| |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 7/10/2009 12:08:37 PM | | i am with one guy who had the stamina of a god... he can make it last for hours if he wants to or he can make it last for 15 minutes... before the topic of sexual likes and dislikes came up in our relationship we ended up in bed and goin at it. 3 hours later after having my bumm rammed for that long i thought i would rather die that have to endure any more... i am pleased with a good holf hour not including fore play. there is only so much that you can take!!! | |
|
| |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 7/10/2009 9:10:53 PM | Lasting.
Quick sessions should be followed by longer ones - sometimes spontaneous is the way to go, but there is no rule to go by.
5, 10, 15 minutes are the time to take breaks in between, when you absolutely cannot go anymore. I've gone days consisting of just sex, sleep, food, talking and nothing else. Generally that's how it goes with me unless we have a different arrangement. Having sex through the night is pretty standard as long as you're comfortable with the person - if you have a different kind of relationship, a few rounds then going your separate ways works too, although honestly it's not preferred in my case. Some people live for that, but I like being in between completely intimate and sort of distanced - a playful balance.
I mean, it's not about length as a rule. Time has little to do with it as long as both partners are satisfied. Some nights it'll take you 5 minutes to have a rip roaring time, other nights you can let it build.... don't over think it.
Now, it's given that sex is actually tiring so having one session in it of itself is tiresome. But foreplay, oral, massages, sex, all of it can be blended to go all night. Actually having straight up intercourse most people cave after about an hour and a half (for one session).... I mean unless you're extremely fit you'll get muscle fatigue and start to shake. Which is a nice badge of honor, too..... but generally between two people it's hard to exhaust both of you unless you're 100%.
I've had nights with really intimate partners where I lost track of how many times either of us had an orgasm, I mean, you can fit a lot into an evening, let alone a whole night. But having 10 orgasms apiece is great, but it's ok to have a few and be content. Sometimes those three will completely decimate you. | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 7/11/2009 12:17:52 PM | | oh i thought the question was sex non stop, without a break in bw. if it's with breaks of fore play, a tiny break to recharge, then my longest would be um.. 7 hour.s.. if its' without a break non stop then 2 hours. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 7/11/2009 12:28:27 PM | | My longest session has been about 50 minutes. The women I have been with recently, prefer a series of 15-20 minute sessions, instead of several long sessions. What has helped me is doing Kegel Exercises. This has increased my stamina, and helps prevents pre mature ejaculation. I have never tried Viagra or any sexual enhancement pills. A quickie, is only good if we are in a hurry or do not have time for something longer. | |
|
| Longest sexual performance. Is it better quick or lasting?
Posted: 7/11/2009 12:57:00 PM | Foreplay with a womans always been long....I take my time....so when she blows,she shutters.....sounds goofy but its the time taken with a woman that bulds her for the final result....I do like some of the same if she can feel when to back off...then once I climax it comes from the toes so-to-speak.... | |
|
Home
login 
