personal priority. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/18/2008 6:33:20 PM | My longest sexual experience is somewhere around 6 hours, for me to have one orgasm. I spend the majority of the time focusing on giving her orgasms. On that 6 hours experience, I was told that she had well over 30, at which time she began losing count. My usual experience is between 1 and 2 hours.
I love long sexual experiences, but occasionally I enjoy quick ones, lasting 15 minutes or less. It all depends on the mood, frequency of sex, my comfort with that person, and how turned on I am. | |
|
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/22/2008 7:48:38 AM | | some can go on as long as 30????????if i only lasted 30 mins id be well pleased.most of the time i go on for an hour+ and get extremely bored thinking of ways to make myself cum yet if i masturbate it takes 3 mins?there for ive come to the conclusion that women are as bad in bed as they make men out to be!sex longer than 15 mins is boring[penetration]but the build up to intercourse is fun and should last more than 30 mins even if her clit is "too tingly" to take anymore licking | |
|
| |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 2/22/2008 1:57:59 PM | | There is definitely such a thing as "too long". When you're hitting the 2 hour mark, I start making grocery lists in my head. Thankfully, I've only encountered one guy like that. I much prefer two 20-30 minute sessions, foreplay and cuddling not included. | |
|
Home
login 
blushing
